View IGT_Winter2008_ClimateChange
Transcripción
View IGT_Winter2008_ClimateChange
November / Dcember 2008 Volume 19, No.5 tilth (fr. OE “tillian” + th): A. the quality of cultivated soil. B. cultivation of wisdom FREE and the spirit. Climate Chan ge: Upping the ante N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page www.tilth.org Editor’s Desk November / December 2008 Vol. 19, No. 5 ISSN # 1065-1527, 2008 Oregon Tilth Editor, publisher, layout and ad sales: Andrew Rodman Contributing Writers: Angela Ajootian, Laura Batcha, Kathy Dang Dr. Stephan Haefele, Paul Hepperly Joanna Johnson, Harry MacCormack Christopher Matthews, Elizabeth Schwartz Joel Preston Smith, Erin Volheim, Conner Voss Outside my office on the Oregon Coast, the weather changes so often that it is almost futile trying to predict it. It seems a fitting backdrop for an issue devoted to climate change. Given that the weather is comprised of a bewildering number of variables, it is almost forgivable that many still react to news of global warming as the alarmist constructs of the doom and gloom set with a pernicious green agenda. The growers of healthy food and other producers of organics are on a more proactive green agenda however, and we are all impacted by variations in climatic trends. The venerable Farmer’s Almanac predicts that in the NW in 2009, “Winter temperatures will be about one-half degree above normal, on average, with above-normal rainfall in the north and below-normal rainfall in the south.” What does that mean on the ground? To this end I asked my writers to look at unexpected angles of global warming as it plays out underfoot. “The climes they are a changing,” looks at statistical variations of climate on ag, and projects what we can expect. “One farmer’s almanac,” offers seasonal observa- Cover collage by Andrew Rodman Subscriptions are free with Oregon Tilth membership, which begins at $30/year ($40 outside U.S.). Reprints by permission. Tilth’s mission Oregon Tilth, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that supports and promotes biologically sound and socially equitable agriculture through education, research, advocacy and product certification. Since its inception in 1974, Tilth has brought together rural and urban producers and consumers around land stewardship and healthy food. Oregon Tilth administers educational programs, supports sustainable agriculture research and policy, and offers organic certification to producers and food handlers throughout the Americas. For more information about any of the exciting programs of Oregon Tilth, please call on us: Oregon Tilth, Inc. 470 Lancaster NE • Salem, OR 97301 office (503) 378-0690, • (877) 378-0690 fax (503) 378-0809 [email protected] www.tilth.org Contents Climes are a changing Feedback, Tilth advocacy OEC Grasshoppers heating up Gold from Amazonia Carbon sinking soil Right to know under assault New fuels, unexpected places One farmer’s almanac Increasing biodiversity Sparking public participation Burgers that fry Bedding with coffee Cold frame Welcome Bonnie Hoffman Cox En Español 4 6 7 8 12 15 19 20 21 23 26 27 28 29 31 El oro negrp del Amazonas Un suelo que sirve de drenaje para el carbono 32 Research Reports Classifieds Calendar Membership 38 41 45 47 tions of the Willamette Valley, and the Southern Oregon focused “Grasshoppers heating up,” looks at the modern plague of locusts and offers some organic controls (as I was editing this piece, the local news reported on a grasshopper plague in Eastern Oregon). Meanwhile “Black gold from Amazonia” is focused on tropical rice production, but biochar has application and promise for soils much closer to home. While the issue of carbon footprints in food miles has been given much ink in prior editions of this mag, I thought it best to focus on aspects of organic farming that have not been given as much play. Many of us know that organic agriculture stores more carbon in the soil than “conventional,” but the piece from the Rodale Institute “Carbon sinking soil” illlustrates how in the rich detail these findings deserve. Far from overlooking the role of diet in our climatic crisis, “Burgers that fry” looks at the report Livestock’s Long Shadow and serves some well-done food for thought. It is often said that “everyone complains about the weather, but no one does anything about it.” Well, we all affect it everyday. With organics and sustainable farming practices, we have the ability to affect it positively. –Andrew Rodman Grass hoppers pg. 8 Climes changing pg. 4 Amazon Gold Farmer’s pg. 12 almanac pg. 21 35 Deadline for the Frontier Organics issue is Nov 10, 2008 Page N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Oregon Tilth Staff Oregon Tilth Board of Directors Jody Berry Wild Carrot Herbals Kate Carman Carman Ranch Miguel Guerrero OMRI Joe Snyder Myrtle Point Vet Hospital Adam Zimmerman ShoreBank Enterprise Cascadia New ADMINISTRATIVE Quality Control Director Chris Schreiner, [email protected] (503) 566-3012 Enviro. Ed. Coordinator/AmeriCorps Randall Cass, [email protected] (503) 638-0735 Processing Program Reviewer/Specialist Mike Mountain, [email protected] (503) 566-3018 Administration Jenny Smith, [email protected] (503) 566-3011 Editor, In Good Tilth Andrew Rodman, [email protected] (503) 779-3929 Mike Dill, [email protected] (503) 566-3010 Administrative Assistants Erin Jensen, [email protected] (503) 566-3014 Amanda Brown, [email protected] (503) 566-3020 Michelle Borene, [email protected] CERTIFICATION Certification Director Kristy Korb, [email protected] (503) 566-3024 Farm Program Reviewer John Stalley, [email protected] (503) 779-3041 Accounts Manager Catherine Steffens, CPA [email protected] (503) 566-3021 Global Organic Program Manager Jim Pierce, [email protected] (503) 779-9063 Latin American Specialist Garth Kahl, [email protected] (503) 507-4122 Information Tech Specialist Heather Smith, [email protected] (503) 779-5873 RESEARCH AND EDUCATION R&E Projects Manager Bonnie Hoffman Cox, [email protected] (541) 224-2226 OEC Program Manager Kathy Dang, [email protected] (503) 779-4631 Garden Coordinator Conner Voss, [email protected] (503) 798-8906 Processing Program Manager Connie Karr, [email protected] (503) 566-3022 Processing Program Assistant Darin Jones, [email protected] (503) 566-3026 Processing Program Tech Specialist Gwendolyn Wyard, [email protected] (503) 566-3017 Darryl Williams, [email protected] (503) 566-3027 Farm Program Manager Tiffanie Huson Labbe, [email protected] (808) 772-4406 Inspection Coordinator Kelly O’Donnel, [email protected] (503) 779-5877 Inspectors Andrew Black, [email protected] (503) 779-5876 Pat Moore, [email protected] (541) 621-1777 Andrew Bennett, [email protected] (541)760-9328 John Caputo, [email protected] (503) 798-8216 Callyn Trujillo, [email protected] (503) 566-3025 MIDWEST OFFICE Midwest Certification Coordinator Dave Engel, [email protected] (503) 779-4823 Inspector: Robert Caldwell, [email protected] (608) 606-2317 OTCO certified farms & processors D Domestic New Growers: B Street Permaculture Project (Forest Grove, OR) Richard & Mary Bradbury (Plush, OR) Brook Acres Jerseys Organic Production (Comanche, TX) since September, 2008 GB Produce S.A. DE C.V. (La Piedad, Michoacan ) Sunny Ridge Dairy (Vale, OR) Goldridge Organic Farms, LP (Cloverdale, CA) Thumb Meadow Farm (Sandusky, MI) Greenleaf Farms I, LLC (Salem, OR) Valley Livestock, LLC (Prairie City, OR) M & M Peach Ranch (Lake Hughes, CA) Wegman Organics (Dover, MN) Depies Family Organic Farm & Springbrook Organic Dairy, LLC (Springbrook, WI ) Nine Star Ranch (Wilsonville, OR) Windy Ridge, LLC (Bonanza, OR) Grupo Nopalero del Bajío (S.P.R. de R.L., Silao Gto) New Processors: Fairfield Farm (Corvallis, OR) Gary Scoville (De Soto, WI) Friendly Aquaponics, Inc. (Honokaa, HI) Singing Pig Farm, Inc. (Stayton, OR ) Jeffrey & Matthew Gall (Saukville, WI) Sonora Farms (Eugene, OR) Alpha Aromatic (Pittsburgh, PA) dba Aloha Bay dba Botani Organics (Lower Lake, CA) BrucePac (Silverton, OR) Crust Eat Real (Chicago, IL) Earthpure Organics, LLC (Garden City, ID) Harvest Time Foods, Inc. (Ayden, NC) Heartland Harvest, Inc. (Kankakee, IL) Antoine Creative Industries, (Santa Clarita, CA) Imperial Brands, Inc. dba Florida Distillers Company (Lake Alfred, FL) BPNC, Inc. (Temperance, MI) Jeffco Fibres, Inc. (Webster, MA) Bright Lights Candle Co. LMF Tea Traders, LLC (Eugene, OR) Nature’s Laboratory (Glendale, CA) Paragon Spray Drying (Muscoda, WI) Pendleton Grain Growers (Pendleton, OR) Portland Bottling Company (Portland, OR) Randall International LP (Carlsbad, CA) Twincraft Soap (Winooski, VT) United Food Ingredients (Portland, OR) Wilbur-Ellis (Portland, OR) Woolgatherer Carding Mill (Montague, CA) Oregon Tilth certifies: 579 organic processors • 646 organic growers • 4 organic restaurants • 1 retailer N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page Base photo by University Corporation for Atmospheric Research The climes By Joel Preston Smith “The fact that the entire home was lifted off its foundation is almost certainly evidence of inadequate attachment of the home to its foundation ... This evidence is bolstered by a number of flying objects during the event, including a certain Ms. Gulch, who was to be the tornado’s only fatality.” - Charles A. Doswell III and Harold E. Brooks of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Severe Storms Laboratory, commenting to the American Meteorological Society in 1996 on the twister that extracted Dorothy Gale’s clapboard shack from Clyde, Kansas and set it down in the Land of Oz, crushing taxpayer Ms. Gulch— the Wicked Witch of the West. Sans dead witches or drowed Gulf Coast denizens, it’s getting harder to believe the U.S. Government is more than vaguely interested in addressing global warming in terms that don’t just add more hot air to the problem. Reading accounts of the Bush Administration’s resistance to cut greenhouse emissions, and how the White House oscillates between scientific fact and cinematic fantasy, one gets the impression of a government that wishes its troubles would melt like lemon drops. Meanwhile, NASA scientists keep throwing back the curtain and presenting the Administration with revelatory satellite photos of the mushy, receding Patagonia Icefields of Chile and Argentina. Separating the Administration’s facts from fiction is like sorting wind from whis- Page pers. The conflicting doomsday reports are particularly troubling for farmers, who’d like someone to just come out and tell them if their fields are going to fry, or if it’s going to rain frogs from here to Leviticus. What does global warming mean for those who feed us? The most comprehensive and accessible field guide to the presumed apocalypse is a 250-page report published last May by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, a task force composed of 15 agencies charged with integrating federal research on climate change. The projected impacts to U.S. agriculture outlined in The Effects of Climate Change on Agriculture, Land Resources, Water Resources, and Biodiversity in the United States are often just as vague—with good reason—as they are grim. Jerry L. Hatfield, lead author of the report’s chapter on climate change and agriculture, says research to date has largely overlooked the question of food security for 300 million U.S. residents. “The government is finally beginning to realize that there are very real impacts associated with climate change,” says Hatfield, director of the USDA’s National Soil Tilth Laboratory in Ames, Iowa. “That a 1.8 degree Celsius rise in annual temperature may lead to a seven to eight percent decline in corn yields.” Calculating the projected yield of even one of the USDA’s 116 economical- ly significant “plant commodity groups,” is a nightmare unto itself. Hatfield notes that in order to estimate how climate might affect production, researchers must consider impacts on precipitation, nitrogen cycling, soil permeability and waterstorage capacity. They might also consider growth rates and life cycles of individual crops, and pollen viability under a variety of weather and climate conditions. A 2-to3 degree spike during pollen production for some crops, Hatfield notes, “can mean the difference between a fertile plant and an infertile one.” Complicated as they are, statistical projections often don’t take into account such variables as the impact of changing technologies, the impact of various forestry or agricultural practices, competing demands for water resources among industry, agriculture and the private sector, pest versus host interactions … or other interrelated (but perhaps underrated) variables. Nevertheless, the Climate Change Science Program looked at the dominant variables—at historical climate patterns, crop yields and “constituent biota and processes”—and at the existing body of scientific literature in drawing what is an unquestionably bleak picture (save for rangelands) for U.S. agriculture (and therefore the U.S. environment and economy) through the year 2050. Here’s a brief summary of their projections (quotes are italicized): - Increased incidence of disturbances such as forest fires, insect outbreaks, severe storms, and drought will command public attention N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Agrarian chaos theory and place increasing demands on management resources; - Increased intensity of rainfall; One economic consequence of excessive rainfall is delayed spring planting, which jeopardizes profits for farmers paid a premium for early season production of high value horticultural crops such as melon, sweet corn, and tomatoes; - Warmer winters will increase the overwintering of pest species, the range of some pests, and increase the occurrence of some pathogens (and chemical controls on pests); studies conducted in Western Europe and other regions have already documented changes in spring arrival and/or geographic range of many insect and animal species due to climate change; warmer winters will likely increase populations of insect species that are currently marginally over-wintering in high latitude regions; - Increased atmospheric CO2 may lead to intensified pest behavior; the frequently observed higher carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of leaves of plants grown at high CO2 can require increased insect feeding to meet nitrogen (protein) requirements; - Physiologic and metabolic changes to crops; smaller grain size (affecting both grain cattle producers) or lower test weight from heat stress, more failures of pollination associated with heat stress, and greater variability in crop production; however, elevated CO2 will have a helpful effect via reduced water consumption; - Expanded ranges for weeds, and more of them, and Monsanto can’t help; many weeds respond more positively to increasing CO2 than most cash crops, particularly “invasive” weeds that reproduce by vegetative means; recent research also suggests that glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in the United States, loses its efficacy on weeds grown at CO2 levels that likely will occur in the coming decades; - Diminished yields; the anticipated 1.2ºC rise in temperature over the next 30 years is projected to decrease maize, wheat, sorghum, and dry bean yields by 4.0, 6.7, 9.4, and 8.6 percent, respectively, in their major production regions; - Rangelands are likely to experience increased productivity, but may undergo shifts in species; by stimulating both photosynthesis and water use efficiency, rising CO2 has likely enhanced plant productivity on most rangelands over the past 150 years, and will likely continue to do so over the next 30 years; - Diminished water quality, potential loss of some species, expanded ranges of warm-water species; warmer temperatures will also enhance algal production and most likely the growth of nuisance species, such as blue-green algae; modeling results suggest that increased temperatures associated with climate warming will increase the abundance of bluegreen algae and thus reduce water quality; stream temperature increases have already begun to be detected across some of the United States, although a comprehensive analysis … has yet to be conducted. Adding another element of uncertainty, the report notes that “irrigated crops can easily be 10°C cooler than air temperature …” In other words, in order to accurately predict yields, scientists may also need to factor in the impact of irrigation, crop by crop. The report also concedes that for horticultural crops, fruits and vegetables—40 percent of the U.S. agricultural market in 2002, according to the USDA—very little is known about the relationship between climate change, plant physiology and projected yields. But the question remains: What does it all mean to a specific farmer in a specific place? To assess climate change on a local scale, Washington State University is running computer models of how changes in temperature might affect growing seasons on parcels of land (in some cases) as small as a few hundred acres. Chad Kruger, Interim Director of the university’s Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, says the Climate Impact Assessment Project is the first small-scale study to look at the backyard dynamics of a global phenomenon. Kruger’s team is calculating regional shifts in temperature on the life-cycle of the codling moth Cydia pomonella—the N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Continued on page 11 Page Feedback Email your comments to [email protected], or send to Oregon Tilth! Good ag gone bad Thanks for the article by Andrew Rodman and Garth Kahl in the July/Aug issue, “Good Ag Gone Bad.” (Volume 19iii) It’s hard to be against food safety but recent developments in standards and requirements are over the top and leave me with an uneasy feeling about the direction the industry is heading. It was reassuring to read of the controversy and to know others are questioning the merits and perils of the excessive and scientifically indefensible food safety arms race. –Ann Lameka Dear editor Thanks to all for the great information contained in each issue. I wonder if you could address the tax implications of organic farming, such as the “hobby farm” rules? It seems that small farmers are being discouraged by our tax laws from operating and expanding at a sustainable rate. –Linda Porter Cassidy Interns to burn I loved the “bug” coverage in the last issue and read it all straight through. The Delhi Sands flower-loving fly description is amazing, unforgettable. The OEC Yard & Actions & Advocacy August 19, Erin Jensen gave a presentation to the Western Hills Corvallis Kiwanis Club on organic certification, what it entails for farms and processors, and what it means to consumers. August 19, Andrew Black met with Kang Chang-Yong of the Korea Rural Economic Institute of Seoul, Korea and Taeyoung Kim of Oregon State University to explain the NOP organic regulations. The trio toured Gathering Together Farm and Stahlbush Island Farms as examples of organic agriculture systems in Oregon. September 4, Andrew Rodman participated in a roundtable discussion hosted by Wes Jackson of the Land Institute, to craft language for the President’s Inaugural Address, on a 50-year land use plan of ag, forestry and ranching. The discussion took place at the St. Philip Nehri Church in SE Portland. Page Garden section is great and is really helping invite home gardeners to learn from IGT. The Monsanto film listed is intense and will further deepen your desire to support organic seed. Thank you for encouraging discussion. An important concern related to the intern article in the July/August issue, is what happens in the case of an accident? My husband and I worked for a farm delivering vegetables in exchange for housing. We were not interns and were listed on their website as employees. I broke my foot during a delivery and was taken to the hospital by kind bystanders. The hospital listed the accident as work-related and gave me a form for my employer to fill out. The next day, when we tried to give them the form, they would not take it and told us we were not “employees” and could not work for them anymore. We were subsequently given a written two weeks’ notice of termination, which in turn meant we had two weeks to look for new housing as well. We had been growing our own crops on a separate plot of leased land nearby, and in the peak of our harvest season our lives were suddenly turned upside down. Oregon’s Workers’ Comp Division investigated the hospital’s claim and found I was a subject worker/employee, not an independent contractor. This meant that the employer was responsible for the medical bills, as well as fines for not having the proper coverage. The employer rejected the decision and initiated legal action, which forced us to get our own attorney. We learned that the state has protections for injured workers and laws to provide legal aid in these situations. The state’s decision held, but our attorney was very concerned about a number of issues, including the termination of both us with no cause other than my injury, our de facto eviction and wages. The state of Oregon has laws in place to protect both the employee and the employer and, very important in farming, equally protect workers who are not in the country legally. An important question is to find out how workers’ comp and a farm’s liability and vehicle insurance relate to interns. Following the labor laws and having the proper insurance protects everyone and goes hand-in-hand with the principles of sustainable organic farming. This is only one aspect of a very big conversation on how to keep our small farms alive and growing. See www.cbs.state.or.us/external/ wcd/. -Naomi Montacre September 4, Kathy Dang attended the Pacific NW Multicultural Farming Roundtable in Hood River and gave a brief presentation about Oregon Tilth’s work. The roundtable was an opportunity to learn from local agencies, universities, and non-profits working in partnership with Latino, Hmong, African, and other emerging farmers in Oregon and Washington. September 30, Oregon Tilth and Gwendolyn Wyard teamed with AIB International for Organic Certification with a Foundation in Food Safety, in Ontario, California. Geared towards companies interested in becoming certified as well as certified companies learning how to effectively intertwine food safety and quality programs with their organic systems plan. Septmber 9, Andy Bennett spoke at the OSU Master Gardener Program in Portland about certification; fielding great questions in front of a lively crowd. October 2, Kristy Korb spoke at the Marketing Organic Goods: What does it mean for Retailers panel at the Provender Alliance Conference in Hood River. September 25 - 26, in Madison, WI. Jim Pierce represented OTCO as well as the Food Trade Sustainability Leadership Association on the Standards Committee for the Sustainable Agriculture Practice Standards. Standards development is expected to take three years. October 15-18, Jim Pierce presented for a Retailer Workshop; Best Organic Practices in conjunction with Natural Products Expo East in Boston. ini a r T y• Education • S u p p o r t • Te s t i m o n ngs October 21, Andrew Black gave a talk at People’s Co-op for the Portland Master Vegetarian Program about organic farming, certification, and food issues. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 By Kathy Dang The Organic Education Center (OEC) team has had a busy fall engaging 60 community members in our new Organic Gardening Certificate Program. This was offered in collaboration with OSU Extension and other program partners, including Metro and East Multnomah Soil and Water Conservation District. It has been a great pleasure collaborating with these organizations. Class registration filled quickly and we hope this year’s course will lay a foundation for offering this program next year and beyond. To help us teach this new program we hired Sarah Brown, organic farmer extraordinaire, who has a background in farm-based education and a degree from UC Davis in Sustainable Agriculture. This comprehensive training is delivered at various locations and learning gardens around the city from October through December. We are excited to host two of the classes at our Luscher Farm demonstration garden which includes a class on soil building, debuting our newly constructed three-bin compost system and worm bin, as well as a class on greenhouse plant propagation in our new hoop house constructed last spring. In early December, class participants will graduate from the program and begin volunteering in gardenbased education projects in the Portland area to apply what they’ve learned. This fall, we had the pleasure of hiring Conner Voss as Garden Coordinator. As many of you know, Conner recently completely his term of service with us as an AmeriCorps member. He was instrumental in making some big improvements to the OEC farms and programs this past year, including piloting a spring field trip program, establishing a volunteer farm crew to help maintain our two demonstration gardens and preparing our Luscher Farm site for the current Organic Gardening Certificate Program. Late this season, we also had the wonderful help of Kabir Green, as parttime gardener, who worked with us during the final months of fall. With a background in both farming and carpentry, Kabir has been a valuable member of our team help- Photo by Kathy Dang Dedicated to educating Tilth gardeners, Conner Voss and Kabir Green haul tomatoes to the food bank. ing with building projects on the farms and putting the farms to bed. With help from our farm crew volunteers, the Tilth gardeners harvested 300 pounds of fresh produce weekly throughout the growing season and donated it to local social service agencies. In September, we welcomed Randall Cass to our team, as our Environmental Educator AmeriCorps member for the ’08-’09 season. Randall is a recent graduate from Willamette University with a degree in International Studies. His thesis was Continued on page 30 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page By Erin Volheim In 1874, there was a giant grasshopper plague that swept in a Z-shape across Eastern Oregon, the Dakota Territory, Kansas and Missouri. A news correspondent in the July 28, 1874, issue of The New York Times describes the scene: “The present Summer has been remarkable for the immense swarms of destructive insects which it has given life to all over the West, from Illinois to distant Oregon, and from Texas to Dakota… These pests are leaving nothing green or edible above the surface of the ground…In my rambles through the country I have heard much complaint of expected hard times, and probable want of food in certain districts where the grasshoppers have been a visitor.” This past summer, the grasshoppers in our part of Southern Oregon were unusually abundant in our lower pasture and garden. Though not at plague proportions, one human step sent a dozen fleeing over the tomatoes and pumpkins. My three plus years on the land give me only a limited perspective on the ebb and flow of the local grasshopper populations, so to be sure of my hunch I asked around. Farmer friends who have been working the soil for around 10 years now, concurred my perception. They have also seen some extensive damage to certain field crops. Grasshoppers are native to this country. There are hundreds of species of grasshoppers on western rangeland. About a dozen of these cause economic damage, with five to seven species considered the most destructive. Localized outbreaks, cover- Page ing thousands of acres, occur almost every year. But when climatic conditions are right, a few of these species reproduce in astounding numbers. Trillions of their offspring can spread across millions of acres in the West. Over 450,000 acres in 11 Oregon counties were estimated to be at risk of economic infestations of grasshoppers in 2005. Back in the 1870s, there weren’t many known options to protect crops from damage. The first “mechanical method” documented in 1877 was an early incarnation of the “hopper dozer,” a metal scoop coated with tar that was dragged across the fields to trap grasshoppers. Nowadays, when an infestation hits a conventional farmer or rancher, they shell out money for planes loaded with pesticides to fly over and spray or drop poison bait. Early last summer in Baker County, Eastern Oregon, a grasshopper invasion moved 60 farmers and ranchers to jointly fund a $46,000 aerial pesticide application covering more than 3,500 acres. It was deemed the worst infestation of that county in 22 years. The USDA defines a grasshopper infestation by eight insects per square yard. In Baker County, they found 100 to 120 grasshoppers per square yard. Observation is a very important element of farming. All farmers need to be aware of trends, “the general direction in which something tends to move.” Insect infestations tend to peak around four years, when food runs out, disease strikes or predators notice the new tendency. One bird population in England has managed to adapt to global warming trends. Parus major, a bird commonly known as the “great tit” has adapted its breeding season over the last five decades so that their chicks hatch when their main food source, the winter Photo by Pavel Kratochvil Grasshoppers heating up N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 The hills are alive moth caterpillar, is the most abundant. With continued observation, it’s possible that farmers can adjust their practices in response to these fluctuations. Phenology is the scientific study of periodic biological phenomena, such as breeding in relation to climatic conditions. Climate change has led to an adaptation in some species, like the example above. Yet the relationship between different species within a food chain may be disrupted if an increase in temperature affects one species differently than another, as is the case with insects. Insects are highly adaptable organisms, with the highest diversity in the Animal Kingdom. Around 925,000 species have been described, though the real number may be at least three times higher. Their adaptability enables them to cope with many environmental changes, including climate shifts due to global warming. A recent study from the University of Washington suggests that global warming leads to far more insects. Warmer climates seem to increase their reproductive rate and population growth, with widespread effects on agriculture. Grasshopper outbreaks are determined by a complex interaction of several factors, of which weather is the most important. Warm and dry spring conditions encourage nymphal growth. An early spring followed by cloudy, damp weather encourages diseases that sicken and kill grasshoppers. A long, hot summer ensures a plentiful food supply and encourages early maturity and a long egg-laying period. On the other hand, a cool summer and early fall slows down grasshopper maturity and reduces time for laying eggs. Continued on page 10 Bob’s Red Mill Natural Foods, a distinctive stone grinding miller of whole grains, offers a diverse line of all natural, organic flours, cereals, meals and mixes for every meal of the day. 13521 SE Pheasant Court • Milwaukie, OR 97222 www.bobsredmill.com N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page grassGenetic resistance increasing Organic hopper controls Continued from page 9 More than 55 million years ago, the Earth experienced a rapid jump in global carbon dioxide levels that raised temperatures across the planet. Researchers studying plants from that time period have found that the rising temperatures may have boosted the foraging of insects. Because food webs involving plant-eating insects affect as much as three quarters of organisms on Earth, researchers believe that the current increase in temperature could have a profound impact on present ecosystems, and potentially to crops, if the pattern holds true in modern times. The 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment Report concluded that the poorest countries would be hardest hit, with reductions in crop yields in most tropical and sub-tropical regions due to decreased water availability, and new or changed insect pest incidence. Many agronomists believe that agricultural production will be mostly affected by the severity and pace of climate change, not so much by gradual trends in climate. There are three stages in a grasshopper’s life cycle, the egg, nymph (the young grasshopper), and the adult. Most grasshopper species over-winter as eggs, which are laid in clusters in late summer and early fall and hatch in spring, when soil temperatures warm up. It takes approximately 40 to 60 days for the nymph to develop into an adult. During this time, it sheds its exoskeleton several times as it moves from one nymphal stage—called an instar—to another. The best time to control the insect pest is during early nymphal development, when it is most vulnerable to disease, parasites, predators, insecticides and unfavorable weather. The biological growth regulator Dimilin 2L is used to kill young larvae and nymph grasshoppers. If they reach the adult winged stage then broad-spectrum pesticides like Mustang Max are considered the only option. Mustang Max replaces Mustang insecticide in the northern U.S. and Fury in the South. It’s a pyrethroid, who’s active ingredient is Zeta-cypermethrin. Broad spectrum pesticides kill beneficial insects ranging from lady bugs to honeybees. Pesticide should only be applied when the potential for drift to adjacent sensitive areas (e.g. residential areas, bodies of water, known habitat for threatened or endangered species, non-target crops) is minimal (e.g. Page 10 when wind is blowing away from the sensitive areas). During periodic infestations of native marsh grasshoppers around Klamath Falls National Wildlife Refuge, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is required to drop poison bait or do aerial spraying in a percentage of the refuge to aid surrounding farms and ranches. Pesticides can negatively effect aquatic and non-vertebrates species in the refuge. There are minimal laws protecting those species, but due to hard-won efforts to protect nearby bald eagle nests, no poison was applied by the USFWS along the eastern edge of the refuge near a ranch that was infested in 2004. Instead, for $27,000, a rancher hired workers to spray his rangeland, first with Dimilin, and later with Malathion, a powerful insecticide. The breakdown products (oxons) of this pesticide is 10 - 100 times more toxic to amphibians than its parent compound. The estimated annual domestic use of Malathion ranges from 10 to 15 million pounds. In these warming times, it is reasonable to expect that weed productivity will increase in parallel with that of crop and pasture plants; potentially raising the use of herbicides on conventional farmlands and landscapes. Instead of making the necessary changes to our agricultural systems, we keep throwing fuel on our global warming fire. The long-term control of grasshoppers is possible through practices like tillage, fall clean-up, trap cropping, early seeding, and early harvest. These methods should be guided by fall egg counts and regular scouting to identify their hatching locations. Cultural measures, in conjunction with biological controls and practices that increase farm biodiversity, can provide good sustainable control even within the seasonal fluctuations of global warming. Certainly, the alternative is a better option and should be explored, instead of repeating the same human assaults on our environment that led us to “global weirding” in the first place. Let’s follow the philosophy of this old English proverb, “A farmer must live as if he’s going to die tomorrow, but he should farm as if he’s going to live forever.” Erin Volheim is a writer residing in the Little Applegate of Southern Oregon. Tillage in late summer discourages females from laying eggs in the ground. It also destroys eggs by exposing them to the weather, predators, and parasites. Spring tillage is effective primarily because it eliminates food sources for the newly hatched nymphs. However, fall tillage and sanitation procedures that reduce winter soil cover may not be compatible with the goals of sustainable farming and should be used sparingly. Trap crops are small plantings established within or next to the main crop to draw the pests away and concentrate their populations where they can be destroyed. In spring, tilling all plant matter will probably not work because nymphs mobile enough to search for food will simply move to adjacent crops. Strips of vegetation left untilled will concentrate their populations and make insecticide treatments, whether synthetic or organic, more efficient. In summer, when the surrounding rangeland vegetation begins to dry up, trap crops act as a barrier to migrating grasshoppers. In the case of a market garden, an irrigated “greenbelt” along the perimeter acts as a trap crop for migrating grasshoppers when the surrounding vegetation begins to dry up in late summer. The annual kochia Kochia scoparia is attractive to the grasshopper and reportedly works well as a shelter belt. Grasshoppers dislike cilantro, and some organic growers suggest planting a wide barrier of the crop for protection. Natural predators and parasites rank next in importance to weather in keeping grasshopper populations in check. In addition to integrated pest management programs that reduce pesticide usage, actions that increase the numbers of beneficial insects and other organisms in the agro-ecosystem must be encouraged. For additional information, see ATTRA’s publications Farmscaping to Enhance Biological Control and Biointensive Integrated Pest Management. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Moving the field goals Continued from page 5 world’s most resilient and ubiquitous apple pest. The moth, whose larval form bores its way through apple cores to feed on seeds, produces two full generations annually in Washington, requiring two insecticide treatments. But over the past five years or so, Kruger observes, rising temperatures, an earlier onset of the growing season and a longer summer have led to a partial third generation of the moth. Kruger says his team’s study, due out December first, projects that current climate trends indicate that by 2040, the moth is likely to produce three full generations annually, outbreeding the methods used to control it. “That’s a significant concern to us,” Kruger adds, “because if we’re going to be spraying three times a year instead of two, the moth is going to develop resistance to the insecticide even more quickly.” Kruger points out that while there’s been much talk of how farmers can combat global warming trends by sequestering CO2 in soil and in crops, few reports have considered the negative impacts of nitrogen fertilizer in agriculture. “Nitrogen management,” Kruger says, “may become the single greatest issue we need to be concerned with. What we’re doing, ultimately, is creating nitrous oxide, which is an extremely potent greenhouse gas.” There doesn’t seem to be much good news in climatic projections for organic farmers, but at least there’s some recognition that insecticides and industrial fertilizers may contribute to the problem. Kruger says WSU is looking at low-energy, non-industrial solutions. “Anything we can do to reduce energy use, and our nitrogen use is going to have a major impact on climate. We’re going to have to start finding biological substitutes for nitrogen.” Environmentalists have struggled for more than a quarter century to find an ear in Washington, but now both Federal and State governments are coming to terms (at least in principal) with the need to manage resources for potential climate shifts. In its 2007 list of “Top 20 Issues Facing the Industry,” The Oregon Department of Agriculture ranked climate change as an attribute of the “availability, storage and distribution of water.” The department ranked climate change as the state’s fourth highest concern, behind labor availability, Farm bill legislation and plant protection. In May of 2006, Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski founded a Climate Change Integration Group and populated it with scientists, and government and industry officials, but has yet to provide funding for a single paid staff member. Sources: The Climate Change Science Program report can be downloaded at: www.usda.gov/oce/ global_change/files/CCSPFinalReport.pdf. Doswell, Charles A. III and Harold E. Brooks: Case Analysis Of A Historic Killer Tornado Event In Kansas On June 10, 1938. NOAA/ERL National Severe Storms Laboratory. Appears in Preprints, 18th AMS Conf. Severe Local Storms (San Francisco, CA), 19-23 February 1996, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 471-473. Oregon Governor establishes climate change panel: www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/ GBLWRM/CCIG.shtml. Joel Preston Smith’s work can be found at www.joelprestonsmith.com. Experience the Magic Alkaline Ionized Water • Oxygenating • Alkalizing • Micro-clustered • Truly Hydrating • Cleansing • Beneficial Minerals • Catalyst for Healing • Anti-oxidant Rich Free Personal Trial: Cheri 541-929-5782 www.sunbowfarm.org N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 11 lack old from Amazonia B g Field workers incorporate biochar into an experimental plot at the IRRI farm in Los Banos, Philippines. Photo by Joel Siopongco. otherwise typified by highly weathered reddish or bleached soils. A detailed report from Smith, a geologist, characterized these “dark earths in Amazonia” as having a top-layer of a fine, dark loam, up to 60 centimeters thick. He also described them as the best soils of the Amazon, producing much higher crop yields than surrounding soils, and speculated Independently Owned and Operated that they owed their fertility “to the refuse of a thousand kitchens for maybe a thousand years.” That they were Look to the Leader human-made was indicated by the UÊ ÝÌiÃÛiÊÌiÃÌ}Ê«À}À> abundance of fragUÊ Ý«iÀiVi`Ê`i>iÀÊiÌÜÀ ments of Indian UÊ *ÀÛiÊ«iÀvÀ>ViÊÀ}>VÊÃii` pottery that “cover the ground ...like Investing in the future of Organic Farming shells on a surfwashed beach.” ÊÌÊwww.blueriverorgseed.com ÌÊV>ÌiÊÊ Despite the >Ê`i>iÀ ÀÊV>ÊÌ iÊ,ÊvwViÊ>ÌÊ800-370-7979. unusual nature of these findings, they initially failed Corn | Soybeans | Alfalfa | Red Clover | Sudangrass to excite many By Dr. Stephan Haefele In the 1870s, scientists exploring Amazonia in South America made an unusual discovery. Working independently, James Orton, Charles Hartt, and Herbert Smith described patches of black or dark brown soils, varying in size from five, to more than 300 hectares, within a landscape for Organic Seed Page 12 scientists. Almost a century later, however, renowned Dutch soil scientist Wim Sombroek sparked international interest by including several