Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation

Transcripción

Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
CONTENTS
A. Invitations
1. Invitation tracking table
2. Text of invitations or newspaper ads
B. Meeting
1. Program
2. Non-technical summary
3. Participants
i. list
ii. feedback forms
4. Pictures
5. Outcomes of consultation
i. Minutes of the meeting
ii. Assessment of comments
iii. Revisit sustainable development assessment
iv. Summary of alterations based on comments
C. Sustainable development matrix
1. Own sustainable development assessment
2. Outcome blind exercise stakeholders
3. Consolidated sustainable development matrix
D. Preparation of Stakeholder Feedback Round
Annex 1: Participant list
Annex 2: Feedback forms
SECTION A.
Invitations
The local consultation was programmed to count with the participation of
organizations, institutions and government representatives. Invitations were sent
to NGO, government, civil society agencies and individuals known to have
experience and deep knowledge in improved cookstoves. Nevertheless, an open
invitation was published at a local wide-range newspaper. We also had the
support of the Grupo de Apoyo al Sector Rural (Rural Sector Support Group), a
division of the Engineering School of Católica University (Pontificia Universidad
Católica DEL Perú – PUCP). They helped us with the setting of the event, lending
us the auditorium were it was held, and broadcasting information about it (with
designed posters, flyers and press notes made by Microsol)
This way, we counted with the participation of 70 people that attended the
meeting. The principal means of invitation were: a) sent invitations by e-mail to
listed organizations and people (stakeholders); b) published advertising
(newspaper, poster, flyers).
The stakeholder consultation was held on August the 20th of 2009 at 9.30AM, at
the Auditorium of the Engienieering School of PUCP.
A.1.
Invitation tracking table
In this table we will present all participants that were invited by different means of
invitation. The following chart includes all mandatory categories proposed by GS
methodology. It is a long list because, as this is a national programm (not a
project) many actors are involved and so, their participation was required.
The means of invitations for this event were:
a. E-mail invitations: As our field of action is the whole country. There were
many guests to keep in mind and we couldn’t send invitations to all of them.
Therefore, a mail research phase previous to the event was necessary.
b. Printed invitations: We wanted the presence of certain policy maker groups,
such as ministries, international government agencies, etc. This needed
printed invitations as part of their protocols.
c. Personal invitations: Mainly made to beneficiaries, as they didn’t count with
email accounts nor telephone connection. Invitations were made by
Microsol LPP’s.
d. Advertisements: A newspaper add was published on August 14th. Also, we
printed posters and flyers that were distributed at Catolica University. The
event was also published at our website.
We didn’t have the attendance of many beneficiaries of the program, only of 2 of
them. This can be explained because: a) The event took place in Lima, Peru’s
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
2
capital, and most of current beneficiaries live in far away provinces. We had the
participation of 2 of them because of coordinations we had with ADRA, NGO that
is one of our LPP for 2008 POA, b) For Qori Q’oncha Program we consider
organized institutional groups as our LPP, and so main actors with whom we
work, and institutions. Our LPP can be NGO, Local Government, and other
organized institutions. Therefore, they are our main focus to whom we direct our
job.
Notice that we consider in this chart general people that confirmed their
attendance because of the different publications we had (under the code G –
people in general). Not all of them came the day of the event, but some others, of
which we didn’t have any record, did. Also, keep in mind that invitations are sent
to institutions, although we place as name of the invitee the people with highest in
the institution (such as Mayor, Manager, etc.). Therefore when they answered
back they confirmed the participation not only of one member, but sometimes
even 3 or 4.
Because of the amount of people invited, we created one more code called H,
which refers to exclusive research institution & press.
Before the main chart, read the following one which includes all names, initials
and description of all invited organizations
Official name (in Spanish) Gobierno Regional de [Name of the Region] Ministerio Nacional del Ambiente Ministerio de Vivienda Programa Nacional de Apoyo Directo a los más pobres ‐ JUNTOS Ministerio de Salud Comunidad Andina de Naciones Naciones Unidas Programa de las Naciones Unidad para el Desarrollo ‐ Organización de las Naciones Unidas Organización Panamericana de la Salud Translated Name INITIALS Regional Government GR of [Name of the Region] Ministry of MINAM Environment Ministry of Houshold MINVIV National program for direct support to the poorest Ministry of Health Community of Andean Nations United Nations United Nations Program for Development Pan‐american health organización JUNTOS MINSA CAN UN PNUD ‐ ONU Description of the institution Peru is divided in regions, provinces and districts. This is the first macro government unit. National authority with intendance in environmental issues National authority that promotes houses to each citizen Program that belongs to the Prime Ministry Consul National authority in health issues Network that groups the governments of Peru, Bolivia, Colombia and Ecuador United Nations UN program for development, based in Peru. OPS UN program for health Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
3
Fondo Nacional del Ambiente Centro de promoción del desarrollo humano, ecotecnologías y culturas Red de Municipalidades Rurales del Perú Centro de Estudios y Promoción del Desarrollo DESCO ‐ Programa Regional Sur DESCO ‐ Programa Sierra Central Manejo Sostenible de Suelo y Agua en Laderas Instituto de Desarrollo y Medio Ambiente Sociedad Nacional del Ambiente Fundación Peruana para la Protección de la Naturaleza Conservación Internacional Peru Environmental National Fund Promotion center for human development, eco‐technologies and culture. Peru's Local Governemnts' Network Studies Center for Development Promotion DESCO ‐ South Regional Program DESCO ‐ Central Highlands Program Sustainable handle of water and land in slopes Environment and Development Institute Environmental National Society Peruvian fund for Nature Protection Conservation International Peru Pro Health Pro Ambiente Saludable Environment PRISMA Prisma Proper Techonology Instituto de Transferencia Transfer Institute for de Tecnologías Apropiadas Marginal Sectors ‐ para Sectores Marginales ‐ Andres Bello Convenio Andrés Bello Convention Asociación Peruana de Energía Solar Centro de Ecología y Género Peruvian Asociation for Solar Energy Gender and Ecology Center Heifer Peru Heifer Peru Soluciones Prácticas ‐ ITDG Practical Solutions FONAM Institution that promotes the inversion in environmental projects. DETEC Local NGO REMURPE Association of all local governments from rural zones in Peru DESCO Local NGO DESCO DESCO program for the south DESCO DESCO program for the north MASAL IDMA Project managed by COSUDE and MINAG (Ministry of Agriculture) SNA Local NGO Society that groups diverse environmental organizations in Peru PRONATURALEZ
A Local NGO CI PRO AMBIENTE SALUDABLE PRISMA ITACAB APES CENTRO ECO HEIFER PERU ITDG International NGO Local NGO Local consultory enterprise and NGO Institution that promotes the usage of adequate techonolgies in poor sectors Civil society asociation that promotes and developes the use of solar energy in the country. Local NGO International technical cooperation agency International NGO that promotes the use of renewable energies and technology diffusion Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
4
Swiss contact Swiss Contact SWISS CONTACT ILZRO RAPS Perú ILZRO RAPS IRP Grupo GEA GEA Group Grupo GEA Grupo VIDA VIDA Group GRUPO VIDA Organization for the development of Latin America and the Caribbean ONWARD PERU Organización para el desarrollo de América Latina y El Caribe Peru Ambiente Desarrollo Alternativo Sistémico Instituto para una Alternativa Agraria CARE PERU Environment Peru Systematic Alternative Development Institute for an Agro Alternative PA CARE Peru ODS Local NGO that promotes research of new clean technologies IAA Organización para el Desarrollo Sostenible Asociación de Comunicadores Sociales Calandria Eficiencia energética SAC Energy Eficiency Calandria EFICIENCIA ENERGETICA Programa Sembrando Sembrando Program SEMBRANDO Bolivia Inti Bolivia Inti Embajada de Finlandia Finland Embassy BOLIVIA INTI EMBAJADA DE FINLANDIA SOLARIS WORLDVISION Intercooperation German Technical Cooperation Swis Fundation for Development and international cooperation Intercooperation Cruz Roja Red Cross CRUZ ROJA Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Technische Zusammenarbeit
International NGO that develops workshops and training in project managment Local NGO that developes environmental works Local NGO that developes environmental works Institution that carries out research about forestry and agriculture. Local NGO dedicated to child protection and promotion DEALSI CARE PERU Organization for Sustainable Development Association of Social Communicators Calandris Asociación Solaris Solaris Association World Vision International ‐ World Vision Peru International ‐ Peru Swiss cooperation fund for techincal development. Local NGO that works in peruvian amazon Local NGO that developes environmental works Local NGO that developes environmental works GTZ Local NGO that promotes transparent communication processes Local consultory enterprise that works with energy improvement. National programm held by ITYF NGO about improved cookstoves in Peru Bolivian NGO that promotes clean energies Embassy Consultory and NGO with works in environment and social development International NGO that works with projects to dimish poverty German agency that finances, executes and promotes development projects Swiss non‐profit making organisation engaged in development International voluntary organization that promotes health protection Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
