EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 07.04.2011
Transcripción
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 07.04.2011
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 07.04.2011 SEC(2011) 475 final PART III COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL RESIDUE MONITORING PLANS IN THE MEMBER STATES IN 2009 (Council Directive 96/23/EC) 1 PART III Actions taken as a consequence of non compliant results including modifications of the national residue plan for 2009 2 AT AUSTRIA Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Information with regard to the recommendations of the CRL Bilthoven Information with regard to the recommendations of the CRL Berlin (plan 2008) Accreditation and validation of Group A substances or forbidden substances according to Council Decision 2002/657/EC New in the plan 2009 Due to compliant results over a two or more years period, the number of samples will be decreased Due to non-compliant results in 2008, the number of samples will be increased General information Non-compliant results 1 17alpha-boldenone-21.9 µg/l and 17 beta-boldenone-< 0.38 µg/l and 1 17alpha-boldenone-3.4 µg/l-young bovine (1. follow-up investigation; suspect sample, farm) 2 17alpha-boldenone- 2.87 and 6.46 µg/l-young bovines (2. follow-up investigation; suspect samples, farm) Aggregate for all animal products and substances See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 Follow-up actions Bovines • Three follow-up samples (1. Follow-up investigation, urine samples) were taken as a consequence of a non compliant result in 2008. The farm was investigated by an official veterinarian. About 70 bovine animals were held on the farm. • Verification of the records. • 2. Follow-up investigation: 2 Official samples were taken (urine samples). • Intensified supervision/checks for the following 12 months. • Sampling in 2010 showed a negative result. There was no indication of an illegal use of 17betaboldenone; therefore no administrative proceedings 3 1 17alpha-boldenone-4.55 µg/l young bovine (suspect sample, farm) were started against the farmer. • Three follow-up samples were taken as a consequence of a non compliant result in 2008. The farm with about 12 bovine animals was investigated by an official veterinarian. • Verification of the records. • Intensified supervision/checks for the following 12 months. • Sampling in 2010. There was no indication of an illegal use of 17betaboldenone; therefore no administrative proceedings were started against the farmer. Sheep and goats 1 17alpha-nortestosterone-1.02 µg/l • The farm was investigated and placed under and 17 beta-nortestosterone-< 0.37 official control (18/06/2009-24/08/2009) by the µg/l-lamb Provincial Governor (official veterinarian) in (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) accordance with article 58 of the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act. • Verification of the records and the administration of veterinary medicinal products. • Three official samples were taken (on-farm sampling; urine); the analyses showed a negative result. There was no indication of an illegal treatment of the animals; therefore no administrative proceedings were started against the farmer. 1 17alpha-boldenone- 2.55 µg/l and 17beta-boldenone- < 0.33 µg/l-lamb (suspect sample, farm) • • This was a follow-up sample as a consequence of a positive test result in 2008. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. There was no indication of an illegal use of 17betaboldenone. 4 Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Information with regard to the recommendations of the CRL Berlin (plan 2008) New in the plan 2009 General information Due to compliant results over a two or more year period, the number of samples will be decreased Due to non-compliant results in 2008, the number of samples will be increased Non-compliant results 1 Sulfadiazin-312.8 ppb and Sulfadimidin-5,369.9-muscle-veal calf (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) 1 Penicillin G-96.2 ppb- muscle-young bovine (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) Aggregate for all animal products and substances - See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 See Plan Data Information of Plan 2010 Follow-up actions Bovines • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. • The withdrawal period had not been observed. • Administrative proceedings were started against the farmer. • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. The withdrawal period had been observed correctly. Animals of the farm will be checked in 2010 (sampling at slaughterhouse). • • 1 Ivermectin-543.4 ppb-liver-young bovine (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. The administration of Ivermectin was not entered in the register. One official follow-up sample (liver) was taken; the analysis showed a negative result. Oral instruction of the farmer. • • • 1 Dihydrostreptomycin-9,055.8 ppbkidney-veal calf (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) • The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and the offals were declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. The treatment had been recorded correctly; the withdrawal period had been observed. • • 5 1 Oxytetracycline-2,654.97 ppbmuscle-cow (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) • Emergency slaughter because of a liver damage. The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. The veterinary practitioner’s dispensary of the veterinarian in charge of the farm was checked too. The withdrawal period had been observed correctly but the withdrawal period was too short (due to a mistake of the veterinarian in charge). Administrative proceedings were started against the farmer and the veterinarian in charge of the farm. • • • • • 1 Oxytetracycline-2,389.0 ppbmuscle-cow (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) • The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. The storage of the VMPs on the farm was not correct. The withdrawal period had been observed (later on, the manufacturers extended the withdrawal period from 14 to 21 days). The veterinary practitioner`s dispensary of the veterinarian in charge of the farm was checked too. Oral instruction of the farmer. • • • • • 1 Penicillin G-315.0 ppb- kidney-cow (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) • The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian. Incomplete documentation of the administration of VMPs. The farmer is a member of the Animal Health Service of Lower Austria. The veterinary practitioner`s dispensary of the veterinarian in charge of the farm (member of the Animal Health Service) was checked too. Intensified supervision/checks of the farm and the veterinarian have been planned for the • • • • • 6 following 6 months. Oral instruction of the farmer and the veterinarian in charge. • 1 Penicillin G-179.4 ppb- kidney-cow (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian. • The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and the offals were declared unfit for human consumption. • The withdrawal period has been observed Intensified supervision/checks for the following 6 months. It was not possible to identify the reason of this test result. 1 Ampicillin-302.4 ppb- kidney-cow (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) • Emergency slaughter outside the slaughterhouse. The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian. Verification of the records. Intensified supervision/checks for the following 6 months. Oral instruction of the farmer. • • • • • • It was not possible to identify the reason of this test result. 1 Methylaminoantipyrin (Metamizole)515.00 ppb-muscle; Methylaminoantipyrin-3,453.3 ppb and Penicillin G-712.3 ppb–kidney-cow (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) • The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. Intensified supervision/checks for the following 6 months. Oral instruction of the farmer. • • • It was not possible to identify the reason of this test result. 1 Methylaminoantipyrin (Metamizole) -30,202.03 ppb-kidney-cow • • Emergency slaughter. The carcase was 7 impounded at the (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. No documentation of the treatment by the veterinarian in charge. Intensified supervision/checks for the following 6 months. Oral instructions. • • • • 1 Methylaminoantipyrin (Metamizole) -186.5 ppb-kidney-cow (suspect sample, slaughterhouse) • Emergency slaughter outside the slaughterhouse. The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. The farmer is a member of the Animal Health Service of Lower Austria. Incomplete documentation of the administration of VMPs. The withdrawal period had not been observed. Administrative proceedings were started against the farmer, the official veterinarian of the slaughterhouse and the veterinarian in charge of the farm. • • • • • • 5 WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ-4,50, 5.20, 8.79, 8.84 and 11.2 pg/g-muscleveal calves (4) and young bovine (1) (suspect samples, slaughterhouse) • In 2008, an official veterinarian of Bavaria informed that as a result of a routine control in meat of a bovine animal originating from Austria 17.7 pg/g fat dioxin-like PCBs had been found. Two farms were involved and investigated and placed under official control by the Provincial Governor (official veterinarian). Both farms are small farms with a special form of cattle breeding; the cows and their calves are kept together in their natural environment (organic animal husbandry). Most of the time cows of both farms were pastured together. On one of these pastures there is a feeding place for wild game with six hay racks; They used contaminated railway sleepers to build the hay racks. 39 official samples were taken: 9 meat samples, 13 milk samples, 5 samples of feeding stuff, 4 soil samples, 2 samples of wood (hay racks), one egg sample, 4 samples • • • 8 of wild game meat and one sample of the paint of the stable; The contamination of the wood samples varied between 11.19 and 29.68 ng WHO-PCDD/FPCB-TEQ/kg; one explanation for the higher levels of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs were the contaminated wood of the hay racks; particularly with regard to the fact that calves like to nibble and suckle. The carcases of 4 veal calves and one young bovine were impounded at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. In both farms a lot of reconstruction (clean-up) measures, especially the improvement of the hay racks had been done. Further investigations are still ongoing. In three milk samples the maximum limits had been exceeded and therefore the cows were killed and sent to a processing plant according to the requirements of Reg. (EC) No. 1774/2002. All batches of contaminated milk were disposed as well. • • 3 WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ-6.51, 6.82 and 7.87 pg/g- cow milk (see also table “Group B substances – Bovines”) (suspect samples, farm) 1 Sulphamethoxazole-135.9 ppbmuscle- fattening pig (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) • • Pigs Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. On-farm mixer. One follow-up sample of feed was taken and showed a negative result. Oral instructions. • • • • 1 Ochratoxin A-2.41 ppb-kidneyfattening pig (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. One official feed sample was taken which showed a negative result. • It was not possible to identify the reason of this test result. 1 Oxytetracycline-2,186.0 ppb and Sulfadimidin-136.7 ppb musclefattening pig (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. Incomplete documentation of the administration of VMPs and withdrawal periods. The carcase was impounded at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption. • • 9 • • 1 Nicarbazin-1.09 ppb-liver-broiler (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) 1 Nicarbazin-1.94 ppb-liver-broiler (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) 1 Semicarbacid-1.93 ppb – casings (import, Pakistan) 1 Sulfadiazin-153.4 ppb-and Methylaminoantipyrin (Metamizole) 261.9 muscle-other horse (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) 1 cadmium-0.26 ppm-muscle- other horse (targeted sample, slaughterhouse) Intensified supervision/checks for the following 6 months. Oral instructions and administrative proceedings were started against the farmer. Poultry • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. • One official sample was taken (on farm); the analysis showed a negative result. • Oral instructions No indication of misuse of Nicarbazin. • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. • One official sample was taken (on farm); the analysis showed a negative result. • Oral instructions No indication of misuse of Nicarbazin. Sheep and goats • Border rejection of 200 kg salted sheep casings. • Date of notification: 18/11/2009. Horses • Investigations on the farm of origin by official veterinarian including verification of records. • The administration of Metamizole was not documented! • The equine identification document was available and was rendered invalid at least by stamping it ‘invalid’ on the first page. • The owner stopped horse keeping. • 10 The horse was 39 years old. 1 Penicillin G-57.3 µg/l – targeted sample • • • • Milk The farm was investigated by the official veterinarian including verification of records. The farmer is a member of the Animal Health Service of Upper Austria. One official milk sample (on-farm sampling) showed a compliant result (suspect sample). Administrative proceedings were started against the farmer. It was not possible to identify the reason of this test result. 3 WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ-6.51, 6.82 and 7.87 pg/g- cow milk (suspect samples, farm) 1 Salinomycin-6.51 ppb (targeted sample) Please refer to “Group B substances – Bovines” • • • • • Eggs The farm was investigated by the official veterinarian including verification of records. Official detention of 300 eggs. The eggs had been cracked and destroyed according to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002. The analytical result of one follow-up sample was compliant. A written warning was given to the farmer and administrative proceedings were started. It was not possible to identify the reason of this test result. 1 Malachite Green-Leuco-1.8 ppbmuscle-trout (targeted sample) Aquaculture • The farm was investigated and has been placed under official control (15/06/09–18/08/09) by the Provincial Governor (official veterinarian) in accordance with article 58 of the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act; about 1,000 trout were held on the farm as a consequence of the positive finding. • Verification of the records; most of accompanying records, documentations and other information were insufficient. 11 • • • 1 Malachite Green-Leuco-1.4 ppbmuscle-trout (suspect sample) 2 Malachite Green-1,235 and 356 ppb and Malachite Green-Leuco-2,934 and 930 ppb-muscle-char (targeted samples) No verification of the illegal use of malachite green • One follow-up sample of above mentioned trout (LMG 1.8 ppb). • • • • • • 4 Malachite Green-76.0, 107.0, 134.0 and 182.0 Malachite Green-Leuco1.092, 943.0, 1,483.0 and 2.131.0 ppbmuscle-trout (suspect samples) 1 Malachite Green-< 0.4 ppb Malachite Green-Leuco11.1 ppb-muscle-char (targeted sample) Official samples were taken (6 samples); the analyses of one sample showed a non compliant result. All fish ready for slaughter (310 kg) of the “positive” ponds were killed and sent to a processing plant of category 1 material as required by Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002. Intensified checks for the following 12 months. The farm was investigated and placed under official control (29/10/09-29/12/2009) by the Provincial Governor (official veterinarian) in accordance with article 58 of the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act; In four ponds trout and chars of different weight were held on the farm as a consequence of the positive finding. Verification of the records. Official samples were taken (11 samples); the analyses of four samples showed again noncompliant results. (Please refer to information below). All fish (2,800 kg) were killed and sent to a processing plant of category 1 material as required by Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002. Intensified checks for the following 12 months. Administrative proceedings were started against the farmer. The farmer lodged a complaint against persons unknown. The farmer strongly denied the use of malachite green. • Four of eleven follow-up samples of above mentioned chars (MG 1,235 ppb) showed noncompliant results (three of these samples were taken from a pond which was located in another area; these samples were negative). • 12 The farm was placed under official control (02./12/2009-05/01/2010) by the Provincial Governor (official veterinarian) in accordance with article 58 of the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act; about 100 chars • • • were held on the farm as a consequence of the positive finding. One official sample was taken and showed a negative result. Verification of the records; Intensified checks for the following 12 months. No verification of the illegal use of malachite green 1 Malachite Green-Leuco-1.3 ppbmuscle-carp (targeted sample) • • • • 1 Malachite Green-Leuco-0.7 ppbmuscle-carp (suspect sample) 1 Malachite Green-Leuco-0.8 ppbmuscle-carp (targeted sample) The farm (a small farm) was placed under official control (16/10/2009-18/03/2010) in accordance with article 58 of the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act. Verification of the records. One follow-up sample was taken; the amount of Malachite Green-Leuco found was below the reference point for action of 2.0 ppb (see below). Intensified checks for the next 12 months. No verification of the illegal use of malachite green. • One follow-up sample of above mentioned carp (LMG 1.3 ppb). • • • The farm was investigated by the official veterinarian including verification of records. The follow-up sample showed a negative result. The farm will be kept under official control. No verification of the illegal use of malachite green. 1 Malachite Green-Leuco-1.2 ppbmuscle-trout (suspect sample) • • 7 Malachite Green-Leuco<2.2/2.2/2.5/2.6/4.3 and 6.7 ppbmuscle-carps (suspect samples) • • 13 One follow-up sample was taken from the farm which has been placed under official control by the Provincial Governor since 2008 which has been already reported last year. Administrative proceedings were started against the farmer. The farm was investigated in 2008 for the first time. Due to the positive test results parts of the farm (4 ponds) had been placed under official control on 21/08/2009 in accordance with article 58 of the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act. • • 1 Malachite Green-1.2 and Malachite Green-Leuco-18.8 ppbmuscle-carp (suspect sample) • • • • 3 Malachite Green-<0.4/0.6 and 0.0 Malachite Green-Leuco-17.7/35.5 and 1.7 ppb-muscle-carps • • • The farmer purchased most of the contaminated fish from the farm described below (please refer to non compliant result MG 1.2 ppb and LMG 18.8 ppb). Further investigations are still ongoing. The farm was investigated and placed under official control (24/09/09-24/04/2010) by the Provincial Governor (official veterinarian) in accordance with article 58 of the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act; in 28 ponds about 5 tons of carp, chars and pike perches of different weight were held in the farm as a consequence of the positive finding. Eight official samples were taken and four of these samples showed a non-compliant result (see information below). Verification of the records. All fish of three ponds were killed (650 kg) and sent to a processing plant of category 1 material as required by Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002. Parts of the farm are still blocked. Intensified checks for the following 12 months. Four follow-up samples of above mentioned carp (MG 1.2 ppb and LMG 18.8 ppb) showed a non-compliant result. 1 Malachite Green-<0.4 ppb and Malachite Green-Leuco-35.3 ppbmuscle-pike perch (suspect samples) 2 lead-0.74 and 1.08 ppm-muscle-deer (targeted samples) Wild game • In wild game the detection of lead can be traced back more or less to environmental pollution and sometimes to bullets (to some extent depending on the modern construction of bullets and the type of bullets). The contamination of the meat also depends on the way the bullets penetrate the body of the animals. • During the next hunting season deer of the hunting grounds will be sampled again. 14 BE BELGIUM Group A substances Modification of national residue plan - Aggregate for all animal products and substances Increase of the number of analysis for A1/A3 and A4 made in fat and urine instead of feces and muscle; No more A2 analysis in poultry; A5 analysis in milk; Increase of the number of analysis for CAP, nitrofuranes and nitroimidazoles in poultry. Non-compliant results 1/ CAP-muscle-target sampleslaughterhouse-broiler 2/ CAP-muscle-target sampleslaughterhouse-broiler 3/ Prednisolone (>4 ppb)-feces-target sample-slaughterhouse-pig Follow-up actions Investigation still ongoing. Investigation still ongoing. 4/ Dexamethasone ()-feces-target samplefarm-bovine 5/ Prednisolone ()-feces-target sample-farmcalf Investigation on farm. Samples of animal matrices, feed and material were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All samples were compliant. Investigation on farm. Samples of animal matrices, feed and material were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. Samples of feces and material not compliant (see 18 and 19). Investigation still ongoing. 6/ AMOZ-muscle-target sample-pigeonsslaughterhouse Animals from the Netherland. Products were recall. 7/ AOZ-muscle-target sampleslaughterhouse-broiler Products still present at slaughterhouse (16 460 kg) were put under seizure. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. See also Group B results. 8/ Prednisolone-suspect sample-urineslaughterhouse-bovine 9/ Prednisolone-injection site-suspect sample-slaughterhouse-bovine 15 10/ Prednisolone-injection site-suspect sample-slaughterhouse-bovine 11/ Dexamethasone (> 1.5 ppb)-injection site-suspect sample-slaughterhouse-bovine 12/ Prednisolone-injection site-suspect sample-slaughterhouse-bovine 13/ Dexamethasone-injection site-suspect sample-slaughterhouse-pig 14/ Dexamethasone-muscle-suspect sampleslaughterhouse-pig 15/ Dexamethasone-injection site-suspect sample-slaughterhouse-bovine 16/ Dexamethasone-injection site-suspect sample-slaughterhouse-bovine 17/ Dexamethasone-muscle-suspect sampleslaughterhouse-bovine Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. See also Group B results. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Samples of animal matrices, feed and material were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. One material sample non compliant (see 20). Investigation on farm. Samples of animal matrices, feed and material were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All samples were compliant. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. See also Group B results. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. The bovine farm was investigated due to dexamethasone residues in feces found on farm (see 4). 18/ Dexamethasone-suspect sample-feces bovine-farm 19/ Dexamethasone isonicotinoate-suspect sample-material 20/ Dexamethasone-suspect sample-material 21/ Dexamethasone isonicotinoate, progesterone-beta testosterone-suspect samples-material 16 The bovine farm was investigated due to dexamethasone residues in injection site at slaughterhouse (see 11). The bovine farm was investigated following presence of low concentration of propylthiouracil found at slaughterhouse (see below “results not considered as non compliant”). Samples of animal matrices, feed and material were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. 22/ Prednisolone, prednisolone actetatesuspect sample-material The bovine farm was investigated due to prednisolone residues in suspect sample at slaughterhouse. See below “results not considered as non compliant”. Results from official samples taken during monitoring/suspicion in farm or at slaughterhouse level showing presence of some A substances but which could not been considered as non compliant. Results from non-official samples. In these cases, an investigation on farm was performed, samples of animals, feed and material are taken and fattening animals are put under temporary seizure until the results. Progesterone (3.5 ppb), testosterone (3.48 ppb)-muscle-slaughterhouse-target samplecalf The farm of calves was investigated. Samples of animal matrices, feed and material were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. Alpha boldenone and beta boldenone-fecesThe farm of calves was investigated. slaughterhouse-target sample-calf Samples of animal matrices, feed and material were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. Prednisolone (< 1 ppb)-urine-non official The farm of calves was investigated. sample-slaughterhouse-calf Samples of animal matrices, material and milk were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. Prednisolone (6 ppb)-urine-non official The farm of calves was investigated. sample -slaughterhouse-calf Samples of animal matrices, material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. Cortisol-feces-suspect sampleThe bovine farm was investigated. slaughterhouse-bovine Samples of animal matrices, material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. Thiouracyl-suspect sample-slaughterhouseThe bovine farm was investigated. bovine Samples of animal matrices, material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. Prednisolone-suspect sample-slaughterhouse- The bovine farm was investigated. 17 bovine Alpha boldenone (1.2 ppb), alpha testosterone (8,6 ppb)-feces-target sampleslaughterhouse-bovine Prednisolone-target sample-slaughterhousebovine Dexamethasone-target sampleslaughterhouse-bovine Alpha boldenone (182 ppb), alpha testosterone (186 ppb)-feces-target sampleslaughterhouse-bovine Delmadinone (2 ppb)-muscle-target sampleslaughterhouse-bovine Propylthiouracyl-non official sample-bovine Prednisolone (>4 ppb)-feces-target sampleslaughterhouse-bovine Prednisolone-target sample-slaughterhousebovine 18 Samples of material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. Samples were also taken at slaughterhouse. Samples of materials were found non compliant. See 21 in Group A results The bovine farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. The bovine farm was investigated. Samples of feces and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. The bovine farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices, material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. The bovine farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices, material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. The bovine farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices, material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. The bovine farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices, material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. Samples of material were non compliant (see 21 in Group A results). The bovine farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices, material and feed were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. The bovine farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these Delmadinone (2 ppb)-muscle-target sampleslaughterhouse-pig Prednisolone-target sample-slaughterhousepig samples were compliant. The pig farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. The pig farm was investigated. Samples of animal matrices were taken. Fattening animals were put under temporary seizure. All these samples were compliant. Administrative measures H status : for 52 weeks, animals from the farm may only be sent to slaughterhouse in Belgium where 10 % of them are analysed at the expense of the farmer. In case of new infringement during this period, another period of 104 weeks is added to the first one. No H status were allocated in 2009. Criminal penalties In all cases of infringements relating to group A substances (except A6), a Pro Justitia is sent to prosecutor who decides whether prosecution or not (Law 15 July 1985 Hormones1 e.a.). 1 Loi du 15 Juillet 1985 relative à l’utilisation de substances à effet hormonal, à effet antihormonal, à effet beta-adrénergique ou à effet stimulateur de production chez les animaux. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan - Aggregate for all animal products and substances Anticoccidials analyses added in milk; Analysis for anthelmintics are planned depending of the grazing season; Analysis for antibiotics, benzimodazoles and coccidiostatics planned in piglets; Increase of the number of analysis for B2c and pesticides in pigs. Non-compliant results Oxytetracycline (235 ppb)-muscletarget sample-slaughterhouse-calve Follow-up actions Bovines Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Dioxin (22 pg TEQ/g fat) and sum dioxin and dioxin-like PCB (43 pg TEQ/g fat)-fat-target sample-bovine- Products still at slaughterhouse (10 kg) destroyed. The farm was blocked. Investigation on the source of contamination. Samples of feed and of 2 bovines 19 slaughterhouse Sulfadiazine (>200 ppb)-kidneytarget sample-slaughterhouse-bovine Sulfadiazine (>200 ppb)-muscletarget sample-slaughterhouse-bovine Sulfadimidine (>200 ppb)-muscletarget sample-slaughterhouse-bovine Sulfadimethoxine- kidney (>200 ppb))-target sample-slaughterhousecalve Sulfadimethoxine- muscle (>200 ppb)-target sample-slaughterhousecalve Sulfadimethoxine- kidney (>200 ppb)-target sample-slaughterhousecalve Sulfadimethoxine- muscle (>200 ppb)-target sample-slaughterhousecalve Sulfadimethoxine (170 ppb)-kidneytarget sample- calf-slaughterhouse Dihydrostreptomycine (2880 ppb)injection site-suspect sampleslaughterhouse-bovine Flunixine (873 ppb)-injection sitebovine- suspect sampleslaughterhouse Flunixine (2094 ppb) + tolfenamic acid (773 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovine-slaughterhouse negative, release of the farm. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Allocation R-status. Carcass destroyed. Sulfadoxine (229 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Sulfadoxine (199 ppb)- musclesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tilmicosine (1390 ppb)-injection sitebovine- suspect sampleslaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Flunixine (2300 ppb)-muscle-suspect sample-bovine-slaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Allocation R-Status. Carcass destroyed. Phenylbutazone (2350 ppb)-injection site-bovine- suspect sampleslaughterhouse Phenylbutazone (1850 ppb)-musclebovine-slaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Official report against the veterinarian. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Allocation R-Status. Carcass destroyed. 20 Tylosine (5185 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tolfenamic acid (275 ppb)- injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Sulfadimethoxine (15500 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Sulfadimethoxine (300 ppb)-musclesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tolfenamic acid (1311 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Benzylpenicilline (3500 ppb) + sulfadimethoxine (3400 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Benzylpenicilline (1500000 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Benzylpenicilline (500 ppb)-musclesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Caprofen (2345 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tylosine (1400 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample- bovineslaughterhouse Tolfenamic acid (379 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Flunixine (950 ppb) + spiramycine (16000 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovine-slaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Official report against the dealer. Tetracycline sum (3000 ppb) + oxytetracycline sum (57000 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse See (11) in Group A Results. Tilmicosine (107 ppb)-injection site- Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Animal from the Luxembourg. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Official report against the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. See (9) in Group A Results. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. 21 suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Flunixine (> 750 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Flunixine (200 ppb)-muscle- suspect sample-bovine-slaughterhouse Flunixine (49 ppb) + sulfadimethoxine (11190 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Sulfadimethoxine (250 ppb)-musclebovine- suspect sampleslaughterhouse Tolfenamic acid (168.08 ppb)injection site-bovine- suspect sampleslaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Official report. Flunixine (437 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Flunixine (890 ppb) + sulfadimethoxine (25610 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Sulfadimethoxine (329 ppb)-musclesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Benzylpenicilline ( 63000 ppb) + dihydrostreptomycine (4447 ppb) + streptomycine (572 ppb)-injection site-bovine-slaughterhouse Ampicilline (3000 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Flunixine (48 ppb) + dihydrostreptomycine (1739 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Flunixine (39 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Phenylbutazone (20 ppb)-injection sites- suspect sample-bovine-suspect samples-slaughterhouse Phenylbutazone (27 ppb)-injection sites- suspect sample-bovine-suspect samples-slaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Official report against the veterinarian. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Allocation R-status. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. 22 Oxytetracycline sum (5000 ppb) + dihydrostreptomycine (7763 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tetracycline sum (644 ppb) + oxytetracycline sum (100000 ppb) + marbofloxacine (725 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Benzylpenicilline (675 ppb) + dihydrostreptomycine (649 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Meloxicam (830 ppb) + sulfadoxine (326 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovine-slaughterhouse Sulfadoxine (180 ppb)-muscle suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Enrofloxacine + ciprofloxacine (15000 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovine-slaughterhouse Tolfenamic acid (143 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tetracycline sum (1755 ppb) + oxytetracycline sum (800 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tetracycline sum (183 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Oxytetracycline sum (176 ppb) + tilmicosine (3600 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tilmicosine (76 ppb)-muscle suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Flunixine (4900 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Ceftiofur (> 5000 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tylosine (588 ppb) + Tilmicosine (177 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovine-slaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Allocation R-Status. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. See (12) in Group A Results. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Interview of the veterinarian. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Official report against the veterinarian. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Allocation R-status. Carcass destroyed. Official 23 Benzylpenicilline (737 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Flunixine (236 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tilmicosine (5013 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tilmicosine (786 ppb)-musclesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tilmicosine (3004 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tilmicosine (85 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Enrofloxacine + ciprofloxacine (12071 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovine-slaughterhouse Dihydrostreptomycine (4442 ppb) + benzylpenicilline (30561 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Benzylpenicilline (352 ppb)-musclesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Sulfadimethoxine (2400 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tolfenamic acid (96 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tolfenamic acid (351 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Oxytetracycline sum (1091 ppb)injection site- suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Enrofoxacine + ciprofloxacine (204 ppb)-injection site- suspect samplebovine-slaughterhouse Tilmicosine (4250 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Tilmicosine (250 ppb)-muscle- report against the veterinarian. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. 24 suspect sample-bovineslaughterhouse Flufenamic acid ()-muscle-target sample-slaughterhouse Marbofloxacine (> 200 ppb)-kidneytarget sample-slaughterhouse Pigs Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Allocation R-Status. Sulfadiazine (120 ppb)-kidney-target sample-slaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Sulfadiazine (203 ppb)-kidney-target sample-slaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Sulfadimethoxine (>200 ppb)-kidneytarget sample-slaughterhouse Sulfadimethoxine (>200 ppb)muscle-target sample-slaughterhouse Sulfadimethoxine (>200 ppb)-kidneytarget sample-slaughterhouse Sulfadimethoxine (>200 ppb)muscle-target sample-slaughterhouse Ampicilline (5519 ppb)-injection sitesuspect sample-slaughterhouse Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. 4-Methylaminoantipyrin (884 ppb) + tetracycline sum (7372 ppb) + oxytetracycline sum (220000 ppb)injection site-suspect sampleslaughterhouse 4-Methylaminoantipyrin (174 ppb) + oxytetracycline sum (1049 ppb)muscle-suspect sampleslaughterhouse Doxycycline (345 ppb) + sulfadiazine (355 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-pig-slaughterhouse Doxycycline (545 ppb) + sulfadiazine (275 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-pig-slaughterhouse Ampicilline (95000ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-pigslaughterhouse See (14) in Group A Results. Nicarbazine (387 ppb)-musclebroiler-target sample-slaughterhouse Doxycycline (229 ppb)-muscle- Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the dealer. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Animal from the Netherland. Poultry Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. 25 broiler-target sample-slaughterhouse Doxycycline (179 ppb)-musclebroiler-target sample-slaughterhouse Doxycycline (813 ppb)-musclebroiler-target sample-slaughterhouse Doxycycline (163 ppb)-musclebroiler-target sample-slaughterhouse Monensin (17,3 ppb) -muscle-broilertarget sample-slaughterhouse Ketoprofen (44 ppb)-muscle-broilertarget sample-slaughterhouse Ketoprofen (13 ppb)-muscle-broilertarget sample-slaughterhouse Nicarbazine (48.7 ppb)-musclebroiler-target sample- slaughterhouse Nicarbazine (77.8 ppb)-musclebroiler-target sample- slaughterhouse Enrofloxacine + ciprofloxacine (460 ppb)-injection site- suspect samplepig-slaughterhouse Enrofloxacine + ciprofloxacine (353 ppb)-muscle- suspect sample-pigslaughterhouse Tolfenamic acid (252 ppb)-injection site- suspect sample-pigslaughterhouse Interview of the holder. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Animals from the Netherlands. Products still at slaughterhouse (200 kg) were destroyed. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Interview of the veterinarian. Products still at slaughterhouse (50 kg) were destroyed. Animals from the Netherlands. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Carcass destroyed. Allocation R-status. Investigation on farm. Check of the VMP register. Interview of the holder. Allocation R-Status. Carcass destroyed. Sheep and goat No non-compliant results Horses No non-compliant results Moxidectine (5 ppb) – equine milk – target sample Flunixine – ewe milk – target sample Milk Investigation on farm. Investigation on farm. Eggs No non-compliant results Rabbit 26 Ketoprofen-muscle-target sampleslaughterhouse Aquaculture No non-compliant results Farmed game No non-compliant results. Wild game No non-compliant result Honey No non-compliant results Administrative measures R status : R-status: for a 8 weeks period the identification document of the animals of the same species (bovine, pigs) from the herd are marked with a R symbol. In the slaughterhouse, 10 % of these animals are sampled. In case of new infringements during this period, the period will be extended by 26 weeks. The analysis are at the expense of the responsible of the herd. R-status were allocated to bovine farms : 16 R-status were allocated to pig farms : 5 Official reports sent to the legal service for the attribution of administrative penalty : 19. Fines paid : 5. In 6 cases, the report was sent to the prosecutor for follow-up. In 3 cases prosecution was given up. 27 BG BULGARIA ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS FROM THE NATIONAL MONITORING PROGRAMME FOR CONTROL ON RESIDUES (NMPCR) FOR THE YEAR 2009 IN BULGARIA No presence of any residues from veterinary medicinal products and environmental contaminants above MRL or from illegal use of forbidden substances has been ever detected for the year 2009. 28 CY • • • • • • CYPRUS Sampling should take place over the entire year (January to December); The tender of Veterinary Services of Cyprus for the interest of accredited laboratories to carry out the laboratory examinations of substances of animal tissues and food of animal origin that are included in the National Residues Plan concerning the year 2011 must be published in the European gazette early in July 2010; Horsemeat. There is not slaughterhouse for horses. Horsemeat is not used for human consumption in Cyprus. Horses exported from Cyprus accompanied by a Passport (Commission Decision 2000/68/EC) is implemented on the basis of “Genetic improvement of Animals” Law 86 (I) 2001, Κ.∆.Π. 522/2005, Αρ. 4051, 18.11.2005 in which mentioned all the drugs used for this horse and the withdrawal period; The number of Horses (Animals) 5700 which included in the plate of PRODUCTION by SPECIES of the DATABASE are the total live horses population of Cyprus NOT SLAUGTERED ANIMALS Efforts are in progress to arrange NRP tests to be carried out in foreign accredited laboratories in order to cover all the numbers on all substances provided in the programme for the year 2010; WE CONFIRM that all methods used by the foreign laboratories to carry out analysis were validated and accredited. This is a basic term included in the Tender. During the evaluation of laboratories responded to the Tender, the evaluation committee checked first if the method used by the laboratory is validated and accredited and for which matrix and if this method is included in the list of the accreditation body; DETAILS OF NON-COMPLIANT RESULTS – TARGETED SAMPLING MEMBER STATE: CYPRUS GROUP SUBSTANCE RESIDUE YEAR: 2009 ANIMAL CATEGORY/ SPECIES A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 FARM/ SLAUGHTERHOUSE/ OTHERS NONCOMPLIANT 0 0 0 0 0 0 A6 29 B1 Antibiotics, Cows chemotherapeu milk tics / Inhibitors Antibiotics, Sheep and chemotherapeu Goats milk tics/ Inhibitors Antibiotics, chemotherapeu tics Oxytetracyclin e Amoxycillin Sulfadimidine Oxytetracyclin e/Tetracycline Farm Farm Bovines Bovines 26 Slaughterhouse Slaughterhouse Porcine Porcine 8 1 1 Slaughterhouse Slaughterhouse 1 1 Slaughterhouse 2 Rabbits Slaughterhouse 7 Sheep and goats Slaugterhouse 1 Sheep and goats Oxytetracyclin e/Tetracycline B2a B2b B2c B2d B2e Diclazuril Diclofenac B3a B3b B3c B3d B3e 48 SUM Bovine Muscles Porcine Muscles 2 2 30 Sheep and goats Muscle 3 Milk Cows milk 8 Sheep and goats milk 26 Rabbits Liver 7 Total number of non compliant samples 48 Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances NONE Follow-up actions Non-compliant results • Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several noncompliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue Aggregate for all animal products and substances plan NON-COMPLIANT RESULTS Non-compliant results B 1. Antibiotics / Chemotherapeutics Follow-up actions Bovines B1. Antibiotics / Chemotherapeutics Bovine/ Bovine farms (Two farms) 31 1.Discarded cow Amoxycillin Bovine/ Discarded cow (CYB 4202009) – (One bovine farm) LCMSMS- Amoxycillin 1199 µg/kg muscle 1. Pastou Bros, (CYB 101058714) AthienouNicosia • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (Bovines 528) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (1carcass / 258 kg) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others (Mrl in muscle 50 µg/kg) 2. Discarded cow Oxytetracycline Bovine/ Discarded cow (CYB 1108009) – (One bovine farm) LCMSMS / HPLC-DPA Oxytetracycline 963 µg/kg muscle (Mrl in muscle 100 µg/kg) 1. Dimitris and Andreas Petrou, (CYB 101287442) Lympia- Nicosia • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (Bovines 281) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (1 carcass / 252 kg) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others 32 B1.Antibiotics / Chemotherapeutics Pigs B1. Antibiotics / Chemotherapeutics Porcine/ Fattening pigs (Two porcine farm) 1. Oxytetracycline Porcine/ Fattening pigs – (One 1. Pantelis Vassou Ltd, (CY 117) Marki-Nicosia porcine farm) • Investigation in the farm of origin √ LCMSMS / HPLC-DPA • Verification of records √ Oxytetracycline 1439 µg/kg muscle • Additional sampling √ (Mrl in muscle 100 µg/kg) • Animals held in the farm (1717 Fattening pigs / 417 sows) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (NONE) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others 2. Sulphonamides Porcine/ Fattening pigs – (One porcine farm) 1. Chr. Nicodemou and others Ltd 2.1. Sulphadimidine (CY 145) –Kato Moni-Nicosia LCMSMS, Sulphadimidine 1426 µg/kg –porcine muscle • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (16000 fattening pigs/ 1052 sows) 33 • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (NONE) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others Poultry Sheep and goat B1.Antibiotics / Chemotherapeutics Sheep and Goats (One farm- 2 cases) Chlortetracycline 1. Demetris Varnavas- (CYS 4012103) Dromolaxia-Larnaca LCMSMS / HPLC-DPA Oxytetracycline 1395 µg/kg Investigation in the farm of origin √ Oxytetracycline 3015 µg/kg Verification of records √ Mrls: Muscle- 100 µg/kg Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (2508) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (2 carcasses/ 52 kg) Administrative measures (NONE) Others 34 B2e NSAIDs Sheep and Goats (One farm) 1. Loucas Philippou and sons Farm Ltd(CYS 5021014) – Kato Polemidia-Lemesos LCMSMS Diclofenac 12 µg/kg (Sheep muscle) Investigation in the farm of origin √ No Mrls 2010. Verification of records √ Additional sampling Animals held in the farm (200) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (NONE) Administrative measures (NONE) Others Horses None None Milk B1. Antibiotics/Chemotherapeutics Antibiotics (Delvo SP test) Dairy cows farms (8 cases) 1. Farmes Sanx Ltd-(CYB 4110003) –Kiti Larnaka Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (365) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (6793lt) 35 Administrative measures √ Others 2. Kypros Hadjistasou (CYB 112006) –Potamia, Nicosia • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (99) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (11161.3 litre milk) • Administrative measures √ • Others 3. Lambros Hadjigiorgallis- (CYB 1107016) – Dali - Nicosia • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (164) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (2000lt) • Administrative measures √ • Others 36 4. G & D Farm Ltd – (CYB 4202018) – Athienou - Larnaka • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (363) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (7623.1 litre milk) • Administrative measures √ • Others 5. Victoria & Giannakis Charalambous -(CYB 1225006) –Tseri-Nicosia • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (202) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (11859 litre milk) • Administrative measures √ • Others 6. Νeka Farm (CYB 5210001) –Kolossi – 37 Limassol Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (119) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) Administrative measures √ Others 7. Christodoulos Theodorou 1107018) –Dali - Nicosia – (CYB Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (156) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) Administrative measures √ Others 8. Makromallis Farm- (CYB 3111004)Dasaki Achnas - Ammochostos Investigation in the farm of origin √ 38 Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (170 ) Sheep and Goats farm 26 (26 cases) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (3000 litre milk) Administrative measures √ Others 1. Dimitris Afxentiou-(CYS 3110023) –Dasaki Achnas, Ammochostos Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (282) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) Administrative measures √ Others 2. Stelios Giorgallou-(CYS 3111039) –Dasaki Achnas - Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ 39 • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (457 sheep-117 goats) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) • Administrative measures √ • Others 3. Georgios M. Savva-(CYS 4106010) –Ormideia - Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (512) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) • Administrative measures √ • Others 4. Loukas & Petros Adamou-(CYS 4106042) – Ormideia - Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ 40 • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (30 goats- 483 sheep) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) • Administrative measures (√) • Others 5. Pavlos Adamou -(CYS 4106086) –OrmideiaAmmochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (93 goats and 636 sheep) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) • Administrative measures (√) • Others 6. Isidoros Savva Posios-(CYS 4106026) Ormideia - Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ 41 • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (142 sheep) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) • Administrative measures (√) • Others 7. Petros Koulendrou - (CYS 4106057) – Ormideia- Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (135 sheep) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) • Administrative measures √ • Others 8. Panagiotis Christodoulou-(CYS 4106051)Ormideia - Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ 42 • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (53 goats and 297 sheep) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) • Administrative measures (√) • Others 9. Ioannis Prodromou-(CYS 4106027)-Ormideia Ammochostos Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (22 goats and 38 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) Administrative measures (None) Others 10. Andreas Evgeniou - (CYS 4106098) – Ormideia - Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ 43 • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (136 goats) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) • Administrative measures (None) • Others 11. Paraskevas Fesas-(CYS 3110068) –Avgorou Ammochostos Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (32 goats and 210 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) Administrative measures (None) Others 12. Kostas Hadjiilia-(CYS 1241022) – Paliometocho - Nicosia Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ 44 Animals held in the farm (27 goats and 197 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (160litre milk) Administrative measures (√) Others 13. Kostas Petrou-(CYS 4217004) – Lympia Nicosia Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (608 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (980 litre milk) Administrative measures (√) Others 14. Kostis Hadjistavri -(CYS 1108018) – Lympia - Nicosia Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ 45 Animals held in the farm (52 goats and 352 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (385 litre milk) Administrative measures (√) Others 15. Georgios Georgiou-(CYS 1207004) –Kalo Chorio Oreinis - Nicosia Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (329 goats) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (210 litre milk) Administrative measures (√) Others 16. Savvas Pieri-(CYS 3111041)-Dasaki Achnas – Ammochostos Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ 46 Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (11 goats and 226 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) Administrative measures (None) Others 17. Christofis Symeou-(CYS 3111045) – Vrysoulles – Ammochostos Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (48 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (None) Administrative measures (NONE) Others 18. Christos Iona-(CYS 4124022) –Kivisili Larnaka Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ 47 Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (136 goats and 174 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (200 litre milk) Administrative measures √ Others 19. Neofytos Makri - (CYS 4210071) –Kalo Chorio - Larnaka Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (36 goats and 75 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (77 litre milk) Administrative measures √ Others 20. Ttooulou Bros - (CYS 4202033) – Athienou Larnaka Investigation in the farm of origin √ 48 Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (42 goats and 936 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (1660 litre milk) Administrative measures (√) Others 21. Meliton Farm - (CYS 5222006) –Avdimou Limassol Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (142 goats and 111 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (5500 litre milk) Administrative measures √ Others 22. Anthemis Kosti - (CYS 3110016) –Avgorou Ammochostos Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ 49 Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (126 goats and 623 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (97 litre milk) Administrative measures (√) Others 23. Stelios Giorgallou - (CYS 3111039) – Dasaki Achnas - Ammochostos Investigation in the farm of origin √ Verification of records √ Additional sampling √ Animals held in the farm (117 goats and 457 sheep) Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (1717 litre milk) Administrative measures (√) Others 24. Neofytos Groutidis - (CYS 1226007) –Politiko - Lefkosia • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ 50 • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (486 goats and 39 sheep) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (4583 litre milk) • Administrative measures (√) • Others 25. Anastasis Karoullas - (CYS 3114033) – Vrysoulles - Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (54 goats and 510 sheep) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (35 litre milk) • Administrative measures (√) • Others 26. Andreas Savvidis - (CYS 4309111) – Kofinou - Larnaka • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ 51 • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (212 goats and 48 sheep) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (120 litre milk) • Administrative measures (√) • Others Eggs None None Rabbit B2b Coccidiostats (Five rabbit farms-Seven cases) 1. Diclazuril (Five rabbit farms) 1.1. LCMSMS- Diclazuril 612 µg/kg (Rabbit liver) 1. Sotiris Ioannou –Polemidia -Lemesos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (Females and males parents 800/fattening 1000) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (NONE) 52 1.2. LCMSMS- Diclazuril 8310 µg/kg (Rabbit liver) Diclazuril 223 µg/kg (Rabbit liver) Diclazuril 242 µg/kg (Rabbit liver) 1.3. LCMSMS- Diclazuril 53 µg/kg (Rabbit liver) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others 2. Miltos Xadjimiltis –Mathicoloni -Lemesos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (Females and males parents 450/fattening 1000) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (NONE) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others 3. Georgios Hadjizacharias – Augorou Ammochostos • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (Females and males parents 1030/fattening 5000) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (NONE) 53 1.4. LCMSMS- Diclazuril 35 µg/kg (Rabbit liver) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others 4. L.G.L. Rabbit Farm Ltd –Ergates -Nicosia • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (Females and males parents 1500/fattening 25000) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (NONE) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others 1. Maria Kostantinou –-Marathounta-Paphos 1.5. LCMSMS- Diclazuril 154 µg/kg (Rabbit liver) • Investigation in the farm of origin √ • Verification of records √ • Additional sampling √ • Animals held in the farm (Females and males parents 270/fattening 650) • Intensified checks on the animals and products from the farm / establishment in the event of repeated infringements √ • Carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption (NONE) • Administrative measures (NONE) • Others 54 Eggs None None Aquaculture None None Farmed game None None Wild game None None Honey None None IMPORTS NON-COMPLIANT RESULTS Non-compliant results None Follow-up actions None 55 CZ CZECH REPUBLIC Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Not found * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue Aggregate for all animal products and substances plan State Veterinary Administration (SVA) will carry out in cooperation with ISCVBM the study focused on residues of antibiotics (beta-lactams) in sows (muscle, liver, kidney). SVA will carry out in cooperation with CISTA the study focused on reason of high content of cadmium in kidney of bovine animals in some localities (soil – plant – cow). Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines B1: Neomycin cow/liver: 1740 ppb Action: investigation was conducted on the farm; the treatment was not mentioned in FCI. Last treatment was 9.12.2009 (Mastijet forte intra uberis, Alamycin i.m.), cow was slaughtered 21.1.2010. Extraordinary veterinary measures were imposed; additional samples from other cows were taken: 5x livers (3x NC neomycin, 1x NCDHSTM, 1x compliant), 2x B1: Neomycin cow/muscle: 866 kidneys (1x NC DHSTM, 1x compliant). ppb, liver: 723 ppb Withdrawal period was not kept. There were confiscated livers and kidneys from all cows which B1: Tulathromycin calf/muscle: were treated by neomycin and DHSTM during last 1122 ppb, liver: 11431 ppb 100 days before slaughter. Frequency of official controls was increased on the farm. B3c: Cadmium (Cd) 8x kidney (cows) on 8 different farms: 2,22 ppm, 2,22 ppm, 2,2 ppm, 2,13 ppm, 1,97 ppm, 1,73 ppm, 1,48 ppm, 1,2 ppm. Action: all tissues was confiscated (whole body: byproduct category 2 according to regulation (EC) 1774/2002). Investigation on the farm and at the private veterinarian was conducted. Withdrawal period was not kept. Action: investigation on the farm and at the private veterinarian was conducted. Withdrawal period was kept for last application of PNC (which has been written on list of treatment - 21 days) but it was used 56 Draxxin (tulathromycin - 49 days of WP). Treatment was not mentioned in FCI. B1: Sulfadiazin fattening pig/muscle: 146 ppb, kidney: 246 ppb B2b: Nicarbazin chicken/liver: 620,5 ppb, 350,0 ppb Actions: investigations on the farms were conducted; follow-up testing of feed and additional testing of kidneys (in total 37 samples) were carried out on the farms concerned. Non-compliant findings occurred mostly in the older cows. Total condemnation of cows´ kidneys above defined age was ordered on 5 farms. Pigs Action: investigation on the farm was conducted. Withdrawal period was not kept. Treatment was not mentioned in FCI. Additional samples from 2 pigs (muscle, liver, kidney) was examined – compliant. Poultry Action: two farms - residues of nicarbazin were detected in amount above the action limit which was recommended for chicken liver by the Codex Alimentarius - 200 ppb in liver. Investigation on the farms was conducted; extraordinary veterinary measures were imposed. Additional samples of livers and feed were taken (other batches) - all samples on two farms were compliant. Sheep and goat B3c: Cadmium (Cd) horse/liver: 2,78 ppm, kidney - 57,2 ppm Horses The horse was 20 years old. Milk B2b: Nicarbazin hen eggs: 916 ppb + narazin 6,5 ppb B2b: Robenidin quail eggs: 63,2 ppb Eggs Action: investigation on the farm was conducted; extraordinary veterinary measures were imposed; additional samples of eggs (14x) and feed (3x) and egg products (10x) were taken for further testing – eggs with NC samples (two hens hall) and all noncompliant egg products (melange) were confiscated. Probably it was cross contamination of feed; the producers of feeding mixtures have been warned. Action: investigation on the farm was conducted; probably cause was cross-contamination of feed mixture; extraordinary veterinary measures were imposed, expedition of eggs was block; additional samples (eggs and feed) were analysed – all compliant. 57 B2b: Salinomycin rabbit/liver: 15,56 ppb B3e: Sum of Malachite and Leucomalachite green (MG/LMG): 2x (trout) from 2 sites were above the MRPL (LMG: 5,33 ppb and 3,71 ppb) and 1 sample (carp) was above MRPL (2,2 ppb); samples from 5 fish farms were bellow the MRPL. Rabbit Action: investigation on the farm was conducted; extraordinary veterinary measures were imposed, expedition of liver was block, additional samples (other batch) of liver and feed were taken – all compliant. Aquaculture Actions: investigations on the fish farms were conducted; extraordinary veterinary measures were imposed, prohibiting of sale (the non-compliant batches) until the results are compliant. Farmed game B3c: Lead (Pb) roe-deer/muscle: 48,0 ppm and Mercury (Hg) 0,0623 ppm Lead (Pb) above action level 0,3 ppm: phasant (2x), wild duck (4x), roe-deer (2x), wild boar (1x) Wild game Actions: additional samples (muscle, liver, kidney) were taken from two other roe-deer: compliant (action levels: Pb - 0,3 ppm, Hg - 0,5 ppm) Most likely contamination by bullet. Honey 58 DE GERMANY Modification of national residue plan Group A substances Aggregate for all animal products and substances Group A substances A5 = Beta antagonists Aquacultures On the occasion of an FVO inspection mission in 2009, the Commission recommended to analyse aquacultures for ß antagonists, citing the minutes of a meeting in 2000 of the Commission’s working group on residue control plans. Yet, the minutes do not contain such a recommendation. As use of ß antagonists in aquacultures is questionable anyhow, we did not follow the Commission recommendation. According to the National Reference Laboratory, there is no new knowledge as regards the question whether it would make sense to include ß antagonists in NRCP testing. The NRL therefore did not recommend including this aspect in the NRCP, which is herewith brought to the Commission’s attention. A6 = Dapsone Bovines Germany has so far declined to include dapsone in the NRCP because there is no need to use the product as there have been no cases of granular dermatitis in cattle in Germany. The BVL database shows negative findings in 415 samples from 2007 to 2009, four of them stemming from other Member Sates. Dapsone was therefore considered only with a small sample number in the 2010 NRCP. A6 = Nitrofurans Bovines, ovines/caprines, farmed game, horses, and rabbits Oral administration of nitrofurans and nitroimidazoles seems little likely, but cannot be excluded in general, at least not for nitroimidazoles. The 2010 plan therefore provides for a few samples in cattle, sheep/goat, horses, farmed game, and rabbits to be analysed for nitrofurans and nitroimidazoles. A6 = Nitroimidazoles Milk The 2010 NRCP provides for testing milk for nitroimidazoles. A6 = Chloramphenicol Poultry Positive findings here have been attributed to hygienic problems in sample taking. Therefore, it does not seem necessary to enhance the sample number. The recommendation is to train sample taking personnel in this respect. 59 Non-compliant results 1 Taleranol (beta-zearalanol); fattening cattle; urine; 2.01 µg/kg Follow-up actions Contents of alpha and beta zearalenol and of zearalenone indicate that mycotoxins are a likely cause of findings. On-site investigation at the farm of origin; examination of the records. 1 Taleranol (beta-zearalanol); cows; Contents of alpha and beta zearalenol and of zearalenone urine; 2.58 µg/kg indicate that mycotoxins are a likely cause of findings. On-site investigation at the farm of origin; examination of the records. Control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU subsidies). 1 alpha-boldenone; cows; urine; 0.6 The sample did not give rise to official complaint µg/kg because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; heifers; u.rine; The sample did not give rise to official complaint 0.34 µg/kg because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; heifers; urine; The sample did not give rise to official complaint 0.34 µg/kg because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; heifers; urine; The sample did not give rise to official complaint 0.36 µg/kg because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening calves; The sample did not give rise to official complaint Urine; 0.36 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening cattle; The sample did not give rise to official complaint urine; 0.41 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; cows; urine; The sample did not give rise to official complaint 0.41 µg/kg because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening calves; The sample did not give rise to official complaint urine; 0.42 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. 60 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening cattle; urine; 0.43 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; heifers; urine; 0.44 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; cows; urine; 0.46 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening cattle; urine; 0.49 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; cows; urine; 0.54 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening cattle; urine; 0.55 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; heifers; urine; 0.59 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-Nortestosterone; heifers; urine; 0.59 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-Nortestosterone; cows; urine; 0.61 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; heifers; urine; 0.63 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; heifers; urine; 0.64 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; heifers; urine; 0.68 µg/kg 1 beta-boldenone, 1dehydrotestosteron; fattening pigs; urine; 0.73 µg/kg The sample did not give rise to official complaint because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because the level of alpha-nortestosterone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because the level of alpha-nortestosterone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy (calved 02 Nov 2009). The sample did not give rise to official complaint because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. The sample did not give rise to official complaint, because beta-boldenone naturally occurs in adult male pigs. 61 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; cows; urine; 0.8 µg/kg The sample did not give rise to official complaint because the level of alpha-nortestosterone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy.. 1 alpha-boldenone; heifers; urine; The sample did not give rise to official complaint 0.86 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening calves; The sample did not give rise to official complaint urine; 0.98 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; heifers; urine; The sample did not give rise to official complaint 1.02 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. 