pages on the “terra preta” (black soil) and “terra mulata” (brown soil) in his influential 1966 book on Amazon soils. Several studies have since confirmed that the dark color of terra preta and terra mulata is caused by the incorporation, by humans, of black carbon (also called biochar)— incompletely burned organic matter such as charcoal. The soils were created by Amerindian populations 500–2,500 years ago, and some of the carbon in terra preta soils dates back to 450 B.C. Their high fertility compared to surrounding soils is attributed to the high levels of soil organic matter (which includes biochar), higher nutrient concentrations, high nutrientand moisture-holding capacity, and lower acidity. Amazingly, the soils have generally sustained this fertility to the present despite the tropical climate (in which soil organic matter tends to rapidly degrade) and frequent or periodic cultivation. Terra preta and terra mulata are limited to Amazonia, and represent a technology predating modern agriculture. People started to wonder whether this ancient Continued on page 14 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 13 Biochar’s rich promise Continued from page 12 Stephan Haefele holds a pile of biochar essentially charcoal - that has been produced from rice husks. Photo by Jose Raymond Panaligan indigenous technology could offer solutions to some of the problems of modern agriculture. Poor soils comparable with soils in Amazonia can be found in tropical regions around the globe, including Asia, where they are—unfortunately for farmers—depressingly abundant. Such soils benefit greatly from the incorporation of organic matter but its rapid decomposition in the humid tropics makes this a very labor-intensive and short-lived solution. Addition of biochar to soils has similar positive effects—it increases nutrient availability, boosts nutrient and moisture holding capacity, and contributes plant-available nutrients—and is reported to last for centuries. If researchers can confirm this much-delayed decomposition in modern agricultural systems, biochar could contribute to sustainable production increases in some of the most disadvantaged agricultural environments, which are frequently characterized by very low yields and widespread extreme poverty. The delayed decomposition of biochar could also help with another, more recent problem. It is widely agreed that global climate change is related to an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration. If some of the atmospheric carbon fixed by plants could be locked up in soils (a process known as carbon sequestration) instead of being returned to the atmosphere through decomposition, the buildup of carbon in the atmosphere could be slowed. And, in flooded rice soils, where the decomposition of organic matter produces methane—30 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2—this effect would be even greater. This sounds very exciting—but can it be done? To start with, the amounts of biochar needed are enormous. Agronomic trials have achieved good results with biochar applications equivalent to eight tons of carbon per hectare. The top 30 cm. of terra preta contains more than three times as much carbon from biochar—an average 25 tons per hectare. Assuming a biomass carbon concentration of 36 percent (typical for rice straw) and carbon loss during charring of 50 percent, to obtain even the eight-ton level, 44 tons of dry biomass (plant matter) per hectare would need to be converted into biochar. To reach the 25-ton terra preta level, 138 tons of dry biomass is required. In most Asian rice lands, the only feasible source for such large quantities of biomass is rice residue left over after harvest and milling. The total amount of rice residue produced each year in Asia is estimated at 549 million tons of rice straw and 110 million tons of rice husks. Rice residue is used for several purposes (such as organic fertilizer, fuel, fodder, and building material), but its use is dwindling. Today, it is often perceived as more of a problem than a valuable resource. Worse, the most convenient way to eliminate rice residue, field burning, Continued on page 31 Page 14 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Collage by Rodman Carbon sinking soil By Paul Hepperly An analysis of gases trapped within glacier ice shows that 18,000 years ago, during the last ice age, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide were 60 percent lower than those found in the atmosphere today. This low concentration of carbon dioxide was associated with a 4° C (about 10° F) drop in average temperature. Presently, global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are 25 percent higher than in the late 1800’s. If emissions continue at current levels, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere may double or even quadruple within the next 100-300 years. In 1938, G. Callendar published findings suggesting that the burning of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gases, would likely increase world temperatures. Since 1958, continuous carbon dioxide measurements on Mount Mauna Loa in Hawaii confirm that carbon dioxide is increasing in the atmosphere at a rate of about 1.3 parts per million (ppm) per year. Atmospheric scientists believe that although several other gases contribute to the greenhouse effect in the Earth’s atmosphere, carbon dioxide is responsible for over 80 percent of potential warm- ing. NASA scientist James Hansen tracked temperature changes in relation to past carbon dioxide levels and he correlated the 25 percent increase in carbon dioxide over the last 100 years with a 0.7° C warming of the atmosphere. A number of models have predicted that at current rates of carbon dioxide emission, the Earth will warm 2.5° C in the next 100 years. According to climatic change models, agriculture could be seriously affected by global warming. It is estimated that 20 percent of potential food crop production is lost each year due to unfavorable weather patterns (drought, flood, severe heat and cold, strong storms, etc.). The deterioration of weather patterns in North America could have devastating effects on world supplies of basic food grains such as wheat and corn. Climate change modelers predict that higher temperatures will generate more extreme weather events, such as severe droughts and torrential rains. A shift of 1 to 2° C in summer temperatures at pollination season can cause a loss of pollen viability, resulting in male sterility of many plant species such as oats and tomatoes. As global temperatures rise, the glaciers and polar icecaps will melt, leading to major island- and coastal-flooding. About 50 percent of the United States population lives within 50 miles of a coastline. As coastlines move inland, uncontrolled carbon dioxide levels will directly affect coastal dwellers. If greenhouse gases continue to increase in the next several 100 years, the rise of global temperature is estimated at 7° C, or almost 15° F, and the sea level would rise over two meters, or in excess of six feet. Soil organic matter-key to sequestration Normal seasonal carbon dioxide fluctuations in the atmosphere demonstrate that plant growth governs major amounts of carbon dioxide, enough to change atmospheric concentration by up to 10 ppm. By increasing plant production, we can reduce carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide levels are minimized in summer when vegetation is lush, and maximized in winter when N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Continued on page 16 Page 15 Agriculture is major tool in Carbon sequestration Continued on page 15 plants die or go dormant. The fluctuation of carbon dioxide from season to season (about 10 ppm) is about seven times greater than the yearly average increase in atmospheric carbon from fossil fuel burning and deforestation (1.3 ppm). Plants serve as sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide. Carbon stored in vegetation, soil, or the ocean, which is not readily released as carbon dioxide, is said to be sequestered. To balance the global carbon budget, we need to increase carbon sequestration and reduce carbon emissions. While carbon can cycle in and out of soil or biomass material, there are methods for building up what are hundred years, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would increase four to eight times present levels (currently the atmosphere holds 750 gigatons of carbon [C], while known fossil fuel energy reserves hold 5,000 gigatons C). Soil organic carbon, even at its present depleted level (1,580 gigatons C), is still estimated to be almost double the quantity of all the carbon currently found in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide (800 gigatons C), and about three times the amount found in all living organisms on the planet (500 gigatons C). Soil, agriculture, and forests are essential natural resources for sequestering runaway greenhouse gases helping to derail drastic climate changes. The amount of carbon in forests (610 gigatons) is about 85 percent of the amount in the atmosphere. The 1998 Resources For the Future Climate Issue Brief #12 states, “Although it is well known that the world’s tropical forests are declining, it is less widely recognized that the world’s temperate and boreal forests have been expanding, albeit modestly…Nevertheless, overall, the size of the global forest carbon stock appears to be declining, thereby generating a net carbon source.” 580 billion pounds of carbon dioxide per year would be sequestered by farmers switching from conventional chemically based farming systems to organic grain farming methods. called soil “humic” substances (also known as organic matter) that can remain as stable carbon compounds for thousands of years. Before forests and grasslands were converted to field agriculture, soil organic matter generally composed six to 10 percent of the soil mass, well over the one to three percent levels typical of today’s agricultural field systems. The conversion of natural grasslands and forests around the globe works to elevate atmospheric carbon dioxide levels significantly. Building soil organic matter by better nurturing our forest and agricultural lands can capture this excess atmospheric carbon dioxide, and preserve more natural landscapes. Agricultural and forest carbon sequestration will reduce the dangers that carbon dioxide currently presents to our atmosphere and world climatic patterns. These benefits will complement energy conservation and emission control efforts. Improved energy use is important because if all fossil fuel reserves were used in the next several Page 16 Trial findings Agriculture is, and always will be, a major tool in carbon sequestration. The Rodale Institute’s 23-year Farming Systems Trial® (FST) research provides real world experience and the starting point for understanding the potential for agriculture to reduce greenhouse gases. The FST is the longest running agronomic experiment designed to compare organic and conventional farming methods and production systems. Since 1981, The Rodale Institute has continuously monitored soil carbon and nitrogen in its FST. Carbon and nitrogen monitoring is just one component of a comprehensive battery of soil quality, economic and energy data that Rodale researchers gathered over the 23-year lifespan of the FST. Researchers believe that soil carbon and nitrogen findings are especially significant and dramatic. In the organic systems, soil carbon increased 15-28 percent, demonstrating the ability of the organic systems to sequester significant quantities of atmospheric carbon. Specifically, the FST organic manure system showed an average increase of soil carbon of about 1000 lbs. per acre-foot of soil per year, or about 3,500 lbs. of carbon dioxide per acre-ft. per year sequestered. When multiplied over the 160 million acres of corn and soybeans that are produced nationally, a potential of an increase of 580 billion pounds of carbon dioxide per year would be sequestered by farmers switching from conventional chemically based farming systems to organic grain farming methods. Over the 23-year lifespan of the FST, the conventional system showed no significant increases in either soil carbon or nitrogen. This demonstrates that organic farming methods increase stored carbon and retain other nutrients because organic soils hold these nutrients in place for uptake by plants. In the process, organic farming reduces nitrate and nutrient runoff into streams and water aquifers. These findings can be beneficial to all farmers by helping them to increase crop yields while decreasing energy, fuel and irrigation costs. In addition to capturing more carbon as soil organic matter, organic agricultural production methods also emit less greenhouse gases through more efficient use of fuels. Energy analysis of the FST by Dr. David Pimentel from Cornell University show that organic systems use only 63 percent of the energy input used by the conventional corn and soybean production system. In all systems, yields of corn and soybean were not different, except in drought years, when organic systems yielded 25 to 75 percent more than the conventional system. The organic yield advantage in drought years is specifically related to the ability of higher-carbon organic soils to capture and deliver more water to crop plants. Dr. David Pimentel’s findings N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Organic ag dramatically reduces CO2 show that the biggest energetic input, by far, in the conventional corn and soybean system is nitrogen fertilizer for corn, followed by herbicides for both corn and soybean production. Organic farming also makes economic sense. In addition to reducing input costs, economic analysis by Dr. James Hanson of the University of Maryland has shown that organic systems in the FST are competitive in returns with conventional corn and soybean farming, even without organic price premiums. Real world organic price premiums allow farmers to take advantage of certified organic production systems to achieve economically viable returns without massive governmental subsidies. How can low input organic systems be competitive in productivity with a high input chemically based conventional system? USDA scientist, David Douds, in collaboration with scientists at The Rodale Institute, has shown that in the organically managed systems, the biological support system of mycorrhiza fungi is much more robust and the fungi are more prevalent, active, and diverse. Additionally, soil microbial activity, specifically the work of mychorrhiza fungi, plays an important role in helping conserve and slow down the decay of organic matter. Synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides inhibit mycorrhizae. In organic production systems, increased my- Resources Bolin, B., E. Degens, S. Kempe, and P. Ketner. 1979. The Global Carbon Cycle. Wiley, New York. Chen, Y., and Y. Avimelech. 1986. The Role of Organic Matter in Modern Agriculture. Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, The Hague. Douds, David D. Jr, R. R. Janke, and S. E. Peters. 1993. VAM fungus spore populations and colonization of roots of maize and soybean under conventional and low input sustainable agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 43: 325-335. Douds, David D. Jr., and P. D. Millner. 1999. Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 74:77-93. Drinkwater, L., P. Wagoner, and M. Sarrantonio. 1998. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262-265. Nebel, Bernard J., and Richard T. Wright. 1996. Chapter 16. Major Climatic Changes in The Way The World Works Environmental Science Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle Rive, New Jersey. 687 p. corrhiza fungal activity allows plants to increase their access to soil resources, thereby stimulating plants to increase their nutrient uptake, water absorption, and their ability to suppress certain plant pathogens. These fungi work to conserve organic matter by aggregating organic matter with clay and minerals. The process and ability of mycorrhiza to sequester carbon has perhaps an even greater significance. Mycorrhiza fungi produce a novel glue-like substance called glomalin which stimulates aggregation of soil particles, resulting in increased ability for soil to retain carbon. The role of mycorrhiza and glomalin in soil carbon retention requires further investigation. Other biological mechanisms that will result in a greater ability of soil to sequester carbon naturally and to improve soil properties require further investigation as well. Benefits beyond carbon sequestration The presence of sequestered carbon in the organic field trials is an indicator of healthy soil which is abundant in carbonaceous matter, in particular the organic material humus. Humus enables healthy soils to retain water during periods of drought; as well as retaining mobile nutrients found in soils such as phosphates and nitrates, otherwise lost as runoff to streams and aquifers. Paul, E. A., and F. E. Clark.1989. Chapter 6 Carbon cycling and soil organic matter in Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, New York. 271 p. Puget, P., and L. Drinkwater. 2001. Short term dynamics of root and shoot-derived carbon for a leguminous green manure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:771-779. Rillig, M., and S. F. Wright. 2002. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin in soil aggregation. Plant and Soil 234:325-333. Rillig, M., S. F. Wright, K. Nichols, W. Schen, and M. Torn. 2001. Large contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to carbon pools in tropical forest soils. Plant and Soil 233:167-177. Sanchez, P., M. P. Gichuru, and L. B. Katz. 1982. Organic matter in major soils of the tropical and temperate regions. Proc. Int. Soc. Soil Sci. Cong. 1:99-114. Sedjo, Roger A. Brent Sohngen and Pamela Jagger. 1998. RFF Climate Issue Brief #12 Stevenson, F. 1982. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, and Reactions. Wiley Interscience, New York. 583. These trials are illustrative of both economic benefit as well as environmental protection working hand in hand. The economic benefits are realized by farmers and landowners who see reduced costs for fertilizer, energy fuels and irrigation, and increased crop yields at the same time. Organic farming can reduce the output of carbon dioxide by 37-50 percent, reduce costs for the farmer, and increase our planet’s ability to positively absorb and utilize greenhouse gases. These methods maximize benefits for the individual farmer as well as for society as a whole. It is a winning strategy with multiple benefits and virtually no risk. These proven approaches mitigate current environmental damages and promote a cleaner and safer world for future generations. Former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Ann Veneman, puts it this way, “The technologies and practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon sequestration also address conservation objectives, such as improving water and air quality and enhancing wildlife habitat. This is good for the environment and good for agriculture.” Paul Hepperly is the The New Farm Research Manager at The Rodale Institute. Stevenson, F. 1985. Cycles of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur and Micronutrients. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 380 p. Wander, M., S. Traina, B. Stinner, and S. Peters. 1994. Organic and conventional management effects on biologically active soil organic matter pools. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 1130-1139. Wright, S. F., and R. Anderson. 2000. Aggregate stability and glomalin in alternative crop rotation for the Central Plants. Biology and Fertility of Soil 31:249-253. • Related articles: About The Rodale Institute www.strauscom.com/rodale-facts • October 10th press release www.strauscom.com/rodale-release • Text of the October 10th Statement of Cooperation - www.strauscom.com/rodale-MOU • About The Rodale Institute www.strauscom.com/rodale-background N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 17 Get Yer Tilth On! Hats, Organic T’s & Bumper stickers available from www.tilth.org Page 18 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Consumer’s right to know under assault Organic Trade Association seeks truthful organic food labeling Rodman By Laura Batcha Can you imagine not being able to read on product labels that organic farmers do not use toxic and persistent pesticides, or that organically produced foods are made without the use of petroleum-based fertilizers, sewage sludge, irradiation, antibiotics, growth hormones, and genetic engineering? This situation may be closer than you realize. It is an unprecedented threat to organic. A well coordinated campaign has been launched on a state-by-state basis to challenge organic farmers’, processors’ and retailers’ informing consumers that their products are free of practices prohibited in organics. If this campaign is successful, any products in the United States that communicate the absence of materials prohibited in organic—commonly referred to as “absence claims”— will likely be affected. Consumers seeking truthful information on product labels have much at stake. In 2007, a group called AFACT (www.itisafact.org) began reaching out to states, urging them to prohibit labeling claims that a milk product is produced with milk from cows that have not been treated with the synthetic growth hormone rBST (also known as rBGH, the synthetic growth hormone manufactured and sold by Monsanto under the brand Posilac®). Although AFACT began by addressing labeling of milk, the first words of its home page indicate clearly that it will not stop with dairy: “Despite years of testing, scrutiny and broad consumer use, processors in search of a marketing niche are increasingly calling into question the safety and environmental impact of many of the basic foods we consume such as milk, meat and produce.” (AFACT web site, emphasis added) The basic premise of AFACT and others involved in this assault on organic is that organic farmers and processors have, in essence, tricked consumers with false and misleading claims into fearing non-organic foods and those produced “using new technology, which in turn forces valuable management tools from the hands of farmers and ranchers.” The Organic Trade Association (OTA) opposes any proposed state regulation on dairy labeling that would affect the way organic dairy products are labeled concerning the synthetic growth hormone rBGH. “Any proposed restriction would prevent organic dairy farmers and processors from truthfully communicating with retailers and consumers regarding federally regulated organic production practices. It also would prevent consumers from exercising full and free choice in determining which products they wish to purchase,” according to David Gagnon, OTA’s Chief Operating Officer. Gagnon points out that organic agriculture is regulated nationally under the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA), with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program having oversight over both the certifiers of organic farms and handlers and labeling statements made under OFPA.“By definition, organic farmers never have used synthetic growth hormones such as rBST or rBGH (recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone). The statement about non-use of synthetic growth hormones organic farmers and their dairies make on their dairy product labels is an organic process claim authorized under OFPA.” Monsanto, which has been linked to the state-by-state efforts to impose restrictions on dairy labels concerning the nonuse of rBGH, announced late last summer that it sold its POSILAC‚ recombinant growth hormone to Elanco, a division of Eli Lilly and Company. OTA, via a lawsuit, has challenged Ohio’s emergency dairy labeling regulation that excessively limits organic dairy manufacturers’ ability to provide truthful and non-misleading information to consumers on dairy product labels and will continue to monitor efforts in other states to restrict these rights. See www.ota.com for further details. Laura Batcha is the Director of Marketing and Public Relations at the Organic Trade Association. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 19 New fuels from unexpected sources Crawford Nursery employee sorts blueberries in Cornelius Oregon. Photo by Elizabeth Schwartz. By Elizabeth Schwartz Oregon is in various stages of developing the capacity to process waste products and canola into biofuel. I made some exciting discoveries when I looked into four ways our state is solving agricultural and landfill problems on the way to energy independence. I am especially intrigued by the idea that we may not need to grow food for renewable energy, but can use by-products of primary crops: food and fuel. What kinds of by-products have hidden value? Pacific Ethanol, Inc. is scheduled to begin processing wheat straw, corn stover, and poplar tree residuals into biofuel in Boardman, Ore. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, it will be the first cellulosic (inedible organic matter) demonstration plant in the Northwest. They will spin straw into ethanol. I decided to investigate whether something like noxious weeds could develop value. Green yard waste I asked Mark W. Kendall, Senior Policy Analyst at the Oregon Department of Energy, if cities might eventually be able to deliver their green yard waste to biofuel processing plants. “Some of those green wastes will have a home in a fuels market.” he replied. Of course, we are not planning on simply re-routing yard waste from composting facilities to fuel production. “There are hundreds of thousands of tons of green and damp food waste going to landfills each year in Oregon. That is an ideal feedstock to develop into cellulosic ethanol.” Waste blueberry juice is an example of damp food. Waste blueberry juice Summit Foods of Cornelius, Ore. dries blueberries and other fruit for commercial bakeries. The process creates waste blueberry juice, which is expensive to dispose of. The company is building an ethanol plant in Cornelius that will, according to Kendall, potentially turn blueberry juice and starch from frozen food rinse water into two million gallons of biofuel annually. Annual ryegrass straw In early September 2008, Lane County, Ore. determined that Willamette Valley annual ryegrass straw converts well to ethanol and methane. These Page 20 new technologies could potentially cut field burning of grass seed straw in half, according to Mike McKenzie-Bahr of Lane County. McKenzie-Bahr is coordinating a study on the technical and economic feasibility of converting straw into renewable energy. The study may show that it makes financial sense to use the new technologies. If that happens, Willamette Valley may see a decrease in field burning. About 66 percent of up to 50,000 acres of grass straw burned each year in the valley is from ryegrass, because growers have not found an economic alternative. Cautionary note We need to think about what removing plant residue from fields for biofuel might do to soil organic matter. The cellulosic demonstration plant in Boardman will reportedly use wheat straw and corn stover from nearby farms as part of their cellulosic feedstock. According to the Oregon Department of Agriculture, grass seed growers currently remove fescue straw and sell it as pelletized livestock food in Asia. They may sell annual rye straw for biofuel, resulting in cleaner air, economic viability, and decreased dependence on petroleum fuels. Currently, rye straw is tilled under or burned. I am pleased that Kendall and Brian Duggan of OSU have expressed to me that Continued on page 22 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 One farmer’s Harry MacCormack (left) and Tim Gotsch inspect quinoa, stunted by June cold at Sunbow Farm in Corvallis. By Harry MacCormack The primary effect of global warming for agriculture is inclement weather. Across the world, growers of foods, fiber, and fuel have lost somewhat predictable weather patterns. 2008 saw month after month of record setting weather. Over-wintered grains dealt with 90-degree temperatures in March. Soil temperatures suddenly jumped into the high 50s and 60s awakening soil biology and bio activations at a level usually associated with May. Then just as suddenly, soil and air temperatures plummeted into the low 40’s. A sudden spurt of faster than normal growth was followed by a sudden slow down. This condition set the stage for disease as nutrient cycles started then stopped. Rusts and other diseases grabbed some grain varieties and never let go, lowering yields. May was more normal -but drier- allowing many plants to recover and grow out of their weakened stages, in the end producing superior yields. April-May were dry enough to allow for planting of spring wheat, oats, buckwheat, flax, sunflower, quinoa, amaranth and dry beans which included lentils, garbanzo, black, pinto, red chile, anasazi, and soy. Fairly normal soil moisture levels allowed for germination and about two weeks of good growth. Then came June, which except for the last two days of the month, was the coldest ever recorded. Plants that had not germinated earlier didn’t germinate or did so very slowly, setting them up to insect attack. Plants growing normally stalled for a month. We had a 34-degree night in late June almost killing some bean varieties. Just west of us, it froze and killed everything. This month-long event set back plant development, including development of seed heads on winter crops. One positive development, pigweed which is amaranth, did not germinate during this cold. Our edible amaranth either didn’t germinate or wouldn’t grow. It took several July foliar feedings to get beans back on track for what we had planned as a mid to late August harvest. Basically, all our 13 kinds Photo by Andrew Rodm an almanac of wheat, seven kinds of rye, six kinds of triticale, seven kinds of dry beans and five kinds of edible seeds were set back by two to three weeks. Some crops were stunted by the cold. Some at harvest show production levels in terms of yield lowered. Rather than mid July ripening for grain, ripening was late July and early August. Some, like one variety of triticale, weren’t finished until late August. Some Continued on page 22 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 21 Can yard waste energy be far behind? Continued from page 20 waste going to landfills should probably be considered the ideal feedstock for biofuel. In my conversation with him, Duggan cautioned that Oregonians should be careful of how they “mine the soil” for organic matter. While straw may have an appropriate part to play in energy independence, waste normally going to landfills, like the blueberry juice in Cornelius and poplar tree trimmings in Boardman, might be the best large-scale supply of organic matter. Portland air quality The city of Portland is working on replacing petroleum-based diesel with cleaner burning biodiesel for its vehicles. Michele Crim of the Portland Bureau of Development Services told me that the city has been encouraging eastern Oregon farmers to grow canola for biodiesel for 1.5 to two years. The city pays StarOilco, a distributor of SeQuential-Pacific Biodiesel, a fixed price for canola sourced in Oregon and used in biodiesel. Wouldn’t it be fun if we could point to various city vehicles and say: “That one’s running on canola from Umatilla,” but, according to SeQuential, the Salem facility uses a mix of yellow grease, soy, and canola as feedstock. They do not separate it out. Portland’s price supports encourage eastern Oregon farmers to risk growing new crops for biofuel. A number of farmers in the Columbia Basin are growing canola as a rotation crop with dry land wheat. I asked Duggan if canola benefits the soil when grown this way, and whether growing it for biodiesel could be construed as displacing food crops. It appears that canola is a beneficial rotation crop. It kills diseases often found in grain fields, busts through hardpan, and improves soil fertility. It could also be considered as displacing food crops such as field peas and lentils, which are often rotated with wheat. The canola used in biodiesel is the same plant used to make edible canola oil. Conclusion Despite international criticism that our biofuel programs contribute to increased food prices, the USDA officially supports an ethanol industry based primarily on corn and soy grown in the Midwest. That may be changing. The Los Angeles Times has reported that Henrietta Fore, administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, informed a small group of reporters on June 5, 2008, that our government is re-evaluating this focus and hopes to move to cellulosic fuels as quickly as possible. No one, to my knowledge, sees a future for spinning your backyard weeds into the new gold, but it may be that some of Oregon’s research on the feasibility of using agricultural and forestry waste will help change the federal government’s focus from corn and soy to more sustainable solutions in the race for increased energy independence. Elizabeth Schwartz recently transitioned from her Idaho farm to a Portland high rise. Chill challenges, wet weirdness Continued from page 21 Spring wheat also didn’t finish until late August. What happened for a full week in late August? Unseasonal rain, a week of it. Most of the beans were in a dry-down state by that time. The danger is that moisture during dry down can bring on sprouting or molds. We were fortunate that there was enough sun that was hot enough to dry out wet crops. The rains resulted in some bean crops attempting regrowth during a dry-off period. Also during this period, leaves dry and fall off. The rain germinated weed seed and harvest which looked like it would be clean suddenly had some weed pressure. One of the late germinating weeds was pigweed, first delayed, then growing toward seed with a fury, pushed by lower, fall-approaching, light-heat levels. Sunbow, and the other small farms working at a homestead scale have been able to handle all of these unexpected, weather related, crop changes. Stalford farm has also broken their large acreage Page 22 into smaller 20-acre plots. Scale for any dry land commodity crop here on the valley floor reduces some of the gamble. Our project, which embraces both homestead and small industrial farming transitions, learned a lot of lessons about how to grow and harvest in what might be our future weather conditions. These weather conditions were not limited to our locality. For five weather related articles see the September 5 Capital Press showing similar conditions in Eastern Oregon and Washington which are major commodity production areas. Our caloric food future has gotten trickier due to the complex syndrome known as global warming. Light-heat hours are marginal in our maritime climate for growing commodity crops. Although this valley produced almost all of its foods 100 years ago, that has not been done in recent history with our large urban consumer populations. The South Willamette Valley Bean, Grain and Edible Seed Project lists this fact as the over-arching parameter (along with fuel expense) that limits and drives our attempt to localize what amounts to at least 80 percent of typical human caloric intake, see www.mudcitypress.com. Our project hopes to reverse that trend by taking grass seed lands into food production. Stalford Farms, a 9,000 acre operation has 147 acres devoted so far to the project. Sunbow farm in Corvallis, and five other small growers are experimenting at homestead levels. Localizing 80 percent of our food intake may be best done on smaller acreages where risks are easier to mange and where the consuming community can be organized to share in these risks. Harry MacCormack is a pioneering organic farmer in the Willamette Valley and co-runs The Institute for Biowisdom at Sunbow Farm, Corvallis. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Multi-dimensional approach increases biodiversity biodiversity tends to create soil conditions ideal for populations of methanotroph bacteria. These bacteria oxidize methane, a gas that contributes to global warming by a factor 21 times that of carbon dioxide. Expanding hedges on marginal land, and adding birdhouses increase biological services on the farm and beyond. By Joanna Johnson As fall unfolds and day length shortens, there is time again to think past the immediate tasks and consider future plans and possibilities, perhaps even the long-term vigor of your farm. Enduring quality and quantity of harvests are not just products of inputs, but are integrally tied to the health of the land. In order for successive generations of farmers and land managers to inherit robust farms, a network of ecological services must be intact and durable. And for agriculture to outlast the vagaries of weather, policies and the economy, it must reflect a dynamic reality. A half century ago, Aldo Leopold defined ecological health as “the capacity of the land for selfrenewal” and conservation as “our effort to understand and preserve this capacity.” Rather than an attempt to freeze diversity and environmental processes in time, Leopold argues - and most farmers would probably concur - true conservation means recognizing that change is constantly afoot. The challenge lies in setting a biodiverse groundwork that allows your operation to bend and meet those changes as they come. Here are some key areas of biodiversity to ponder as the nights lengthen: Restore riparian corridors Expanding the frame beyond the wellordered crop rows and taking in a much more complex view, one that includes the riparian corridor adjacent to an almond orchard, and that patch of willows along the neighbor’s stream, means recognizing benefits like water purification from the filtering capacity of grass and willows and pest suppression afforded by the beneficial native habitat. Think multi-dimensionally Durability and resilience involve viewing a complex web of interconnections and noting the “stacking” of ecosystem services. Picture a network of interconnected wetlands, grass filter strips, hedgerows, and riparian buffers dotting the region of your farm and serving multiple roles: defending against flooding hazards, increasing groundwater recharge, diminishing nutrient and fertilizer runoff, and decontaminating pathogens in water, all while containing plants that also attract beneficial insects and other wildlife. Talk to your neighbors Building a community committed to biodiversity can help coordinate and multiply your efforts by restoring a matrix that provides durability for organic farmers and the capacity for change; if one part is weakened, the others fill in. Return areas of marginal production to a natural state Allowing low-producing, marginal portions of the farm to be taken out of cultivation and restored to a more natural state, seeding an erosion-prone drainage with native grasses, or working with a local conservation group to establish a habitat corridor for wildlife movement through agricultural land can increase natural enemy function and enhance the resilience of your farm. Care about the climate Permanent vegetation like shrubs and trees in a hedgerow can serve as carbon storage units. And scientists recently discovered that adding regionally appropriate plant Plant natives Perhaps most traces of the wild vanished from your farm years or even generations ago. Restoring native plants along a fence line or between fields can have valuable ecosystem services in tow. Beneficial insects will be drawn to floral resources and a permanent shelter, and soil that could have washed or blown away will have a permanent anchor. And a few more strands of biodiversity will have been added to strengthen the capacity of your farm to remain productive for many seasons to come. A good resource for determining the area-appropriateness of native plants for your region is the climate zone guide in the Sunset Western Garden Book, but here are a few general suggestions: For a dry site, plant red flowering currant Ribes sanguineum and tall Oregon grape Mahonia aquifolium. For damp soil, try black hawthorn Crataegus douglasii and the red-twig dogwood Cornus sericea. Natives like the Nootka rose Rosa nutkana and common snowberry Symphoricarpos albus will grow in a variety of conditions. Other plants to consider are salal Gaultheria shallon, Indian plum Oemleria cerasiformis, mock orange Philadelphus lewisii, fireweed Epilobium angustifolium, vine maple Acer circinatum, Sitka Spruce Picea sitchensis, and shore pine Pinus contorta. The hedgerow manual published by Community Alliance with Family Farmers, while written for a California audience, is a great resource that can be readily adapted for the Northwest. It is available at www.caff.org/programs/farmscaping/Hedgerow.pdf. For additional resources or information on how to increase biodiversity on your farm, contact the Wild Farm Alliance by email, [email protected], or call (831) 761-8408. You can also visit us on the web at www.wildfarmalliance.org. Joanna Johnson is communications coordinator for the Wild Farm Alliance. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 23 A LWAY S P U R E - A LWAY S N AT U R A L Nancy’s family of Organic Yogurt, Soy and Organic Kefir Nancy’s is delighted to support family farms who have made a commitment to sustainable organic farming practices. Certified Organic by Oregon Tilth Springfield Creamery Family owned and operated since 1960 Eugene, Oregon www.nancysy o g u r t . c o m Page 24 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Rodale New farm color full page ad Farmers have always been our heroes – Farmers heroes can be PROTECTING OUR HEALTH, HEALING OUR EARTH feeding our country in good times and bad. Now organic farmers can be our heroes in the fight against global warming. You can be a hero too. Buy organic food. Support local farmers. Tell your elected officials that the way we grow our food matters. John and Aimee Good – Quiet Creek Farm – Kutztown, PA PhoTo BY MiTchell MANdel Find out more: www.rodaleinstitute.org N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 25 Book Review A fuse you can use By Angela Ajootian Thinking about global warming feels much the same as knowing I had to clean my room as a kid. A necessary job, but so overwhelmingly complicated that I’d rather just rationalize every second of sweet delay. But life is a world of self-motivation and responsibility. Here we are faced with a legacy of environmental decay that threatens our life, economy and future generations. Search the phrase “global warming” and you will find an array of minute-byminute blows exchanged by finger-pointing politicians, question-the-science-lobbyists denying any wrongdoing, polar bears perfecting their dogpaddle, and scientists mounting podiums and signing accord of decisive theory. Meanwhile, the citizen consumer is pulled apart by a weakening dollar and agitprop from all sides. It’s a mess. A very timely example is a recent report released in the September 10th issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It concludes that the temperature increase seen in recent decades is larger than any change over the previous 1,300 years. Increased field data has made the empirical accuracy of the study nigh impenetrable. The world is heating up in an abnormal fashion despite all naysayer disdain. The charting of our temperature since 1980 is said to resemble a “hockey stick,” as it was level and then experiences a sharp and undeniable rise. An example of politics and environmental science colliding is the self-proclaimed “hockey mom” gone politician, Page 26 Sarah Palin. Whilst governor of Alaska she wrote a January essay against placing the polar bear on the Endangered Species list and doubting the veracity of Global Warming. She went on to sue the Department of the Interior for placing the polar bear on endangered status. Since her nomination to run as Republican VP, she has weakened her stance and admitted to The New York Times that “I believe that man’s activities certainly can be contributing to the issue of global warming, climate change.” Politicians represent the will of constituents, right? The question before us is “How do we get our voices heard and future secured with our elected leaders and doubting neighbors?” Good question. Jonathon Haidt, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Virginia, wrote an excellent essay addressing this dilemma. His main point was that we must “think about liberal and conservative policies as manifestations of deeply conflicting but equally heartfelt visions of the good society.” Condemnation, rhetoric, or data alone will simply not work to effect change in the status quo. The stellar book Ignition: What You Can Do To Fight Global Warming And Spark A Movement deserves to be thoughtfully read and passed around. Island Press published it in 2007, and is edited by Jonathan Isham and Sissel Waage. The book weighs in at 284 pages. This collection of essays from a broad range of concerned and intelligent individuals presents one of the best tools for refining the effective environmental advocate in us all. In light of possible political outcomes, we must hone our goals and become functional masses able to bring about palpable planetary change. Ignition encourages the “role of citizens in promoting climate-friendly businesses” and is a focused and determined representation of what some of the best minds in the field have to say on the topic of actual and feasible positive change. In a well presented five parts, this work represents climate experts, corporate executives, organizational consultants, professors, social activists, doctors, award winning students, and UN representatives. All talk to the undeniable issue of global warming. And it is refreshingly realistic and unabashed, at one point, it even encourages the reader to be as cynical as they want. Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert’s essay “If Only Gay Sex Caused Global Warming,” he points out that “global warming is a deadly threat precisely because it fails to trip the brain’s alarm, leaving us soundly asleep in a burning bed.” One particular section, entitled “Irrationality wants to be your friend,” presents the powerful current of groupthink of denial and illustrates well our social attitude towards environmental crisis. The writers in this section make it clear that we are not supposed to make people feel guilty or threatened. We must present an immediate plan of action that is easily represented and gives people a sense of control and doesn’t require unpleasant sacrifice. We should emphasize the need for action as a preparedness task. By embracing the first step of “preparedness” we encourage commitment to future action from the very people who are initially defensive and reject the whole idea of global warming. The whole reason this book exists is because there is a problem with our world and our social norm. Both issues are not inherent and can be changed for the better; as such issues have been positively addressed in the past. The things that can motivate one reader can motivate masses as each individual adds necessary dimension to a debate that must be carried out at the community level. Each person can make a difference, especially when voices unite against the paradigm of a seemingly intractable government. We simply need to learn how to effectively carry them where they need to go. Angela Ajootian is a writer based in Philomath, Oregon. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Burgers that fry By Christopher Matthews According to a report published by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the livestock sector generates more greenhouse gas emissions as measured in CO2 equivalent – 18 percent – than transport. It is also a major source of land and water degradation. Says Henning Steinfeld, Chief of FAO’s Livestock Information and Policy Branch and senior author of the report Livestock’s Long Shadow –Environmental Issues and Options. “Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today’s most serious environmental problems. Urgent action is required to remedy the situation.” With increased prosperity, people are consuming more meat and dairy products every year. Global meat production is projected to more than double from 229 million tons in 1999/2001 to 465 million tons in 2050, while milk output is set to climb from 580 to 1043 million tons. Long shadow - The global livestock sector is growing faster than any other agricultural sub-sector. It provides livelihoods to about 1.3 billion people and contributes about 40 percent to global agricultural output. For many poor farmers in developing countries, livestock are also a source of renewable energy for draft and an essential source of organic fertilizer for their crops. But such rapid growth exacts a steep environmental price, according to the FAO report, “The environmental costs per unit of livestock production must be cut by one half, just to avoid the level of damage worsening beyond its present level,” it warns. When emissions from land use and land use change are included, the livestock sector accounts for nine percent of CO2 deriving from human-related activities, but produces a much larger share of even more harmful greenhouse gases. It generates 65 percent of human-related nitrous oxide, which has 296 times the global warming potential of CO2. Most of this comes from manure. And it accounts for respectively 37 percent of all human-induced methane (23 times as warming as CO2), which is largely produced by the digestive system of ruminants, and 64 percent of ammonia, which contributes significantly to acid rain. Livestock now use 30 percent of the earth’s entire land surface, mostly perma- nent pasture but also including 33 percent of the global arable land used to producing feed for livestock, the report notes. As forests are cleared to create new pastures, it is a major driver of deforestation, especially in Latin America where, for example, some 70 percent of former forests in the Amazon have been turned over to grazing. Land and water - At the same time, herds cause wide-scale land degradation, with about 20 percent of pastures considered as degraded through overgrazing, compaction and erosion. This figure is even higher in the dry lands where inappropriate policies and inadequate livestock management contribute to advancing desertification. The livestock business is among the most damaging sectors to the earth’s increasingly scarce water resources, contributing among other things to water pollution, and the degeneration of coral reefs. The major polluting agents are animal wastes, antibiotics and hormones, chemicals from tanneries, fertilizers and the pesticides used to spray feed crops. Widespread overgrazing disturbs water cycles, reducing replenishment of above and below ground water resources. Significant amounts of water are withdrawn for the production of feed. Livestock are estimated to be the main inland source of phosphorous and nitrogen contamination of the South China Sea, contributing to biodiversity loss in marine ecosystems. Meat and dairy animals now account for about 20 percent of all terrestrial animal biomass. Livestock’s presence in vast tracts of land and its demand for feed crops also contribute to biodiversity loss; 15 out of 24 important ecosystem services are assessed as in decline, with livestock identified as a culprit. Remedies The report, which was produced with the support of the multi-institutional Livestock, Environment and Development Initiative, proposes explicitly to consider these environmental costs, including: Book Review Land degradation – Controlling access and removing obstacles to mobility on common pastures. Use of soil conservation methods and silvopastoralism, together with controlled livestock exclusion from sensitive areas; payment schemes for environmental services in livestock-based land use to help reduce and reverse land degradation. Atmosphere and climate – Increasing the efficiency of livestock production and feed crop agriculture. Improving animals’ diets to reduce enteric fermentation and consequent methane emissions, and setting up biogas plant initiatives to recycle manure. Water – Improving the efficiency of irrigation systems. Introducing full-cost pricing for water together with taxes to discourage large-scale livestock concentration close to cities. The FAO and partners are charting a way forward for livestock production. These discussions include the substantial public health risks related to the rapid livestock sector growth as, increasingly, animal diseases also affect humans; rapid livestock sector growth can also lead to the exclusion of smallholders from growing markets. Christopher Matthews works with the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 27 Photo by Conner Voss Cool Tips For Hot Gardens Yard & Garden Bedding your garden with coffee Kathy Dang (left) presents while a bed of artichokes is mulched with used coffee grounds at Luscher Farm. By Kathy Dang A little effort put toward mulching your garden this fall will go a long way when you begin to prepare your soil the following spring. Mulch is any organic material spread over the surface of your soil and although a very simple act, the value is immense. Mulch is an amazingly easy, low-cost garden technique and these late months of fall are a perfect time to take advantage of available organic materials. Nothing is more satisfying than diverting things from the urban waste stream, like used coffee grounds and leaves, and turning them into nutrient Page 28 rich fertilizer for your garden. Mulch controls weeds, reduces soil compaction, insulates soil from extreme temperatures, minimizes leaching of valuable soil nutrients and builds healthy soil by increasing the organic matter content of your soil. Regarding compaction, I’ve noticed a drastic difference in the size of my garlic if I simply cover my beds with 2-3 inches of fluffy straw mulch in the fall. The straw helps to minimize compaction over the rainy winter months, giving my newly planted garlic a chance to get established and bulk up into nice, large heads in the spring. Over the years, we’ve helped build the garden soil at Luscher Farm with a myriad of mulch materials such as, straw, coffee grounds, leaves, and grass clippings. Now we’re reaping the benefits of these soil-building mulches, which have helped to build good tilth and break up our heavy soil. Coffee grounds Used coffee grounds are a favorite mulch material and are easily available from your local coffee roaster or cafe. Coffee grounds are a wonderful source of nitrogen, N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Continued on page 30 Cool Tips For Hot Gardens By Conner Voss The onslaught of relentlessly wet weather through the Willamette Valley is our cue to put down the hoes and pick up the hammers. Though our work in the soil slows to a slug’s pace, my mind races with innumerable winter project possibilities. The aim: to create simple garden infrastructure that expands our seasonal repertoire without expanding our budget. This season, one such project comes in the form of a modest wood frame with a transparent lid. They call this a cold frame. Cold frames, for all practical purposes, are miniature greenhouses that utilize the sun’s energy for heat. They are useful as both season extenders and for starting vegetable seedlings. The cold frame is also a helpful tool for “hardening-off ” seedlings – a sort of horticultural halfway house, wherein young plants are spared the shock of moving immediately from greenhouse to garden. While the shape and size of cold frames varies widely, and is largely dependent upon available space and materials, there are some universally valuable considerations. First, the frame itself is often constructed of wood, because wood is easy to work with, easy to come by, light, and it retains heat relatively well. Species such as redwood and cedar are most rot resistant, though expensive. Pine and fir are less pricey, but may need replacing in four or five years. Second, the front wall should be shorter than the back, necessitating a sloped lid, which more efficiently captures the sun’s winter rays. Third, cold frames should be placed on well-drained soil to avoid excessive moisture retention – hence, your very own “mold frame.” If you enjoy heavy soil, it is advised to excavate 8-12 inches and then add a 2-3 inch layer of course gravel before backfilling the soil and placing the cold frame. This layer of course rock will greatly improve drainage. Fourth, cold frames utilize a transparent roof, which helps to capture and retain heat in the earth beneath. Many gardeners use Yard & Garden Photo by Conner Voss Cold frame of mind A simple cold frame constructed of recycled materials provides an early start for spring greens. old windows, often found at rummage sales for a couple dollars. Alternatively, you can use polyethylene plastic film (4 or 6 mil) stretched over a simple 2x2 wood frame. Plastic, however, will need to be replaced every few years. It is helpful to determine the size of your lid before constructing your box, especially if using recycled windows. Lastly, the cold frame is situated with as much southern exposure as possible. But be forewarned: due to its relatively small volume and large surface area, the cold frame will spike in temperature quick enough to aptly scorch your seedlings. During the fall and spring, your daily challenge will be to keep the frame cool, rather than warm. An effective measure for temperature regulation is to prop the lid up on the low side, allowing generous ventilation. Many gardeners employ automatic vent openers on their cold frame lids, which can be set to a specific temperature. Usually, if overly concerned about toasty trays, I’ll just open the lid completely, and hope that I remember to close it before the cool of evening arrives. For a complete set of plans and more detailed instructions, see: www.garden- gatemagazine.com/main/pdf/coldfram. pdf. I found these plans from Garden Gate Magazine to be straightforward and easy to follow. The permanence or portability of your cold frame is influenced by a number of factors. Many plans I’ve come across call for the use of bricks or cinder blocks for the sides. Though they retain heat well, and are imbedded nicely into the ground, it proves to be much more work if plans and interest change from year to year. Conversely, wood is light and cheap but does not insulate as well. Also, placing a structure on top of the soil – rather than sunken - exposes more surface area through which valuable heat is lost. Ultimately, your intended use will directly influence the shape of this new garden fixture. In our demonstration gardens, cold frames are helpful for growing small amounts of greens earlier or later in the season. Early this spring, we will move our cold frame to an area in the garden where we wish to get a head start on lettuce. Since the cold frame is placed directly on the garden bed, we can prepare and amend the soil beforehand, sow our seeds, and then N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Continued on page 30 Page 29 Warming soil Welcome Randall Cass Photo by Kathy Dang Continued from page 29 Continued from page 7 move the cold frame into location, piling a small amount of soil around the lower edges to help reduce drafts and retain heat. When we need to water our seedlings, the lids are removed for easy access. When weeds become pervasive, the entire frame is lifted off, and then replaced when the job is done. Finally, as the weather warms and the plants mature, the cold frame is removed permanently and used elsewhere for pioneering warm-weather crops. In this way, the cold frame proves to be a versatile garden tool where portability is an asset. One last tip: By placing the cold frame in the garden a week or two before you inRandall Cass, our new Environmental tend to employ its virtues, the soil will have Educator AmeriCorps member a chance to warm, giving your seedlings the on the ability of current agricultural aid little extra boost they need in early spring. projects to adapt to environmental changes. Conner Voss is the OEC’s He also has a background in community outreach and volunteer coordination and we are looking forward to plugging him into projects at the OEC. Growing up on a farm in Idaho, Randall has a deep respect and devotion to organic farming and his eagerness and enthusiasm to learn all that is organic has made him a wonderful addition to the OEC. This winter, with our season winding down and our team bulking up, we have been focusing on the direction for the OEC education and outreach activities in the next year and beyond. I will keep you posted as we develop our educational offerings and make plans for 2009. Kathy Dang is the OEC Program Manager. Better under cover Continued from page 28 which veggies love, and make deliciously aromatic mulch when applied 1-2 inches thick in garden beds. They act as a green material with a carbon-nitrogen (C-N) ratio of 20-1. At a recent fall soil building class at Luscher farm, we learned that coffee also helps to deter slugs in the garden. A woman mentioned that she uses coffee to mulch around her dahlias to keep them slug-free. And if that’s not the ideal mulch material, then I don’t know what is! Adding brown leaves or straw to the grounds will help balance the pH of the soil. This fall we applied a “sheet mulching” or “lasagna layering” technique around perennials plantings by adding a layer of 2-3 inches of coffee grounds, then a few inches of straw on top. This value-added mulch helps supply our soil with nutrients as it rots and provides a thick barrier to control winter weeds. This mulch combo also makes a fantastic mulch on open veggie beds over the winter. Leaves and leaf mold Photo by Kathy Dang As a Northwest native, leaves are my all-time favorite mulch material because they are readily available and have amazing soil building abilities. To use leaves as garden mulch you have a few options. You can put leaves directly on your garden beds, break them down first with a mulching mower for faster decomposition, or my personal favorite: make leaf mold. Leaf mold is leaves that have molded, or fully decomposed. When applied to your garden soil, leaf mold improves soil structure and provides a healthy habitat for the billions of beneficial organisms living in your soil. Leaf mold is also a common additive to homemade potting soil mixes. If you don’t have a supply of leaves at home, you can source them from a local park, or help a neighbor out by raking their leaves. To make leaf mold, construct a simple holding bin by making a cylindrical cage (3’x 3’) from chicken wire and stakes. Next, pile your leaves in and let ‘em rot! I find it useful to place a couple burlap bags on top of the pile to keep them contained and hold in moisture. If you want to speed up the composting process and ensure even decomposition, you can turn your pile occasionally. By mid-summer, just in time to mulch those tomato plants, your finished leaf mold should be ready. Using free, local materials, such as leaves and used coffee grounds in your garden, is a great, cost-free way to build your soil and turn a potential waste into a valuable garden resource. An overwintered bed of garlic mulched with straw. Page 30 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Oregon Tilth is pleased to announce the hiring of Bonnie Hoffman Cox for the Research and Education Projects Manager position. This position serves as the principal advisor and liaison of Oregon Tilth’s research and education projects to the greater sustainable agriculture community. A key role of this position is to provide leadership for Oregon Tilth research and education initiatives, and work to energize, enliven and support the development of more effective research and education opportunities for Oregon Tilth’s constituents. Bonnie will spend much of her time identifying and representing the needs of Oregon Tilth constituents, while interacting with state and federal agencies, educational institutions, private industry, foundations, and other organizations which will assist Oregon Tilth in implementing its strategic plan and mission. Bonnie is well positioned to take on this post. She has over 10 years of experience concentrating in agricultural extension, organic farming techniques, and farm-product transformation, overseas and in the US. Bonnie has a Master of Science degree in Horticulture with a minor in Soil Science from Oregon State University and served in the Peace Corps in Bolivia from January 2006-April 2008 working in agricultural extension and community development. She also served as a Grants Manager through the University of California, Davis in the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, and as a Pest Field Scout for the Community Alliance with Family Farmers (Davis, CA) and the Bio-Integral Resource Center in Winters, CA. Bonnie can be reached at [email protected]. Biochar Continued from page 14 is a waste of resources and causes severe air pollution in some regions. This leads to another question. Usually, biochar is the product of burning at low temperatures (280–500 °C) and restricted oxygen supply. Consequently, local biochar production by farmers in simple earthen mounds or pits could also cause considerable air pollution. However, relatively clean biochar production from rice husks can already be achieved with, for example, an improved rice husk furnace. Developed at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), this type of furnace produces carbonized rice husks as a by-product of the paddy drying process. Some large rice mills in Thailand have already perfected this approach. Using rice husks to produce energy and biochar simultaneously, these mills reduce their fossil fuel bill and carbon emissions, and sell the biochar by-product to producers of bio-fertilizers. A similar solution under development is the use of pyrolysis—decomposition caused by heat in the absence of oxygen—of biomass for energy production where biochar is a by-product. These examples also show that biochar from rice residues is already used in many Photo by Britta Hansen Bonnie Hoffman Cox bolsters Tilth’s R&E Bonnie at a workshop in Bolivia, making stamped wax foundation sheets to install in new hives. Asian countries. In Japan, biochar from rice husks (called kuntan) has been used in agriculture for a long time (mainly for seedbeds and as a soil amendment for upland crops and orchards). Use of biochar from rice husks as an additive to the culture medium of ornamental plants and in vegetable gardens is common and several nongovernmental organizations promote the use of it in organic farming. Biochar can increase the “greenness” of bad soils, and offers new opportunities to sustainably improve system productivity and farmer livelihoods. Applied on a larger scale and beyond unfavorable environments, it could also reduce the negative effect of rice-based systems on the global climate. And, if the use of rice residues for energy and biochar production is combined, rice producers, rice consumers, and the environment could all profit. Much research remains to be done, but the possible prize seems worth the effort. Dr. Stephan Haefele is a senior agronomist in IRRI’s Crop and Environmental Sciences Division. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 31 Escoja historias en Español El oro negro del Amazonas Los trabajadores de campo incorporan biochar a un lote experimental en un huerto del IRRI en los Banos , Filipinas. Foto de Joel Siopongco Por: Dr. Stephan Haefele Traducido por: Odilia Hernández Onofre En los años de 1870 los científicos que exploraban las amazonas hicieron un raro descubrimiento. James Orton, Charles Hartt y Herbert Smith que trabajaban de forma independiente reportaron sus observaciones de áreas de terreno de suelo negro o café obscuro que variaban desde 5 a 300 hectáreas en tamaño, dentro de un paisaje que se caracterizaba por ser rojizo y erosionado por la acción de los elementos o bien, por estar deslavado. Un reporte detallado del geólogo Smith, Page 32 caracterizó a estos “suelos obscuros del amazonas” como suelos con una capa superficial de hasta 60cm de arcilla obscura y fina. También los describió como los mejores suelos del amazonas, con una producción muy superior a la de los suelos colindantes, y especulaba que le debían su fertilidad a “desechos de miles de cocinas de posiblemente miles de años atrás” el hecho de que habían sido elaborados por humanos se le podía atribuir a la abundancia de fragmentos de alfarería india “que recubre el suelo...como las conchas del mar que cubren las orillas de las playas.” A pesar de la inusual naturaleza de estos hallazgos, no lograron despertar el interés de muchos científicos. Sin embargo, un siglo más tarde, Win Sombroek, un reconocido científico holandés especialista en suelos, despertó el interés internacional cuando le dedicó varias páginas en su libro de gran influencia Suelos Amazónicos a la “terra petra” (suelo negro) y a la “terra mulata” (suelo café). Varios estudios han confirmado que el color obscuro de la terra petra y terra mulata se debe a la incorporación al suelo por los humanos de carbón negro (también llamado N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 La gran promesa del biochar biochar) – materia orgánica, como el carbón, que no ha sido completamente quemada. Los suelos fueron creados por la población Amerindia de hace 500-2,500 años y parte del carbón en la terra petra data de 450 A.C. Su alta fertilidad comparada a los suelos colindantes se debe a los altos niveles de materia orgánica (donde se incluye el biochar), a su mayor concentración de nutrientes, a su alta capacidad de retención de nutrientes y humedad y a su menor acides. Increíblemente, estos suelos han mantenido su fertilidad hasta el presente a pesar del clima tropical (donde la materia orgánica se degrada rápidamente) y a pesar de una cultivación periódica y frecuente. La terra petra y la terra mulata son exclusivas de las amazonas, no son utilizadas para sembrar arroz y representan una tecnología que data antes de la agricultura moderna. La gente se ha comenzado a preguntar si esta tecnología ancestral indígena podría ofrecer soluciones a algunos de los problemas que enfrenta la agricultura contemporánea. Suelos con características muy parecidas a los suelos amazónicos se encuentran en varias regiones tropicales por todo el mundo, incluyendo Asia, donde desafortunadamente para los agricultores son suelos muy pobres. Esos suelos se benefician de la incorporación de materia orgánica pero su rápida descomposición por la humedad tropical hace que esta práctica tan laboriosa tenga beneficios muy efímeros. La incorporación de biochar al suelo tiene efectos positivos muy similares- incrementa la disponibilidad de los nutrientes, incrementa la capacidad de retención de nutrientes y humedad y contribuye al aumento de los nutrientes disponibles a las plantas – y se ha reportado que dura por siglos. Si los científicos pueden reafirmar esta descomposición prolongada de la materia en los sistemas agrícolas contemporáneos, el biochar podría contribuir a la producción sustentable en los ambientes con más desventajas agrícolas, que son caracterizados por bajos rendimientos y situaciones de pobreza extrema. La descomposición prolongada del biochar también podría contribuir a solucionar otro problema más reciente. Se ha confirmado que el cambio del clima global está relacionado con el aumento de la concentración del dióxido de carbono (CO2 ) atmosférico. Si parte de eses carbón atmosférico fijado por las plantas se pudiera retener en los suelos (un proceso conocido como secuestración del carbón) en vez de ser regresado a la atmósfera por la descomposición, la concentración del carbón en la atmósfera se reduciría. Y en suelos anegados para la siembra del arroz, donde la descomposición de la materia orgánica produce metano- un gas de invernadero 30 veces más potente que el CO2- este efecto se podría potencializar. Esto suena muy emocionante – pero, ¿se puede lograr? Para empezar, la cantidad de biochar que se necesita es enorme. Las pruebas agrícolas han tenido buenos resultados con la aplicación de biochar equivalente a 8 toneladas de carbono por hectárea. Los 30 cm de la superficie de la terra petra contiene tres veces más carbón del bichar – un promedio de 25 toneladas por hectárea. Si Continuado en la pagina 34 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 33 En Español Biochar Stephan Haefele sostiene un montón de biochar- prácticamente carbón- que ha sido producido de la cascarilla de arroz. Foto de Jose Raymond Panaligan Continuado desde la pagina 33 se pretende una concentración del 36 % de biomasa de carbono (algo típico para la paja del arroz) y la pérdida de carbono durante el proceso de quemado del 50%, para obtener por lo menos un nivel de 8 toneladas, se necesitarían 44 toneladas de biomasa seca (derivada de plantas)por hectárea para que sean convertidas en biochar. Para alcanzar el nivel de 25 toneladas como el de terra petra, se necesitan 138 toneladas de biomasa seca. En tierras asiáticas, la única fuente factible de esas cantidades de biomasa son los residuos del arroz que quedan después de la cosecha y la trilla. La cantidad promedio de residuo de arroz producida anualmente en Asia es de 546 millones de toneladas de paja de arroz y 110 millones de toneladas de cascarilla de la semilla de arroz. Este residuo se usa con diferentes propósitos (como fertilizante orgánico, combustible, Page 34 pienso y material de construcción) pero su eso es cada vez más escaso. En la actualidad ese residuo se percibe más como un problema que como un recurso. Peor aún, la forma más eficiente de eliminar los residuos del arroz es por medio de la quema en el campo, lo cual es una pérdida de recursos y causa contaminación en el aire de algunas regiones. Esto nos lleva a otra cuestión. Generalmente, el biochar es el producto de una quema a bajas temperaturas (280-500º C) y con oxigeno limitado. Lo que consecuentemente, la producción de biochar por los productores locales que harían sus quemas en hornos de tierra improvisados o en fosas también causaría contaminación al aire. Sin embargo, se puede crear una producción de biochar relativamente limpia con el uso de un horno para cascarilla de arroz. Desarrollado en el Instituto de Investigación Internacional del Arroz (ARRI, por sus siglas en inglés), este tipo de horno produce cascarilla de arroz carbonizada como subproducto del proceso del secado del arroz. Algunos molinos más grandes en Tailandia ya han perfeccionado esta técnica. Utilizando la cascarilla del arroz para producir energía y biochar simultáneamente, estos molinos reducen sus costos de combustible fósil y sus emisiones de carbono y venden su subproducto, el biochar, a los productores de biofertilizantes. Otra solución similar que está en desarrollo es el uso de la pirolisis – descomposición causada por calor en ausencia de oxigeno- de la biomasa para la producción de energía donde el biochar es un subproducto. Estos ejemplos también muestran que el biochar de los residuos de arroz ya está siendo usado en los países asiáticos. En Japón, el biochar de la cascarilla de arroz (llamado kuntan) se ha usado en la agricultura por mucho tiempo (principalmente para cama de semillas y como un correctivo de suelos en los cultivos de las altiplanicies y las huertas de frutales). El uso de biochar de la cascarilla de arroz es un aditivo usado comúnmente en la tierra de cultivo de las plantas ornamentales y en los huertos de verduras y varias organizaciones no gubernamentales promueven su uso en la agricultura orgánica. Tal parece que el biochar puede incrementar el “verdor” de los sistemas basados en la producción de arroz y que puede ser incorporado a las ya existentes producciones de arroz. Especialmente donde existen suelos malos, ofrece nuevas oportunidades de un sistema de producción mejorado para la sustentabilidad y para ganarse la vida como agricultores. Si se aplicara a gran escala y fuera de los ambientes desfavorables, podría también reducir los efectos negativos de los sistemas basados en la producción de arroz en el clima global. Y si se utilizan los residuos del arroz para producción combinada de energía y biochar, los productores y consumidores de arroz y el ambiente se verían beneficiados. Queda mucha investigación por hacer, pero la presea por alcanzar bien vale la pena todo el esfuerzo. El Dr. Stephan Haefele es un agronomo ilustre en la División de Ciencia Ambiental y de Cultivos del Instituto de Investigación Internacional del Arroz N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 En Español Un suelo que sirve de drenaje para el carbono Por: Paul Hepperly Traducido por: Odilia Hernández Onofre Un análisis de los gases atrapados en un glaciar muestra que hace 18,000 años, durante la última era de hielo, las concentraciones del dióxido de carbono eran 60% menores que las que se encuentran actualmente en la atmósfera. Esta baja concentración de dióxido de carbono se asoció con una baja de temperatura promedio de 4º C (cerca de 10º F). En la actualidad, los niveles del dióxido de carbono a nivel mundial son 25% más altos que a finales de 1800. Si las emisiones continúan a los niveles que están, el dióxido de carbono en la atmósfera se podría duplicar o cuadruplicar en los próximos 100 a 300 años. En 1938, G. Callendar publicó sus hallazgos que sugerían que la quema de combustibles fósiles, como el carbón, el petróleo y los gases naturales, incrementarían las temperaturas mundiales. Desde 1958, las medidas continuas registradas en Mount Mauna Loa en Hawai confirman que el dióxido de carbono está incrementando en la atmósfera a un ritmo de 1.3 partes por millón (ppm) por año. Los científicos creen que a pesar de que otros gases contribuyen al efecto invernadero en la atmósfera de la tierra, el dióxido de carbono es el responsable del 80% de ese calentamiento. El científico de la NASA James Hansen ha registrado los cambios de la temperatura en relación con los niveles del dióxido de carbono y le correlacionó el 25% del incremento del dióxido de carbono en los últimos 100 años con el 0.7º C de calentamiento de la atmósfera. Varios modelos han predicho que a los niveles actuales de las emisiones de dióxido de carbono, la Tierra se calentará 2.5º C en los próximos 100 años. De acuerdo a los modelos de cambio climático, la agricultura podría ser seriamente afectada por el calentamiento global. Se estima que el 20% de la producción que serviría como alimento se pierde cada año por los patrones de clima desfavorable (sequias, inundaciones, calores y fríos extremos, fuertes tormentas, etc.) El deterioro de los patrones climáticos en Norteamérica podría tener efectos devastadores en el suplemento alimenticio mundial de granos verano cuando la vegetación es exuberante como el trigo y el maíz. Los expertos en y se maximiza durante el invierno cuando el cambio climático predicen que las altas las plantas mueren o entran en letargo. temperaturas generarán eventos climáticos La fluctuación del dióxido de carbono de extremos, tales como sequias severas o estación a estación (alrededor de 10ppm) lluvias torrenciales. Con una variación de es 7 veces mayor que el incremento anual las temperaturas de verano de 1 a 2º C du- promedio de carbón atmosférico viniente rante la temporada de polinización puede de la quema de combustibles fósiles y la causar la perdida de la viabilidad del polen, deforestación (de 1.3ppm). Las plantas resultando en la esterilidad masculina de sirven como lavabo para el dióxido de muchas especies de plantas como la avena carbono atmosférico. El carbono que se y el tomate. almacena en la vegetación, en el suelo o en A medida que las temperaturas el océano, que no son liberados fácilmente aumenten, los glaciares y los casquetes como dióxido de carbono, se dice que está glaciares se derretirán, trayendo inundacio- secuestrado. Para balancear el presupuesto nes masivas a las islas y las zonas costeras. del carbono, necesitamos incrementar el Cerca del 50% de la población de los Esta- carbono secuestrado y disminuir las emisdos Unidos viven dentro de las 50 millas de iones del mismo. A pesar de que el carbono zona costera. Conforme las zonas costeras puede ciclar dentro y fuera del suelo y de la se muevan tierra adentro, los niveles de biomasa, hay métodos para construir lo que dióxido de carbono incontrolables afecse le llama sustancias del suelo húmicas tarán a los habitantes de esas zonas. Si los (también conocidas como materia orgánica) gases de invernadero continúan incremenque pueden permanecer como compuestos tándose en los siguientes cientos de años, se de carbono estable por miles de años. estima que la temperatura global increAntes de que los bosques y las praderas mente a 7º C o casi 15º F, y el nivel del se cubrieran de campos agrícolas, el suelo mar se incrementaría a más de dos metros. contenía del 6 al 11% de materia orgánica La materia orgánica: la llave para el de su masa total, de un 1 a un 3% más alto secuestro de lo que actualmente contiene un sistema Las fluctuaciones estacionales noragrícola. La conversión de los bosques y las males del dióxido de carbono en la praderas para su uso en la agricultura ayuda atmósfera demuestran la influencia deterContinuado en la pagina 36 minante que tiene el crecimiento de las plantas en las cantidades LOCAL GRASS-FED MEATS de dióxido de carbono, suficiente CERTIFIED ORGANIC PRODUCE • ANTIBIOTIC/HORMONE-FREE para cambiar la concentración POULTRY • BULK FOODS, HERBS & SPICES hasta por 10ppm. Al incremen• NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS • HOMEOPATHIC REMEDIES tar la producción de las plantas • LOCAL PRODUCTS podemos reducir las concentra• CARROT/WHEATGRASS JUICE • FINE WINE & BEER ciones atmosféricas del dióxido de • WINE TASTING SECOND THURSDAY OF EACH MONTH DURING ARTWALK carbono. Los niveles de dióxido de Member governed since 1971 carbono son reducidos durante el Coos Head Food Store 1960 Sherman, Hwy. 101 S. ◆ Downtown North Bend 541-756-7264 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 35 En Español La agricultura en una principal herramienta en la secuestración del Carbono a incrementar los niveles de dióxido de carbono en la atmósfera de forma significativa. Si cultivamos suelos ricos en materia orgánica en nuestros bosques y suelos agrícolas estaremos ayudando a capturar este exceso de dióxido de carbono atmosférico y conservando más paisajes naturales. La secuestración del carbono en los suelos agrícolas y boscosos reducirá los daños que en este momento representa el dióxido de carbono a nuestra atmósfera y a los patrones climáticos. Sería un complemento a los esfuerzos actuales para reducir las emisiones y conservar energía. La utilización de energía mejorada es muy importante ya que si usamos todos las reservas de combustible fósil en los próximos siglos, el dióxido de carbono en nuestra atmósfera aumentaría 4 a 8 veces más que los niveles actuales (actualmente la atmósfera retiene 750 giga toneladas de carbono, y se sabe que las reservas de energías de los combustibles fósiles retienen 5,000 giga toneladas de carbono.) El suelo, aún en sus niveles presentes tan deplorables contiene 1,580 giga toneladas de carbono (C), se estima que sea casi el doble de la cantidad del total de carbono que actualmente se encuentra en la atmósfera como dióxido de carbono (800 giga toneladas C), y cerca de tres veces más la cantidad que se encuentra presente en todos los organismos vivientes del planeta (500 giga toneladas C). El suelo, la agricultura y los bosques son recursos naturales indispensables para secuestrar los gases de invernadero que se están escapando y ayudar a frenar los desatados cambios climáticos globales. La cantidad de carbón en los bosques (610 giga toneladas) es casi el 85% del carbono que existe en la atmósfera. El resumen de la publicación #12 de Recursos para el Clima del Futuro de 1998 decía A pesar de que es bien conocido que los bosque tropicales del mundo están disminuyendo, casi no se ha reconocido que la temperatura y los bosques arbóreos están al aumento, sin embargo, aunque modestamente, el tamaño de la reserva de carbono a nivel mundial parece estar mermando, creando así una red de fuentes de carbono. Hallazgos de las pruebas La agricultura es y siempre será una herramienta principal en el proceso de Page 36 secuestro del carbono. El Instituto Rodale con 23 años de investigación de su Sistema de Prueba de Producción Agrícola Æ provee experiencia del mundo real y un punto de partida para entender el efecto que tiene la agricultura en la reducción de gases invernadero. El FST Æ es el experimento agronómico con mayor duración, diseñado para comparar los métodos de producción agrícola orgánica con convencional y los sistemas de producción. Desde 1981, el Instituto Rodale Æ ha monitoreado de forma constante el carbono y nitrógeno del suelo en su Sistema de Prueba de Producción Agrícola (FST, por sus siglas en inglés). El monitoreo del carbono y el nitrógeno es solo uno de los componentes de una batería completa de los datos de la calidad del suelo, de la economía y la energía que el mismo instituto recopiló a lo largo de sus 23 años de vida. Los investigadores del Instituto Rodale creen que los descubrimientos de las pruebas del carbono y nitrógeno del suelo son muy significativos y alarmantes. En los sistemas orgánicos, el carbono del suelo incrementó entre un 15 a un 28%, demostrando la habilidad de los sistemas orgánicos de secuestrar cantidades significantes del carbono atmosférico. El sistema de abono a base de estiércol específicamente, mostró un incremento de carbono en el suelo con un promedio de alrededor de 1000 libras por acre-pie por año o cerca de 3,500 libras de dióxido de carbono por acre-pie por año secuestrado. Cuando se multiplica esta cantidad por los más de 160 millones de acres de maíz y soya que se producen a nivel nacional, podría haber un incremento potencial de 580 billones de libras de dióxido de carbono capturadas por año si los productores se cambiaran de sus sistemas agrícolas convencionales a métodos de producción orgánica. Además, en los sistemas orgánicos, el carbón del suelo ha aumentado de 15 hasta 28%. Durante los 23 años de vida del FST, los sistemas convencionales no han mostrado un incremento significante de nitrógeno ni de carbono. Esto demuestra que los métodos de producción agrícola orgánica guardan el carbono y otros nutrientes porque los suelos orgánicos retienen estos nutrientes listos para que sean tomados por las plantas. Durante ese proceso, reducen la lixiviación del nitrato y otros nutrientes a los arroyos y los acuíferos. Estos hallazgos pueden ser benéficos para todos los productores agrícolas al ayudarles a incrementar el rendimiento de sus cultivos a la vez que reducen los costos de energía, combustible e irrigación. Además de capturar más carbón en el suelo en forma de materia orgánica, los métodos de producción agrícola orgánica también emiten menos gases invernadero por que hacen un uso más eficiente de los combustibles. Los análisis de energía del FST hechos por el Dr. David Pimentel de la Universidad de Cornell muestra que los sistemas orgánicos utilizan 63% menos energía de los que se usan en los sistema de producción de soya y maíz convencional. En todos los sistemas, los rendimientos de soya y maíz no fueron diferentes, excepto en los años de sequía donde los sistemas orgánicos produjeron un 25 a un 75% más que los sistemas convencionales. La ventaja en los rendimientos en los años de sequía se relaciona específicamente a la habilidad de los suelos orgánicos altos en carbono de capturar y proporcionar más agua a las plantas del cultivo. Los hallazgos del Dr. David Pimentel demuestran que la aportación energética más grande en los sistemas de producción convencionales de soya y maíz es el fertilizante nitrogenado en el maíz seguido por los herbicidas en ambas producciones. La producción agrícola orgánica también tiene sentido en lo económico. Además de reducir los costos de los insumos, el análisis económico realizado por el Dr. James Hanson de la Universidad de Maryland ha demostrado que los sistemas orgánicos en el FST son competitivos en la rentabilidad con los sistema de producción convencional de la soya y el maíz, sin considerar el precio extra que se recibe por ser orgánico. El precio de los productos orgánicos en el mundo real les permite a los productores tomar ventaja de la producción orgánica certificada para alcanzar una viabilidad de rendimiento económico sin los subsidios gubernamentales masivos. ¿Como un sistema orgánico de pocos insumos puede ser competitivo ante un sistema convencional a base de insumos químicos? El científico de la USDA, David N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 En Español La agricultura orgánica reduce drásticamente el CO2 Douds, en colaboración con los científicos del Instituto Rodale Æ, han demostrado que en los sistemas manejados orgánicamente, el sistema biológico de soporte de los hongos micorrizas es mucho más robusto y los hongos son más prevalecientes, activos y diversos. Aunado a esto, la actividad bacterial del suelo, en específico el trabajo de los hongos micorriza, juegan un papel muy importante para ayudar a conservar y disminuir la degradación de la materia orgánica. Los fertilizantes y pesticidas químicos sintéticos inhiben las micorrizas. En los sistemas de producción orgánica, el incremento de la actividad de los hongos micorriza le permite a las plantas incrementar su acceso a los recursos del suelo, estimulando así la absorción de los nutrientes, del agua de las plantas y a incrementar su habilidad de contrarrestar algunos patógenos. Estos hongos trabajan para conservar la materia orgánica conjuntando la materia orgánica con arcilla y otros minerales. El proceso y la habilidad de la micorriza de secuestrar el carbono posiblemente tengan mayor significado. Los hongos micorriza producen una sustancia parecida al resistol llamada glomalina. La glomalina estimula el incremento de adherencia de las partículas del suelo. La adherencia de las partículas del suelo resulta en un incremento en la habilidad del suelo de retener carbono. El papel que juega la micorriza y la glomalina en la retención del carbono en el suelo requiere de mayor investigación. También se requiere mayor investigación en otros mecanismos biológicos que le proporcionarían al suelo una mayor habilidad para obtener el carbón de forma natural e incrementar sus propiedades. Los beneficios más allá del secuestro del carbón La presencia del carbón obtenido en las pruebas de campo del FST Æ del Instituto Rodale es un indicador de que es un suelo saludable, por que los suelos saludables son ricos en materia carbonífera, principalmente en el humus de material orgánico. Es el humus el que le permite a los suelos saludables retener agua durante los periodos de sequia, así como a retener los nutrientes móviles que se encuentran en los suelos como son los fosfatos y los nitratos, que de otro modo se hubieran perdido en las corrientes de los arroyos o por lixiviación a los acuíferos. Estas pruebas con ilustrativas tanto como de beneficio económico como una protección ambiental trabajando mano a mano. Los beneficios económicos son percibidos por los productores o los dueños de terrenos quienes ven reducido sus costos en fertilizantes, combustibles energéticos e irrigación y que a la vez ven incrementado sus rendimientos. También beneficia a la economía de los negocios agrícolas y ambientalmente nos beneficia a todos, debido a las prácticas de manejo y cosecha que pueden ayudar a retener o capturar el carbono en el suelo carbono que de otra manera se perdería en la atmósfera como un componente de los gases invernaderos. En resumen, la agricultura orgánica puede reducir la aportación de dióxido de carbono de 37-50%, reducir el costo de los productores e incrementar la habilidad de nuestro planeta a posiblemente absorber y utilizar los gases invernadero. Estos métodos maximizan los beneficios de un agricultor en forma individual y como parte de una sociedad. Es una estrategia de ganar con beneficios múltiples y prácticamente sin riesgos. Estos enfoques probados mitigan los daños al ambiente de la actualidad y promueven un mundo más limpio y sano para las generaciones futuras. La secretaria de agricultura, Ann Veneman, lo expresa de esta forma Las tecnologías y/o las practicas que reducen las emisiones de gases invernadero e incrementan el secuestro del carbono también se enfocan en los objetivos de conservación, tales como el mejoramiento de la calidad del agua y el aire y en los mejoramientos del habitad de la vida silvestre. Esto es bueno para el ambiente y es bueno para la agricultura. Esto está emergiendo como un nuevo campo desde la perspectiva de muchas comunidades agrícolas y de manejo de suelos. Debido a que los datos que se desprenden de las pruebas de campo son cuestión de registro, hay mucho por hacer antes de que estos conocimientos puedan llevarse a mercados y aplicaciones más grandes. No obstante, lo que se ha demostrado es significativo y guarda grandes promesas para ayudar a reducir el acumulamiento de gases invernadero a la vez que promueve un mayor uso de la agricultura orgánica. Paul Hepperly es el gerente de investigación de La Huerta Nueva. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 37 Research Reports Organic farming reduces net GHG emissions A team of scientists in Germany carried out a comprehensive review of existing studies relevant to comparing the net greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and organic farming systems in Europe. Their basic conclusion – “Organic farming emits lower amounts of greenhouse gases (GHG) than comparable conventional systems.” Higher GHG emissions occur in conventional agriculture because of greater reliance on imported animal feedstuffs, including a portion purchased from overseas. The use of energy-intensive pesticides and fertilizers on conventional farms also increases GHG emissions. While higher yields on conventional farms compensate for some of the differences, total emissions are still higher in conventional farming. The article provides examples of several steps that organic and conventional farmers can take to increase the efficiency of energy use and reduce net GHG emissions Source: Rahmann, G.; Aulrich, K.; Barth, K.; Boehm, H.; Koopmann, R.; Oppermann, R.; Paulsen, H. M., and Weissmann, F. 2008. Impact of organic farming on global warming - recent scientific knowledge. Landbauforschung Volkenrode 58(1-2)71-89. [in German]. Page 38 Taking Earth’s temperature via Satellite Imagine adding a thermometer to Google Earth. That’s the vision of Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists Martha Anderson and Bill Kustas, who see the need for high-resolution thermal infrared imaging tools--such as those aboard the aging Landsat satellites--as vital to monitoring earth’s health. These thermal data are especially important given the combination of global warming and the growing population’s increasing demand for water. Anderson is a physical scientist and Kustas is a hydrologist at the ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory in Beltsville, Md. Based on remote sensing experiments over the past two decades, Anderson and Kustas see the potential to combine results from a suite of satellites for regional monitoring of evapotranspiration and drought on a daily basis. As with Google Earth, users could zoom in from the continental scale to a single field or irrigation operation. Thermal remote sensing of the earth’s land surface and plant canopies from satellites is a valuable way to diagnose water stress and drought conditions. Also, thermal imaging can be used in lieu of precipitation data, providing much-needed information on soil moisture status in data-poor parts of the world. The ability to map evapotranspiration and soil moisture via satellite has broad applications in monitoring drought and water consumption, administering irrigation projects, predicting water demand, and providing information for hydrological and weather forecast computer models. Landsat 5 is more than 24 years old; Landsat 7 is nine years old, but already has operational problems. When the Landsat satellites fail, which could happen at any time, there will be a gap in high-resolution thermal measurements until the National Aeronautics and Space Administration launches its HypspIRI satellite, possibly sometime between 2013 and 2020. An article on this research recently appeared in EOS, a weekly newspaper published by the American Geophysical Union. ARS is a scientific research agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Discovery waters down fears of fast-melting ice A team of Canadian researchers has unearthed the most ancient ice ever found in North America - 700,000-year-old wedges that didn’t melt when the Earth was much balmier than it is today. The scientists say their discovery means the permafrost that covers a quarter of the land in the Northern Hemisphere may not release its vast stores of carbon as quickly as some experts fear. That’s not to say one of the most catastrophic global-warming scenarios isn’t going to happen, said Duane Froese, an assistant professor in the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science at the University of Alberta and lead author of a paper that appears in The Journal Science. It will just happen more slowly, he said. “There is a certain stubbornness to permafrost,” he said. Dr. Froese first found the cone-shaped wedges about seven years ago only a few metres beneath the surface, not far from Dawson City, Yukon. It formed in cracks in the permafrost, or frozen soil. Normally, ice is difficult to date beyond 50,000 years. But in this case, the wedges were under volcanic ash that the team, including researchers at the University of Toronto and the Geological Survey of Canada, determined was roughly 700,000 years old. This means the ice didn’t melt during two periods when many scientists believe the planet was warmer than it is today. In the most recent of those periods, 120,000 years ago, temperatures were likely several degrees N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Research Reports higher than now. There was probably far less sea ice in the Arctic back then, and global sea levels were up to eight metres higher than today, Dr. Froese said. It may have been even steamier 400,000 years ago. In theory, the permafrost in the interior of Yukon and Alaska should have melted during these balmy periods, Dr. Froese said. Unlike the permafrost farther north, it is not continuous at those latitudes, and is found only in some parts of the landscape, depending on exposure and vegetation coverage. This means it is more vulnerable to higher temperatures. “Even in those areas, permafrost has existed over 700,000 years,” Dr. Froese said. He and his colleagues insist their discovery is not an invitation to ignore the potentially serious impact of global warming, especially in the North, where temperatures are rising faster than anywhere on Earth and the sea ice is vanishing at a rate that has stunned the scientists who study it. By some estimates, permafrost holds twice as much carbon as is in the atmosphere. So its fate in a warmer North is a critical question to scientists trying to predict the course and potential impact of climate change. Several climate models predict significant melting of permafrost in the coming decades, or by the end of the century. Dr. Froese said the pace of the thaw could be slower. “It may happen at time scales slower than those models are predicting,” he said. How fast the permafrost thaws will greatly affect people who live in the North. When it melts, forests and houses tilt and sinkholes open. “Permafrost is like a glue that holds the Arctic together,” said Alberto Reyes, a graduate student at the University of Alberta. U.S. researcher Ted Schuur, an expert on the carbon contained in permafrost, says there is no scientific consensus on how fast it could melt as temperatures rise. “We don’t have a great understanding of how fast the permafrost thawing will be,” said Dr. Schuur, an associate professor of ecology at the University of Florida. He says the discovery of the ancient ice is intriguing, but more research is required to assess whether it is a widespread phenomenon and not the result of conditions that are unique to this particular part of Yukon. “How do we know it isn’t a local effect?” he asked. Still, he says, it is intriguing to learn that permafrost ice has lasted 700,000 years. “It is really cool research,” he said. The Canadian ice is relatively modern compared with the oldest ice in the world, an eight-million-year-old fragment found in Antarctica. Scientists were also able to date it because they found it under ash from a volcanic eruption. -Annie McIlroy, The Globe and Mail New crop model should speed resistance to wheat diseases An Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientist’s work with a wild grass could help breeders to more quickly develop wheat that’s resistant to key diseases. David Garvin, a plant geneticist at the ARS Plant Science Research Unit in St. Paul, Minn., was perhaps the first scientist in the United States to work on the small grass Brachypodium distachyon as a model species for cereal crops. Garvin can produce seed in less than two months with some of his Brachypodium genetic stocks. That’s important because it reduces the time required to perform experiments that may lead to improved resistance of wheat, barley and other related cereal crops to major diseases like rusts. Rusts are the most common wheat diseases in the United States and worldwide, causing yearly losses in all wheat market classes. New races of these diseases continually appear in the United States, overcoming the resistance that breeders build and re-build continually into wheat varieties. Together with their ARS colleagues, this team made ARS a leader in getting Brachypodium adopted worldwide as a model for grass research. Seeds of Garvin’s genetic stocks have been shared with research scientists in 25 states and 20 countries. Garvin has also developed populations of Brachypodium that are being used to create the first genetic maps of Brachypodium. ARS has given scientists worldwide free access to not only the seeds but also to genes and a draft sequence of the entire Brachypodium genome. This has contributed greatly to the adoption of Brachypodium by plant researchers worldwide as a model grass just a few years since it emerged from obscurity. Read www.ars.usda.gov/is/AR/archive/ sep08/grass0908.htm. –ARS N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 39 Page 40 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 41 Classifieds Deadline for Next Issue is Nov. 20. Email [email protected] for ad changes! IGT Classifieds Organic claims made in the classifieds are not verified! Organic Products, Services & Equipment Marine Phytoplankton, alive in ocean water concentrate. 400 times the energy of any known plant. Contains sea minerals that are absent or may be low, even in organic produce. Pamela Melcher, (503) 946-8048; [email protected]. Weeds are a product of poor soil environments, The book “Weeds and Why They Grow” lists over 800 weeds and factors encouraging their growth. Other control tips included, 116 pages, $25.00 postpaid. McCaman Farms, PO Box 22, Dept OT, Sand Lake, MI 49343-0022, (800) 611- 2923. For Sale: 2008 certified organic alfalfa hay. 2nd, & 3rd cuttings; in 20T lots or more. Crane, Oregon (541) 493-2541. Grade AA brown eggs from happy cage free-ranging chickens. No chemicals, antibiotics or hormones. Combo large/extra large $2.75/dozen. Medium (1/4 oz. less than large) for $2.00. Chickens fed oyster shells to strengthen the egg shells. Portland-Woodstock area. (503) 310-4992. E-mail [email protected]. Organic meats. Grass-fed beef and goat and pastured Heritage turkey. Hearty turkey poults to raise your own. Fresh and frozen meats available direct to customer or through retail outlets all year round. Direct purchase discounts. Harmony Jack Farms Certified by Oregon Tilth. Call to order (503) 910-5690; [email protected]. Microbe rich, compost and compost teas. Compost in retail ready bags (1.5 cu/ft) or bulk purchases. Call for prices FOB or delivered. We can apply to your pastures, gardens, crops or orchards. OMRI approved. MarWest/Harmony Jack Farms Scio, Oregon (503) 930-0118, or (503) 910-5690. Edible, Medicinal, and Native plants for the Pacific NW. Locally Grown and Oregon Tilth Certified Organic. Fern Hill Nursery in Cottage Grove, OR. For a catalog or price list, contact Devon at (541) 942-3118 or [email protected]. Products Farm trained, calm Belgian draft horses. Farm grown, intelligent, friendly, sustainable power! Great trained teams year round. David and Deborah Mader, Horsepower Organics Halfway, Oregon. OTCO since 1993. (541) 742-4887; [email protected]. Pasture raised meats. Grassfed and finished beef, pastured pork, lamb and goat raised on dedicated pasture. Pastured poultry; soy-free broilers and heritage turkeys. Raw milk dairy. pesticide, herbicide and nitrogen fertilizer free. No sub-theraputic antibiotics or hormones. Selling at the Eugene and Portland (PSU) farmers markets. Come by any day but Sunday. www.deckfamilyfarm.com (541) 998-4697. Seascape strawberry plants (C.O.) available Lots of 100 only. $35.00 ea. + Shipping USPS Priority. Teal Creek Farms (503) 623-6605; [email protected] Falls City, Oregon. Composting toilet. Sun-Mar Excel NE (nonelectric). Never used. $1200. 2) A.O. Smith 6 gallon electric water heater. 110 single phase. Also never used. $175. Contact Neil at (503) 873 2349 or efwood83@ gmail.com. Certified organic cover crop seed! Farmdirect organic bell beans, organic crimson clover. Call Jim Bronec, Praying Mantis Farm, Canby, OR. (503) 651-2627; [email protected]. Certified organic cayuse oat seed. $20/50 lb. bag or $720/ton. FOB Grants Pass, OR Pacific Botanicals, Call (541) 479-7777; [email protected]. Organic Cranberries, certified. Frozen, Bulk 500-1200 lb. bins. Brush Prairie Bogs, Sixes, Oregon. (541) 348-2370, [email protected] Certified organic herb plants. Rosemary 4” to 5 gallons. Figs, lemongrass, lavender, plus many more rare or unusual varieties. For more info call Brennan at (503) 678-5056; [email protected]. Two 1000-watt grow lights for sale. Metal halides. Includes two 120-volt transformers, Continued on page 42 Certified organic alfalfa, grass hay and rye hay! Will deliver lots under three tons. South-central, OR. Call Leon Baker, (541) 576-2367. Fresh certified organic seed garlic. Grown in Hood River, Oregon. Farm direct. Gourmet Hardneck and Softneck varieties. Certified Organic by Oregon Tilth since 2002. Bulk prices available. (541) 386-1220; www.hoodrivergarlic. com.. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 41 Products Continued from page 41 two large circular reflectors, two bulbs. Excellent condition. $150 each OBO. Also have a new roll of over 1000’ large-meshed Hortnova plastic trellis, will sell cheap. Andrea, (541) 929-4054; or [email protected]. Certified organic grassfed beef and lamb. Your clean source for protein, Omega 3 fatty acids, CLA’s and the good cholesterol! Eastern Oregon raised - ecologically grown and humanely handled. Check our website: www.doublediamondranch.us or call (541) 853-2320. 100 percent organic baby clothing and accessories. Diapers, carriers, blankets, toys, etc. Call for free brochure. Williams, Oregon (541) 846-0848; dragonflyorganics.com. Organic alfalfa hay and winter barley seed for sale. 3000 N 7500 W. Abraham, Utah 84635. (435) 864-5400; [email protected], [email protected]. Top quality certified organic seed garlic, 12 varieties available include: Cal Early, Kettle River Giant, Susanville, Music, Chesnok Red, Purple Glazer, and more. Prices range from $6/lb. to $12/lb. Contact Ryan at L&R Farm soon, our best seed garlic will sell out fast. (541) 846-0602. Ionize and purify your city or well water to produce glacial quality pure water: energized, highly alkaline, micro-clustered, full of negative hydrogen and stable oxygen, all of which detoxifies acidic/pathogenic waste and acts as a powerful anti-oxidant. Overacidification of the body is the single underlying cause of all disease. Sunbow Farm uses, endorses and sells Alkaline Water Ionizers by Ionways. For info, articles and studies go to www.sunbowfarm.org. (541) 929-5782. Land for Sale Orchard transitioning to winery for sale.16 acres of Pinot Noir, Pinot Gris, Gewurztraminer and Tempranillo. Offerring 3 parcels. All with homes and incredible views of Mt. Hood. Owner will contract to plant and manage vineyard. First two vintages of Organic Pinot Noir (2007 & 2008) won Gold & Silver at NW Wine Summit. Contact Risa Wonsyld with Don Nunamaker Realtor (541) 387-6575. Page 42 Land for sale Opportunities 20 Tilth Certified acres in SW Coast Range, 1 hr from Eugene. Homestead-nursery w/ over 5K sq. ft. greenhouses. 11 acres forest. Creek, well, spring fed pond. 20 x 30 shop w/concrete pad. 20 x 40 Mobile Home w/ improvements. 20’ Yurt. Wood heated Sauna. Include some farm equipment and nursery materials. $350,000. Contact [email protected] for more info. rigation rights. Some timber. Coldwell Banker Mt. West. Andy Alsko (800) 637-5263. 10+ acre lots in Wine Country $150K & $165K Can be sold together with discount. River frontage, trees, raw untouched land 19 mi from Eugene, 13 mi from Cottage Grove. Call Angelique Orman RE/MAX (541) 344-9909 Land for Sale. 43 acres, 3 bed, 2 bath solid farmhouse, barn, small orchard. 12,000 sq’ glass greenhouse. 17 acre 2nd growth. 7’ deer/elk fence. Trees, pasture, creek, lake. 35 minutes to Eugene. Call Jean (541) 937-2837. Near Tidewater: 37+acs on river. Unique Straw Bale home built 1999 sitting in mtn. meadow w/ 3Br-2Ba 2160sf. 2Br-2Ba guest home (M.H.) 4 bay machine shed, greenhouse. Lg. orchard. Nat’l forest 3 sides. Coldwell Banker Mt. West. Andy Alsko (800) 637-5263. Wine Country: 20 acs w/ B&B & 7-ac vineyard. Built on 3 levels w/ approx 3900sf 5Br-4Ba (2 guest suites.) Personal winery. Stocked pond, walking trails. 15 min to Salem. Adjoining 24 w/ sm. home also for sale. Coldwell Banker Mt. West. Andy Alsko (800) 637-5263. Near Salem: 51 acs w/ hilltop manor estate of 4290SF 4Br-3.5Ba 3Br-2Ba Mfg. home. Barn, shop, 2 ponds, 5 min. to I-5/ 35 acs of 22 yr. old firs. Owner does private weddings. Coldwell Banker Mt. West. Andy Alsko (800) 637-5263. 49 acres w/ 3800ft on Umpqua River between Elkton and Scottsburg. 2-story barn. Owner has setup an RV area near river w/ water-elec. Buildable. Coldwell Banker Mt. West. Andy Alsko (800) 637-5263. Near Molalla - 53acs ready for cattle/horses. Main ranch house plus MFG home (hardship.) 87x90 barn for stalls or hay storage. Would make great equestrian Center. One mi. to town. Fenced & X-fenced. Timber. Fabulous 70 GPM well. Coldwell Banker Mt. West. Andy Alsko (800) 637-5263. Near Corvallis: 77+acs that was once a camp. Main Lodge + Caretaker’s home. 5000sf all-purpose bldg & 1500sf kitchen/dining hall. Big Elk River thru property. 15acs w/ ir- Near coast at Lakeside: 141 acs in your “own valley.” Noble Creek thru property where coho spawn. 3 Br-2Ba Mfg Home + sm. guest house for farm worker or guest. 2 barns. Machine shed.Coldwell Banker Mt. West. Andy Alsko (800) 637-5263. For Sale, 564 acres certifed organic, 400 irrigated. Dairy quality alfalfa. Complete with equipmnet, 13-acre pond, wildlife. S. Central Oregon. (775) 849-2025. 20 to 40 acres secluded beautiful with drilled well, meadow, small stream/wetland and forest land. Qualifies organic 40 yrs. No pesticides. Farm Management Plan for medicinal herbs such as Ginseng, Goldenseal etc. 9 miles east of Sandy OR Approved building site for 3 homes under measure 49. 20 acres 289,000, 20 acres 249,000, Both $520,000 cash. Call Ginny (971) 678-8407 or (503) 794-2737. Employment, Internships & Opportunities Seeking 1 or 2 persons desiring self-sufficiency to share a farm.We grow fruits and vegetables and have a young orchard. We are 2 adults with an extra house to rent for a trial period. 1/2 hr. west of Eugene. Preference to people with skills. Contact Nellie.jan@gmail. com or (541) 485-1426. Permaculture Shared Housing, just north of Vancouver, WA vacancy in daylight basement. $400 month plus share utilities. Couple must be willing and able to garden organically, live permaculturally, working out the rent by helping with the weeding, composting, pruning, planting at an hourly rate in the rest of the yard. Beverly Doty (360) 574-1343; [email protected]. Easy tempeh making. Model for a small business working with local farmers producing a healthy food for the local community. See www.maketempeh.org. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Opportunities Make more money moving your produce to market! 30 years experience shipping, selling, storing, packing & processing produce…tree fruit, berries & mixed vegetables…small & large farms and packers. Specializing in organics, contact Joe. J. Gabriel Consulting LLC, (541) 520-0053 or email [email protected]. Farm for lease, 16 Acres organic, with water on 12 Acres, 60-gpm well, irrigation lines with many outlets. 2 Greenhouses (20’ x 95’), orchard, berries, table grapes, open acreage for annual field crops. remodeled 2 br 1 ba house. Garage, shop and barn. 7 miles south of Amity, near 99W. 12 miles to Salem, McMinnville or Dallas. Flexible starting date. Bernard at (503) 835-0894; [email protected]. Seeking intern for start-up farm operation. Have equipment, land, water, certification, and a market of people drooling for the first crop! Crop share, and willing to split profit. We are easy going, like our privacy. Looking for a younger, quiet, committed individual willing to work a reasonable amount of time for a very fair profit. Opportunities for future growth! Contact Dr. Hayden and Dawn Sears at [email protected]. Bookkeeping services offered. Eugene area. Are you too tired to deal with bills, invoices and bank reconciliations at the end of the day? Let a farmer turned bookkeeper help you with bookkeeping services tailored to your needs: off-site or on-site, one-time setup or ongoing support, year-end clean up or cash flow forecasting. 10% discount for Tilth members. Contact Michael at [email protected] or (541) 513-9625. Looking for organic farmers to transition conventional farmland to organic, in Hillsboro, Oregon. 10+ acres on beautiful, scenic hillside presently in wheat. No irrigation. Has been cultivated for wheat/oats/barley, grass in past years. Please contact Bob and Carla Patterson at (503)647-2480; [email protected]. Seeking hard working field hands on established organic farm in SW Oregon. We grow and pack diversity of roots, veggies, tree and vine fruits and seeds. Will weed, harvest and do maintenance. Send resume to Hi Hoe Produce at Bluebird Farm, 1785 Caves Camp Rd., Williams, OR. 97544, (541) 846-6676. Organic grower with family seeks farm. Seeking to partner-up in joint venture raising diverse vegetables, eggs, livestock, etc. supporting market stands, restaurants, and a CSA. Just because you want to slow down, your farm doesn’t have to. Respond to [email protected]. Seeking representatives. Become part of the world’s first and only certified organic company with a full line of health care products to international (food) standards. Full support and training provided. Contact: www.naturescreation.info, www.naturescreation.biz. Caretaker worker sought for 4-acre organic vegan farm. Fruit and nut trees, flower garden, buffered by surrounding meadow and forest. 20-60 hours a month depending on availability/your abilities. 2 bed house available for individual or small family. 20 min. from Portland airport. (360) 909-3383; [email protected]. Trade Part-time work for housing, Yamhill County, Oregon. Community-minded babyboomers seek person(s) with knowledge and experience growing organic produce, natural building, and/or permaculture projects. Landshare options 25 miles SW of Portland on 30 acres of fields, trees, old orchard, meadows, pond and seasonal creek. Contact Pam or John, (503) 538-8096. Want to buy land, Williams, Applegate, or Jacksonville area for permaculture. 10-40 acres, good water, good soil. Secluded, quiet with small house, cabin or yurt site. Call (541) 836-2943 or email at [email protected]. Workers Wanted - Winter Green Farm (near Eugene) is seeking workers. Biodynamic (Tilth Certified) farm. 500-member CSA program, five farmers markets, grow for processors and distributors, and have a herd of beef cows. No housing. Applications at www.wintergreenfarm.com or call Wali Via at (541) 935-1920. Safely detoxify with Natural Cellular Defense: purified, micronized, liquid zeolite. Removes heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides, depleted uranium, etc. Absorbs free radicals, buffers the body toward alkalinity, inhibits viral replication, improves liver and immune functioning, brings greater mental clarity and energy. Home business opportunity. Pamela Melcher. [email protected]. www.mywaiora.com/472784. (503) 946-8048. Two acres for very reasonable rent or lease. McKenzie River bottom land near Walterville, OR. Excellent S/SW exposure, gently swaled loamy pasture. Irrigation well, no pump. Serious inquiries. Organic only. Email proposal to: [email protected], or call (541) 741-7336. Wanted: organically grown cattle. Buckaroo Cattle Co. Contact (541) 865-4386; [email protected]. Organic Asian pear and apple orchard. Looking to enter into a lease or crop-sharing agreement with experienced grower. Our brand label fruits are in demand and are sold both wholesale and mail order. Contact (541) 673-7775, fax 957-5121; [email protected], www.asianpearsorganic.com. Experienced, landless, organic grower looking for 1 to 5 acres (or large city lot) to rent/lease/use for CSA/Market Garden operation in or around Portland or Eugene. Housing on-site or off. (503) 313-5239; or email [email protected]. Couple looking to buy farm land or form land partnership. Experienced in organic farming and permaculture design. Want land with irrigation rights or good year round water source. Open to purchasing land, leasing land or alternative arrangement. Contact Lauren and Brian at [email protected]. Seeking Land Partners: Do you have the desire, skills, and financial resources to help build a sustainable and energy self sufficient community/farm? Buy into ownership of 36 acres of farm/forest in SW Oregon. Much has been completed. Much remains to be done. Ideal entry contribution is $50k (or more). Call or email: Liz and Jeff (541) 825-3402; [email protected]. Mercy Corps Northwest’s immigrant agriculture project is seeking land to lease in the Portland Metropolitan area: plots of 1/4 acre and greater for individual participants, and a training site of 2+ acres. David, (503) 236-1580 x200; [email protected]. N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 43 Page 44 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 November 1- 22, Crop Planning and Cultivation, Soil Management. Portland. A four-week course introducing essential organic agriculture concepts through group lecture, discussion, and observation at Zenger Farm’s six-acre field and garden sites. (786) 972-1333; www.zengerfarm.org/events-and-volunteering. November 1, Cascadia Local Fair Trade Gathering. Bellingham, WA. Launching community dialogue for fair trade collaborative in WA and the Pacific NW. See www.localfairtrade.org. November 4 –18, Marketing Nursery Plants w/ Miles McCoy. Clackamas Community College, Oregon City. Effective nursery industry examples of advertising, direct mail, catalogs, internet use, newsletters, public relations and more. Call Bob Nelson at (503) 657-6958 x2236 for information. Fee $65. November 5, 6th Annual Chico Organic Farming and Food Conference, CSU Chico, CA. Featured speakers will give their perspectives on tree crops, nuts, row crops and forage, rice, dairy and livestock. Contact Fred Thomas 530-891-6958, [email protected]. November 5 – 7, Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Conference, Eugene Hilton and Conference Center, Eugene. Information: www.oregon.gov/OWEB/biennialconference_08.shtml. November 5, Sustainable Industries Economic Forum. Seattle, WA. Unprecedented economic climate, businesses large and small are achieving economic advantage through ambitious environmental innovation and social responsibility. www.sustainableindustries. com/forums, email [email protected] or call (970) 471-6587. November 7, Sustainable Foodservice Operations. University of Oregon in Portland. Workshop focused on the unique issues of implementing sustainable practices in the foodservice industry. Email [email protected] or call (800) 824-2714. November 12, Growing U.S. Organic Agriculture: Accessing the 2008 Farm Bill. Chicago. How to access the new organic provisions of the 2008 Farm Bill. For more information, contact Marissa Potter, [email protected]. November 14-16, Greenfestival. San Francisco Concourse Exhibition Center, San Francisco. More than 150 renowned speakers and 400 green businesses. See www.greenfestivals.org/san-francisco-2008. November 15, How to Buy Solar Electric (PV) System. Smith Memorial Student Union, Rm 333, PSU, Portland. This 3-hour workshop covers PV technology, site analysis, system sizing, more. Email [email protected]. December. 4 – 18, Permaculture Design Course. Lost Valley Ed. Center, Dexter, Ore. Holistic overview of the concepts and practices of permaculture including organic gardening, forest gardening, natural building, eco-forestry, appropriate tech, renewable energy and urban applications. See www.lostvalley.org, call (541) 937-3351. December 5, Carbon Footprints and Climate Risk. Portland. Measuring an organization’s “carbon footprint” or greenhouse gas inventory; and understanding and defining “climate risk” for an organization. Email [email protected] or call (800) 824-2714. December 10 – 11, Building Better Soils Conference. Clarion Hotel, Yakima. Connecting you and healthy soils to organic recycling, carbon sequestration and productive crops. (360) 556 -3926; [email protected]. January-June, Every 3rd weekend of the month. Permaculture Design Course. Try-on Life Farms, Portland. Toby Hemenway offers a 72-hour certificate course oriented towards professionals in architecture, agriculture, planning, engineering and design. Cost: $850, www.patternliteracy.com, [email protected] or call (503) 351-2075. November 7 – 9, Tilth Producers Annual Conference Bellingham, WA. Farming for the Ages: Exploring Our Roots, Adapting to Change. Keynote address by Dr Paul Hepperly, Research Director, Rodale Institute. Includes a WSU symposium on Food Safety and Risk Management for Farmers. www.tilthproducers. org/conference.htm. January 9 – 11, California Women for Agriculture Statewide Convention, Chico. Information: [email protected]. November 11 – 13 - Health and Safety in Western Agriculture New Paths Conference, The Lodge at Suncadia, Cle Elum. Information: www.depts.washington.edu/pnash/2008conference. January 23 – 25, 4th Annual Good Earth Home, Garden & Living Show. Lane Events Center, Eugene. Over 250 commercial and educational exhibits for earth-friendly products, services and businesses. (541) 484-9247. November 12, Workshop: Garden Planning and Design. An introduction to gardening with a focus on gardening planning and design – a great thing to do in the winter. Open to the public. Cost is $3-$10 (sliding scale) donation. Please email [email protected] for registeration and details. January 18 – 21, Northwest Food Manufacturing and Packaging Expo. Oregon Convention Center, Portland. Information: (503) 327-2200 or www.nwfpa.org. January 21 – 24, Ecological Farming Conference, “United We Grow”. Asilomar, Pacific Grove, CA. Eric Schlosser, Award-winnning N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Continued on page 46 Page 45 Calendar Deadline for January / February listings is Nov. 20! Continued from page 45 journalist and author of Fast Food Nation, speaks. (831) 763-2111; [email protected]. January 22, Deadline to register for Southern Oregon Research & Extension Center 4-week course on Designing Farm Internship Programs. Classes held in Central Point 2/12, 19, 26 and 3/05, fee: $60. Call Shelley Elkovich (541) 776-7371 for more information or to register. January 25 – 27, Harvesting Clean Energy Conference. Billings, MT. Bringing ag and clean energy production together to advance opportunities for rural economic development. (360) 352-1763; www.harvestcleanenergy.org. January 30, Organic Land Care for the Landscaping Professional. Oregon City, OR. Co-sponsored by Oregon Tilth and Clackamas Community College. A half-day workshop for professionals focusing on organic practices for soil building and healthy turf in ornamental landscapes. Cost: $50. To register, contact Loretta Mills, 503-657-6958 ext 2246. February 26 – 28, Organicology. Double Tree, Lloyd Center, Portland. Presented by Oregon Tilth, Organically Grown Co., Organic Seed Alliance and the Food Trade Sustainability Leadership Association. Vandana Shiva keynotes. Call Oregon Tilth, (503) 378-0690 or visit www.organicology.org. Page 46 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Supporting Membership Name Your membership fee gives crucial support to Tilth’s Research & Education programs, entitles you to a one-year subscription to In Good Tilth, gives you free classifieds and reduces your admission fee at Tilth-sponsored events. $10 more enrolls you in the Oregon Tilth Yard and Garden program. Additional donations to Oregon Tilth Research & Education are welcomed! Detach and mail with your check for $30 ($40 outside U.S.), plus $10 for the Yard and Garden program, if applicable, to: Address County City, State, ZIP Phone Email Enclosed is my membership fee plus a Research & Education donation of ____. Enclosed is my additional $10 for one year for the Yard and Garden program. I am a current member with a new address. Catagory Voting Privilege Benefits Oregon Tilth, 470 Lancaster Dr. NE, Salem, Oregon 97301 Save a stamp, renew your membership online at www.tilth.org. Dues Please allow six to eight weeks for delivery of In Good Tilth. Oregon Tilth Certified Organic growers, processors and restaurants are eligible for complimentary membership. If you are a certified operator making an additional donation, please indicate your status. For questions about membership contact Oregon Tilth, (503) 378-0690. Individual 1 Vote -In Good Tilth Subscription -Free classifieds in IGT -OTCO directory (1) -Discounts (1 person) to events $30/year($40 outside U.S.) $150 ($160 outside U.S.) Lifetime Household 1 Vote Primary Member Identified -In Good Tilth Subscription -Free classifieds in IGT -OTCO directory (1) -Discounts (2 person) to events $45/year($55 outside U.S.) $225 ($235 outside U.S.) Lifetime Non-profit 1 Vote Organization Primary Member Identified -In Good Tilth Subscription -Free classifieds in IGT -OTCO directory (2) -Discounts (5 person) to events $60/year ($70 outside U.S.) $300 ($310 outside U.S.) Lifetime For-profit 1 Vote Organization Primary Member Identified -In Good Tilth Subscription -Free classifieds in IGT -OTCO directory (2) -Discounts (5 person) to events $100/year ($110 outside U.S.) $500 ($510 outside U.S.) I do not want my name listed as a new member. Lifetime New Oregon Tilth Supporting Members - with a total of 791 Rania Bratberg California Certified Organic Farmers Fresh For Life, Inc. Jonathan Gold Jude Hobbs Claire Lanzarotta Sarah Lawrence Jay McCaman Adam McKinley Robert and Patricia Patterson David Paulk Philip Perota John R Pollard Aloysha Ricards shopOrganic.com Lawrence Thicke West Multnomah Soil & Water Conservation District Ryan Wist THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT! Regional Chapters B Street Project, Forest Grove Contact Terry O’Day, (503) 352-2765 Corvallis Garden Club Meetings are the second Sunday of every month. Contact Colin King, (541) 758-0316 In Good Tilth online Visit the IGT page on the Tilth site for a listing of distribution sites, select online articles, display ad rates and specs, deadlines for themeissue articles, classifed and calendar listings, and sending letters to the editor. Visit www.tilth.org. Bold indicates Yard & Garden member N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5 Page 47 Page 48 N ovember / D ecember 2008 • I n G ood T ilth • V olume 19, N umber 5