docDEBATE EN CLASE Fecha: Formato Cada debate tomará 2
download 
Demanda Transcripción
DEBATE EN CLASE Fecha: Formato Cada debate tomará 2
ESPAÑOL 4 DEBATE EN CLASE Nombre: __________________________ Fecha: __________________________ Formato Cada debate tomará 22 minutos. Equipo A- 2 minutos para construir su argumento Equipo B- 2 minutos para construir su argumento Descanso- 3 minutos para planear el contraataque Equipo B- 2 minutos para contraatacar al argumento del otro equipo Equipo A- 2 minutos para contraatacar al argumento del otro equipo Descanso- 3 minutos para planear la reconstrucción de su argumento Equipo A- 2 minutos para reconstruir el argumento Equipo B- 2 minutos para reconstruir su argumento Descanso- 2 minutos para planear la conclusión de su argumento Equipo A- Conclusión 1 minuto Equipo B- Conclusión 1 minuto ESPAÑOL 4 DEBATE EN CLASE Nombre: __________________________ Fecha: __________________________ Rúbrica para el Equipo Afirmativo Criteria 1. Organization & Clarity: 1 2 3 4 Unclear and disorganized throughout Clear in some parts but not overall Mostly clear and orderly in all parts Completely clear and orderly presentation Few or no real arguments given, or all arguments given had significant problems Poor crossexam of rebuttals, failure to point out problems in Negative team’s position or failure to defend itself against attack. Some decent arguments, but some significant problems Many good arguments given, with only minor problems Very strong and persuasive arguments given throughout Decent crossexam and/or rebuttals, but with some significant problems Good cross-exam and rebuttals, with only minor slip-ups Excellent crossexam and defense against Negative team’s objections Very few style features were used none of them convincingly Few style features were used convincingly Most style features were used convincingly All style features were used convincingly Grade: Main arguments and responses are outlined in a clear and orderly way. 2. Use of Argument: Reasons are given to support the resolution. 3. Use of crossexamination and rebuttal: Identification of weakness in Affirmative team’s arguments and ability to defend itself against attack. 4. Presentation Style: Tone of voice, clarity of expression, precision of arguments all contribute to keeping audience’s attention and persuading them of the team’s case. Total: ESPAÑOL 4 DEBATE EN CLASE Nombre: __________________________ Fecha: __________________________ Rúbrica para el Equipo Negativo Criteria 1. Organization & Clarity: 1 2 3 4 Unclear and disorganized throughout Clear in some parts but not overall Mostly clear and orderly in all parts Completely clear and orderly presentation Few or no real arguments given, or all arguments given had significant problems Poor crossexam of rebuttals, failure to point out problems in Affirmative team’s position or failure to defend itself against attack. Some decent arguments, but some significant problems Many good arguments given, with only minor problems Very strong and persuasive arguments given throughout Decent crossexam and/or rebuttals, but with some significant problems Good cross-exam and rebuttals, with only minor slip-ups Excellent crossexam and defense against Affirmative team’s objections Very few style features were used none of them convincingly Few style features were used convincingly Most style features were used convincingly All style features were used convincingly Grade: Main arguments and responses are outlined in a clear and orderly way. 2. Use of Argument: Reasons are given to support the resolution. 3. Use of crossexamination and rebuttal: Identification of weakness in Affirmative team’s arguments and ability to defend itself against attack. 4. Presentation Style: Tone of voice, clarity of expression, precision of arguments all contribute to keeping audience’s attention and persuading them of the team’s case. Total:
