Shredding plant - Universitat Jaume I
Transcripción
Shredding plant - Universitat Jaume I
VEHICLES AT THE END OF THEIR LIFE IN SPAIN: TRADITIONAL AND NEW TREATMENT FACILITIES Muñoz, C.(1)(*), Sanfelix, J.(1), Gómez, G.(1), Garraín, D.(1), Franco, V.(1), Justel, D.(2), Vidal, R.(1) (1)GID, Engineering Design Group, Dpt. Mechanical Engineering & Construction, Universitat Jaume I, Avd. Sos Baynat, s/n. 12071, Castellón (Spain). Tel.: +34 964729252, Fax: +34 964728106, *e-mail: [email protected] (2)Dpto. de Mecánica y Producción Industrial, Escuela Politécnica Superior de Mondragon (EPS), Mondragon Unibertsitatea, C/ Loramendi nº 4, Aptdo. 23. 20500, Arrasate (España) INTRODUCTION In Spain, the End-of-Life (EOL) of vehicles is mainly determined by three agents: Authorized Treatment Facilities (ATFs), shredding plants and dense media or flotation plants. The work method that those agents use defines the final fate –reuse, recycling, recuperation or disposal into landfills– of the waste coming from the vehicle. In the present study, the EOL treatment of vehicles in traditional ATFs –which apply manual methods to dismantle materials and components– is compared with the EOL treatment in newer ATFs –which apply systematic dismantling methods–. For the analysis of traditional ATFs, eight plants located near Castellón (Spain) were considered, plus a shredding plant and a dense media plant in Zaragoza (Spain). In order to study newer ATFs, a particular ATF from La Coruña (Spain) –which features an automated vehicle disassembly line- was considered, plus the aforementioned shredding plant and a dense media plant in Zaragoza. MATERIALS & METHODS Starting with the EOL of vehicles defined by Muñoz et al (2008), waste inputs and outputs are defined for the scenario of EOL of vehicles in Spain –Figure 1–. Taking as reference that diagram, waste inputs and outputs will be established for the EOL system –Table 1–. Each waste is identified according to the European waste catalogue and hazardous waste list (List of Waste code –LoW code–, hazardous nature, label), as well as the amount generated by vehicle processed and their next destiny. The data of the ATFs with manual dismantling are obtained from the data compiled by Muñoz et al (2009). For the inventory of ATFs with systematic dismantling, it has been analyzed the production data of the years 2007 and 2008 of the ATF VFUs Armonía Galicia S.A. The inventory of the shredding and dense media plant has been obtained as an application of the process performance data derived from the analysis of both plants. The generated wastes are established as a function of the input wastes and performance of each plant. LoW 160104 Authorized Treatment Facility Decontaminating Hazardous waste Dismatling Non-Hazardous waste LoW Code Hadarzous Recycled Energy recovery Disposal into landfill Recycled Energy recovery Pneumatic sorting Ferrous metals Magnetic sorting Dirty Metals Flotation sorting Dense Media plant Hazardous & NonHazardous waste LoW 191212 Recycled Disposal into landfill Figure 1. Inputs & outputs of Spanish EOL system of vehicles EOL system based on ATF Manual Systematic Recycled 74,81% 82,23% Energy recovered 3,02% 2,38% Disposal into landfill 22,17% 15,39% Table 2. Recycled, energy recovered and disposal into landfill; final value ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study is part of the project “Reducción del impacto ambiental de automóviles mediante el aligeramiento estructural basado en composites de carbono de bajo coste, sin comprometer la seguridad y el confort (ref. PSE-370100-2007-1)”, funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). VFUs Armonía Galicia S.A., for their assistance in preparing this study. References Muñoz, C., López, R., Justel, D., Garraín, D. (2008). Análisis medioambiental de los retrovisores de vehículos. Evolución temporal y escenarios de fin de vida, Proceedings of 9th Congreso Nacional del Medio Ambiente, CONAMA 09, Madrid, España. ISBN: 978-84-613-1481-2. Muñoz, C., Vidal, R., Garraín, D., Franco, V., Justel, D., Espartero. (2009). Estudio de los Centros Autorizados de Tratamiento de vehículos de la provincia de Castellón, Proceedings of 13th International Congress on Project Engineering, AEIPRO 2009, Badajoz, España. ISBN: 978-84613-3498-8. Manual Systematic End-of-life vehicles Mineral-based non-chlorinated engine, gear and lubricating