1 17-alpha-19-nrtestosterone; cows; Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. urine; 1.2 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; The sample did not give rise to official complaint cows; urine; 1.2 µg/kg because the level of alpha-nortestosterone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening calves; The sample did not give rise to official complaint urine; 1.22 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening cattle; The sample did not give rise to official complaint urine; 1.25 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates, according to current state of knowledge. 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosteron; Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. heifers; urine; 1.32 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. cows; urine; 1.4 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. cows; urine; 1,5 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; cows; urine; The sample did not give rise to official complaint 1.51 µg/kg because the level of alpha-boldenone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. Illegal treatment is only indicated by beta-boldenone conjugates. 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening cattle; The sample did not give rise to official complaint urine; 1.66 µg/kg because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; The sample did not give rise to official complaint cows; urine; 1.7 µg/kg because the level of alpha-nortestosterone found is physiologically attributable to the animal’s pregnancy. 1 17-beta-19-nortestosterone; Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. fattening pigs; urine; 1.8 µg/kg 62 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; fattening calves; Urine; 2.15 µg/kg 1 17-beta-19-nortestosterone; fattening pigs; urine; 2.52 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; heifers; urine; 3.24 µg/kg 1 alpha-boldenone; fattening calves; urine; 6.43 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; cows; urine; 6.78 µg/kg 1 17-beta-19-nortestosterone; fattening pigs; urine; 8 µg/kg 1 17-alpha-19-nortestosterone; cows; urine; 18,1 µg/kg 1 17-beta-19-nortestosterone; fattening pigs; urine; 42.79 µg/kg 1 17-beta-19-nortestosterone; fattening pigs; urine; 284.7 µg/kg 1 17-beta-19-nortestosterone; fattening pigs; urine; 592 µg/kg 1 chloramphenicol; turkey hens; drinking water; 0.18 µg/kg 1 chloramphenicol; fattening pigs; muscle; 0.3 µg/kg Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. The sample did not give rise to official complaint because only alpha-boldenone conjugates were found, while illegal treatment is only indicated by betaboldenone conjugates. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. Probably endogenous. Therefore no further measures. Exceeding CC alpha, but below MRPL; therefore not subject to complaint. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, 16 additional sampling, ban on transport and delivery of livestock (634 animals), increased controls in the establishment of origin (16) 1 semicarbazide (SEM); fattening On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination pigs, muscle; 1.53 µg/kg of the records, ban on transport and delivery of livestock, Control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU subsidies). 1 metronidazole; fattening pigs, On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination muscle; 18.44 µg/kg of the records, 5 additional samplings. * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as backgroand information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. 63 Modification of national residue plan Group B substances Aggregate for all animal products and substances B1 = Amino glycosides Bovine Amino glycosides were included new in the 2009 plan, with a relatively low number of samples. Because of positive findings in 2009, sample numbers in cattle and fattening calves have been increased by 1/3 (one third) in the 2010 plan. B1 = Sulfonamides Pigs After one finding exceeding the legal residue level of sulfonamide in swine in 2007 and six findings in 2008, the number of samples of swine has been raised to roughly 2000 animals in the 2010 NRCP. B2a = Benzimidazoles Milk, poultry and farmed game Sample numbers have been enhanced for 2010 to the end of obtaining more analytic data for an evaluation of relevance of the problem. B2b = Coccidiostatics The spectrum of coccidiostatic substances tested in eggs has been transferred to all other animal species and matrices (with the exception of milk and honey), but is confined to the substances subject to Regulation (EC) No. 124/2009. B2c = Carbamates and pyrethroids Horses BVL pointed out that horses have so far not been tested for carbamates and pyrethroids, though insecticides are playing an important role in horse keeping, in particular in summer. It is, for instance, usual to braid horse manes with insecticide clips. Therefore, it was decided that five horses should also be tested for pyrethroids under the 2010 NRCP. B2c = Lambda-cyhalothrin Honey Sample number enhanced by 20 per cent. B2d = Sedatives Testing for xylazine (Rompun®) was discussed. According to Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No. 2377/90, xylazine is authorised for use in bovines and Equidae, but not in pigs. Xylazine is a widely used sedative. It is increasingly being used in cattle kept in extensive pasture farming before slaughter, to facilitate handling of the animals. It was therefore decided to include xylazine in testing in bovines and horses for one year. B2e = NSAID Samples of horses are tested for all kinds of NSAID tested also in other animal species under the NRCP. In addition, ibuprofen and mefenamic acid have been included in analyses conducted in red meat, poultry, milk, and farmed game, and tolfenamic acid has been included in analyses in milk. Analyses of diclofenac in red meat are to be enhanced to improve the data basis. B2f = Carbadox and olaquindox The Commission holds that the substances carbadox and olaquindox, though no longer authorised for use, are relevant to health, and therefore recommends considering them in the NRCP. This question was also discussed in Germany before. Both substances are feed additives which are no longer permitted. They are subject to analyses in the framework of the feed control plan. In 2007 and 2008, a total of nearly 800 samples of single feed, feed premixtures, and feed mixtures were analysed for carbadox and olaquindox, and all were 64 negative. According to our risk-based approach, carbadox and/or olaquindox will only be considered in the NRCP after there have been relevant findings in the feed control plan, or when there are other signs showing that the substances have actually been used. Hence, this problem has to be discussed anew when the 2011 plan is prepared. B2f = Cymiazole Honey Sample number enhanced by 20 percent for the whole group. B3a = Nicotine It was decided to raise the number of samples from 6 (to date) to 18 boiling chicken in the 2010 NRCP. B3b = Phosmet Phosmet has been included in the 2010 NRCP because there was one phosmet product about to be authorised for use in laying hens. We have now learnt that the application for this product has meanwhile been withdrawn. B3e = malachite green Aquacultures Sample number enhanced by ten per cent in the 2010 plan. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovine 1 Enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin; cows; muscle and kidney 2 tetracycline; fattening calves; muscle and 1 kidney 1 4-methylamino-aAntipyrin 4methylaminophenazone; fattening cattle; liver 1 flunixin meglumin; fattening cattle; kidney 1 phenylbutazone; fattening cattle; plasma Information to competent authority. Information to competent authority. Information to competent authority. Information to competent authority. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, 3 additional sampling, 2 increased controls in the establishment of origin (blood and milk), injunction to notify slaughter; criminal proceedings, control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU subsidies). 1 dexamethasone; cows; liver On-site investigation at the farm of origin, 4 additional sampling, notification of slaughter required, criminal proceedings. 1 WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ On-site investigation at the farm of origin, 2 additional (WHO-TEF 1997) upper bound; sampling, following slaughter cattle will be sampled. fattening cattle, fat 1 WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ Likely source of contamination is a colour coating of (WHO-TEF 1997) upper bound; protective barriers separating animals’ resting boxes. On-site fattening cattle, fat investigation at the farm of origin, 4 additional sampling, 18 65 1 lead Pb; fattening cattle; kidney 1 cadmium Cd; cows; liver and kidney 1 cadmium Cd; cows; kidney 2 mercury Hg; cows; kidney 2 mercury Hg; cows; kidney 1 mercury Hg; cows; kidney 1 mercury Hg; fattening cattle; liver 1 mercury Hg; fattening cattle; liver 1 mercury Hg; fattening cattle; kidney 1 mercury Hg; fattening cattle; kidney 1 mercury Hg; fattening cattle; kidney 5 mercury Hg; fattening cattle; kidney ban on transport and delivery of livestock (whole stock), 3 increased controls in the establishment of origin. The suspected source of contamination has been eliminated. Blood samples will be taken for a longer period ahead in order to test effectiveness of the measure. No information. No information. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, additional sampling. Control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU-subsidies). According to the relevant national regulations, positive samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. Information to competent authority. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, 1 additional sampling On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records. Follow-up sampling. Control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU subsidies). The animal was an 11-year old mother cow. The farm of origin is in another Member State. According to the relevant national regulations, positive samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. Information to competent authority. Pigs 1 dihydrostreptomycin; other pigs; kidney 1 benzylpenicillin penicillin G; fattening pigs; kidney No information. No information. 66 1 enrofloxacin; kidney and muscle and sulfadimidin muscle; other pigs 1 trimethoprim; fattening pigs; kidney 1 sulfadiazine; other pigs; kidney and muscle 1 sulfadiazine; fattening pigs; muscle 1 sulfadiazine; kidney, and trimethoprim; muscle and kidney; fattening pig 1 chlortetracycline; fattening pigs; kidney 1 tetracycline und oxytetracycline fattening pigs; muscle 1 tetracycline; fattening pigs; muscle and kidney 5 cadmium Cd; other pigs; kidney 2 cadmium Cd; other pigs; kidney 1 cadmium Cd; other pigs; kidney 1 cadmium Cd; fattening pigs; kidney Non-compliance with waiting period. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, criminal proceedings, More veterinary drug checks announced. Information to competent authority. No information. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, additional sampling, criminal proceedings. Control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU subsidies). On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, criminal proceedings, control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU subsidies). Cross-contamination by liquid feeding. Information to competent authority, examination of the record, criminal proceedings, control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU-subsidies). Information to competent authority. No information. Breeding animal, aged over 24 months. No information. Animal aged over 18 months. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, additional sampling, control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU-subsidies). 10 mercury Hg; other pigs; liver Breeding animals aged over 24 months. and 2 kidneys 26 mercury Hg; other pigs; According to the relevant national regulations, positive kidney samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. 1 mercury Hg; other pigs; On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the kidney records. 1 mercury Hg; other pigs; Kidney and liver of the animal have not been sold as a food. kidney Early in 2010, all slaughter establishments will be addressed with a recommendation not to place kidneys and livers of 67 breeding pigs on the market as food. 13 mercury Hg; fattening pigs; liver and 37 kidneys 1 mercury Hg; fattening pigs; liver 2 mercury Hg; fattening pigs; liver and 6 kidneys 3 mercury Hg; fattening pigs; liver and 1 kidney 1 mercury Hg; fattening pigs; liver 2 mercury Hg; fattening pigs; liver 1 mercury Hg; fattening pigs; kidney According to the relevant national regulations, positive samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, increased controls in the establishment of origin. Slaughter and sampling/analysis of another sow. Sales ban on livestock. Information to competent authority. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, additional sampling. The contaminated liver stems from a more than two-year-old sow, in which natural environmental contamination with heavy metals, including mercury, must be expected. The slaughter establishment therefore condemns all livers and kidneys from pigs aged over two years. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, 7 additional sampling. Control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU-subsidies). It is suspected that the mercury was released from pigs’ toys (biting balls). On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, additional sampling, animals and products classified as not suitable for human consumption. Technical advice to the animal keeper. Poultry 1 doxycycline; fattening chicken; muscle 1 lindane; gammahexachlorocyclohexane; gamma-HCH; fattening chicken; fat; 0.057 mg/kg Information to competent authority. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, 4 additional samplings, ban on transport and delivery of livestock (33000) Sheep / Goat 1 tulathromycin; sheep, fattening lambs; muscle No information. 1 mercury Hg; sheep, fattening lambs; liver and 7 kidneys According to the relevant national regulations, positive samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present 68 1 mercury Hg; sheep, fattening lambs; liver and 1 kidney cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. Information to competent authority. Horses 1 cadmium Cd; other horses; muscle, liver and kidney Information to competent authority. Milk 1 doramectin Doramectin probably applied during the dry period. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, fine imposed. Control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU-subsidies). Eggs 9 lasalocid No information. 1 lasalocid On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, 3 additional samplings. 1 DDT, sum of DDT, DDE, DDD, calculated as DDT and 1 DDE 1 endrin No information. 1 WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ (WHO-TEF 1997) upper bound and 1 WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ (WHO-TEF 1997) upper bound 1 WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ (WHO-TEF 1997) upper bound and 1 WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ (WHO-TEF 1997) upper bound Information to competent authority. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, criminal proceedings. Owner killed affected livestock on his own responsibility. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records, additional sampling, animals and products classified as not suitable for human consumption. Official investigations with participation of the environmental engineer; livestock/product barred; farmer advised. The outdoor range of the fowl farm is subjected to various sanitation measures. Flocks (total of 30 laying hens) are killed. 69 Aquacultures 1 leucomalachite green; trout; muscle of fish No information. 1 leucomalachite green; trout; muscle of fish On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of records, 1 additional sampling 1 leucomalachite green; trout; muscle of fish Information to competent authority. 1 leucomalachite green; trout; muscle of fish On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of records, 1 additional sampling. Ban on transport and delivery of fish from that pond until results of investigations were available. Increased controls in the establishment of origin. Offence proceedings instituted. 1 leucomalachite green; trout; On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the muscle of fish; 0.026 mg/kg records, 3 additional samplings, ban on transport and delivery of livestock, farm barred. Fish may only be delivered when proved to be free of any residues. 1 malachite green CI 42000 and It is suspected that waste water from the ornamental fish 1 leucomalachite green; trout; pond was drained into rainbow trout and carp pond. On-site muscle of fish investigation at the farm of origin, examination of records, 4 additional samplings. Ban on transport and delivery of fish. 13 enhanced controls in the establishment of origin, criminal proceedings. 1 malachite green CI 42000 and It is suspected that waste water from the ornamental fish 1 leucomalachite green; carp; pond was drained into rainbow trout and carp pond. On-site muscle of fish investigation at the farm of origin, examination of records, 4 additional samplings. Ban on transport and delivery of fish. 13 enhanced controls in the establishment of origin, criminal proceedings. 1 leucomalachite green; other It is suspected that malachite green contaminated the ponds fish; muscle of fish during the previous owner’s era. On-site investigation at the farm of origin, examination of the records. Ban on transport and delivery of fish from all 4 ponds. Affected animals (210) killed. 50 increased controls in the establishment of origin. Animals and products classified as not suitable for human consumption. Criminal proceedings. Control report pursuant to Art. 9 letter e of Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 (Withdrawal of the possibility of receiving or requesting EU subsidies). Farmed Game 1 mercury Hg; red deer; kidney According to the relevant national regulations, positive samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level 70 1 mercury Hg; fallow deer; kidney findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. According to the relevant national regulations, positive samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. Game 1 mercury Hg; wild boar; muscle; 0.017 mg/kg 16 mercury Hg; wild boar; liver and 16 kidneys 5 mercury Hg; wild boar; liver and 1 kidney 1 alpha-HCH and 1 beta-HCH; wild boar; fat 1 beta-HCH; wild boar; fat 1 DDT, sum; 1 pp-DDE, wild boar; fat 2 DDT, sum; wild boar; fat 1 DDT, sum; wild boar; fat 1 hexachlorebenzene HCB; wild boar; fat 1 lindane; gammahexachlorocyclohexane; gamma-HCH; wild boar According to the relevant national regulations, positive samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. According to the relevant national regulations, positive samples give only reason to complaint when the residues do not stem from soil, water, or air pollution. In the present cases, low contamination levels indicate that the source of residues is environmental pollution. The maximum permissible level in feed is 0.1 mg/kg, so that low-level findings may also be attributable to legal feeding. Information to competent authority. No information. No information. No definite exceeding of legal maximum level, as the value measured is within the analytic method’s variance. No information. Information to competent authority. No information. Information to competent authority. Honey 2 N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide DEET Attributable to use of insect deterrent spray "FABI". The spray was an old-dated product which still contained the substance DEET. The new spray products do no longer contain this substance, according to the authority which reported the finding. 71 DK DENMARK Group A substances (aggregate for all animal products and substances) Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Thiouracil – Urine – Bull on farm, 9 5 subsequent suspicion samples were taken for each Presumably Non-Compliant sample. The months – 25,8 ppb sample on farm was followed up in 2009 while the Thiouracil – Urine – Bull in sample from the slaughterhouse was followed up Slaughterhouse, 13 months – 27 in 2010. Both cases proofed eventually to be ppb compliant because the 5 follow up samples contained less than 25 ppb Thiouracil in both Substance--Matrix-animal or animal cases. Actions: (investigations in the farm of origin, product-Concentration animals held in farms, slaughtered animals, intensified sampling in related farms, products declared unfit for human consumption, administrative measures, denial EC aid, others). Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines 1 WHO-PCDD / F-PCB-TEQ - Fat Investigations in order to find the source have led to the hypothesis that it is a local pollution of the feed due to spillage of PCB-containing liquid. & Number of non-compliant @ List actions: (e.g investigations in the farm of results-substance (if possible origin: verification of records, additional matrix) sampling; animals held in the farm, iintensified checks on the animals and products from the farm/establishment in the event of repeated infringements, carcasses and products declare unfit for human consumption, administrative measures, others). Pigs 6 Benzylpenicillin (Penicillin G)1 herd could not be identified, carcass declared Sow Kidney unfit for human consumption, no action. 1 verification of records concluded that withdrawal period was compliant, therefore no action but carcass declared unfit for human consumption. Remaining 4 cases: Investigations in the farms of 2 Oxytetracycline – Sow kidney origin, verifications of records, carcasses declared 72 unfit for human consumption, administrative fines. 2 Investigations in the farms of origin, verifications of records, carcasses declared unfit for human consumption, administrative fines. Poultry Sheep and goat Horses Milk 1 Salinomycin – 9,1 ppb in eggs Eggs Information of the Plant Directorate who takes care of enforcement of rules on feed. Rabbit 1 Leuco Malachite Green – Uncertain concentration – Muscle and skin of trout Aquaculture The Presumably Non-Compliant Sample was eventually declared Compliant, because 5 subsequent suspicion samples were negative. Farmed game 3 Lead-Muscle of Wild Game Wild game No action since game is a rare menu. Honey 73 EE ESTONIA Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Chloramphenicol – 0.12 µg/kg- raw milk- cow The sample was taken from dairy industry before the bulk tanker has discharged (milk from 2 farms cows together). The farms of origin were investigated immediately after receiving positive results. 2 milk samples were taken and analysed with negative results. The follow-up inspection didn’t give any evidence of an illegal use of chloramphenicol. Thiouracil – 4.10 µg/kg – urine - pig The farm of origin was investigated immediately. There was no indication of an illegal use of thiouracil. The presence of thiouracil at such low level could be linked as a result of the natural presence of crucifera plants in feed. β-testosterone - <0.1 µg/kg; αtestosterone 2.8 µg/kg - serum – young bovine at farm 2 samples were taken from one farm. The farm of origin was investigated immediately after receiving positive results. α-testosterone 0.8 µg/kg - serum – young bovine at farm Movement of animals from farm to other facilities or movement to the slaughterhouse was temporarily stopped. 2 additional (serum) samples were taken and analysed with negative results. During the follow-up inspection in the farm of origin it became obvious that both samples were taken from pregnant young bovines and there were no indications of an illegal use of testosterone. * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan All the 2009 non-compliant results (except wild game) have been taken into account 74 regarding the 2010 plan and the numbers of samples have been increased accordingly. The number of the wild game samples will be at the same level as 2009. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines No non-compliant results Pigs No non-compliant results Poultry No non-compliant results Sheep and goat No non-compliant results Horses Milk Microbiological screening – positive The farm of origin was investigated immediately. result – for further examination with Additional raw milk sample was taken and analysed LC-MS/MS – PenicillinG – 4.5 with negative result. µg/kg Eggs Salinomycin – 8.35 µg/kg The farm of origin was investigated immediately after receiving positive result. 1 additional egg sample was taken and analysed with negative result. The farm has its own feed–mill plant. Investigation was performed on the feed-mill plant too. Additional animal feed samples (2 samples) were taken and analysed with positive results: salinomycin 193 µg/kg and salinomycin 18 µg/kg. The contamination reason was feedingstuffs crosscontamination. Rabbit @ Aquaculture No non-compliant results Farmed game @ Wild game 2 muscle samples in wild boar were Heavy metals are present in the environment as a positive for cadmium result of a long-time absorption and may accumulate 1 muscle sample in roe was positive in animal tissues. for lead Honey No non-compliant results 75 ES SPAIN Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Equino:Incremento de la investigación de nuevas sustancias en el grupo A3 y A6 (nitrofuranos) Non-compliant results Follow-up actions 2. Cloranfenicol en músculo de aves. Control dirigido. Análisis iniciales:0,25 y 0,47 µg/kg.Análisis contradictorios 0,23 y 1,57 µg/kg Actuaciones C. Sanidad: Inhibición CCAA de origen. Comunicación SCIRI (Sistema Coordinado de Intercambio Rápido de Información). Seguimiento analítico de 21 muestras correspondiente a 1 lote con resultado negativo a petición de la CCAA de origen dentro del Plan de Sospechosos. Actuaciones en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Investigación en las explotaciones ganaderas de avicultura - producción de carne, verificación de registros de la explotación, movimientos de animales, consumos de pienso y prescripciones de pienso medicamentoso. Implantación de medidas cautelares, inmovilización de los animales de las explotaciones (20.994 y 10.200), recogida, en total, para análisis de 3 muestras de pienso y 3 de agua de bebida, con resultado negativo. Se procede al sacrificio bajo control sanitario de un lote de 21 animales, de cada explotación, resultando negativos a la detección de Cloranfenicol, por lo que son conducidos a matadero para su sacrificio. Iniciación de expediente sancionador calificado como muy grave en una cuantía de 30.000 €. En tramitación. El resultado de los análisis contradictorios confirman la no conformidad 1. Cloranfenicol en músculo de aves. Actuaciones C. Sanidad: Inhibición CCAA de Control dirigido. Análisis inicial: 0,90 origen. Comunicación SCIRI. Seguimiento analítico µg/kg Análisis contradictorios: 0,38 de 21 muestras correspondiente a 1 lote con resultado µg/kg negativo a petición de la CCAA de origen dentro del Plan de Sospechosos. Actuaciones en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Los Servicios Veterinarios Oficiales, realizan visita de inspección a dicha explotación con las consiguientes investigaciones pertinentes, referentes a libro de registro de tratamientos, recetas de prescripción veterinaria de medicamentos, así como 76 los controles documentales sobre entradas y salidas de animales, alimentos, piensos y materias primas destinadas a la alimentación animal. Así mismo se procede a la correspondiente toma de muestra de pienso y envío al Laboratorio. Concluida la inspección y tras la realización de los análisis con resultado conforme, se informa al ganadero que puede optar por anticipar el envío de un lote representativo y selectivo al matadero, el cual será analizado con intervención de canales y despojos, habiendo una restricción total de movimientos del resto del lote (en la explotación) hasta la obtención de resultados. Si estos fueran satisfactorios, se podrán sacrificar el resto del lote sin intervención ni análisis, siendo la selección del lote en la explotación para su sacrificio y muestreo, realizado por las Autoridades competentes de la Oficina Comarcal Agraria. Así mismo, durante los doce primeros 12 meses, la documentación que acompañe a los animales al matadero hará mención expresa de que dicha explotación se encuentra bajo vigilancia por haber detectado cloranfenicol en alguno de los animales de dicha explotación en el ámbito de actuaciones del Plan Nacional de Investigación de Residuos, al objeto de proceder a las medidas contempladas en el artículo 22 del RD 1749/1998. Posteriormente se realiza nueva visita por los Servicios Veterinarios Oficiales, procediendo a la toma de muestras de 21 animales como lote representativo para su envío al matadero, toma de muestras y análisis, siendo el resultado del mismo conforme. Situación del expediente administrativo: Suspendido por estar conociendo el juzgado de instrucción correspondiente. 1. Cloranfenicol en músculo de aves. Actuaciones Consejería de Sanidad: Comunicación Control dirigido. Análisis inicial: 0,19 a Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación µg/kg. Análisis contradictorio: 0,28 para la investigación de la explotación de origen. µg/kg Comunicación SCIRI. Seguimiento analítico de 21 muestras correspondiente a 1 lote con resultado negativo a petición de la Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación dentro del Plan de Sospechosos. Comunicación a la Unidad de Sanciones para la incoación del correspondiente expediente. Actuaciones Consejería de Agricultura: Se realiza una investigación en granja, con censado y toma de muestras, e inmovilización cautelar. 77 Los análisis de pienso, agua y animales han dado resultado negativo, por lo que no se ha podido determinar el origen del residuo. 1. Cloranfenicol en músculo de Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la pollo.Control dirigido.Analisis Salud.: inicial: 1,04 µg/kg.Análisis Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a contradictorio: 0,40 µg/kg. fiscalía. Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo. Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI. Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: 1 explotación intervenida. Toma de muestras: 3 aguas, 4 piensos y 4 orinas de los bovinos presentes en la explotación. Todos los resultados negativos. 1. Ronidazol en músculo de ovino.Control dirigido.Analisis inicial: 1,2 µg/kg.Análisis contradictorio: 1,4 µg/kg. Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Salud: Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a fiscalía. Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo. Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI. Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: Explotación intervenida (1880 animales). Toma de muestras: 5 aguas, y 7 piensos. Todos los resultados negativos. 1. Ronidazol en músculo de ovino. Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Control dirigido. Análisis inicial: 2,2 Salud.: µg/kg.Análisis contradictorio: 1,4 Se ha enviado el expediente a la Consejería de µg/kg. Sanidad de la comunidad de origen de la explotación y se ha comunicado también a la AESAN a través del SCIRI. Actuación en la explotación ganadera de la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Los Servicios Veterinarios Oficiales de la Delegación de Agricultura y D.R. y de la Oficina Comarcal Agraria, realizan visita de inspección a dicha explotación con las consiguientes investigaciones pertinentes, referentes a libro de registro de tratamientos, recetas de prescripción veterinaria de medicamentos, así como los controles documentales sobre entradas y salidas de animales, alimentos, piensos y materias primas destinadas a la alimentación animal. Así mismo se procede a la correspondiente toma de muestra de pienso (2 muestras) y envío al Laboratorio correspondiente. Concluida la inspección y tras la realización de los análisis del pienso con resultado conforme, se informa al ganadero que, durante los seis primeros meses a partir del 05/10/2009 (fecha de 78 comunicación de AESAN), puede optar por anticipar el envío de un lote representativo y selectivo al matadero, el cual será analizado con intervención de canales y despojos, habiendo una restricción total de movimientos del resto del lote (en la explotación) hasta la obtención de resultados. Si estos fueran satisfactorios, se podrán sacrificar el resto del lote sin intervención ni análisis, siendo la selección del lote en la explotación para su sacrificio y muestreo, realizado por las Autoridades competentes de la Oficina Comarcal Agraria. En este caso el ganadero ha decidido acogerse a esta opción. Hasta el 25 de marzo se han formado 8 lotes de corderos con destino a sacrificio, tomándose muestras representativas de ellos para su análisis, siendo los resultados conformes. Así mismo, durante los doce primeros meses a partir de dicha fecha, la documentación que acompañe a los animales al matadero hará mención expresa de que dicha explotación se encuentra bajo vigilancia por haber detectado ronidazol en alguno de los animales de dicha explotación en el ámbito de actuaciones del Plan Nacional de Investigación de Residuos, al objeto de proceder a las medidas contempladas en el artículo 22 del RD 1749/1998. 1. Cloranfenicol en leche de Inmovilización de 344 ovejas en la explotación y de 3000 quesos elaborados a partir de la leche de la ovino.Control dirigido.2 µg/kg explotación. Apertura de expediente sancionador. Recogida de muestras de agua y de queso que resultaron negativas. Como resultado de la investigación se concluyó que el origen del cloranfenicol se encontraba en el conservante empleado para recogida de muestras decontrol lechero efectuada, por la Asociación de Ovino Lechero, en el mismo día en que se recogió la muestra para el PNIR. La contaminación tuvo lugar por desbordamiento del contenido de los envases en el flujo que conduce la leche al tanque. Como consecuencia de ello, se ha modificado el procedimiento de recogida de muestras de la citada asociación y se levantaron las medidas cautelares adoptadas en la explotación. * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. 79 Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Miel: Incremento de la frecuencia de muestreo en los grupos B1 y B2f. Leche: Inclusión de la investigación en esta matriz del grupo B2e. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines 1. Oxitetraciclina pienso no Análisis Contradictorio: Confirmada presencia. medicado. Control dirigido: 1.293,00 Investigación en la fábrica de las posibles causas. µg/kg Implementación del sistema de control de calidad en referencia a contaminaciones cruzadas en fábrica. Archivo expediente. 6. Prednisolona/prednisona orina. Consejería de Medio Rural y Pesca Control dirigido 1. Positivo en explotación 1,54 µg/L de PREDNISONA y 1,93 µg/L de PREDNISOLONA en orina de bovino de cebo macho de 11 meses de edad de raza asturiana de los valles. Actuaciones en explotación según normativa aplicable (RD 1749/98). Incoada propuesta de procedimiento sancionador Se comunica a la Agencia de Sanidad Ambiental y Consumo para su seguimiento en matadero. 2. Positivo en explotación >0,25 µg/L de PREDNISOLONA en orina de bovino de cebo macho de 7 meses de edad mestizo. Pendiente de actuaciones en explotación según normativa aplicable (RD 1749/1998). 3. Positivo en explotación >0,25 µg/L de PREDNISOLONA en orina de bovino de cebo macho de 9 meses de edad de raza asturiana de los valles. Actuaciones en explotación según normativa aplicable (RD 1749/98). Incoada propuesta de procedimiento sancionador Se comunica a la Agencia de Sanidad Ambiental y Consumo para su seguimiento en matadero. 4. Positivo en explotación >0,50 µg/L de PREDNISONA en orina de bovino de cebo macho de 12 meses de edad de raza asturiana de los valles. Actuaciones en explotación según normativa aplicable (RD 1749/98). Incoada propuesta de procedimiento sancionador Se comunica a la Agencia de Sanidad Ambiental y Consumo para su seguimiento en matadero según 80 normativa aplicable (RD 1749/98). 5. positivo en explotación >0,25 µg/L de PREDNISOLONA en orina de bovino de cebo macho de 11 meses de edad de raza asturiana de los valles. Actuaciones en explotación según normativa aplicable (RD 1749/98). Incoada propuesta de procedimiento sancionador Se comunica a la Agencia de Sanidad Ambiental y Consumo para su seguimiento en matadero. 6. Positivo en explotación >0,25 µg/L de PREDNISOLONA en orina de bovino de cebo macho de 8 meses de edad de raza asturiana de los valles. Actuaciones en explotación según normativa aplicable (RD 1749/98). Las investigaciones revelan que el resultado se debe a tratamiento autorizado avalado por la correspondiente receta y anotado en el registro de tratamientos. No se abre expediente y se notifica al titular como resultado favorable. Actuaciones Agencia Sanidad Ambiental y Consumo en los 6 casos En los casos de positividad a prednisolona: traslado de la información a los Servicios Veterinarios de los mataderos de la Comunidad Autónoma. Se ha investigado 11 animales originarios de esas explotaciones. Todos los resultados fueron satisfactorios. 1. Dihidroestreptomicina. Riñón. 1 Canal decomisada por screening positivo a Control sospechoso.5068 ppb antibacterianos, confirmada la presencia de dihidroestreptomicina (5068 ppb) por encima de los LMR. Renuncia a análisis contradictorio. Bovino hembra, 13 años de edad. Incoado procedimiento sancionador. Trasladado a Fiscalía. Se trasladó toda la información a la Consejería de Medio Rural y Pesca. Actuaciones Consejería de Medio Rural y Pesca: Se comprueban los movimientos del animal en la base de datos REMO y se realiza visita de inspección a la explotación de origen del animal, donde se ponen de manifiesto los siguientes hechos: No consta ningún tratamiento anotado en el libro de registro de explotación de ganado vacuno. No hay ninguna receta correspondiente a los últimos 81 1. Doxiciclina en músculo.Control dirigido 9. Doxiciclina sospechoso en orina.Control 1. Oxitetraciclina en riñon.Control dirigido.Bovino de lidia .5521 µg/kg 2. Dexametasona en hígado. Control dirigido.15 y 19 µg/kg 1. Zearalenona en pienso. Control sospechoso.21 µg/kg meses. No hay ningún medicamento en el establo Medidas cautelares en la explotación. Inmovilización y toma de muestras y demás medidas del RD 1749/1998.(Véase **) Comunicación a través de red de alerta. Toma regular de muestras por sospecha en explotación y matadero. Propuesta de expediente sancionador. Los 9 no conformes son consecuencia del citado mas arriba (relación con **). Inmovilización cautelar de 280 reses en explotación, con restricción de movimientos y control por muestreo en matadero previo a sacrificio. Inclusión en red de alerta durante 7 meses. Propuesta de expediente sancionador (diferente al no conforme en matadero) Comunicación a Comunidad Autónoma de Origen. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: En la Comunidad Autónoma de origen se realiza una investigación epidemiológica, con inmovilización cautelar, y toma de muestra de piensos y agua con resultados conformes, En el Libro de registro de Tratamientos de la explotación no viene reflejado que se haya tratado alguno de los bovinos que fueron a la plaza de toros. No hay evidencias que indiquen que se le administró dicho antibiótico en la explotación de origen. Las dos no conformidades son de la misma explotación. Investigación en la explotación ganadera de Bovino de cebo, verificación de registros de la explotación, especialmente de tratamientos veterinarios con antiinflamatorios, procedencia y consumos de pienso y prescripciones de pienso medicamentoso. Implantación de medidas cautelares, inmovilización de 641 bovinos, se recogen 3 muestras de pienso y 1 de agua con resultados analíticos negativos a dexametasona. Se procede al sacrificio bajo control sanitario de un lote de 21 animales, resultando aptos para el consumo. Iniciación de expediente sancionador calificado como grave en una cuantía de 3.500 €. Resuelto con fecha 21/01/2010 Investigación en la explotación ganadera de bovino de producción de carne, verificación de registros de la explotación, movimientos de animales, consumos de pienso. 82 Implantación de medidas cautelares, inmovilización de los animales de la explotación (89 bovinos). Se mantiene la inmovilización hasta el muestreo de los animales en el momento de su sacrificio en matadero 2. Cadmio en riñón. Control Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la dirigido.1, 41 mg/kg y 3,3 mg/kg. Salud.: Comunicaciones al Departamento de Medio Ambiente de la Comunidad Autónoma correspondiente. 1. Dexametasona en hígado. Control Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: dirigido. Bovino de lidia Mas de Comunicado a través del SCIRI. 4,8µg/kg Iniciado expediente sancionador. Estado de tramitación: Acuerdo de iniciación y Pliego de cargos. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería: Visita a la explotación y revisión documental, del botiquín y del contenedor de residuos de medicamentos, comprobación de la trazabilidad del animal afectado, así como diligenciado del libro de registro. Notificación de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo al departamento de Salud. 1. Dexametasona en hígado .Control Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: dirigido. Mas de 4,8µg/kg Comunicado a través del SCIRI Ha resultado positivo en una nueva partida de animales a matadero. Seguimiento de la explotación con muestreo en matadero durante seis meses. Iniciado expediente sancionador. Estado de tramitación: acuerdo de inicio. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería: Visita a la explotación y revisión documental, del botiquín y del contenedor de residuos de medicamentos, comprobación de la trazabilidad del animal afectado, así como diligenciado del libro de registro. Retirada de talonarios de autoguías y marcado de las GOSA en caso de salida de animales de la explotación hasta la obtención de los resultados de las nuevas muestras de pienso recogidas de las que todavía no se dispone de los resultados. 1. Triamcinolona acetonide en hígado de Comunicación a través del SCIRI. Inmovilización y destrucción de la canal Traslado del expediente a toro de lidia. Control dirigido 2,4 µg/kg la Comunidad Autónoma de origen. Entrada en listado de sospechosos para seguimiento. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Personado el control oficial en la explotación de origen, donde se censa el efectivo de la explotación 83 que cuenta con 309 animales. No hay anomalía en la identificación. Se comprueba el pienso que se da a los animales, es correcto con identificación correcta. Se coteja el libro de tratamientos veterinarios, el cual solo tiene anotaciones desde el 8 de julio de 2.009. A partir de ese momento se procede a consignar en las G.O.S.P. emitidas desde la explotación, la referencia del seguimiento a la investigación de la sustancia referida anteriormente. 1. Dexametasona en hígado de toro Comunicación a través del SCIRI. Traslado del de lidia. Control dirigido 49,7 µg/kg. expediente a la Comunidad Autónoma de origen. Entrada en listado de sospechosos para seguimiento. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Se procedió a la investigación epidemiológica, inmovilización cautelar de la explotación. No procedía un muestreo reforzado por haber transcurrido cierto tiempo desde la toma de muestras que dio resultado positivo hasta que llegó la notificación. Comprobado libro de tratamientos medicamentosos de la explotación, y según manifestaciones del representante, no se ha aplicado dicha sustancia a ningún toro. Que el titular ya tenía conocimiento del positivo, pues había recibido notificación de la Comunidad Autónoma que detecto la no conformidad, en la que se le notificaba y se le daba la posibilidad de realizar el Análisis Contradictorio. El titular solicita dicho análisis con el resultado no conforme de 10µg/kg.Desde la C.A.que detectó la no conformidad se está incoando el expediente. No hay evidencias para atribuir responsabilidades al titular de la explotación de origen. . 1. Dexametasona en hígado de toro Comunicación a través del SCIRI. Inmovilización de lidia. Control dirigido 10 µg/kg y destrucción de la canal Traslado del expediente a la Comunidad Autónoma de origen. Entrada en listado de sospechosos para seguimiento Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Actuaciones en explotación: Los Servicios Veterinarios Oficiales, realizan visita de inspección a dicha explotación con las consiguientes investigaciones pertinentes, referentes a libro de registro de tratamientos, recetas de prescripción veterinaria de medicamentos, así como los controles documentales sobre entradas y salidas de animales, alimentos, piensos y materias primas destinadas a la alimentación animal. Se comprueba la anotación en el libro de tratamientos de una administración de Vetione (medicamento a base de dexametasona) 84 prescrito mediante receta veterinaria número D/0053368-0, con fecha 22 de julio de 2009. Se informa al ganadero que durante seis meses la documentación que acompañe a los animales al matadero hará mención expresa de que dicha explotación se encuentra bajo vigilancia por haber detectado dexametasona en alguno de los animales de dicha explotación en el ámbito de actuaciones del Plan Nacional de Investigación de Residuos, al objeto de proceder a las medidas contempladas en el artículo 22 del RD 1749/1998. Actuaciones en mataderos: Se han sacrificado 33 animales procedentes de la explotación sospechosa inmovilizándose las canales hasta la obtención de los informes laboratoriales, que resultaron negativos. Situación del expediente administrativo: Expediente en tramitación. Pigs 1. Prednisolona- Hígado. Control Actuaciones del Departamento de Salud: dirigido Comunicación SCIRI Comunicación y traslado de documentación a la Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (AESAN) Seguimiento en matadero durante tres meses Actuaciones de AESAN: Comunicación a las autoridades competentes de Portugal ya que la explotación es de dicho país. 1. Doxiciclina Riñón. Control Actuaciones del Departamento de Salud: dirigido Comunicación SCIRI Comunicación al Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente Comunicación al Juzgado de Primera Instancia Comunicación al interesado Seguimiento en matadero durante tres meses. Propuesta de apertura de expediente sancionador. Actuaciones del Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente Visita de inspección a la explotación e inmovilización cautelar de la misma 1. Doxiciclina en músculo.Control Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la dirigido. Mas de 150 µg/kg Salud.: Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a fiscalía. Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo. Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI. Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: Una explotación visitada. Comprobación de documentación. No hay toma de muestras. 85 1. Enrofloxacina en músculo. Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Control dirigido. Mas de 150 µg/kg Salud. Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a fiscalía. Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo. Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: 1 explotación intervenida. Toma de muestras: 1 agua y 1 pienso. Todos los resultados negativos. 1. Sulfametacina (sulfadimidina) en Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la músculo.Control dirigido. Inicial más Salud.: de 150 µg/kg y Contradictorio mas Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a de150 µg/kg fiscalía. Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo. Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: 1 explotación intervenida (3550 animales) Toma de muestras: 1 agua y 1 pienso. Todos los resultados negativos. 1. Sulfametacina (sulfadimidina) en Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la músculo. Control dirigido. Inicial Salud: Mas de 150 µg/kg y Contradictorio Se ha enviado el expediente a la Consejería de mas de150 µg/kg Sanidad de la comunidad de origen de la explotación y se ha comunicado también a la AESAN a través del SCIRI. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Actuaciones Consejería de Sanidad: comunicación Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación para la investigación en la explotación de origen. Seguimiento analítico de 20 muestras correspondiente a 1 lote con resultado negativo a petición de la Consejería de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación dentro del Plan de Sospechosos. Comunicación a la Unidad de Sanciones para la incoación del correspondiente expediente. Actuaciones Consejería de Agricultura: Se realiza una investigación en granja. Con anterioridad al envío al matadero se trataron los animales con sulfametazina entre el 27/02/09 y el 03/03/09. El período de supresión es de 8 días, y el primer envío a matadero se realizó el 22/04/09 por lo que se respetó el período de supresión 1. Sulfadiacina en músculo. Control Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: dirigido. 178 µg/kg Comunicado a través del SCIRI. Notificación a la CA de origen de los animales. Renuncia a la realización del contradictorio. Iniciado expediente sancionador. Estado de tramitación: Propuesta de Resolución, en 86 periodo de alegaciones, con sanción pecuniaria de 3.005,07 € Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Salud.: Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo. Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: 1 Explotación visitada. Comprobación de documentación. No hay toma de muestras. Se comprobó el registro de tratamientos veterinarios y se observó que se hizo un tratamiento con sulfadiazina mediante premezcla medicamentosa autorizada un tiempo antes de la salida de los animales al matadero.se comprobaron las fechas de administración del tratamiento y salida de los animales a matadero y se comprobó que se respetó el tiempo de espera. 1. Sulfadiacina en músculo. Control Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: dirigido. Más de 200 µg/kg Comunicado a través del SCIRI. Análisis contradictorio positivo. Iniciado expediente sancionador. Estado de tramitación: Propuesta de Resolución, en periodo de alegaciones, con sanción pecuniaria de 3.005,07 €. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería: Visita a la explotación y revisión documental, del botiquín y del contenedor de residuos de medicamentos, comprobación de la trazabilidad de los posibles animales afectados, así como diligenciado del libro de registro. Retirada de talonarios de autoguías y marcado de las GOSA en caso de salida de animales de la explotación hasta la obtención de los resultados de las nuevas muestras de pienso y agua recogidas que finalmente resultaron negativas. Notificación de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo al departamento de Salud. 2. Sulfametacina (sulfadimidina) Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: en músculo.Control dirigido. 123 Comunicado a través del SCIRI. µg/kg y 176 µg/kg Notificación a la CA de origen de los animales. Renuncia a la realización del contradictorio. Iniciado expediente sancionador. Estado de tramitación: Propuesta de Resolución, en periodo de alegaciones, con sanción pecuniaria de 3.005,07 € Actuación en la explotación ganadera de la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: 87 1. Dioxinas y furanos en aditivo tecnológico con destino a la alimentación animal.Control dirigido.3.61 ng TEQ/kg 4. Sulfametacina en pienso. Control sospechoso.0,9 mg/kg,0,9 mg/kg,0,5 mg/kg y 4,2 mg/kg 2. Clortetraciclina en pienso.Control dirigido. 8.7 +/- 2.0 mg/kg. Y 6.0 +/1.5 mg/kg 2 Doxiciclina en pienso.Control dirigido. 17 +/- 4.0 mg/kg. y 18 +/-4 mg/kg 1. Doxiciclina más tilosina en pienso.Control dirigido.6.6 +/- 1.6 mg/kg y 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/kg 1. Doxiciclina más tilosina en pienso.Control dirigido.9 +/- 2 mg/kg y 24 mg/kg 4. Oxitetraciclina en pienso .Control dirigido. 10 +/- 2.0 mg/kg., 14 +/-3 mg/kg, 9 +/- 2 mg/kg y 9.5 +/- 2.2 mg/kg 1. Oxitetraciclina en pienso. Control dirigido.42 +/- 8 mg/kg Investigación en granja de origen, todos animales inmovilizados cautelarmente en la granja hasta los primeros resultados, 0 animales sacrificados, 6 meses duración del seguimiento, todas muestras resultados negativos, no procede iniciar expediente ya que la Comunidad Autónoma que lo detectó no se inhibe por cuestión de territorialidad. Comunicación alerta RASFF nº E10/2009. En la actualidad sigue prohibida la comercialización de este aditivo hasta que identifiquen la fuente de contaminación y aseguren su inocuidad. 920 Animales inmovilizados cautelarmente hasta los primeros resultados.Se toman 4 muestras por haber 4 lotes de animales comiendo piensos diferentes.Tras los resultados restricción total movimientos hasta nuevos análisis, continua seguimiento otros 6 meses con toma de muestras cada 3 meses. Segunda toma de muestras dan resultados negativos, se levanta la restricción una vez pasado periodo de espera del primer pienso consumido que dio positivo. Tercera toma de muestras dan resultados negativos. Se inicia expediente sancionador por parte de Agricultura consecuencia de los primeros análisis. El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. 1 Expediente sancionador iniciado en trámite. 1 Explotación intervenida (800 animales). Toma de muestras: 4 aguas y 3 piensos. Todos los resultados negativos. El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos 1 Expediente sancionador iniciado en trámite. 1 Explotación intervenida (280 animales). Toma de 88 muestras: 1 Agua y 1 pienso. Todos los resultados negativos. 1. Oxitetraciclina en pienso. Control 1 Expediente sancionador con resolución de dirigido.57 +/- 10 mg/kg sobreseimiento del mismo 3. Tilosina en pienso. Control El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y dirigido. 4 +/- 0.7 mg/kg. , 2.6 +/-0.5 Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / mg/kg, y 0.9 +/- 0.3 mg/kg expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. 1. Tilosina en dirigido. 48 mg/kg pienso.Control 1 Expediente sancionador iniciado en trámite. 1 Explotación intervenida (104 animales). Toma de muestras: 1 Agua y 1 pienso. Todos los resultados negativos. Poultry 1. Enrofloxacina músculo (pollo Renuncia a contradictorio broiler). Control sospechoso. Inicial: Control de la explotación ganadera y restricción 164 µg/kg salida de animales. Investigación en la explotación de las posibles causas (libros de explotación y de medicamentos, alimentación, sistema de administración de medicación en agua). Comunicación SCIRI Muestreo representativo en granja del lote con engorde finalizado. Autorización de salida a matadero del lote con engorde acabado tras resultados de muestreo representativo conforme. Instrucción de expediente sancionador. Causa más probable: falta de control en el sistema de administración de medicamento en agua. Medidas cautelares en explotación. 1. Enrofloxacina más Ciprofloxacina en músculo. Control Inmovilización y toma de muestras y demás medidas dirigido. del RD 1749/1998. Comunicación a SCIRI. Toma regular de muestras por sospecha en explotación y matadero. Propuesta de expediente sancionador. 1. Enrofloxacina más Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Ciprofloxacina en músculo de pato. Salud.: Control dirigido. Más de 150 µg/kg Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a fiscalía. Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo la Comunidad Autónoma. Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: 1 explotación intervenida (980 animales). Toma de muestras: 1 agua y 2 piensos. 2 resultados positivos a 89 enrofloxacina en las muestras de pienso (1139µg/kg y 936µg/kg).(véase también****) 1 expediente sancionador iniciado en trámite. 2. Enrofloxacina en pienso. Control En los dos casos es consecuencia del citado mas sospechoso. 1139µg/kg y 936µg/kg arriba (véase ****). 1 Expediente sancionador iniciado en trámite. Quedan pendientes las actuaciones a la explotación con resultado positivo. Se han dado instrucciones a los servicios veterinarios locales para realizar dichas actuaciones. 2. Oxitetraciclina en pienso. Control En 2 casos investigaciones en granja.Se observa que dirigido el origen está en la fabrica de piensos, lo que genera nuevas actuaciones por sospecha en explotaciones.(véase *) 3. Oxitetraciclina en pienso. Control En los 3 casos es consecuencia del citado mas arriba sospechoso (relación con *).Se concluye que se debe a una contaminación cruzada en la fabrica. Propuesta de expediente sancionador a la fábrica. 1. Doxiciclina en músculo. Control Actuaciones en matadero: dirigido.140,3 µg/kg Comunicación al SCIRI. Comunicación a la autoridad Competente de origen y al Vocal del PNIR en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen. Solicitud y auditoria del Plan de residuos del matadero en cuestión. Propuesta de sanción a la explotación ganadera. Inclusión en relación de explotación sospechosa. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Se realiza la investigación epidemiológica, con inmovilización cautelar, con toma de muestras con resultado negativo y en el libro de tratamientos de la explotación figura que la manada de aves fue tratada en el agua de bebida con una combinación de doxiciclina y enrofloxacina, y que se respetaron los tiempos de espera (4 días). Nos llega fax indicándonos que el Análisis Dirimente ha resultado no conforme (No teníamos noticia de que se hubiera realizado el Contradictorio) En octubre, se recibe oficio de la Autoridad competente que ha detectado la no conformidad, en el que nos vuelven a notificar un segundo positivo a doxiciclina (>150 µg/kg) en músculo de pollo de la misma explotación y en el mismo matadero. El Análisis Dirimente de este positivo da un resultado de no superar el límite de Decisión (CC alfa). Nuevamente, se realiza un estudio epidemiológico, con toma de muestras negativa, y donde se pone de manifiesto que este lote de aves ha sido tratado con la misma combinación de antibióticos que la anterior. Que la explotación de aves pertenece a una 90 1. Sulfametacina en músculo. Control dirigido. Inicial 178 µg/kg Contradictorio: 159 µg/kg 1. Doxiciclina en agua. Control dirigido. 3mg/kg 1. Doxiciclina en agua. Control dirigido. 33,6mg/kg 1. Doxiciclina en agua. Control sospechoso. 12 +/- 3 mg/kg . 1. Oxitetraciclina en agua.Control sospechoso. 10 +/- 2 mg/kg . integradora que la suministra los pollitos de un día de vida, el pienso que consume, el matadero donde se sacrifican y el veterinario que prescribió ambos tratamientos. Se han respetado los tiempos de espera prescritos (4 días), no obstante, si la asociación de más de un medicamento se puede entender como una prescripción excepcional, entonces, en el artículo 81 del RD 109/95, de 27 de enero, sobre medicamentos veterinarios, se establece un tiempo de espera de 28 días para carnes de aves de corral. Actuaciones en la Comunidad Autónoma de origen Actuaciones Consejería de Sanidad: Comunicación a Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación para la investigación en la explotación de origen. Seguimiento analítico de 21 muestras correspondiente a 3 lotes con resultado negativo a petición de la.Consejeria de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación dentro del plan de sospechosos.Comunicación a la Unidad de Sanciones para la incoación del correspondiente expediente. Actuaciones C. agricultura: Se efectúa una investigación completa en la explotación, con toma de muestras de pienso y animales, con resultado negativo. Se investigan también la fábrica suministradora del pienso y los transportistas de pienso medicamentoso, con resultados negativos, por lo que no se puede determinar el origen del residuo. El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. 1 expediente sancionador iniciado en trámite. 1 explotación intervenida (1200 animales). Toma de muestras: 7 aguas y 4 piensos. Todos los resultados negativos El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. 91 2. Doxiciclina en pienso. Control El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y dirigido. 7,7 +/- 1,8 mg/kg y 7,4 +/- Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / 1,7 mg/kg expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. 1. Doxiciclina en pienso. Control El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y sospechoso. 10 +/- 2 mg/kg Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos. 1. Oxitetraciclina en pienso.Control El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y sospechoso. 7.5 +/- 1.8 mg/kg. Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos 1. Oxitetraciclina mas sulfadiazina El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y en pienso. Control sospechoso. 18 y Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / 7.2 +/- 1.7 mg/kg. expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos 1. Oxitetraciclina mas sulfadiazina El Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y en pienso. Control sospechoso. 20+/- Acción Rural no realiza ninguna actuación / 4 mg/Kg y 6.2 +/- 1.5 mg/kg. expediente sancionador cuando se obtienen resultados inferiores o igual a 20 mg/kg +/- de antibióticos en piensos 1. Enrofloxacina en músculo. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: Control dirigido.>200 µg/kg Comunicado a través del SCIRI. Análisis contradictorio negativo. Análisis dirimente positivo. Expediente sancionador resuelto, cuantía de la sanción 4000 €. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería: Visita a la explotación y revisión documental, del botiquín y del contenedor de residuos de medicamentos, comprobación de la trazabilidad de los posibles animales afectados, así como diligenciado del libro de registro. Retirada de talonarios de autoguías y marcado de las GOSA en caso de salida de animales de la explotación hasta la obtención de los resultados de las nuevas muestras de pienso y agua recogidas que finalmente resultaron negativas. Notificación de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo al departamento de Salud. 2. Enrofloxacina en músculo de Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la pollo. Control dirigido. En los dos Salud.: casos: Análisis inicial: >150 µg/kg y Comunicación de ambos expedientes a la comunidad Análisis contradictorio: >150 µg/kg Autónoma de origen de loa animales.Comunicación a 92 2. Enrofloxacina en músculo. Control dirigido.>200 µg/kg y .>200 µg/kg 1. Plomo hígado. dirigido:0,92 mg/kg Control 1. Plomo y 1 Cadmio en hígado. Control dirigido. Cadmio: 0,71 mg/kg. Plomo: 0,79 mg/kg la AESAN a través del SCIRI. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de origen Iniciación de expedientes y propuesta de resolución. Comunicaciones al Servicio de Seguridad Agroalimentaria. Investigación en granjas de origen, todos los animales inmovilizados cautelarmente en la granja hasta los primeros resultados, 0 animales sacrificados, 6 meses duración del seguimiento, muestras tomadas de pienso 4 y agua 5, todas muestras resultados negativos. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: Comunicado a través del SCIRI. Ha resultado positivo en un muestreo de otra partida de animales. Iniciado expediente sancionador. Estado de tramitación: habiendo resultado infructuosa las notificaciones se ha publicado el Acuerdo de Iniciación y Pliego de cargos en Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad Autónoma. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería: Visita a la explotación y revisión documental, del botiquín y del contenedor de residuos de medicamentos, comprobación de la trazabilidad de los posibles animales afectados, así como diligenciado del libro de registro. Retirada de talonarios de autoguías y marcado de las GOSA en caso de salida de animales de la explotación hasta la obtención de los resultados de las nuevas muestras de pienso y agua recogidas que finalmente resultaron negativas. Notificación de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo al departamento de Salud. Sheep and goat Renuncia a contradictorio Investigación en la explotación de las posibles causas. Archivo expediente Comunicación a la Autoridad Competente de origen y al Vocal del PNIR en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de origen Personado el control oficial en la explotación de origen, se toman muestras de agua y de pienso que se distribuye a los animales en ese momento, siendo los resultados conformes. Se censa toda la explotación que resulta ser de 1.910 cabezas de ovino y 810 cabezas de porcino. 93 3. Sulfadiazina en riñón. Control Actuaciones en matadero en los tres casos: dirigido.2 con mas de 150 µg/kg y 1 Comunicación al SCIRI. con 137 µg/kg Comunicación a las autoridades Competentes de origen y a los dos Vocal del PNIR de las Comunidades Autónomas de Origen. Solicitud y auditoria del Plan de residuos del matadero en cuestión. Propuesta de sanción a las explotaciones ganaderas. Inclusión en relación de explotaciones sospechosas. Actuación en la primera explotación : Inspección de la explotación y realización de investigación pertinente.Se comprobó una inadecuada utilización de un medicamento autorizado. Restricción total de movimientos por un periodo no inferior al periodo de supresión del producto. Restricción parcial de movimientos desde 3 de agosto hasta diciembre, permitiendo movimientos a matadero con comunicación oficial a destino y detallando en el documento de acompañamiento que la explotación está sometida a controles por presencia de residuos. Actuación en la segunda explotación ubicada en una de las CCAA de origen: Los Servicios Veterinarios Oficiales, realizan visita de inspección a dicha explotación con las consiguientes investigaciones pertinentes, referentes a libro de registro de tratamientos, recetas de prescripción veterinaria de medicamentos, así como los controles documentales sobre entradas y salidas de animales, alimentos, piensos y materias primas destinadas a la alimentación animal. De todo ello se levanta el correspondiente Acta de Inspección, poniendo de manifiesto que el la revisión del libro de registro de tratamientos se comprueba que existen dos anotaciones, una con fecha 20/01/2009 y otra con fecha 13/02/2009 de un pienso medicamentoso que contiene sulfadiazina. El administrador de la empresa manifiesta que el pienso medicamentoso se retira con una antelación mínima de 10 días de ser enviados los corderos al matadero, pero que por error en el manejo alguno de los animales ha podido tener acceso a este pienso sin respetarse el periodo de supresión. Concluida la investigación se informa al matadero de las medidas tomadas por la mala utilización del pienso restringiendo por un periodo de 10 días los movimientos para sacrificio.Así mismo, durante los seis primeros meses, la documentación que acompañe a los animales al matadero hará mención expresa de que dicha explotación se encuentra bajo vigilancia por haber detectado sulfadiazina en alguno 94 2. Sulfadiacina y 2 Clortetraciclina en riñón. Control dirigido. Las 2 Sulfadiazina con mas de 200 µg/kg y las 2 Clortetraciclina con mas de 733 µg/kg 2. Sulfadiacina músculo. Control sospechoso 1. Sulfadiacina y Cortetraciclina en riñón.Control dirigido.La Sulfadiazina con mas de 151 µg/kg y de los animales de dicha explotación en el ámbito de actuaciones del Plan Nacional de Investigación de Residuos, al objeto de proceder a las medidas contempladas en el artículo 22 del RD 1749/1998. Actuación en la tercera explotación ubicada en otra de las CCAA de origen: Visita a la explotación y revisión documental, del botiquín y del contenedor de residuos de medicamentos, comprobación de la trazabilidad de los posibles animales afectados, así como diligenciado del libro de registro. Retirada de talonarios de autoguías y marcado de las GOSA en caso de salida de animales de la explotación hasta la obtención de los resultados de las nuevas muestras de pienso y agua recogidas que finalmente resultaron negativas. Revisión del sistema de autocontrol de la fabricación de piensos de la explotación. Visita a la comercial veterinaria de la explotación. Notificación de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo al departamento de Salud correspondiente. Actuaciones del Departamento de Salud: Comunicación SCIRI Comunicación al Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente Comunicación al Juzgado de Primera Instancia Comunicación al interesado Seguimiento en matadero durante tres meses. (***) Propuesta de apertura de expediente sancionador. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de origen Se detecta, en mayo y en junio, Sulfadiazina y Clortetraciclina por encima del LMR en muestras de riñón de ovino, ambas muestras procedentes del mismo cebadero de ovino. Se realiza una encuesta epidemiológica: con inmovilización cautelar de la explotación, y toma de muestras de piensos y agua, con resultado conforme. Se inspeccionó la fábrica de piensos, donde se detectó incidencias en el control de calidad de los piensos. El titular administra a los corderos piensos medicamentosos, que contienen premezclas medicamentosas con ambos antibióticos, y que según manifiesta el ganadero, respeta los tiempos de espera. La explotación se somete a un control durante seis meses, conforme al artículo 16 del RD 1749/98. Dichas no conformidades son consecuencia del citado mas arriba (***). Mismas medidas Actuaciones en matadero: Comunicación al SCIRI. Comunicación a la autoridad Competente de origen y 95 la Clortetraciclina con mas de 900 al Vocal del PNIR en la Comunidad Autónoma de µg/kg Origen. Solicitud y auditoria del Plan de residuos del matadero en cuestión. Propuesta de sanción a la explotación ganadera. Inclusión en relación de explotación sospechosa. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de origen Se procedió a la investigación epidemiológica: se inmovilizó cautelarmente la explotación se efectuaron muestras de pienso y agua con resultado conforme. Se inspeccionó el distribuidor de piensos y al fabricante de piensos. A los animales se les administró pienso medicamentoso que contenía como premezclas medicamentosas ambos antibióticos. Se establece un incumplimiento de los tiempos de espera por parte del ganadero. Actuaciones en explotación: Los Servicios 1. Sulfadiacina y Clortetraciclina Veterinarios Oficiales, realizan visita de inspección a en riñón. Control dirigido.La explotación con las consiguientes sulfadiacina con mas de 300 µg/kg y dicha investigaciones pertinentes, referentes a libro de la Clortetraciclina con mas de 900 registro de tratamientos, recetas de prescripción µg/kg veterinaria de medicamentos, así como los controles documentales sobre entradas y salidas de animales, alimentos, piensos y materias primas destinadas a la alimentación animal. Así mismo, durante los seis primeros meses, la documentación que acompañe a los animales al matadero hará mención expresa de que dicha explotación se encuentra bajo vigilancia por haber detectado sulfadiazina y clortetraciclina en alguno de los animales de dicha explotación en el ámbito de actuaciones del Plan Nacional de Investigación de Residuos, al objeto de proceder a las medidas contempladas en el artículo 22 del RD 1749/1998. Situación del expediente administrativo: Sancionada la explotación con 3100 €. Seguimiento en mataderos: Se sacrifican durante el periodo de vigilancia un total de 650 animales en mataderos de nuestra Comunidad, realizándose análisis a cada partida con resultado conforme. 1. Sulfadiacina en riñón. Control Actuación en la explotación ganadera de la dirigido. Mas de 300 µg/kg Comunidad Autónoma de origen Se procede a la inmovilización de 110 y 87 caprinos reproductores y 98 corderos. Se procede al sacrificio bajo control sanitario de un lote de 20 animales, resultando aptos para el consumo. 17/03/2009. Iniciación de expediente sancionador calificado como grave en una cuantía de 3.500 €. Resuelto 1. Sulfadiacina en músculo. Control Investigación en la explotación de ganado ovino, dirigido.383 µg/kg verificación de registros de la explotación, 96 1. Sulfadiacina en músculo. Control dirigido. Más de 150 µg/kg 2 Oxitetraciclina en músculo de caprino. Control dirigido. En los dos casos >150 µg/kg 1. Sulfadiacina y Clortetraciclina en músculo de ovino. Control dirigido. La sulfadiazina con mas de 150 µg/kg en inicial y contradictorio y la Clortetraciclina con 122 µg/kg en inicial, 94 µg/kg en contradictorio y 142,3 µg/kg en el dirimente 1. Sulfadiacina en músculo de ovino. Control dirigido. Mas de 150 µg/kg especialmente de tratamientos veterinarios con Sulfamidas, procedencia y consumos de pienso y prescripciones de pienso medicamentoso. Implantación de medidas cautelares, inmovilización de 438 ovinos y 27 caprinos reproductores y 100 corderos, recogiendo 1 muestras de agua y otra de pienso medicado detectando la sulfadiacina, entre otros inhibidores en el pienso medicamentoso. Se procede al sacrificio bajo control sanitario de los 100 animales de cebo en varios lotes previo muestreo analítico en el matadero resultando negativos a la detección de Sulfadiacina. Iniciación de expediente sancionador calificado como grave en una cuantía de 3.500 € Una vez comunicado el positivo, se inmoviliza la granja, tomando muestras en la misma. El interesado rechaza el análisis contradictorio La Delegación Provincial de Salud inicia procedimiento sancionador Comunicación y traslado de documentación a la Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (AESAN) Actuaciones de AESAN: Comunicación a las autoridades competentes de Países Bajos ya que la explotación es de dicho país. Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Salud.: Se ha enviado el expediente a la Consejería de Sanidad de la comunidad de origen de la explotación y se ha comunicado también a la AESAN a través del SCIRI. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Personado el Control Oficial en la explotación se procede a la inmovilización de la misma por un periodo mínimo de 28 días. Se toman muestras de pienso y agua de bebida y se envían a Laboratorios acreditados para la determinación de sulfadiazina y clortetraciclina, siendo en ambos casos los resultados conformes. Se propone desde la Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca la exclusión de la citada explotación de la red de alerta. Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Salud.: Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a fiscalía. Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo de "Mossos d'Esquadra". Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI. 97 1. Clortetraciclina en músculo de ovino. Control dirigido.309 µg/kg 1. Enrofloxacina en músculo de ovino. Control dirigido. Mas de 200 µg/kg 1. Enrofloxacina en músculo de ovino. Control dirigido. Mas de 200 Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: 1 explotación intervenida (4540 animales). Toma de muestras: 1 agua y 2 piensos. Todos los resultados negativos. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: Comunicado a través del SCIRI. Notificación a la CA de origen de los animales. Expediente sancionador resuelto, cuantía de sanción 3.005,06 € Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Investigación en la explotación ganadera de cebo de ovino, verificación de registros de la explotación, especialmente de tratamientos veterinarios con Clortetraciclina, procedencia y consumos de pienso y prescripciones de pienso medicamentoso. Implantación de medidas cautelares, inmovilización 2000 corderos, se recogen 3 muestras de pienso (uno medicado) y una de agua, con resultados analíticos negativos a inhibidores a excepción del pienso medicado. Se procede al sacrificio bajo control sanitario de los animales previo muestreo analítico de un lote de 21 animales en matadero, resultando negativos a la detección de clortetraciclina. No se inicia expediente sancionador ya que la Comunidad Autónoma que lo detectó no se inhibe por cuestión de territorialidad. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: Comunicado a través del SCIRI. Notificación a la CA de origen de los animales. Iniciado expediente sancionador. Estado de tramitación: en periodo de alegaciones al Pliego de Cargos por infracción grave Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Los corderos permanecieron 3 días en el matadero. Se realizó la investigación epidemiológica: inmovilización cautelar de la explotación, toma de muestras de piensos y agua, con resultado conforme en el Laboratorio correspondiente. Que el titular administra a los corderos piensos medicamentosos (correctamente recetados y dispensados) que contienen otros antibióticos, pero ninguno con enrofloxacina. Que tanto en este caso, como en otro positivo a enrofloxacina, también detectado en el mismo matadero, el entrador (y gestor del matadero) fue el mismo, y manifiestan que dicho señor también dispone de un cebadero de corderos próximo al matadero. Actuaciones de la Consejería de Sanidad: Comunicado a través del SCIRI. 98 µg/kg Notificación a la CA de origen de los animales. Iniciado expediente sancionador. Estado de tramitación: no ha sido localizado el responsable en la dirección disponible. El expediente se halla en publicación en Boletín oficial autonómico de Pliego de Cargos por infracción grave. Actuación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Origen: Se realiza una investigación epidemiológica: inmovilización cautelar de la explotación, toma de muestras de piensos y agua, con resultado conforme en el Laboratorio correspondiente. Que los animales estuvieron 3 días en el matadero antes de su sacrificio. El ganadero alimenta a los corderos con piensos medicamentosos (correctamente recetados y dispensados) que no contienen en sus premezclas medicamentosas la enrofloxacina. Que tanto en este caso, como en otro positivo a enrofloxacina , también detectado en el mismo matadero, el entrador (y gestor del matadero) fue el mismo, y manifiestan que dicho señor también dispone de un cebadero de corderos próximo al matadero. Milk Horses Renuncia a contradictorio Investigación en la explotación de las posibles causas. Archivo expediente Renuncia a contradictorio Investigación en la explotación de las posibles causas Archivo expediente 6. Cadmio Hígado. Control dirigido Actuaciones del Departamento de Salud Comunicación al Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio ambiente Seguimiento en matadero durante 3 meses 1. Dihidroestreptomicina en riñón. Actuaciones del Departamento de Salud: Control dirigido Comunicación SCIRI Comunicación al Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente Comunicación al Juzgado de Primera Instancia Comunicación al interesado Seguimiento en matadero durante tres meses. Propuesta de apertura de expediente sancionador. Actuaciones del Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente: Visita a la explotación comprobando que no se ha respetado el periodo de supresión e inmovilización cautelar de la misma. 1 Cadmio en hígado. Control Comunicación al servicio de Ganadería. 1. Cadmio hígado .Control dirigido: 2.0 mg/kg 1 Cadmio riñón. Control dirigido: >2 mg/kg 99 dirigido.1,99 mg/Kg. Actuaciones del servicio de Ganadería: Inspección del libro de registro de tratamientos y se levantan actas de control de alimentación animal. Al mismo tiempo se procede a la toma de muestras de pienso, alfalfa y agua, cuyos análisis dieron negativo a la presencia de metales pesados. La explotación se incluye en el plan de controles de la alimentación animal durante el año 2009. 3. Cadmio en riñón. Control Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la dirigido.4,8 mg/kg, 22,6 mg/kg y Salud.: 1,221 mg/kg Comunicaciones al Departamento de Medio Ambiente correspondiente. Eggs Rabbit 1. Oxitetraciclina en pienso. Control Investigación en granja y propuesta de expediente dirigido. sancionador. Contaminación cruzada en la explotación por mala manipulación accidental en el almacenamiento. Apertura de expediente. 1. Oxitetraciclina en músculo. Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Control dirigido. >150 µg/kg Salud.: Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a fiscalía. Comunicación al Departamento de Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo de "Mossos d'Esquadra". Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI. Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: 1 Explotación visitada. Comprobación de documentación. No hay toma de muestras. Aquaculture 2. Arsénico en músculo. Control Comunicación al Departamento de Medio Ambiente dirigido.0, 390 µg/kg y 1,777. µg/kg correspondiente Farmed game 2. Cadmio en Hígado jabalí. Control dirigido 3. Sulfatiazol .Control dirigido (primer caso >25 µg/kg, segundo caso >6,1 µg/kg y tercer caso 10,6 µg/kg) Wild game Comunicación al departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente. Honey Actuaciones de la Agencia de Protección de la Salud.: Expediente incoado y suspendido al enviarse a fiscalía. Seguimiento de los productos elaborados de los mismos lotes.Comunicación al Departamento de 100 Agricultura y a la Unidad de Consumo. Comunicación a la AESAN a través del SCIRI Actuaciones del Departamento de Agricultura, Alimentación y Acción Rural: 3 Explotaciones visitadas (1895 enjambres). Toma de 3 muestras de miel. Pendientes de resultados. 101 FI FINLAND Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Modifications 2009 2010 • A1: Stilbenes are added to the plan of horses and fish GC-MS / GC-MS • A2: Thyreostats are added to plan of horses and poultry LC-MS-MS /LC-MS-MS • A4: Zeranol is added to the plan of horses Elisa /GC-MS • A5: Beta-agonists are added to the plan of horses LC-MS-MS / LC-MS-MS • A6: Nitroimidazoles are added to the plan of horses. GC-MS-MS /GC-MS-MS • Chloramfenicol and nitrofuranes of all matrixes LC-MS-MS/LC-MS-MS • Some changes are made due to changes in production numbers • The missing information on CC-alfa and CC-beta are added to the plan • LC-MS LC-MS-MS Non-compliant results Follow-up actions One urine sample of pig was noncompliant for 17-beta-19-nortestosteron (224 µg/kg) Due to the non-compliant result official control actions have been carried out. On the spot control was made by the local municipal veterinarian. The record (medicinal product) has been checked. Two additional samples (urine/pigs) were taken for futher testing and these samples were compliant. No violation of medication was detected. According to the investigations the sample was taken from a cryptorchid animal (= information on the sampling form). Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Modifications 2009 2010 • B1: Beta-lactams are added to the plan of horses HPLC-fluo/HPLC-fluo • Tetracyclines are added to the plan of pig HPLC-UV/HPLC-UV • Kinolones are tested insteadt of streptomycins in milk HPLC-fluo/HPLC-fluo • Sulfonamides in fish, farmed game and honey new metods HPLC-UV / HPLCUV • Tetracyclines and tylosin in honey nem methods LC-MS-MS / LS-MS-MS • B2b: Toltrazurilsulfon is added to the plan of horses HPLC-UV / LC-MS-MS • Coccidiostats are added to the plan of bovine and pigs feed samples LC-MS-MS / LC-MS-MS. Eggs and farmed game LC-MS-MS. /LC-MS-MS • B2c: Permethrin is added to the plan of horses GC-MS / GC-MS 102 • • • • • • • • • • • • B2d: Xylazine is added to the plan of horses HPLC-DAD/HPLC-DAD B2e: Flunixin, phenylbutazone and oxphenylbutazone new method LC-MS-MS /LC-MS-MS B2f: Dexamethasone and prednisolone are added to the plan of horses Elisa/LCMS-MS. B3a: The organochlorines are added to the plan of horses GC-ECD / GC-ECD (incl. PCB-congeners). The group of organochlorines in eggs is enlarged GC-MSMS/ GC-MS-MS. Chlordimeform in honey new method GC-MS / GC-MS B3b: Organophosphors are added to the plan of horses GS-MS/GC-MS The group of organophosphors in eggs is enlarged GC-MS-MS /GC-MS-MS B 3d: Ochratoxin is added to the plan of horses HPLC-fluo/HPLC-fluo (method changed also for other species) Some changes are made due to the changes in production numbers The goat milk samples are added to the plan for the groups B1 and B3d The number of coccidiostat analyses in eggs is increased due to non-comliant findings. The number of farmed game samples will be at the same level as 2009 (even there were non-compliant reindeer liver and kidney) The number of wild game samples will be at the same level as 2009 (even there were non compliant elks liver and kidney) Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines No -Pigs Suspect: Two suspect samples of one pig were non-compliant for oxytetracycline (muscle 1.08 mg/kg and kidney 13.2 mg/kg) Two meat control samples of one pig were send for the confirmation due to the positive microbiological test results in the slaughterhouse. Official investigations in the farm of origin, checks of medicinal product records, no additional samples have been taken, the carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption. The possible reason for the source of the residue was some misunderstanding between the owner and the assisting personnel in farm. Poultry no Sheep and goat no Horses no Milk One egg sample was non-compliant Eggs Investigations on the farm of origin, verification of 103 for salinomycin ( 3,8 µg/kg) records (medicinal products and feed). No additional samples were taken because there were neither animals nor eggs left on the farm at the time of control. No violation of medication was detected. The source of residue was not found. One egg sample was non-compliant for naracin (3.8 µg/kg) Investigations on the farm of origin, verification of records (medicinal products and feed). Additional samples were taken. The sample of eggs was compliant. The sample of feed contained narasin 48 µg/kg (< MRL for feed). No violation of medication was detected. The possibility of contaminated feed could not be excluded. Rabbit no Aquaculture no Farmed game 5/9 liver samples and 7/9 kidney samples of reindeer were noncompliant for cadmium. 11/ 19 liver samples and 14 / 19 kidney samples of elk were noncompliant for cadmium. 1/7 liver samples and 4/6 kidney samples of wild deer were non-compliant for cadmium Wild game According to Finnish legislation livers and kidneys of over one year old elks are not accepted for human consumption. Honey no 104 FR FRANCE Group A substances (aggregate for all animal products and substances) Modification of national residue plan En France, toute mise en évidence de substances interdites par une DDSV (direction départementale des services vétérinaires) doit être transmise à la Brigade Nationale d’Enquêtes Vétérinaires et Phytosanitaires (BNEVP) qui mène les enquêtes et informe les autorités juridiques. Dans le but de démanteler des trafics de substances interdites, les enquêtes sont longues et les rapports ne parviennent à la DGAL (Direction Générale de l’Alimentation) qu’une fois l’affaire jugée (secret de l’instruction). Tous les élevages et établissements ayant eu des résultats non conformes au cours des plans de contrôle 2009 seront ciblés prioritairement pour les plans 2010. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Substance--Matrix-animal or animal Actions: (investigations in the farm of origin, product-Concentration* animals held in farms, slaughtered animals, Example: MPA-kidney fat-pig-3 ppb intensified sampling in related farms, products declared unfit for human consumption, administrative measures, denial EC aid, others). La Brigade Nationale d’Enquêtes Vétérinaires et 6 Thiouracil– bovin – ferme – 3 Phytosanitaires (BNEVP) a été informée de ces dont la quantification a été précisément rapportée : 6,1 µg/L ; résultats non conformes. La présence de ces molécules, en faibles concentrations, pourraient 8,8 µg/kg ; 6,8 µg/kg ; autres être dues à la consommation par les animaux de résultats compris entre 5 et 10 plantes Crucifères. µg/kg 5 Thiouracil – bovin – abattoir – La Brigade Nationale d’Enquêtes Vétérinaires et Phytosanitaires (BNEVP) a été informée de ces 2 dont la quantification a été précisément rapportée : 8,8 µg/L résultats non conformes. La présence de ces molécules, en faibles concentrations, pourraient ; 7,0 µg/L ; autres résultats être dues à la consommation par les animaux de compris entre 5 et 10 µg/kg plantes Crucifères. La Brigade Nationale d’Enquêtes Vétérinaires et 1 Thiouracil – urine – porcin – Phytosanitaires (BNEVP) a été informée de ces abattoir – 6,0 µg/kg résultats non conformes. La présence de ces molécules, en faibles concentrations, pourraient être dues à la consommation par les animaux de plantes Crucifères. La Brigade Nationale d’Enquêtes Vétérinaires et 1 Thiouracil – urine – ovin – Phytosanitaires (BNEVP) a été informée de ces abattoir – 19,4 µg/L résultats non conformes. La présence de ces molécules, en faibles concentrations, pourraient être dues à la consommation par les animaux de plantes Crucifères. La BNEVP a été informée de ces résultats non 2 Nandrolone – urine bovin – 105 abattoir - 3,6 µg/kg ; 2,2 µg/kg 12 β-nandrolone – urine – porcin – entre 1 et 10 µg/kg conformes. Des enquêtes sont en cours. La BNEVP a été informée de ces résultats non conformes. Des enquêtes sont en cours, ainsi que des études basées sur la compilation des résultats des années précédentes. La Brigade Nationale d’Enquêtes Vétérinaires et 1 Zéranol + Taléranol – urine Phytosanitaires (BNEVP) a été informée de ces bovin – ferme - 2,5 µg/kg + 3 résultats non conformes. La présence de ces µg/kg molécules pourraient être dues à la consommation par les animaux de fourrages contaminés par des mycotoxines. 16 Zéranol + Taléranol – bovin – La Brigade Nationale d’Enquêtes Vétérinaires et Phytosanitaires (BNEVP) a été informée de ces abattoir – résultats quantitatifs résultats non conformes. La présence de ces compris entre 1 µg/kg et 3 µg/kg molécules pourraient être dues à la consommation par les animaux de fourrages contaminés par des mycotoxines. La BNEVP a été informée de ce résultat. Une 1 Chloramphénicol – muscle enquête est en cours. La très faible contamination bovin – abattoir – 0,07 µg/kg relevée peut laisser penser à des hypothèses autres que la fraude. La BNEVP a été informée de ces résultats non 3 chloramphénicol – muscle – porcin – 0,04 µg/kg ; 0,14 µg/kg ; conformes. Des enquêtes sont en cours. Les très faibles contaminations relevées peuvent laisser 0,1 µg/kg penser à des hypothèses autres que la fraude. 3 Hydroxymétronidazole – muscle La BNEVP a été informée de ces résultats non conformes. Des enquêtes sont en cours. Les très – porcin – 1,5 µg/kg ; 0,3 µg/kg ; faibles contaminations relevées peuvent laisser 0,4 µg/kg penser à des hypothèses autres que la fraude. La BNEVP a été informée de ce résultat. Les 1 17-β-estradiol – foie – poule de connaissances relatives aux niveaux réforme – 7,65 µg/kg physiologiques de cette substance dans les foies de volailles sont partielles. Il est donc difficile d’établir un « seuil de non-conformité ». De plus, les concentrations sont trop faibles pour réaliser une confirmation basée sur la spectrométrie de masse de rapport isotopique de manière à différencier une administration d’une production endogène. 1 boldénone méthyl – foie – truite La BNEVP a été informée de ces résultats non conformes. Des enquêtes sont en cours. arc-en-ciel – > 1 µg/kg Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years La quasi totalité des élevages ou entreprises ayant fait l’objet d’un résultat non conforme fera l’objet d’un nouveau contrôle par les agents des services déconcentrés pour l’année 2010. 106 Non-compliant results 1 antibiotique – muscle - bovin 1 Pénicilline G – muscle – bovin – 2635 µg/kg 1 Chlortétracycline – muscle – bovin – 842 µg/kg 14 Oxytétracycline – muscle bovin – 252 µg/kg ; 352 µg/kg ; 528 µg/kg ; 169,5 µg/kg ; 671 µg/kg ; 600 µg/kg ; 551 µg/kg ; 337 µg/kg ; 777 µg/kg ; 400 µg/kg ; 287 µg/kg ; 21910 µg/kg ; 113 µg/kg ; 122 µg/kg 2 Tétracycline – muscle – bovin – 147,5 µg/kg ; 100 µg/kg 1 Tétracycline + Tylosine – muscle – muscle bovin – 195 µg/kg + 33 µg/kg 1 Doramectin – foie – bovin – 10 µg/kg Follow-up actions Bovines Déclaration de résultat non-conforme par le laboratoire erronée : échantillon non-analysable Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’éleveur. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’éleveur. Cas à 337 µg/kg : ordonnance vraisemblablement incomplète ayant conduit l’éleveur a surdosé le médicament ce qui serait à l’origine de la NC malgré le respect du temps d’attente. Un courrier de rappel a été envoyé au vétérinaire traitant. Cas à 169,5 µg/kg : suite à une injection de tétracyclines le temps d’attente de 15 j n’a pas été respecté. Une inspection en pharmacie vétérinaire a été menée dans l’élevage et un rappel à la réglementation signifié à l’éleveur Cas à 400 µg/kg : l’animal, un taureau de 5 ans, a été abattu et à fait l’objet d’une saisie totale pour endocardite fibrineuse, arthrite unique et myosite localisée (590 kg). L’inspection en pharmacie vétérinaire menée à la suite de ce résultat a montré de nombreuses anomalies notamment dans la tenue des registres et l’enregistrement des ordonnances. Le taureau en question apparaît avoir été traité sans ordonnance avec un restant de flacon destiné à un autre animal. Un dossier a été transmis au procureur de la République pour tromperie. L’élevage sera contrôlé au titre de la conditionnalité en 2011. Un rappel réglementaire a également été adressé au cabinet vétérinaire responsable du suivi de cet élevage et il sera également inspecté en 2011. Dans la plupart des autres cas, il a été mis en évidence un non respect du temps d’attente. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’eleveur. Cas à 147,5 µg/kg : une inspection en pharmacie vétérinaire a été menée dans l’élevage impacté. L’éleveur a fait l’objet d’un rappel réglementaire concernant l’enregistrement de l’ensemble des traitements. Cas à 100 µg/kg : Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’eleveur. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’eleveur. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’eleveur. 107 1 moxidectin – foie – bovin – 230 µg/kg 1 Diclofenac – muscle – bovin – 9,3 µg/kg 2 Prednisolone – foie – bovin – 4,5 µg/kg ; 2,45 µg/kg 1 Prednisolone – poil – bovin >8,25 µg/kg 1 Cadmium – muscle – bovin – 120 µg/kg 2 oxytrétracycline – muscle – porcin - 1295 µg/kg ; 200 µg/kg 2 prednisone + prédnisolone – poil – porcin - > 4 µg/kg et >8µg/kg ; > 8,25 µg/kg et >7,9 µg/kg 1 Cadmium – muscle – porcin – 103 µg/kg 1 oxytétracycline – muscle – poulet réforme Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’eleveur. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’eleveur. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’eleveur. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’eleveur. L’élevage sera prélevé à nouveau lors des plans 2010. Pigs Cas à 200 µg/kg : l’inspection de l’élevage en pharmacie vétérinaire a montré qu’un traitement avait été administré mais que le temps d’attente avait été a priori respecté. Toutefois, l’élevage ne tenait pas de registre de soins. Un rappel à la réglementation lui a été adressé. Une inspection en pharmacie vétérinaire a été menée dans l’élevage d’où le porc était issu. Il a été constaté de nombreuses anomalies relatives à la réglementation de la pharmacie vétérinaire en élevage. Toutefois, cela n’a pas permis d’identifier l’utilisation de cette molécule sur le lot d’animaux auquel appartenait l’animal incriminé. L’élevage sera prélevé à nouveau lors des plans 2010. Poultry Cause détectée : non respect du temps d'attente avec envoi d'animaux sous traitement antibiotiques (problème organisationnel de filière avec gestion de l'alimentation et de l'enlèvement par le propriétaire du lot). Le lot de reproducteurs chair a été réformé de manière anticipée par le propriétaire alors qu'il était encore sous traitement antibiotique. L'éleveur n'a pas réagi. Autres anomalies relevées : Eleveur : suite à inspection en pharmacie vétérinaire : insuffisance d'enregistrement des traitements, registre non ordonné, quelques documents manquants et non respect des règles de prescriptions (durée de traitement) : rapport et courrier de rappel à la réglementation Vétérinaires : insuffisance sur les prescriptions détectées et sur les règles de délivrance par rapport aux prescriptions : rapport et courrier en lien avec une visite déjà faite au cabinet (mise en demeure sur le cabinet) Usine d'aliment : rappel réglementaire sur les délivrance avec programmation de contrôle en 108 4 maduramycine – foie – poulet de chair – 1,5 µg/kg ; 2,6 µg/kg ; 2 µg/kg ; 3,3 µg/kg 2 maduramycine – foie – dinde – 6,1 µg/kg ; 48,7 µg/kg 21 nicarbazine – foie – poulet de chair – 16 échantillons entre 4,9 µg/kg et 99,7 µg/kg ; 176,2 µg/kg ; 110,9 µg/kg ; 106,8 µg/kg ; 106,4 µg/kg ; 1355,9 µg/kg 1 oxytétracycline – muscle – caprin – 139 µg/kg 2 sulfadiméthoxine – muscle – ovin 208 µg/kg ; 241 µg/kg 1 sulfadiméthoxine + sulfadiazine muscle – ovin – 109 µg/kg + 12 µg/kg 1 Diazinon – muscle – ovin – 69,7 µg/kg 1 Cadmium – muscle – cheval – 400 µg/kg 2010 sur les Bonnes pratiques de Fabrication et de distribution de l'aliment Les enquêtes menées sur les élevages pour lesquels des non-conformités en anticoccidiens ont été relevés ont fait l’objet d’inspections en pharmacie vétérinaire. Pour une majorité d’entre eux, il n’a pas été relevé d’anomalie majeure. Une contamination croisée d’aliments blancs par des aliments médicamenteux est possible (au stade du transport, de l’élevage ou de la fabrique). Il semblerait que des débris d’aliment supplémentés puissent se retrouver dans les assiettes, et se mélanger avec les aliments blancs. C’est hypothèse semble assez cohérente et, dans certains départements, les éleveurs travaillent une amélioration de leurs pratiques pour supprimer ces contaminations croisées. Les élevages en cause seront prélevés prioritairement lors du plan 2010. Sheep and goat Suite à ce résultat et au vu de l'historique de l'élevage (problème de pleuro-pneumonies) et en l'absence d'une traçabilité fiable de l'abattoir, la DDSV : 1/ a considéré l'ensemble des chevreaux issus de cet élevage et abattus le même jour comme un seul lot, 2/ a fait retirer les restes de viandes congelées issues de ces animaux encore disponibles au niveau de l'abattoir (autour de 170 kg). Une enquête a été menée en élevage. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé aux éleveurs. Suite à ce résultat, une enquête a été menée par la DDSV concernée. Des animaux, normalement destinés à être prochainement abattus, auraient accidentellement été mélangés avec des animaux traités avec un aliment médicamenteux et auraient donc pu manger cet aliment. Un rappel à la réglementation a été signifié à l’éleveur. Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’éleveur. Horses Une enquête a été menée autour de l'élevage pour identifier d'éventuelles causes de la nonconformité et celui-ci sera prélevé à nouveau lors des plans 2010. 109 1 Fenbendazole – lait d’ovin – 74 µg/kg 1 Chlorpyrifos éthyl – lait de caprin – 11,9 µg/kg 1 plomb – lait de bovin – 163 µg/kg 1 sulfadiméthoxine – oeuf de poule – 27,150 mg/kg 3 dinitrocarbanilide – œufs de poule – 1,35 µg/kg ; 2,8 µg/kg ; 8 µg/kg Milk Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’éleveur. La LMR étant de 10 µg/kg et le résultat donné par le laboratoire non corrigé en tenant compte de l’incertitude de mesure, il n’a pas été donné suite à cette non-conformité. L’élevage sera prélevé à nouveau lors des plans 2010. Eggs Ce taux très élevé serait dû au prélevement d’œufs lors d’un traitement. En effet, l’enquête a montré qu’un traitement de 5 jours a été effectué suite à des résultats d’autopsies demandées par l’éleveur. Le registre d’élevage a montré l’enregistrement de ce traitement mais il semble que ces mentions n’aient pas été de suite inscrites car lors du prélèvement fait par le technicien, seule l’information de la responsable indiquant que les œufs n’étaient pas mis à la consommation, lui a été donnée. De ce fait, les analyses ont été demandées quand même. Le temps d’attente de 12 jours a été respecté selon les indications ; cependant le décompte a été fait à partir du premier jour de traitement et non pas à la fin. Cependant les œufs (175 000) auraient été détruits, selon les dires de l’éleveur, sur les champs et n’ont pas été envoyés à l’équarrissage. Le nombre d’œufs indiqués sur le registre est imprécis. Un décompte a été refait ensuite en fonction des relevers de ponte. L’historique des bons de livraisons a été remis lors de la visite sur place. Une enquête a été faite auprès de la casserie et les détails des livraisons envoyés ; aucune livraison n’a été réalisée vers la casserie lors de la période incriminée. Un rapport de visite et une lettre d’accompagnement ont été envoyés à la suite et concernaient aussi d’autres non conformités dont une livraison d’aliments médicamenteux sans ordonnance par un fabricant d’aliments. Pas d’action car entrée en vigueur au 1er juillet 2009 du « RÈGLEMENT (CE) No 124/2009 DE LA COMMISSION du 10 février 2009 établissant des valeurs maximales pour la présence dans les denrées alimentaires de coccidiostatiques ou d'histomonostatiques résultant du transfert inévitable de ces substances vers des aliments pour 110 2 nicarbazine – œufs de poule – 2 µg/kg ; 16 µg/kg 1 lasalocide – œuf de caille – 213 µg/kg 5 Sulfadiméthoxine – muscle – lapin – 122 µg/kg ; 142 µg/kg ; 901 µg/kg ; 1542 µg/kg ; 2120 µg/kg animaux non cibles » et valeur très inférieure à la limite de 100 µg/kg prévue par ce réglement Pas d’action car entrée en vigueur au 1er juillet 2009 du RÈGLEMENT (CE) No 124/2009 DE LA COMMISSION du 10 février 2009 établissant des valeurs maximales pour la présence dans les denrées alimentaires de coccidiostatiques ou d'histomonostatiques résultant du transfert inévitable de ces substances vers des aliments pour animaux non cibles et valeur très inférieure à la limite de 100 µg/kg prévue par ce réglement Un rappel à la réglementation a été adressé à l’éleveur. Rabbit Cas à 901 µg/kg : Une enquête a été menée dans l’élevage concerné. Il n’a pas été relevé d’anomalie majeure dans cet élevage. L’usine d’aliments ayant livré l’élevage a fait l’objet d’une inspection qui n’a pas révélé d’anomalie. Une analyse sur l’aliment blanc livré n’a pas mis en évidence de contamination croisée. Une contamination croisée non homogène d’aliments blancs reste néanmoins possible. Cas à 2120 µg/kg : Une enquête en pharmacie vétérinaire a été menée dans l’élevage. D'après les déclarations de l'éleveur, ce prélèvement fortement positif serait de nature accidentelle. Il reconnaît une possibilité d'erreur dans la distribution d'aliment médicamenteux destiné aux lapines, en lien avec le transfert précipité de lapins d'engraissement 2 jours avant leur départ pour l'abattoir. Cette hypothèse est compatible avec la dose élevée de sulfadimétoxine trouvée dans le muscle (2 120 µg/kg). L'anomalie « non respect du délai d'attente à une seule reprise » a été retenue dans le compte-rendu de contrôle sur place paquet hygiène/Conditionnalité 2009, ce qui est susceptible d'entraîner une pénalité de 1% de ses primes PAC 2009. L'erreur étant de nature accidentelle, il n'a pas été dressé de procès-verbal. Cas à 122 µg/kg : l’information sur la chaîne alimentaire ne montre aucun élément de suspicion (mortalité normale, pas de pathologie ni de traitement mentionnés). L'aliment supplémenté a été arrêté dans les délais conformes. Aucune anomalie majeur n’a été mise en évidence lors de l’inspection de l’élevage pour la pharmacie vétérinaire. Une contamination croisée d’aliments 111 blancs reste possible. La traçabilité de l'abattoir et de la découpe est faite à la journée. Le listage des produits restants congelés montre qu'il reste 20,18 kg de découpe de lapin et 57,00 kg de gigolette de lapin. Ces produits ont été consignés et détruits (enlèvement C2). 1 Sulfadiméthoxine + benzosulfonamide 97 µg/kg + 65 µg/kg 1 Cadmium – foie – lapin – 560 µg/kg 3 Cadmium – foie – grand gibier – 700 µg/kg , 1252 µg/kg, 1,22 µg/kg 1 HCH-α – muscle – grand gibier – 304 µg/kg 4 Plomb – miel – 140 µg/kg ; 170 µg/kg ; 330 µg/kg ; 890 µg/kg 1 oxytétracycline – miel – 15,6 µg/kg Ces élevages seront prélevés prioritairement lors du plan 2010. Une enquête a été menée en élevage et, hormis un manque de rigueur de l’éleveur dans la conduite de son élevage (activité arrêtée le 01/05/2009), il n’a pas été établi de lien entre la non-conformité et la conduite de l’élevage. Par contre, le risque de contamination croisée au niveau de l’usine d’aliment n’est pas totalement maîtrisé. Toutefois, cette usine a cesser l’incorporation de sulfamides dans les aliments d’engraissement pour lapins au 1er juillet, ce qui devrait améliorer ses résultats aux tests de contamination croisée. L’élevage sera prélevé à nouveau lors des plans 2010. Wild game Pas d’action sur les gibiers de chasse Pas d’action sur les gibiers de chasse Honey Les apiculteurs concernés seront prélevés en priorité dans le cadre du plan de contrôle 2010. Les apiculteurs concernés seront prélevés en priorité dans le cadre du plan de contrôle 2010. 112 GR GREECE GREECE Member State Modifications of the NRCP 2010 were performed mostly, due to the following reasons: 1) An extended redistribution of the samples, between the NRCP laboratories took place, in order to facilitate their work, by fully exploiting their existing capabilities in personnel and expendables. 2) The new NRCP for 2010 requires the minimum no of samples to be collected(plus 10%) as a reserve. (The fact that, a large number of extra samples were requested for the 2009 NRCP, instead of the minimum required according to the national production, created a serious nuisance to local producers, which was expressed by complaints to the sample collectors; furthermore the examination of a large number of extra samples except been very costly, created a serious accumulation problems in the laboratories and many deficiencies in expendables). Non-compliant results Mycotoxine/ochratoxine – Kidney (4 samples) Soulfadimidine– Meat/Kidneys (3 samples) Follow-up actions Pigs Investigation of feed. The results of the investigation were negative. No administrative measures were taken - Quarantine - Heavy Metals-Meat (1 sample) Nitrofurans - Meat (1 sample) Heavy metals (Kd) – Liver (4 samples) Aflatoxine – Bovine (3 sample) Heavy metals – (3 samples) 1 bovine, 2 sheep Additional sampling with negative results Poultry investigations in the farm of origin, additional sampling with negative results; Investigation on the farm, new sampling with negative results. Sheep and goat -investigations in the farm of origin -investigation of feed. - The results of the investigation were negative. No administrative measures were taken. Milk - investigations in the farm of origin, - additional sampling; - destruction of feed - Quarantine animals held in the farm, - intensified milk sampling - investigations in the farm of origin, - additional sampling; - Feed examination, no results Aquaculture 113 Malachite Green-Flesh-Fish-n.a (9 samples) Heavy Metals (Pb) (1 sample) Chlorotetracycline-Honey(1 sample) Sulfathiazole-Honey(1 sample) - investigations in the farm of origin, - intensified checks - additional sampling - administrative measures(fine), - denial of EC aid. - Prohibition of fishing in the suspect area. Honey - The infected butch was confiscated and destroyed; an investigation in the farm of origin took place; Quarantine was established. - The results of the investigation were negative. No administrative measures were taken - investigations in the farm of origin; no indications of the suspect substance were found. - Suspect sampling was performed. 114 HU HUNGARY Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances According to the FVO recommendations and CRL comments we have modified the annual 2010 plan Non-compliant results Follow-up actions There was no non-compliant results * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines Bovine –muscle and liver-inhibitors: - additional sampling - administrative measures, Amoxicillin, 2 pc - modifications of the NRCP of 2010 Bovine kidney: Cadmium Cd, 2pc Pigs - additional sampling Pig plasma: progesterone, 1pc - administrative measures, Pig muscle: metronidazole, 1pc - modifications of the NRCP of 2010 Pig kidney Gentamycin 1 pc Poultry - additional sampling Turkey liver: enrofloxacin, 1pc - administrative measures, - modifications of the NRCP of 2010 Sheep and goat - additional sampling sheep kidney: Cadmium Cd, 1pcs - administrative measures, - modifications of the NRCP of 2010 Horses Milk Eggs Rabbit 115 Aquaculture Farmed game wild board muscle: Lead Pb, 2pcs Honey: Sulphadimethoxin 1 pc Wild game - additional sampling - administrative measures, - modifications of the NRCP of 2010 Honey - additional sampling - administrative measures, - modifications of the NRCP of 2010 116 IE IRELAND Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Analysis for Ethynlestradiol in live bovines and Nitromidizoles in milk and honey have been added to the 2010 plan Non-compliant results Follow-up actions 15 non-compliant results Bovines 11 target samples confirmed non-compliant for • Thyrostats –Thiouracil Thiouracil at the following levels: • Urine • 11 Non-Compliant results (1) 38.2µg/kg (2) 4.5µg/kg (3) 13.4µg/kg (4) 19.8µg/kg (5) 16.8µg/kg (6) 1.6µg/kg (7) 25.2µg/kg (8) 87.4µg/kg (9) 8.1µg/kg (10) 27.1µg/kg (11) 33ug/kg A follow up investigation was initiated at farm level in all cases and no evidence of illegal use was identified. In line with scientific evidence, the Competent Authority has concluded that the residues resulted from dietary factors. • • • Nitrofurans- Nitrofurazone as SEM Plasma 4 Non-Compliant results 4 target samples confirmed non-compliant for Nitrofurazone as SEM at the following levels: (1) 0.14µg/kg, (2) 0.32µg/kg, (3) 0.09µg/kg, (4) 0.110µg/kg Follow up investigations were initiated at the farms of origin in all cases and no evidence of illegal use was identified. In line with scientific evidence, the Competent Authority has concluded that the residues resulted from extraneous factors. 9 Non- Compliant results Pigs 117 • • • Thyrostats- Thiouracil Urine 9 Non-compliant results 9 target samples confirmed non-compliant for Thiouracil at the following levels: (1) 1.8µg/kg (2) 3.0µg/kg (3) 12.0µg/kg (4) 2.5µg/kg (5) 3.0µg/kg (6) 0.9µg/kg (7) 6.5µg/kg (8) 3.3µg/kg (9) 2.6µg/kg 11 non-compliant results • • • Thyrostats-Thiouracil Urine 7 Non-compliant results A follow up investigation was initiated at farm level in all cases and no evidence of illegal use was identified. In line with scientific evidence, the Competent Authority has concluded that the residues resulted from dietary factors. Ovine 7 target samples confirmed non-compliant for Thiouracil at the following levels: (1) 7.3µg/kg (2) 31.9µg/kg (3) 1.3µg/kg (4) 20.0µg/kg (5) 12.6µg/kg (6) 5.4µg/kg (7) 0.9µg/kg A follow up investigation was initiated at farm level in all cases and no evidence of illegal use was identified. In line with scientific evidence, the Competent Authority has concluded that the residues resulted from dietary factors. • • • Nitrofurans-Nitrofurazone as SEM Liver 4 Non-compliant results 4 non-compliant results 4 target samples confirmed non-compliant for Nitrofurazone as SEM at the following levels: (1) 0.172µg/kg, (2) 0.122µg/kg, (3) 0.182µg/kg, (4) 0.2582µg/kg A follow up investigation was initiated at farm level in all cases and no evidence of illegal use was identified. In line with scientific evidence, the Competent Authority has concluded that the residues resulted from extraneous factors. Aquaculture 118 4 non-compliant farm finfish samples for Leuco Malachite green This substance is not authorised as an animal remedy, and does not have an established MRL. The reporting limit for the purposes of the Irish NRMP is 1µg/kg. As part of 2009 monitoring, 3 routine target samples of freshwater trout from one farm were found to have Leuco malachite Green (LMG) present; levels were between 0.6 – 0.99µg/kg. These levels were below the reporting limit of 1µg/kg for LMG and were therefore reported as compliant. An investigation was initiated including an on –farm investigation. A legal notice under national legislation, was issued to restrict the movement of fish off the farm. Follow-up samples were taken from fish and sediment throughout the farm. Of 14 suspect samples taken 4 confirmed positive for LMG at levels of 1.2, 1.8, 2.5 & 20.8 µg/kg while 3 of the samples had levels below the reporting limit of LMG. All stock from the pond that had the level of 20.8 µg/kg of LMG was culled. Recent sampling has shown no further non-compliances and movement restrictions were removed. A programme of enhanced monitoring is ongoing at that farm. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances • NSAID analysis in porcine tissue has been added to the plan. • Sampling of anthelmintics in the bovine milk sector has increased due to the incidence of noncompliant results in 2009. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions 9 non-compliant results Bovines Suspect samples • Antimicrobials 9 suspect samples confirmed non-compliant for antimicrobial • Muscle • 9 non-compliant results* substances as follows: • 5 x Oxytetracycline (1 @ 900µg/kg, 2 @ >500µg/kg, 2 @ >200µg/kg) • 1 x Enrofloxacin @ 150µg/kg • 1 x Tilmicosin @ >250µg/kg • 2 x Amoxicyllin @ >100µg/kg & 62.8µg/kg All suspect carcases declared unfit for human consumption and destroyed. Full on farm investigations including examination of medicines on farm and animal remedies record were carried out in each case. As appropriate, advice is given to the farmer and follow-up visits take place. 3 non-compliant results • Antimicrobials • Muscle Pigs Suspect Samples 2 suspect samples confirmed non-compliant for antimicrobial 119 • 3 non-compliant result* substances as follows: • 1 x Oxytetracycline at a level >500µg/kg • 1 x Marbofloxacin at a level of 660µg/kg Target Samples 1 target sample confirmed non-compliant for Trimethroprim @ >100µg/kg & Sulfadiazine @ >200µg/kg. All suspect carcases are declared unfit for human consumption, destroyed and excluded from the food chain. Full on farm investigations including examination of medicines on farm and animal remedies record were carried out in each case. As appropriate, advice is given to the farmer and follow-up visits take place. • • • OC’s & PCB’s Fat 3 non-compliant results 10 non-compliant results • Anticoccidials • Liver • 9 non-compliant results • • • NSAID’s Plasma 1 non-compliant result 6 non-compliant results • Anthelmintics • Liver • 6 non-compliant results* 3 suspect samples associated with the dioxin incident in this sector in late 2008, confirmed positive for PCB’s and Dioxins in early 2009. All carcases were destroyed and excluded from the food chain. Poultry 9 Target Broiler samples confirmed non-compliant for Nicarbazin above the ad-hoc national level of 228µg/kg. The levels found ranged from 240µg/kg to >500µg/kg. Follow up investigations at farm of origin were carried out in respect of the 2 samples with levels exceeding 500µg/kg. 1 Target sample confirmed non-compliant for Diclofenac at a level of 20ng/ml The follow up investigation identified contamination of the sample from use of human medicines by the sampling officer as the source of this result. Ovine 6 target samples confirmed non-compliant for Anthelmintics as follows: • • • 3 x Rafoxanide at (1) 367.47µg/kg (2) 316.6µg/kg (3) 246.6µg/kg 1 x Fenbendazole Sulphone: >2619µg/kg 2 x Closantel (1)6918.6µg/kg (2) 2916µg/kg Full on farm investigations including examination of medicines on farm and animal remedies record were carried out in each case. As appropriate, advice is given to the farmer and follow-up visits 120 14 non-compliant results • Anthelmintics • Bovine Milk • 12 non-compliant results* • • • Antimicrobials Bovine Milk 2 non-compliant result* take place. Milk 12 target samples taken from milk tanks at farm level confirmed non-compliant as follows: • 7 x Nitroxinil at the following levels: (1) 2.17µg/kg, (2) 7.228µg/kg, (3) 2.2µg/kg, (4) 1.43µg/kg, (5) 7.8µg/kg, (6) .795µg/kg, (7) 7.84µg/kg. • 4 x Closantel at the following levels: (1) 1.99µg/kg, (2) 3.49µg/kg, (3) 1.836µg/kg (4) 1.01µg/kg. • 1 x Rafoxanide at 9.83µg/kg Follow up farm investigations were carried out in all cases. Further scientific data revealed that existing VMP labelling was not adequate to avoid presence of residues; immediate action was taken to amend product labels and advise FBOs. Risk assessment concluded that at the very low levels found, it was not necessary to withdraw milk from the market. Restrictions on movement of milk/treated animals; additional sampling and on-going monitoring were implemented as appropriate following the findings of the follow up investigations. 2 target sample taken from milk tanks at farm level confirmed non-compliant as follows: • • 1 Non-Compliant • 1 non compliant • Chemical Elements • Muscle 1 x Sulfadimidine at 147µg/kg 1 x Amoxycillin at >20µg/kg Full on farm investigations including examination of medicines on farm and animal remedies record were carried out in each case. As appropriate, advice is given to the farmer and follow-up visits take place. Wild Game 1 target sample confirmed positive for lead at 3140ug/kg *Non-compliant results as appropriate, have been reported to the relevant Services of the CA for the purposes of implementation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 DETAILS OF NON-COMPLIANT RESULTS – TARGETED SAMPLING GROUP RESIDU SUBSTANCE ANIMAL CATEGOR 121 FARM/ SLAUGHTERHOUSE/OTHE NONCOMPLIAN E Y/ SPECIES RS T A2 THYROSTATS BOVINE FARM 4 A2 THYROSTATS BOVINE SLAUGHTER 7 A2 THYROSTATS PORCINE SLAUGHTER 9 A2 THYROSTATS OVINE SLAUGHTER 7 A6 NITROFURANS BOVINE FARM 4 A6 NITROFURANS OVINE SLAUGHTER 4 B1 ANTIBIOTICS MILK FARM 2 B1 ANTIBIOTICS PORCINE SLAUGHTER 1 B2a ANTHELMINTI CS NSAID’s FARM 12 POULTRY SLAUGHTER 1 B2e B2a B2b B3c MILK ANTHELMINTI CS NICARBAZIN OVINE SLAUGHTER 6 POULTRY SLAUGHTER 9 CHEMICAL ELEMENTS WILD DEER SLAUGHTER 1 SUM 67 122 DETAILS OF NON-COMPLIANT RESULTS – SUSPECT SAMPLING Ireland 2009 GROUP RESIDU E SUBSTANCE B1 ANTIBIOTIC S ANTIBIOTIC S OC’s including PCB Dyes-Leuco Malachite green B1 B3a B3e ANIMAL FARM/ CATEGORY SLAUGHTERHOUSE/OTHER / S SPECIES BOVINE SLAUGHTER NONCOMPLIAN T 9 PORCINE SLAUGHTER 2 PORCINE SLAUGHTER 3 Farmed finfish Farm 4 SUM 123 18 IT ITALY Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Considering the non compliance found on 2008 and on the first semester of 2009, the number of sampling for the following substances was increased: steroids, progesterone, resorcylic acid lactones including zeranol, metabolites of nitrofurans, chloramphenicol. A new substance has been added to be monitored: nitroimidazoles in eggs and milk, zilpaterol in urine. Follow-up actions 2 Boldenone – urine – young Suspect and Other samples. 5 carcasses put bovine: under seizure at slaughterhouse. Investigations in - 0.69 ppb; the farm: record checks, n=27 additional samples - 0.79 pp. have been taken (urine), intensified check in the farm, n= 579 animals put under temporary seizure in farm, administrative measures and criminal penalties. Denial EC aid 1 Betametasone – liver – young Other sample. In the slaughterhouse 12 carcasses bovines: have put under seizure and then 55,5 kg of - 3.16 ppb. products have been declare unfit for human consumption, in the farm of origin have been intensified the checks (record), 2 additional samples have been taken. The source was established in the illegal treatment. Administrative measures. 71 Prednisolone – urine – cows: Other samples. (1) Investigations in the farm: 1. 1.72 ppb; record checks, no additional samples, intensified 2. 0.88 ppb; checks, ask for confirmatory analyses by operator; 3. 1.95 ppb; (2) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no 4. 0.59 ppb; additional samples, intensified checks, n=1 carcass 5. 2.36 ppb; has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse; 6. 3.57 ppb; (3) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no 7. 3.77 ppb; additional samples, intensified checks. Ask for 8. 4.86 ppb; confirmatory analyses by operator; (4) n=1 carcass 9. 3.22 ppb; has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse 10. 0.87 ppb; and declared unfit for human consumption; (5) No 11. 1.81 ppb; information; (6) Investigations in the farm: record 12. 1.92 ppb; checks, no additional samples, intensified checks 13. 2.77 ppb; on n=1 farm; (7) No information; (8) 14. 2.69 ppb; Investigations in the farm: record checks, no 15. 4.93 ppb; additional samples and no intensified checks on 16. 5.80 ppb; farm, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the 17. 2.4 ppb; slaughterhouse, administrative measures and 18. 3.6 ppb; criminal penalties; (9) Investigations in the farm: 19. 37.8 ppb; record checks, no additional samples, intensified 20. 1.31 ppb; checks, administrative measures and criminal 21. 0.65 ppb; penalties; (10) Investigations in the farm: record 124 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 2.43 ppb; 11.4 ppb also liver matrix; 5.04 ppb; 0.95 ppb; 7.09 ppb; 1.81 ppb; 2.17 ppb; 0.8 ppb; 4.77 ppb; 3.46 ppb; 1.16 ppb; 0.77 ppb; 5.07 ppb; 2.07 ppb; 0.68 ppb; 1.32 ppb; 0.66 ppb 2.3 ppb; 1.41 ppb; 2.38 ppb; 3.28 ppb; 2.43 ppb; 1.84 ppb; 2.32 ppb; 5.43 ppb; 1.46 ppb; 7.1 ppb; 1.13 ppb; 1.32 ppb; 1.27 ppb; 0.66 ppb; 1.89 ppb; 3.09 ppb; 1.28 ppb; 2.44 ppb; 0.77 ppb; 1.83 ppb; 2.49 ppb; 8.85 ppb; 0.97 ppb; 1.34 ppb; 6.97 ppb; 6.04 ppb; 1.71 ppb; 0.82 ppb; 3.51 ppb; 1.92 ppb; 2.11 ppb; 1.57 ppb; 2.74 ppb. checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, administrative measures and report to the judicial authority; (11) No information about follow up actions, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse; (12) No information about follow up actions, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption; (13) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, criminal penalties; n=1 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption; (14) See point 13 above; (15) No information about follow up actions, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption; (16) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, administrative measures and criminal penalties, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption; (17) See point 16 above; (18) See point 16 above; (19) See point 16 above; (20) See point 16 above; (21) No information about follow up actions; (22) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, administrative measures and criminal penalties, report to the judicial authority for non compliant about food chain information; (23) See point 16 above; (24) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, administrative measures and criminal penalties, n=1 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption; (25) See point 16 above; (26) See point 24 above; (27) Investigations in the farm: record checks, n=4 additional samples, intensified checks, n=1 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption; (28) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse, administrative measures and report to the judicial authority; (29) See point 24 above; (30) See point 10 above; (31 Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse, administrative measures and criminal penalties; (32) ) Investigations in the farm: record checks, n=17 additional samples, intensified checks, n=1 animal has been put under seizure at the farm, administrative measures; (33) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no 125 additional samples, intensified checks, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption, administrative measures, ask for confirmatory analyses by operator; (34) See point 16 above; (35) See point 16 above; (36) No information about follow up actions; (37) Investigations in the farm: record checks, n=21 additional samples, intensified checks, administrative measures; (38) See point 28 above; (39) See point 16 above; (40) No information about follow up actions; (41) See point 16 above; (42) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, administrative measures and criminal penalties; (43) See point 33 above; (44) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks on n=1 farm, administrative measures and criminal penalties, n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse and n=1 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption; (45) See point 42 above; (46) (47) See point 44 above; (47) n=1 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption, Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, administrative measures and criminal penalties, investigations are still in progress; (49) (50) (51) See point 42 above; For (49) has been asked for confirmatory analyses by operator; (52) See point 47 above; (53) (54) See point 44 above; (55)(56)(57)(58)(59) n=1 carcass has been put under seizure at the slaughterhouse and n=1 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption, no information about follow up actions; (60) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, administrative measures; (61) n=1 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption, administrative measures and criminal penalties; (62) No information about follow up actions; (63) the hind quarters has bee put under seizure and declared unfit for human consumption, investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, administrative measures and criminal penalties; (64) (65) See point 16 above; (66) Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples; (67) See point 16 above; (68) Investigation in farm: record checks but no additional samples, 1 carcass has been put under seizure in farm, administrative measures; (69) See point 68 above; 126 3 Dexamethasone – liver – cows: 1. 5.03 ppb; 2. 66 ppb; 3. 3.80 ppb. 2 Dexamethasone – urine and liver – cows: 1. 3.07 ppb - 3.31 ppb; 2. 5.89 ppb – 9.3 ppb; 1 Prednisolone - 1 Prednisone -1 Betametasone – urine – young bovines: 1. 21.2– 5.35 - 12.5 ppb. 9 Dexamethasone – liver – cows: 1. 2.69 ppb; 2. 1.51 ppb; 3. 1.01 ppb; 4. 1.09 ppb; 5. 10.9 ppb; 6. 32.5 ppb; 7. 6.7 ppb; 8. 15.10 ppb; 9. 13.83 ppb. 9 Dexamethasone – urine – young bovines: 1. 1.08 ppb; 2. 0.62 ppb; 3. 20.1 ppb; 4. 1.40 ppb; 5. 0.91 ppb; 6. 1.18 ppb; 7. 0.99 ppb; 8. 1.75 ppb; 9. 1.24 ppb. (70) No information about follow up actions; (71) Investigation in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, criminal penalties. Investigations are still in progress. Target and Other samples. Investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, intensified checks, n=1 carcass put under temporary seizure, administrative measures and criminal penalties. For point 2, besides the investigation in the farm and of record, n=21 additional samples have been taken, 638 animals have been punt under temporary seizure at farm and n=1 carcass at slaughterhouse. The source was established in the treatment not recorded but the investigation is still in progress. Other samples. See above. For sample (2) also report to the judicial authority for non compliant about food chain information. Other samples. Investigation in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, criminal penalties. Investigations are still in progress. Target and Other samples. Investigations in the farm: record checks and 15 additional samples, intensified checks on 7 farms, 1 carcasses at the slaughterhouse and 16 animals on the farm put under temporary seizure, alert notification (for point (1) and (6), administrative measures and criminal penalties; For point (3) report to the judicial authority; For point 5, besides 103 animals on the farm put under temporary seizure and n=17 additional samples. For point (7) the operator has asked for confirmatory analyses. For point (9) the source was established in illegal treatment. Target and Other samples. n=463 animals have been put under seizure at the farm and n=2 destroyed, investigations in the farm and intensified checks on n=2 farms, record checks, n=33 additional samples have been taken (16 in the same farm and 16 in linked farm, administrative measures. For points (4)(5)(6) also criminal penalties and denial EC aid. For points (5) (6) the source was the illegal treatment by mouth. 127 10 Dexamethasone – liver – young bovines: 1. 20.1 ppb; 2. 14.8 ppb; 3. N/A; 4. 3.07 ppb; 5. 2.64 ppb; 6. 2.91 ppb; 7. 404 ppb; 8. 3.39 ppb; 9. 6.74 ppb; 10. 3.70 ppb. 1 Prednisolone – muscle - veal calves: - 2.9 ppb Target, Other and Suspect samples. Investigations in the farms of origin: record checks, n=5 carcass has been put under seizure at slaughterhouse, administrative measures. For point (3) 1 carcass has put under temporary seizure and 839,95 kg products have been declared unfit for human consumption. For point 6 investigations are still in progress. For point (7) n=8 additional samples have been taken, 1 carcass has put under seizure and declared unfit for human consumption, administrative measures, criminal penalties and denial EC aid. For points (8) (9) investigations are intensified in 1 farm, 1797 animals have put under seizure waiting for the results of the 21 additional samples taken, the source could be illegal treatment. For point (10) n=6 additional samples have been taken. Target sample. Investigations both in the slaughterhouse or in the farm of origin, no additional samples have been taken, verification of records and no treatment was been recorded. Intensified checks for 6 months, administrative measures. 1 Prednisolone – urine – young bovines: - 1.05 ppb Suspect sample. No information 2 Prednisolone – urine - veal calves: - 8.94 ppb; - 17.8 ppb. Target and Other samples. Investigations in the farm: record checks, 8 additional samples, intensified checks in 3 farms, administrative measures, criminal penalties and denial EC aid. 1 Prednisone – urine – young bovines: - 0.82 ppb. 1 Prednisolone and 2 Prednisone – urine - young bovines: - 2.37-0.85-3.39 ppb. Other sample. No information Suspect samples. Investigations in the farm: record checks, 17 additional samples, intensified checks in the farm, administrative measures criminal penalties and denial EC aid. 66 animals put under temporary seizure waiting for the additional samples’ results. Investigations are still in progress. 128 1 Prednisolone and 1 Prednisone – urine - young bovines: - 6.21-4.64 ppb. Target samples. Investigations in the farm: record checks, 21 additional samples (1 non compliant for prednisone and 1 non compliant for prednisolone), intensified checks in one farm, administrative measures criminal penalties and denial EC aid. 103 animals put under temporary seizure waiting for the additional samples’ results. Investigations are still in progress. 1 Testosteron-17-beta-serum-veal calv: - 2.0 ppb Other sample. Investigation in the farm: records checks, 21 additional samples, intensified checks in farm and 1 animal put under temporary seizure. Investigations are still in progress. 1 Boldenone-Alpha – 1 Boldenone – 1 Boldione – urine – young bovines: - 0.69-0.88-2.44 ppb Target samples. Investigations in the farm: record checks, intensified checks, 21 additional samples, administrative measures, criminal penalties and denial EC aid. 1 animal has put under seizure in the farm and then put down. The operator has asked for confirmatory analyses. 1 Chloramphenicol – poultry – muscle: - 1,5 ppb. Target sample. Investigations in the farm are still in progress, examination of the records, 2 additional samples of muscle have been taken. Intensified controls in the farm. The source of residue wasn’t established. 1 Chloramphenicol – cows – muscle: Target sample. Investigations in the farm are still in progress, examination of the records, additional samples have been taken, 16 animals have been put under seizure at farm. - 2,3 ppb. 1 Chloramphenicol – pig – muscle: - 1,4 ppb. 1 Clenbuterol – liver – veal calves: - N/A 1 Taleranol – urine – cows: - 0.58 ppb. Target sample. Investigations in the farm: examination of the records, 3 additional samples have been taken (n=2 feed and n=1 drinking water), 370 animals have been put under seizure at farm waiting for results. Other sample. 1 carcass has put under temporary seizure at slaughterhouse and 178.06 kg of products declared unfit for human consumption. No additional information about follow up actions. Target sample. Investigations are still in progress in the farm of origin: examination of the records, n=15 additional samples, intensified controls in 1 farm, 1 carcass and 64 animals have been put under seizure at farm. 129 1 Alpha Zeralanol and 1 Beta Zeralanol – urine – cows: - 1.10-2.14 ppb 1 Semicarbazide – muscle – poultry: - Target samples. Investigations are still in progress: record checks, 17 additional samples, 67 animals put under seizure in the farm, measures administrative and criminal penalties. Target sample. No information. N/A Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Considering the non compliance found on 2008 and on the first semester of 2009, the number of sampling for the following substances was increased: antibacterial substances, including sulfonamides and chinolones, coccidiostats, anthelmintics, organochlorine substances including PCB, chemical elements and aflatoxines. A new substance has been added to be monitored: ionophore coccidiostats in bovine and milk, levamisole in milk. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines 2 Penicillin G – muscle – young Suspect samples. N=1 carcass has been put under bovines and cow temporary seizure at the slaughterhouse and 1 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption, investigations in the farm of origin: verification of records, intensified checks in the farm, no additional sample has been taken, administrative measures and criminal penalties. 1 Beta HCH – feed Other sample. The source of residue has been established (environmental contamination). Investigations are still in progress. 2 Sulfadimethoxine – muscle – Target samples. Investigations in the farm: young bovine intensified checks in the farm, no additional samples have been taken, administrative measures. 1 Amoxycillin - muscle Target sample. Investigations in the farm: record checks, n=23 additional sampling (21 urine, I milk and 1 feed), intensified checks in farm, n=1 carcass and n=60 animals have been declared unfit for human consumption. 1 Ampicillin - muscle Other sample. 1 carcass the declared unfit for human consumption has put under temporary seizure at slaughterhouse. Investigation in the farm: records checks, no additional sample, intensified checks in farm. The source was established in different treatment compared to recorded treatment. The operator asks for confirmatory analyses. 130 1 Sulfamonomethoxine – muscle cows 2 Sulfadimidine – muscle – veal calves and 1 Sulfadimidine in muscle of cows 4 Oxytetracycline – muscle 1 Dioxins - muscle 1 Tetracycline, 1 Oxitetracycline and 1 Chlortetracycline - muscle 1 Danafloxacin - muscle 3 Chlortetracycline - muscle 8 Sulfadimethoxine – muscle: 1. 180 ppb; 2. 6.12 ppb; 3. 337 ppb; 4. 360 ppb; 5. 115 6. 132 7. 360; 8. lkl Target sample. N=1 carcass has put under seizure at slaughterhouse, investigations in the farm but no additional samples have been taken, intensified checks at farm, administrative measures and criminal penalties. Target samples. 2 carcass has been put under temporary seizure at the slaughterhouse, investigations in the farm: record checks, no additional samples, the source was the treatment recorded but the withdrawal period wasn’t observed, administrative measures. Other and Suspect samples. N=8 carcasses have put under seizure at slaughterhouse and 15 products have been declared unfit for human consumption, no additional information about follow up actions. Intensified checks in one farm. Target Sample. Investigations in the farm and additional sample (1), intensified checks in 1 farm. Target samples. Investigations in the farm of origin, no additional sampling, intensified checks, 1 carcass put under temporary seizure at slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption, administrative measures and criminal penalties. The source of residues was established in the illegal treatment. Suspect sample. N=1 carcass has put under seizure at slaughterhouse and declared unfit for human consumption, no additional sample has been taken, investigation on the farm, administrative measures. Pigs Target and Other samples. Investigation on the farm of origin, examination of the records, 2 carcass has been put under temporary seizure at the slaughterhouse and 2 carcass has been declared unfit for human consumption, administrative measures and criminal penalties. For one case the source of residues is the treatment not recorded and not observations of the withdrawal period. Target samples. Intensified checks in the farm of origin and administrative measures, no additional samples, n=2 carcass has been put under temporary seizure at the slaughterhouse and n=2 declared unfit for human consumption. For sample (2) the source of residues could be the treatment not recorded and for sample 3 also criminal penalties. 131 1 Colistin – drinking water 1 Sulfadiazine –muscle 1 Sulfadimidine - muscle 1 Doxicycline - muscle 8 Lead - muscle 1 Dioxins – muscle 1 Tylosin – drinking water 1 Ciprofloxacin – 1 Enrofloxacin – 1 Sulfadimidine - muscle 1 Sulfadimethoxine – drinking water 2 Nicarbazin – muscle 1 Nicarbazin and 1 Monensin muscle 1 Oxytetracycline - muscle Other sample. Investigations in the farm, n0 additional sampling. The source of residues was established in the administration of medicated water, administrative measures, intensified checks in =1 farm. Other sample. Investigations in the farm of origin: records checks, no additional sampling. The source of residues was established in the administration of medicated feed, 109 animals put under seizure in the farm. Intensified checks in 2 farms. Other sample. Investigations in the f: record checks, 1 sample of feed has been taken, intensified checks in one farm. The source was the treatment recorded for other category of pigs. Administrative measures. Other sample. Investigations in the farm of origin: verification of records, intensified checks in one farm, additional samples (1). The source was non recorded treatment. Administrative measures. Target and Suspect samples. Investigations in the farm of origin: verification of records, intensified checks in one farm, n=13 (8 feed, 1 milk, 6 water) additional samples have been taken and 3 non compliant, 17 animals put under temporary seizure. The source could be the medicated feed. Poultry Target samples. Increased controls in the farms of origin. The source of residue wasn’t established. Other sample. Investigations in the farm. Other sample. Investigation in the farm for the records of treatment. Other sample. Intensified checks on n=1 farm, no additional sample, the source has been established in the withdrawal period not observed, administrative measures. Target samples. N=7 carcasses put under seizure at slaughterhouse, 4.5 kg of products declared unfit for human consumption. Other sample. Investigation in the farm with intensified checks. The source was established in illegal treatment. Target sample. Investigation in the farm and 21 additional sample have been taken. 132 1 Doxycycline – muscle Other sample. Administrative measures. No additional information about follow up actions. 1 Doxycycline and 1 Oxitetracycline – muscle Target sample. No information. 1 Doxycycline – drinking water 1 Aflatoxin M1 – feed 1 Lead – muscle 4 Beta HCH - fat 2 Dioxins - liver 1 Cadmium - muscle 1 Oxytetracycline - bovine 1 Dioxins - bovine 2 Dioxins - buffalo 22 Aflatoxin M1 – bovine Other sample. Investigations in the farm and intensified checks, record check, n=1 additional sample have been taken, the source of residues was established in treatment not recorded, administrative measures. Sheep and goat Target sample. No follow-up actions. Target sample. Investigations are still in progress. Other samples. 1 carcass has been put under temporary seizure at slaughterhouse, record checks at farm, 1 additional sample, intensified checks in 29 farms, 519 animals have bee put under temporary seizure at farm and 1900 kg of milk declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations are still in progress. Other sample. At slaughterhouse the liver has declared unfit for human consumption. At farm the investigations have been intensified (records), no additional samples have been taken. The illegal pasture was the source of contamination. Ban pasture bylaw. Horses Target sample. No information. Milk Suspect sample. No information. Target sample. Investigations in the farm of origin: additional sample has been taken (1 milk). Increased controls in the farms, 2311 litres of milk have put under temporary seizure and declared unfit for human consumption and destroyed, 105 animals at farm have been put under seizure, administrative measures. Target and Other samples. Investigations in the farm of origin: additional sample has been taken (1 feed). Increased controls in the farm, 117 animals have put under temporary seizure. Target - Suspect - Other samples. Investigations in the farm of origin: examination of the records, additional sampling (n=24 of milk with 1 non compliant and 8 of feed), 11100 kilograms of milk have been declared unfit for human consumption, 13900 kilograms of milk destroyed and 303 moulds of cheese have been declared unfit for 133 1 Aflatoxin M1 – sheep&goats 7 Beta HCH – bovine 5 Beta HCH - buffalo 8 Beta HCH – sheep&goats 6 Dioxins 1 Sulfadimethoxine - muscle human consumption and destroyed. For samples (4)(5)(6) the source of residue was established like contaminated feed. For sample (7) (10) criminal penalties. For (10) the source was contaminated feed. For sample (20) administrative measures. Other sample. Investigations in the farm and 2 additional samples of feed have been taken. The source of contamination was established in contaminated feed. Administrative measures. Intensified checks in one farm. Target sample. Investigations in the farm: additional sampling (5 of milk and 4 of feed). In the bovine’s farm n=207 animals have been put under temporary seizure. Intensified checks in 43 farms, 92 ql of milk have been declared unfit for human consumption. The source of residue has been established (environmental contamination). Investigations are still in progress. Other sample. Investigations in the farm: additional sampling (3 of milk and 1 of feed). In the bovine’s farm n=19 animals have been put under temporary seizure. Intensified checks in 29 farms. 200 l of milk declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations are still in progress. Target and Other samples. Investigations in the farm of origin: intensified checks in 29 farms, additional sampling (1 of milk and 1 of feed), 135 animals have been put under seizure at farm, 405.5 ql of milk declared unfit for human consumption. Investigations are still in progress. Eggs Other and Suspect samples. Investigations in the farm: examination of the records and intensified checks in the 6 farm, n=5 additional sampling, 74 animals have put under seizure at farm. For some non compliant the investigations are still in progress. Administrative measures. The source could be the contaminated environment. Rabbit 1 Target sample. Investigations in the farm: records check and intensified checks in 1 farm, n=1 additional sample has been taken. Investigations are still in progress. Aquaculture No non-compliant 134 Farmed game No Non Compliant Wild game No Non Compliant 2 Tetracycline 2 Chlortetracycline 2 Sulfathiazole Honey Other and Suspect samples. Investigations to the original producer: verification of records, intensified checks in the farm, n=9 additional samples have been taken with 1 non compliant, 2,4 ql of honey have been declared unfit the human consumption, administrative measures and criminal penalties. The source is the use of not adequately checked beeswax. Other and Suspect samples. Investigations in the farm: record checks and no additional samples, administrative measures applied, 520,5 kg of honey have been declared unfit for human consumption waiting for being destroyed, administrative measures. Target and Other samples. Investigations to the original producer: examination of the records, 3 additional samples have been taken [1 beehive in other place), intensified checks, 10 beehives with honeycomb, 12 beehives with family, 2 empty beehives and 450 kg of honey have been put under temporary seizure. Administrative measures. Investigations showed evidence of old treatment without records. 135 LT LITHUANIA Group A substances Modification of national residue Aggregate for all animal products and substances plan Number of samples of bovine animals and pigs is decreased whereas there is decrease in the number of slaughtered bovine animals and pigs in Lithuania. Number of honey and aquaculture samples is increased whereas there is increase in production in Lithuania. Number of farmed game and wild game samples is increased up to 100 samples following FVO recommendations. Laboratories involved in analyses of residues of veterinary medicinal products are accredited and use validated methods according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. All compulsory substance groups to be monitored according to the Annex II of the Council Directive 96/23/EC are included in the monitoring plan. Groups B2b, B2d, B3d are added for ovine animals, groups B2b and B2e are added for rabbits, groups B2a, B2b, B2c, B2d, B3a, B3b and B3c are added for horses and groups A1, A2, A3, A4, B2c, B2e and B3a are added for farmed game. The requirement to include in the monitoring plan at least 3 substances from the substance groups A6, B1, B2a and B2e to be tested in 70 % of milk samples is fulfilled. Milk samples are sampled only at dairy farm level. Testing of nitrofurans is foreseen only in NFVRAI. It has validated testing method for all four stable metabolites of nitrofurans. Testing of chloramfenicol is foreseen only in NFVRAI by confirmatory method. A3 group substance medroxyprogesterone was introduced into the monitoring plan for bovine animals and pigs. Testing of beta-agonists (A5 group) is foreseen by LC-MS/MS technique., tests using ELISA are no longer performed. Non-compliant results 1 chloramphenicol – swine muscle Follow-up actions Swine Investigation was carried out, farm was identified. Products were consumed before investigation. The cause of contamination with chloramphenicol was not identified. It was found non-compliances related to withdrawal period for antimicrobials. Administrative sanctions have been applied. 136 Group B substances Modification of national residue Aggregate for all animal products and substances plan UPLC- MS/MS technique is introduced for the testing of B1 group antimicrobials in milk. It is foreseen to test lincomycin, canamycin and spectinomycin (frequently used substances in Lithuania) in milk samples. Testing of avermectins (abamectin, doramectin, ivermectin, emamectin, moxidectin) (B2a group substances) is introduced into monitoring plan for bovine animals, pigs, sheep, horses, poultry, farmed game, eggs, milk and aquaculture. Testing of carbadox and olaquindox (B2f group substances) is introduced into monitoring plan for pigs (feed samples). Testing of mercury (B3c group substance) is introduced into monitoring plan for pigs. Lead and cadmium are tested by Z-ETA-AAS technique. Non-compliant results 2 antibacterials – muscle (in one sample confirmatory method revealed presence of chlortetracycline within the limits of MRL, in another sample dihydrostreptomycin above MRL was confirmed) 1 enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin – muscle 1 cadmium - kidney 1 enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin – muscle 1 antibacterials – muscle Follow-up actions Bovines Investigation was carried out, farms and animals were identified. In both cases infringements regarding withdrawal period were detected and administrative sanctions have been applied. In one case products were consumed before investigation, in other case part of products were consumed before investigation and part of products were withdrawn from the market and destroyed. Investigation was carried out, farm and animal were identified. Products were consumed before investigation. The cause of contamination was not identified. Administrative sanctions have been applied. Farm was identified and investigation on the farm was carried out. Products were consumed before the investigation. Swine Investigation was carried out, farm and animal were identified. Suspected animal products were sampled and tested. Samples were negative for antimicrobials. Products were consumed before investigation. It was found non compliances related to withdrawal period. The farm was included in the group of high risk establishments. Control of movement of animals was intensified. Administrative sanctions have been applied. Investigation was carried out, farm and animal 137 1 Spectinomycin and lincomycin – muscle 1 salicylat – muscle 1 lasalocid – eggs 4 inhibitors – bovine milk by DELVO-SP method (cloxacillin was confirmed in one sample, and penicillin G was confirmed in another sample) 2 dioxins and dioxin-like PCB – 1 cod liver, 1 headlong (Baltic herring) were identified. Suspected animal products were sampled and tested. Samples were negative for antimicrobials. Products from the animal were consumed before the investigation. The cause of contamination was not identified. Investigation is ongoing. Samples have been taken for testing. Products have been withdrawn from the market and destroyed. RASFF notification was sent. Horses Investigation was carried out, farm and animal were identified. Products were sold before investigation. By-products were used for feeding of fur animals. The cause of contamination was not identified. Eggs Investigation was carried out. Suspected products (eggs, drinking water, feed) were sampled and tested. They were negative for coccidiostats. It was suspected cross-contamination of feed during transportation. Contaminated eggs were collected and destroyed. Administrative sanctions have been applied. Milk Investigations were carried out.. In one case it was found infringement related to withdrawal time. In two cases it was suspected that milk could be contaminated using medicated hand ointment. Administrative sanctions have been applied. Aquaculture Investigations were carried out. Products were consumed before the investigation. 138 LU LUXEMBURG Group A substances (aggregate for all animal products and substances) Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Substance--Matrix-animal or animal Actions: product-Concentration* Thiouracil-urine-bovine-14ppb Investigations in the farm of origin, sampling on farm of 7 more animals and sampling of feed. All samples were negative. * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines Pigs Poultry Sheep and goat Horses Milk Eggs Rabbit Aquaculture Farmed game 139 1 sample Pb-liver-roe-3.9mg/kg 1 sample Cd-liver-roe0.922mg/kg 1 sample Permethrine-fatwildboar-0.07mg/kg Wild game Intensifying sampling for the same substances in the same region. All samples were negative and there id no indication that a region is more contaminated than an other. Honey 140 LV LATVIA Group A substances Modification of national residue Aggregate for all animal products and substances plan Modification of plan is described in laboratory file. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Chloramphenicol - 0,46 µg/kg – pig 1 farm (10045 pigs held in the farm) was meat investigated. Stopping of meat realization till situation will clarified. Origin of CAP was not identified. Additional sampling – 1 feed sample. Chloramphenicol - 0,20 µg/kg – pig 1 farm (11125 pigs held in the farm) was meat investigated. Stopping of meat realization till situation will clarified. Origin of CAP was not identified. Additional sampling – 1 meat sample. Group B substances Modification of national residue Aggregate for all animal products and substances plan Modification of plan is described in laboratory file. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines Cadmium – 1,78 ± 0,18 mg/kg – 1 It was clarified that sample was taken from old cow kidney cow (8 years of age) and farm since last slaughtering is not breed bovines. Cadmium – 1,68 ± 0,17 mg/kg – 1 1 farm (11 cows held in the farm) was investigated cow kidney and was clarified that sample was taken from old cow (11 years of age). Cadmium – 2,86 ± 0,29 mg/kg – 1 1 farm (28 cows held in the farm) was cow kidney investigated. Pigs Poultry Sheep and goat Horses Milk Eggs Rabbit 141 Aquaculture Farmed game Cadmium – 6 liver samples (0,520 mg/kg to 5,41 mg/kg); 20 kidney samples (1,15 mg/kg to 6,35 mg/kg); 5 muscle samples (0,069 mg/kg to 0,493 mg/kg). Lead – 4 liver samples (0,515 mg/kg to 0,778 mg/kg); 6 kidney samples (0,566 mg/kg to 3,12 mg/kg); 8 muscle samples (0,11 mg/kg to 0,92 mg/kg) SEM - 4,2 µg/kg - honey SEM - 4,2 µg/kg - honey Wild game Public warning – press release. Honey Origin of honey was country of EU. The product was withdrawn from the market, RASFF notification was created. Origin of honey was country of EU. The product was withdrawn from the market, RASFF notification was created. 142 MT MALTA Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Non-compliant results Nor testosterone: Urine: 45 ug/L α Nor testosterone, 14 ug/L β Nor testosterone Aggregate for all animal products and substances Equine (Target) Follow-up actions Investigation is still underway since the result was received recently. The middleman has been informed to provide owner details. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines Pigs Poultry Liver and Eggs (Target and Suspects) 1 Salinomycin; Liver; 11 ug/kg (Target) Withdrawal period of zoo technical feed 1 Salinomycin: Liver; 10 ug/kg (Target) (containing salinomycin is not being 1 Salinomycin: Liver; 11 ug/kg (Suspect) respected. Warning letter sent to farmers. 1 Salinomycin: Liver; 10 ug/kg (Suspect) Follow up by means of targeting sampling 1 Salinomycin: Eggs; 11 ug/kg (Target) from farmers is being undertaken. One farmer had non compliant results previously. In fact 2 suspect samples were non compliant from the four targeted samples taken in 2009. 1 PCDD-PCDF + dioxin-like PCBs (Target) MEPA (Malta Environment Planning Muscle => 5.76 pg-TE/g fat Authority) is informed for further action. Liver below level of action => 0.07 pg-TE/g fat The farm is going to be investigated and targeted samples will be sent immediately for prompt action. Sheep and goat Horses Milk Eggs 143 Rabbit -----------Aquaculture (Imports) 1 Mercury; Frozen fish (Vietnam); Competent authority of the exporting country has 1.59mg/kg (Imports) been informed and also BIP will target products from the same country/ producer. Farmed game Wild game Honey 144 NL THE NETHERLANDS Group A substances Non-compliant results 11 non-compliant result for conjugated 17-alfa-boldenone bovine (calves). 2 non-compliant results for testosterone in bovine (calves) 1 non-compliant result for alfanortestosterone in equine. 2 non-compliant result for alfanortestosterone in sheep. 4 non-compliant results for alfanortestosterone in bovine 9 non-compliant result for betanortestosterone in pig. 4 non-compliant results for betaestradiol in bovine (calves) 6 non-compliant results for dexamethasone in cattle ( 2 calves, 4 older bovine) Follow-up actions All cases were on-farm investigated. Additional sampling was performed and again 17-alfa-boldenone was detected. A probable cause was not observed. Administrative records were complete and up-todate. No penalties applied Investigation conducted. One animal proved to be male instead of female. Additional sampling for noncompliant female animal was carried out but those samples proved compliant. No penalties applied. Investigation closed. The animal was imported for slaughter.Identification of the animal proved impossible due to improper use of the European horse passport. Investigation closed No investigation conducted. Alfa-nortestosterone is endogenous in sheep. Investigation conducted. Additional sampling carried out but no further non-compliant samples were found. Records were properly kept. Investigation closed In three cases the gender of the animal was male. Beta-nortestosterone is endogenous in male pigs. The administration records were inspected and additional sampling was carried out which did not reveal further indications of the use of beta-nortestosterone. Investigation pending Investigation conducted in three cases, in two cases the legal application of dexamethasone was observed. The withdrawal period was respected. In one other case investigation could not be completed due to an incomplete track record. No penalties applied. 1 non-compliant result for betaAdditional sampling carried out but no additional testosterone in tilapia non-compliant results were found. No indications of VMP use, records properly kept. Investigation closed 1 non-compliant result for isoxuprine Investigation conducted. The use of Duphaspasmin in cattle (calf) was observed. Maternal transfer is a possible explanation. Investigation closed. No penalties applied. 2 non-compliant result for CAP in pig One animal originated from Belgium. Belgian Authorities were informed 145 Investigation was conducted for the other animal. Additional sampling was carried out, no additional non-compliant samples were found and no prove for abuse of CAP could be obtained. Penalty applied and investigation was closed. Investigation conducted. No evidence of abuse of nitrofurazon was found 1 non-compliant result for semicarbazide in pig Group B substances Non-compliant results 1 non-compliant result for cadmium Follow-up actions Bovine animals Investigation was carried out, animal originated from Belgium. Belgian authorities were informed 1 non-compliant result for dihydrostreptomycine 2 non-compliant results for ivermectine 1 non-compliant result for neomycine Animal originated from Belgium. Belgian authorities were informed In one case records were improperly kept. Official warning issued. The other investigation is pending. Records concerning VMP use were absent. Penalty applied Porcine animals 1 non-compliant result for cadmium. Investigation conducted. Additional samples (feed) were taken. No cause found, investigation closed. 2 non-compliant result for One investigations conducted. Records of VMP use dihydrostreptomycine were properly kept By accident a treated animal was send for slaughter. Warning issued. 4 non-compliant results for One animal originated from Belgium, BE authorities doxycycline were informed One fine was applied for not respecting the withdrawal period, one official warning issued. One farmer was instructed concerning use of VMP and cleaning after treatment (compliance assistance) 1 non-compliant result for fenvaleraat Investigation conducted. No probable cause found. 6 non-compliant results for levamisol Use of levamisol was confirmed. Withdrawal period was not respected (3 cases). Penalties applied 4 non-compliant results for Investigations were conducted. 1 fine was issued for oxytetracycline not respecting the withdrawal period. Two warnings were issued when records were not complete. In one case no cause ahs been found and no abnormalities were observed 5 non-compliant results for Two investigations were conducted. In one case sulfonamides (2 sulfadiazine, 3 records were properly kept. No sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole) containing drugs were administered. No probably cause found. In the other case records were not properly kept, penalty applied. 1 non-compliant results for Records were properly kept, withdrawal period tulathromycine respected. Investigation closed. Poultry 146 7 non-compliant results for nicarbazin. Four cases were investigated. One flock originated from Germany. German Authorities were informed. No probable causes found. Use of nicarbazin was confirmed in all cases. Administration records were kept. Indications found that withdrawal periods were not fully respected. Two warnings were issued. Sheep and goat 1 non-compliant result for Pharmaceutical formulation for cattle applied to ivermectine sheep. Official warning issued. 1 non-compliant result for Insufficient data for tracking and tracing of the dihydrostreptomycine and neomycine animal. No investigation conducted 1 non-compliant result for Off-label use of Ampiject 15% was observed. gentamicine Horses None Milk 1 non-compliant result for No investigation conducted aminoglycosides Eggs 1 non-compliant result for monensin No investigation conducted Rabbit None . Aquaculture None Farmed game None Wild game 3 non-compliant results for lead in Free range animals. No investigation conducted rabbit 4 non-compliant results for lead in roe deer 2 non-compliant results for lead in deer 1 non-compliant results for lead in hare 4 non-compliant results for lead in wild boar 2 non-compliant results for lead in wild pigeon 1 non-compliant results for lead in wild duck Honey None 147 PL POLAND Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Increased number of samples of bovines and chickens and decreased number of samples of pigs and turkeys for many substances from group A. New compound/matrix included to the plan: A6 Nitroimidazoles and hydroxymetabolites of nitroimidazoles in milk and honey. Updating of action levels (MRLs, MLs, national levels) and validation data (CCα and CCβ). Non-compliant results A2 – Thiouracil (target) Bovines – urine – 31.4 ppb A3 – 7 Nandrolone (target) 6 Pigs – urine 1. - 78 ppb 2. - 11.5 ppb 3. - 15.5 ppb 4. - 28.9 ppb 5. - 36.7 ppb 6. - 23.5 ppb Bovines – urine – 1.1 ppb Follow-up actions Investigation in the slaughterhouse and in the farm of origin; verification of records;additional sampling (urine, water); all results compliant; origin of thiouracil was not identified; medical treatment registraton kept correct; farm subjected to intensified checks; 1 administrative measure. 1. Investigation on the farm of origin;verification of records; additional samplings (4 urine) - animals were held in the farm until sampling results (all compliant) ; infringements in medical treatment registration and animal registration (administrative procedure); 3 administrative measures; farm subjected to intensified checks. 2.,3. Animals from one origin; investigation in the farm of origin; verification of records; animal medical treatment registration kept correct, additional sampling (2 urine, 1 water), animals were held until sampling results (compliant); 2 administrative measures; farm subjected to intensified checks; additonal farmaceutical control – reason of presence of nandrolone was not established. 4. Investigation on the farm of origin; verification of records; additional sampling (2 urine, 1 water); animals were held until sampling results - all compliant; 2 administrative measures. 5. Investigation on the farm of origin; additional sampling (urine, feed) – compliant results; 148 reason of NC – problem w with sampling procedure – urine was taken from male – training for official veterinarian took place. 6. Investigation in the slaughterhouse and on the farm of origin (additional sampling - urine); the reason of presence of nandrolone was not identified. Investigaton in the slaughterhouse and on the farm of origin; verification of records; additional sampling (water, urine) - animals were held until sampling results (both compliant); 1 administrative measure. Investigation in the slaughterhouse; the reason A3 – Testosterone (target) of presence of testosterone was established as Bovines – serum – 0.73 ppb follows – mistake during sampling - gender of the animal was mark wrongly - female instead of male; 0.73 ppb for male is compliant result; official veterinarian who took the samples was trained according to CVO monitoring instruction. Investigation on the farm of origin; additional A6 – SEM (target) sampling (urine, milk, feed, water) - compliant Bovines – urine – 7.4 ppb results (animals were held until sampling results), verification of record; origin of SEM was not identified; farm subjected to intensified checks; 1 administrative measure; additional control concerning drug wholesaler and veterinarian responsible for treating the herd. Country of origin India; notification to RASFF; A6 – AOZ (import) enforced checks of consignements from this Shrimps – muscle – 4.7 ppb producer were established. * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Increased number of samples of bovines, chickens and milk and decreased number of samples of pigs and turkeys for many substances from group B. New compounds included to the plan: B1 Florfenikol in aquaculture Methods changes: B1 Antibacterials – LC-MS/MS (confirmatory), 149 B1 Antibacterials – Charm BL/TET, Twinsensor BT (screening) in milk Updating of action levels (MRLs, MLs, national levels), validation data (CCα and CCβ) and methods (AAS specified). Non-compliant results B1 – 6 Antibacterials (4 target + 2 suspect) – muscle + kidney B1 – Oxytetracycline – muscle B2f – Dexamethazone – liver (target) B3a – Lindane – fat (target) B1 – 14 Antibacterials – (3 target + 11 suspect) muscle + kidney B1 – 3 Doxycycline – (target) B1 – 2 Penicillin – (target) B1 – Oxytetracycline – (target) B1 – Tetracycline – (suspect) B3a – Lindane – fat (target) B3a – DDT – fat (target) B3d – 4 Ochratoxin A (target) – kidney Follow-up actions Bovines Investigations on the farms of origin and in the establishments; verification of records; additional sampling (compliant results); in most cases farms subjected to intensified checks; in cases where reason for presence of antibacterials was established, it was withdrawal period, that wasn’t kept – 2 cases (infringement) were bring before the prosecution authority,5 administrative measures. Investigation in the farm of origin and in the establishment; carcasses unfit for human consumption (after post-mortem check); the animal was treated before slaughter (withdrawal period wasn’t kept; however it wasn’t dexamethazone) - reason for presence of dexamethazone wasn’t established; farm subjected to intensified checks; infringements in FBO responsible for purchase of animals (purchasing center) - case was bring before the prosecution authority. Investigation in the establishment and on the farm of origin; verification of records; additional feed sampling – all compliant; farm suspected. Pigs Investigations on the farms of origin and in the establishments; verification of records; 11 suspect carcasses and offal declared unfit for human consumption; in one case 135 kg of meat utilized/rendered; additional sampling; verification of records; farms subjected to intensified checks; 10 administrative measures; in 3 cases the reason for presence of antibcterial was indentified - withdrawal period wasn’t kept (sanctions – fine). 2 investigations on the farms of origin and in the establishments; additional sampling (feed, fat) – all compliant results; farms subjected to intensified checks; 2 administrative measures; source of contamination wasn’t identified. 4 investigations on the farm of origin and in the establishments; verification of records; additional sampling (feed) – compliant results; farms 150 subjected to intensified checks; 4 administrative measures; reason of contamination wasn’t identified. B1 – 4 Antibacterials (target) – muscle + liver B1 – Doxycycline (target) – muscle B2b – 15 Anticoccidials (10 target + 5 suspect) 7 – Lazalocyd – liver (target) 2 – Nicarbazin – liver (target) + feed (suspect) 5 – Salinomycin – 3 liver (2 target + 1 suspect) + 2 feed (suspect) 1 – Maduramicin – feed (suspect) B3c – 8 Cadmium (target) – muscle B1 – 5 Antibacterials (target) – milk B3c – Lead (target) B2b – 9 Anticoccidials (3 target + 6 suspect) 1 – Diclazuril – eggs (target) 1 – Lasalocid – eggs (suspect) Poultry 4 investigations on the farm of origin and in the establishments; verification of records - additional sampling – compliant results; one case – 1016 kg of meat and products utilized/ rendered; one case sanction - fine; farms subjected to intensified checks; origin of antibacterials wasn’t identified. Investigation in the farm of origin and in the establishment; verification of records; withdrawal period wasn’t kept (lack of information in FCI; case was bring before the prosecution authority); farm subjected to intensified checks. 10 investigations on the farm of origin and in the establishments; verification of records; additional sampling (feed – NC results); in one case 165 kg of frozen wings were held until results of additional analysis - compliant results; farms subjected to intensified checks; in case, where the reason was found, it was cross-contamination at the stage of feeding mill or on the farm. Sheep and goat Horses Investigations on the farm of origin; verification of records at the stage of FBO responsible for purchase of animals (purchasing center); in one case infringements in identification was established - case were bring before the prosecution office. Milk Investigations on the farms of origin; verification of records, additional sampling; milk was held until results of additional analysis, 1030 l of milk and 1073 kg of cheese were utilized/rendered; farms subjected to intensified checks; 5 administrative measures; origin of presence of antibacterials wasn’t established. Investigations on the farm of origin; verification of records; additional sampling (all compliant); the cause wasn’t identified. Eggs 3 investigations on the farm of origin; verification of records, additional sampling (NC results in feed); 229 772 eggs and 955 kg of eggs were utilized/rendered; farms subjected to intensified 151 2 – Nicarbazin – eggs (target + suspect) 3 – Semduramicin – eggs + 2 feed (suspect) 1 – Salinomycin – eggs (target) 1 – Salinomycin – feed (suspect) B3a – DDT (target) – muscle (fish) B3e – 8 Malachite green (7 target + 1 suspect) – muscle (fish) B3c – 17 Arsenic (import) – muscle (fish) checks; additional control in feeding mills; 3 administrative measures. Rabbit Aquaculture Investigation on the farm of origin; additional sampling (compliant results). 7 investigations in the farm of origin (2 cases concerning carp, 5-trout,); verification of record; additional sampling (fish held in the farm until results – 7000 kg of trout); farms subjected to intensified checks. Farmed game Wild game 9 investigations; verification of records; carcasses B3c – Cadmium (target) – liver or/and offal declared unfit for human consumption B3c – 8 Lead (target) – muscle B3c – Mercury (target) – muscle (about 74 kg of meat according to available data); 5 administrative measures. B1 – 19 Sulfonamides (12 target + 7 suspect) – honey Honey Investigations on the farms, verification of records; additional sampling (7 NC results); product was held until the results of additional analyses; 800 kg of honey were utilized/ rendered; farms subjected to intensified checks. 152 PT PORTUGAL Group A substances (aggregate for all animal products and substances) Modification of national residue plan 1 - We had only one NC for Group A and it was from IMPORT. IN TARGET and in SUSPECT we did not have any non-compliant results in 2009. 2 - In 2010 we kept samples reinforcement for A5 Beta-agonists and increased reinforcement for A6 – Table 2 of Regulation (UE) n. º37/2010. 3 - Introduction of sampling for A2 in poultry. 4 - Introduction of sampling for A5 in milk and for A6 (nitroimidazoles) in milk and honey as it was recommended by CRL Berlin Non-compliant results Follow-up actions AOZ – Furazolidone RASFF Information: Information Notification: Prawns (IMPORT) 2009.1739 on 15 December 2009 1 non-compliant result in frozen shell on Black Tiger Semi IQF Prawns: 38.2 µg/kg * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan 1 – B1 – Antibacterial substances – We reinforced the number of samples, due to the non-compliant results that are appearing in a regular basis in Portugal and in Europe 2–B2a - Anthelmintics - Introduction of sampling in eggs as recommended by CRL Berlin 3 – B2b - Anticoccidials - Reinforcement for 2010, due to the number of non-compliant results in 2008 and 2009. Despite there is a National Control Plan for animal feed, we introduced sampling in feed as it was recommended by CRL Berlin. 4 – B2e –NSAID’s - Introduction of the matrix muscle for this group of substances 5 – B2f - Quinoxalines – Despite we collect samples for quinoxalines every year, as we had one non-compliant result for olaquindox we reinforced de number of samples. 6– B3a – Organochlorine compounds - We introduced samples for dioxins in other species than poultry Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Pigs 153 Sulfadimetoxin 1 non-compliant result in muscle – 0.163 mg/kg Levamizol 2 non-compliant results in liver: 4612.0 µg/kg; 271.8 µg/kg Investigations in the farms origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance. Administrative measures: yes Investigations in the farm origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance. Administrative measures: yes Maduramicin 1 non-compliant result in liver: 15.8 Investigations in the farm origin. Inquiry of µg/kg possible reasons for the presence of the substance. Administrative measures: yes Poultry Nicarbazin – Broilers 14 noncompliant in liver: 172.0 µg/k 133.0 µg/kg; 182.0 µg/kg; 134 µg/kg; 363.0 µg/kg; 157.0 µg/kg; 411.0 µg/kg; 238.0 µg/kg; 303.0 µg/kg; 219 µg/kg; 203.5 µg/kg; 163.9 µg/kg; 1803.0 µg/kg; 160.7 µg/kg. Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance Administrative measures in case of use in the five days before slaughter We would like to inform the Commission, that we will include in our 2009 Results Report, 7 non compliant results from de NRCP 2008, due to the results had arrived after the submission of the 2008 Questionnaire. These results were as follows: Broilers 7 noncompliant results in liver: 152.0 µg/kg; 151.0 µg/kg; 141 µg/kg; 463 µg/kg; 261.0 µg/kg; 606.0 µg/kg; 724.0 µg/kg; Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance Administrative measures in case of use in the five days before slaughter Maduramicin Broiler 1 non-compliant in liver : 288,2 µg/kg Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance Administrative measures in case of use in the five days before slaughter We would like to inform the Commission, that we will include in our 2009 Results Report, 2 non compliant results from de NRCP 2008, due to the results had arrived after the submission of the 2008 Questionnaire. Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance Administrative measures in case of use in the five days before slaughter 154 These results were as follows: Broilers - 2 non compliant results in liver : 10.0 µg/kg; 12.0 µg/kg Olaquindox – Broiler 1 noncompliant in liver: 0,065 mg/kg Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance. Additional sampling of liver, feed and water. All animals held in the farm origin, until results were available Administrative measures: yes Lasalocid – Broiler 4 noncompliant in liver : 1031.0 µg/kg; 291.0 µg/kg; 938.4 µg/kg; 437.6 µg/kg Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance Administrative measures: yes Cadmium and Lead: 2 non-compliant results for both heavy metals in liver : 3.1 mg/kg (Cd); 0.6 mg/kg(Pb); 2.3 mg/kg (Cd); 0,6 mg/kg (Pb) Cadmium 2 non – compliant results in liver: 0.7 mg/kg; 0,6 mg/kg Maduramicin 2 non compliant results in liver: 12,6 µg/kg; 23.0 µg/kg; Horses Horses with more than two years old have their livers rejected for human consumption. Rabbit Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance Administrative measures: yes Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of We would like to inform the possible reasons for the presence of the substance Commission, that we will include in Administrative measures: yes our 2009 Results Report, 1 non compliant result from de NRCP 2008, due to the result had arrived after the submission of the 2008 Questionnaire. This result was as follows: 1 non-compliant results in liver: 15.0 µg/kg; Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance Salinomicin – 1 non compliant Administrative measures in case of use in the five result in liver: 15.3 µg/kg days before slaughter Doxiciclin Farmed game Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of 155 Quail - 1 non-compliant in muscle: 0.270 mg/kg Lead Veal - 1 non- compliant result in liver: 1,5 mg/kg Evaluate - 3 non-compliant results in liver: 0,7mg/kg; 1,2 mg/kg; 1,2 mg/kg possible reasons for the presence of the substance Administrative measures: Yes Wild game Investigation in the farm of origin. Inquiry of possible reasons for the presence of the substance 156 RO ROMANIA Group A substances Modification of national residue plan A.1. No changes. The group was added to horses, the matrix is muscle, screening and confirmatory method is GC-MS/MS. A.2. No changes. The group was added to horses, the matrix is urine, screening and confirmatory method is GC-MS/MS. A.3. No changes. Nortestosteron and trenbolone were added to fish species, screening and confirmatory method are GC-MS/MS (nortestosteron) and LC-MS/MS (trenbolone). A.4. No changes A. 5. No changes A.6. Ipronidazol was excluded. Non-compliant results Follow-up actions * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan B.1. New substances were added : Difloxacine, Flumequin and Marbofloxacine. For milk were added also Lincomycin, Pirlimycin, Cefalonium and Cefazoline. For honey on the sulfonamides group was added Sulfadiazine. B.2.a No changes B.2. b. No changes B.2. c. New substance was included: Flumetrin, Resmetrin. The all group substances was included for rabbit and for horses. The matrix is muscle, screening and confirmatory method is GC-ECD. B.2.d. No changes B.2.e. Were included vedaprofen, flunixin, meloxicam. As matrix, muscle has been excluded, 157 exceptions are poultry and farmed game. The screening and confirmation method is LCMS/MS. B.2. f. New substances were added: prednisolon, methylprednisolone and betametasone; the matrix selected is urine (for live and slaughtered animals) and milk. The screening and confirmation method is GC-MS/MS. B.3.a. No changes. The group substances was added to horses and removed from wild game. B.3. b. New substances were added: Coumaphos, Phoxim. Screening method is GC-NPD and confirmatory method is GC-MS/MS. For honey was added Coumaphos. The group substances was added to horses. B.3. c. No changes. B.3. d. No changes. B.3.e No changes Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines Pigs Poultry Sheep and goat Horses Milk Eggs Rabbit Aquaculture Farmed game Wild game Honey 158 SI SLOVENIA Group A substances Modification of national residue plan in 2010 Aggregate for all animal products and substances A5 substance group has been extended to include: • Brombuterol CAS 41937-02-4 • Cimbuterol CAS 54239-39-3 • Mapenterol CAS 95656-68-1 Non-compliant results NONE. Follow-up actions Group B substances Modification of national residue plan in 2010 Aggregate for all animal products and substances B2d substance group has been extended to include: • Acepromazine CAS 61-00-7 • Propionylpromazine CAS 3568-24-9 • Xylazine CAS 7361-61-7 Non-compliant results Follow-up actions 1x Honey -obtain al the data required for the identification of SULFAMONOMETHOXINE animal product and of the holding of origin Matrix:Honey -honey was assessed as unfit for human Results: 49 µg/kg consumption and destroyed in accordance with applicable regulations Milk 1x -obtain al the data required for the identification of TETRACYCLINES animal product and of the holding of origin Matrix:Milk -honey was assessed as unfit for human 159 Animal: Bovine (Cows) consumption and destroyed in accordance with Results: 174 µg/kg applicable regulations Eggs 12x -Inquiry on the farm including official sampling MADURAMICIN -prohibition of placing eggs on the market till the Matrix:Eggs bussines operator with his own checks proves that Animal: Hen eggs is in compliance with legislation Results: 1.8 µg/kg – 9.6 µg/kg -conducted official inspection and control including official sampling on all major egg farms and packing centers -taking official samples of animal feed on farms and conducted official inspection and control in the feed mills -Inform European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Unit E3: Chemicals, Contaminants and Pesticides about the problem with level of maduramicin in feed and eggs (possible non-harmonisation in the legislation between the authorised maximum level of carryover of the coccidiostat, maduramicin, in animal feed, and the MRL of maduramicin in eggs). Horses 2x Check on slaughterhouse storage premises and CADMIUM when the other kidney was found, it was Matrix: kidney categorized as category 1 according to Regulation Animal : Horse 2002/1774 ES; Results: >6 mg/kg, >6 mg/kg - Data of heavy metals are collected separately and they will be incluted in the new aplication which will provide us an overview of situation (contamination with heavy metals) in our country. Bovines 4x Check on slaughterhouse storage premises and CADMIUM when the other kidney was found, it was 160 Matrix: kidney categorized as category 1 according to Regulation Animal : cow 2002/1774 ES; Results:1,6 mg/kg; 3,32 mg/kg, - Data of heavy metals are collected separately 1,67 mg/kg, 2,5 mg/kg and they will be incluted in the new aplication which will provide us an overview of situation (contamination with heavy metals) in our country. RESULTS OF RESIDUE MONITORING PROGRAMME AT BIPs Non-compliant results 2x MERCURY Matrix: muscle Animal : fish Results: 0,55 mg/kg, 2,54 mg/kg Follow-up actions Fresh fish - RASFF notification - next 10 batches from the same source are impounded and checked on presence of Mercury; 161 SK SLOVAK REPUBLIC Group A substances (aggregate for all animal products and substances) Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Substance--Matrix-animal or animal Actions: (investigations in the farm of origin, product-Concentration* animals held in farms, slaughtered animals, Example: MPA-kidney fat-pig-3 ppb intensified sampling in related farms, products declared unfit for human consumption, administrative measures, denial EC aid, others). * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines 1 Dimetridazole – Bovines – liveList actions: Under the National Residue Control blood serum Plan (NRCP) the blood sample from young breeding cattle was taken on the farm, in which the exceeded MRL of dimetridazole was detected. The sample was tested by the accredited confirmation method which confirmed a positive result for dimetridazole. After reporting a positive result, the respective District Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA) performed the additional official control – investigation on the farm of dimetridazole finding. It aimed at recording of using the veterinary medicinal products and their administration. The control did not reveal any breaking of valid rules. The DVFA ordered by measures the ban on movement of the suspicious animal from the farm pending the results of examination of suspect sample. Within the investigation also samples of feed and drinking water (own well) from the farm of housing and origin of the animal were taken. By the additional official control of measures their fulfilment was 162 1 Dimetridazole – live pig – blood serum 1 Chloramphenicole – raw sheep milk found out. The suspect sample was negative. Pigs List actions: Under the NRCP the blood sample was taken from the fattening pig on the farm and the exceeded MRL of dimetridazole was detected. The sample was examined by the accredited confirmation method which confirmed the positive finding of dimetridazole. Within the investigation the suspect blood samples were taken also from further pig from the same pen. In suspect blood samples no presence of dimetridazole was detected. The respective DVFA aimed upon the investigation of positive dimetridazole finding at the recording of veterinary medicinal products used on the farm, their administration and by the investigation no braking of valid rules was found out. The DVFA ordered by measures the ban on movement of pigs from which the samples were taken, pending the results of examination. The feed and drinking water samples were taken (own well) from the farm. The results of examinations did not confirm the presence of dimetridazole in the blood of pigs, feed or water. By the additional official control the fulfilment of ordered measures was found out. Poultry Sheep and goat Horses Milk List actions: Under the NRCP 1 commingled sample of raw sheep milk was taken on the sheep farm from the total amount of 60 l of milk. In the sample the exceeded MRL of chloramphenicole was found out by the accredited confirmation method. After reporting a positive result for chloramphenicole, the respective DVFA performed the notification to the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) and performed the investigation on the farm aimed at the use of veterinary medicinal products, milking hygiene of raw sheep milk and hygiene of production of lumpy sheep cheese on the farm. From the raw sheep milk the lumpy sheep cheese was produced that was sold at the time of investigation in small quantities to farm employees and consumed. By the additional official control 163 1 DDT – hen’s eggs graded 1 Malachite-Green-Leuco – troutfarmed fish no breaking of valid rules was found out. The DVFA ordered measures to ban the placing on the market of sheep milk and products thereof and movement of sheep from the farm pending the results of examination of suspect raw sheep milk sample (commingled). The results of examinations did not confirm the presence of chloramphenicole in raw sheep milk. By the additional official control the fulfilment of measures ordered by the DVFA was found out. Eggs List actions: Under the NRCP the sample of hen’s eggs was taken from the alternative hen’s farming –laying hens with egg production and the exceeded MRL of DDT was detected, confirmed by the accredited confirmation method. After reporting a positive finding of DDT, the DVFA performed an investigation on the farm aimed at detection of DDT source in the holding. By the control it was found out that one range for laying hens was located in the vicinity of the storehouse of chemicals. The DVFA ordered measures for the ban of the use of hen’s eggs from the holding for human consumption, ordered to perform sanitation of all ranges in the holding and to cancel the range in the vicinity of the storehouse of chemicals and not to use it upon alternative hen’s farming. The suspect samples were not taken because the holding of laying hens was immediately cancelled from the decision of the owner and the animals destroyed. Rabbit Aquaculture List actions: Under the NRCP 1 fish sample from farmed breeding - trout was taken in the breeder of salmonids. By the accredited confirmation method the exceeded MRL of Malachite-Green-Leuco was found out. The DVFA performed the investigation in a fish breeder. The DFVA immediately ordered measures in respect of the ban on the movement, transport and placing on the market of live fish from the affected breeding facility and to submit to the DVFA the results of laboratory examinations from the performed control taking of fish samples for the presence of Malachite-Green and Malachite-Green-Leuko from all fish ponds and tanks where are the fish intended for the market. The whole holding was subsequently disposed due 164 1 Lead – Wild boar - muscle 2 Tylosin – bee honey to infection by VHS virus. Farmed game Wild game List actions: Under the NRCP the sample of wild game muscle – wild boar was taken. The exceeded MRL of lead in wild boar was reported to the competent DVFA that ordered the measures by which it prohibited the consumption of hunted game prior to performance of repeated examination of suspect sample for lead presence and taking of sample for the lead presence from the subsequently hunted game in the hunting ground. The meat and viscera from this game will be released for the human consumption after obtaining a negative result only. It was proved by the investigation that the sample did not originate from the place of the shot surroundings. The repeated muscle sample was taken from further wild boar in the hunting ground in which the exceeded MRL of lead was not found out. Honey List actions: Under the NRCP the exceeded MRL of tylosine was detected in 2 samples of bee honey. The sample was taken from 50-liter cans. The DVFA performed the investigation and ordered by measures the safe disposal of the honey suspended at the time of the control and submission of a document on its disposal, to report to the DVFA the subsequent production of the honey for the reason of the taking the official sample. The DVFA by measures also prohibited the honey producer to put into circulation the bee honey and bee products intended for human consumption pending the result of the examination of the additional official sample. The honey was disposed and confirmation on its disposal was delivered to the DVFA. 165 SW SWEDEN Group A substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Non-compliant results Substance-Concentration-Matrixanimal or animal product* Follow-up actions * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Aggregate for all animal products and substances Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines Pigs liver 2 Doramectin (two animals from the same farm) @ verification of records, investigation on the farm, administrative measures). Poultry Sheep and goat Horses Milk Eggs Rabbit Aquaculture Farmed game 166 Wild game Honey 167 UK UNITED KINGDOM Group A substances (aggregate for all animal products and substances) Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Alpha-boldenone cattle urine 1, 2, Residues were unconjugated alpha boldenone. All 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3.8, 4, 5, 5, 8, samples were collected on farm and some were 11ppb, discoloured; indicative of faecal contamination. One on farm investigation was carried out and no Alpha-boldenone sheep urine 1, 1, evidence of abuse was found. 2, 2, 2, 2, 2.6, 3, 3, 6, 9, 10 Residues were unconjugated alpha boldenone. All samples were collected at the abattoirs but were discoloured indicative of Faecal contamination. No evidence of abuse was found. However in the Alpha-Nortestosterone in Cattle case of one sample the farm of origin could not be Urine 0.40,0.74, 6.2, 7, 7, 11, 33 traced. One sample was taken at the abattoir and the remaining samples were collected on farm... 4 Alpha-Nortestosterone in Sheep samples were from female cattle that were in calf Urine 0.3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, at the time the samples were taken. On farm 1, 1.9, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, investigations were carried out for 3 samples and 2,2, 2.4, 2.5 no evidence of abuse was found.. Follow up Zeranol in Cattle Urine, 0.40, 0.60, samples were compliant. 0.6, 0.9, 0.90, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 5, 6, No follow up investigations were undertaken into 12 the cause of these residues as past investigations suggest that alpha-nortestosterone occurs naturally in sheep at low concentrations. Samples were collected at both Farms and Taleranol in cattle(YB) urine, 1.7 Abattoirs. On farm investigations were carried out for 3 samples and no evidence of abuse was found. Research has shown that residues of zeranol can Zeranol in Sheep Urine, 2 occur where an animal ingests contaminated feed. Letters sent to the farmers of the remaining Thiouracil inCattle Urine, 6, 6.5, samples advising how to avoid residues in the 18 future. On farm investigation established this was due to Clenbuterol in Cattle urine, 0.2 the animal ingesting contaminated feed. No further action was taken and farm was notified. Progesterone in Cattle urine, 10 The sample was collected at the abattoir and an on farm investigation was carried out. The residue was found to be as a result of feed contamination on the farm . On farm investigations were carried out from where the samples were originally collected and 168 follow up samples were all compliant. The sample was collected on farm and a follow up investigation was carried out. Follow up samples were all compliant. A follow-up investigation was requested when this sample was reported. To date no samples have been received. According to movement records, this animal was transferred from another farm the day before it was presented for slaughter. * Information to be included for each non-compliant result. In case of several non-compliant results for the same substance in the same holding or related holdings, data could be aggregated. Data on concentration and matrix is very useful to be used as background information for the monitoring of the prevalence of use of group A substances. Group B substances Modification of national residue plan Please explain changes introduced as a consequence of NC results in previous years Non-compliant results Follow-up actions Bovines 6 Cadmium in cattle kidney Farm investigations for all samples. The source of residue was not established in 4 samples. in one sample it was accumulation due to diet. One 2 Dihydrostreptomycin/ sample due to environmental pollution. Follow up Sulphadiazine in calves kidneys. samples taken were all compliant. Farm investigations: One calf was slaughtered 2 Benzimidazoles/Levamisole in within the withdrawal period and the farmer has cattle liver received written advice. Farm investigations: Medicine records and storage checked. One animal had been slaughtered before the end of the withdrawal period. The farmer has 1 Tilmicosin in cattle kidney been advised on the requirements for record keeping. The details of the second animal had been incorrectly recorded at the abattoir.. 2 Chlortetracycline in calves kidney Measures have been taken to prevent such occurances. A farm investigation found that this animal was sent to slaughter whilst within the withdrawal 2 Phenylbutazone in cattle serum period. Both the farmer and veterinary surgeon have received written advice. Farm investigations: One animal had been sent to slaughter within the withdrawal period, the farmer has received written advice. In the second case, the investigating officer could not find any evidence of the use of Chlortetracycline on the farm. Detected at time of slaughter confirmed in the case of one where follow-up was initiated. An on-farm investigation has been carried out in the case of the 169 1 Dexamethasone in cattle liver first sample. This is a dairy herd. Medicine records are in place in accordance with legislation. The heard owner was unaware of the use of this substance. It was noted that there are also horses on the farm. There was no sign of phenylbutazone on the farm. There was turnover of staff during this period and a new foreman is now in place. The owner & the foreman are now aware of the situation. The DVO has sent a letter to the herd owner and the heard has been flagged for sampling of cows at slaughter. The second sample, from a one year old male bovine was tested for phenylbutazone at slaughter. The farm was visited on 15.06.09; it is predominantly a dairy farm that rears some bull beef (the sampled animal was home bred). No treatment was recorded for the sampled animal; computerised records were checked for a few other animals and found to be appropriate. The medicines store contained several sachets of Danilon Equidos (suxibuzone, a phenylbutazone prodrug, licensed for use in horses not intended for human consumption). The farmer said that these were supplied by the PVP for use in cows that had done the ‘splits’. It had not been given to the sampled animal, and he had no record of its use in others as this was too long ago to be computer recorded. A total of 6 cows were blood sampled (including one that was lame), only one sample was suitable for analysis which was compliant. Resampling was requested. The DVO has written to the herdkeeper and the PVP about their responsibilities. Tested in the liver of one OTM. The farm was visited on 22.06.2009. This herd is a short term finisher/haulier with animals purchased only a few days before presenting for slaughter. Medicine records were checked and were found to be well maintained. There was no entry for this animal. This animal had been sold through a market the day before slaughter (this may have contributed to a breakdown in foodchain information). The carcase was condemned at post mortem inspection for abscess/pyaemia, and fascioliasis was also reported and therefore did not enter the food chain. 170 1 Sulfadiazine 2 Chlortetracycline in pigs 1 Oxytetracycline in pigs kidney 3 Chlortetracycline in poultry muscle. Pigs Farm investigation undertaken. Medicine records and storage checked. The most likely cause of this residue was considered to be unintentional crosscontamination of the feed. Farm investigations: In one case it was established that the animal was slaughtered within the withdrawal period. In the second case the cause of the residue could not be established. It is possible that incorrect details were recorded at the abattoir. Farm investigation established that the residue was due to cross contamination of feed on farm. Poultry On farm investigations were carried out. Medicine records and storage checked. The investigations considered that the most likely cause was crosscontamination of the feed either at the feed-mill or during transport. Ionophores/Nicarbazines in poultry, 1 Salinomycin 3, Lasalocid, 1 Investigations carried out at 15 farms/mills .In Monensin and 42 Nicarbazines, these cases samples of retained feed from the mill and/or farm were tested but none confirmed positive. In cases where the farm and mill were investigated the most likely cause of the residue was considered to be cross-contamination of feed due to the use of a single bin-system on the farms. In one other case the most likely cause was considered to be due to the birds foraging in the litter and picking up medicated feed. Farms have received written advice in all of the above cases. Letters sent to farms where lower level residues of Nicarbazin have been detected advising on how to avoid residues 3 Cadmium in sheep kidney 2 Lead in sheep kidney 1 Chlorpyrofos in sheep kidney fat. Sheep and goat Farm investigations: There were no obvious sources of cadmium on the farms and it was not possible to establish the cause of these residues Far investigations: The cause of the residue in one was due to environmental pollution. The likely cause of the second was whilst grazing the animal had licked an item with lead based paint washed up on the shore. On farm investigation undertaken. There is no 171 1 Doramectin in sheep liver. 1 Oxfendazole in sheep liver 1 Amoxycillin in cows milk 1 nicarbazin in free range egg 1 P, P-DDE in free range egg 3 Emamectin in Salmon muscle. 1 Lasalocid in partridge muscle. evidence to suggest abuse or accidental contamination. The residue is most likely to have come through exposure of animal to a recently sprayed field. On farm investigation undertaken. The sheep was slaughtered within the withdrawal period. It was probably treated at a pervious farm and bought for slaughter. No records exist of previous locations. On farm investigation undertaken. Animal was mistakenly dosed with de-wormer at a neighbouring farm without owner’s knowledge. It was sent to slaughter by the owner within the withdrawal period. Milk On farm investigation undertaken. The animals had been treated with Duphamox, but the medicines records had not been updated. The milk sample was still within the withdrawal period. The farmer has received written advice to avoid a re-occurrence. Eggs On farm investigation undertaken. It suggested that the most likely cause was cross-contamination of the feed, though it was unclear exactly where this had occurred. The mill has tightened up its procedures to try and further minimise the chances of cross-contamination. 6 follow up target samples were taken, all proved compliant. On farm investigation undertaken. It is a small free range farm where birds were foraging in an old orchard, where the residual contamination of DDT could have been picked up. All the birds and eggs have been disposed of. Aquaculture Three samples above the MRLs were sent for follow up investigations. One sample results showed there were no irregularities it was taken just after the end of withdrawal period. In the case of the other two samples. it appears that a miscalculation of biomass to be treated had occurred, resulting in a higher dosage of medicine being administered, which contributed to the MRL being exceeded. The Farm has been notified. Farmed game Farm and mill investigation undertaken. The investigation established the most likely cause of contamination was at the bagging stage of the process within the Mill. The mill has received 172 2 lead in wild deer muscle 1 Naphthalene/1-4 dichlorobenzene in honey written advice and a revised bagging procedure is now in place. Wild game There were no follow-up investigations as the residues were most likely to have been the result of the deer being shot. Honey Farm investigation undertaken. The investigation established that likely cause of residue was crosscontamination. The bee-keeper had treated his supors with naphthalene/1-4 dichlorobenzene in winter to prevent wax moth. The sample was taken from a brood comb about a month before any honey was withdrawn for bottling. The Local Authority took samples from the bottled honey. They informed the beekeeper that the honey should be withdrawn from sale. 173