oils Other engine, gear and lubricating oils Fuel oil and diesel Petrol End-of-life tyres Oil filters Brake fluids 858,01 6,89 8,57 0,00 0,00 9,63 0,58 0,26 1076,00 5,17 0,00 3,61 3,85 20,02 0,14 0,31 160114 160117 160118 160119 160120 160601 160801 Yes No No No No Yes No 1,13 0,00 0,00 0,45 0,00 16,97 0,13 1,73 193,43 8,80 7,18 1,51 11,79 0,44 160106 No No Antifreeze fluids containing dangerous substances Ferrous metal Non-ferrous metal Plastic Glass Lead batteries Spent catalysts containing gold, silver, rhenium, rhodium, palladium, iridium or platinum (except 16 08 07) Reuse parts End-of-life vehicles, containing neither liquids nor other hazardous components Energy recovered Energy recovered Recycled Recycled Energy recovered Energy recovered Energy recovered Disposal into landfill Recycled Recycled Recycled Recycled Recycled Recycled 0,00 813,39 113,08 704,94 Reused Sherreding plant 813,39 704,94 583,25 0,12 9,00 3,82 0,27 20,49 186,98 505,48 0,11 7,80 3,31 0,24 17,76 162,05 9,46 8,20 9,46 8,20 7,29 0,07 2,10 6,32 0,06 1,82 Shredding Non-Ferrous metals Authorized Treatment Facility Use Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Shredding plant Recycled Disposal into landfill Recycled Disposal into landfill [kg/unit] [kg/unit] Inputs 160104 Outputs 130205 130208 130701 130702 160103 160107 160113 Packing LoW 160106 Label Shredding plant Inputs 160106 No Outputs 160117 160117 160118 160118 160118 191006 191212 No No No No No No No 191006 No 191006 No Outputs 160117 160118 191212 No No No Inputs End-of-life vehicles, containing neither liquids nor other hazardous components Ferrous metal (fragmented scrap) Ferrous metal (iron and steel) Non-ferrous metal (aluminum) Non-ferrous metal (copper) Non-ferrous metal (lead) Other fractions other than those mentioned in 19 10 05 (mixed metal) Other wastes (including mixtures of materials) from mechanical treatment of wastes other than those mentioned in 19 12 11 Other fractions other than those mentioned in 19 10 05 (dirty metals and plastics) Dense Media Plant Other fractions other than those mentioned in 19 10 05 (dirty metals and plastics) Ferrous metal (iron and steel) Non-ferrous metal (aluminum, copper, lead) Other wastes (including mixtures of materials) from mechanical treatment of wastes other than those mentioned in 19 12 11 Recycled Recycled Recycled Recycled Recycled Recycled Disposal into landfill Dense Media plant Recycled Recycled Disposal into landfill Table 1. Data collected for two Spanish EOL of vehicles system; manual or systematic ATF disassembly RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS The data presented show a clear difference between ATF with systematic dismantling and the ATFs with manual dismantling. First of all, highlight the class of managed waste by facility type –15 for the systematic dismantling ATF and 10 for the manual dismantling ATFs–. Also, the amount of extracted waste is consistent with the indicated. At VFUs Armonía Galicia S.A. is extracted 34% of the vehicle mass –for recycle and energy recovery–, while the ATFs located near Castellón extract only a 5%. Later –independently of their source– the shredding and dense media plant extract similar amounts of wastes. However, the percentage of recycled or recovered wastes over the total processed is lower in ATFs with manual dismantling. In Table 2 are shown the recycled, energy recovered and landfill data for the EOL systems analyzed. The EOL system formed by the ATF with systematic dismantling, the shredding plant and dense media plant, reaches an 85% of recycled and recovered value –demanded by Directive 2000/53/EC on the end-of-life vehicles–. On the other hand, the EOL system formed by the ATFs with manual dismantling, the shredding plant and dense media plant only reaches a 78%. It seems obvious that the application of systematic processes for the waste, components and pieces extraction, allows reaching higher values of recovery in the EOL of vehicles. Improving those processes of extraction, or even better, design the vehicles to help their dismantling at their EOL is fundamental to increase the recovery and the recycle capacity. It is important to emphasize that in both analyzed scenarios the energy recovery only reaches the 2-3% of the vehicles’ weight. The possible application in wastes disposed into landfill could complete the benefits of the dismantle improvement.