5
Agencia de Estados Unidos para el desarrollo internacional Agrupación Empresarial de Servicios Integrales United States Agency for International Development USAID Enterprise Group for Integral services AESI RAMP PERU RAMP PERU RAMP PERU ANTAMINA ANTAMINA ANTAMINA Fondo Verde Centro Bartolome de las Casas Green Found Bartolomé de las Casas Centre Fondo Verde BARTOLOMÉ Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental Environmental Law Peruvian Society SPDA CARITAS PERU CARITAS PERU CARITAS PERU ADRA ADRA ADRA PROPERU Agencia Suiza para el Desarrollo y la Cooperacion Asesor Andes Gold Standard PROPERU World Wildlife Foundation CEBIES SAC CyB Desarrollo Rural Sustentable Empresa Fundición Municipalidad de Cajatambo PROPERU Swiss Development Coorperation Gold Standard World Wildlife Foundation C y B Sustainable Rural Development Fundition Enterprise Cajatambo Municipality MUNICIPALDIAD DE CAJATAMBO Consultora externa Consultant Universidad del Callao Asociación Civil Pro Desarrollo Humano Estudiante Instituto de Desarrollo Rural Organizacion para el Desarrollo Comunitario Callao University Civil asociation for human development Student Institute for Rural Development UC ACDH Student INDER NGO Private enterprise in metalurgic area Government entity in Cajatambo District ‐ Lima Person that provides advise in enterprises University with careers in engieneering and sciences Local NGO that promotes social programs University student Local NGO that promotes rural sector development ODC NGO COSUDE GS WWF Peru CEBIES SAC USA agency that finances, executes and promotes development projects. Enterprise that offers services in human resources, legal assesment, etc. Project that promotes the use of sustainable technologies Mining company that works in Ancash province. Finnances social responsability projects Local NGO that promotes environmental protective projects Research institution that focuses on andean studies Civil society organization that watches works for the promotion of environmental regulation in the country Catholic church institution that promotes poverty mitigation International NGO that developes projects in Ancash. MICROSOL LPP International NGO that developes projects in Cusco. MICROSOL LPP Swiss agency for development Support group for ProPerú NGO Carbon quality verifying agency International NGO that protects biodiversity Private enterprise Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
6
Servicio Nacional de Capacitación para la Industria de la Construcción Asociacion Solidarios para el Desarrollo Asociación Enlace Solidario ‐ Universidad del Pacífico Capacitation National Service for Building Industry Solidarity Asociation for Development Solidarity Link Association Center for the conservation of Centro de Conservación de energy and the Energía y del Ambiente environment Agro‐Enfoque Revista Agro Enfoque Magazine Grupo de Apoyo al Sector Rural ‐ PUCP Revista CO2 Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Universidad Cayetano Heredia Mission Economique Franco Peruana Embajada de Francia Embajada Britanica Universidad Nacional Agraria de La Molina Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria UNALM ‐ Laboratorio de Energías Renovables UNI ‐ Centro de Energías Renovables Rural sector support group CO2 Magazine Catholic University of Peru Cayetano Heredia University French‐ Peruvian Economic Mission French Embassy British Embassy La Molina Agro National University Ingeneering National Unviersity Renewable Energies Lab. ‐ UNALM Renewable Energies Center ‐ UNI El Comercio Diario el Comercio Newspaper Reportera Journalist Municipalidad Distrital de Huamapoma Huamapoma Municipality Ministerio de Energía y Mining and energy Minas ministry Colegio de Arquitectos del Architect's school of Perú Peru Mesa de Concertación San Juan de Distrital de San Juan de Lurigancho Lurigancho Concertation SENCICO SOLIDARIOS ENLACE SOLIDARIO National Institute that offers technical careers related to building issues. Local voluntary program that works with risk groups Social Responsability Program from Pacifico University CO2 Institution that promotes energetic efficiency Magazine that focuses on agricultural subjects Research group from PUCP that promotes the use of renewable energies and sustainable development Magazine that focuses on local environmental news PUCP University UCH MEFP FE BE University Economic promotion divition of the French Embassy in Peru French Embassy British Embassy UNALM University UNI RE‐UNI University Research group for renewable energies, in Agraria University Research group for renweable energies, in Engeeniering university EL COMERCIO HUAMAPOMA MUNICIPALITY Newspaper Journalist Government entity in Huamapoma District ‐ Lima MINEM UNAC FIARN Government authority in energy sector CAP Official arquitects group of the country MCD‐SJL Group that promotes development in San Juan de Lurigancho District CENERGIA AGRO ENFOQUE GRUPO RE‐UNALM Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
7
Worktable Instituto de investigación y capacitación municipal Entity sponsored by Konrad Adenauer Foundation that supports and promotes institutional capacitites in municipalities. Entity dependent on the Health Minstry that supervises local units of work INICAM Dirección General de Salud Dirección académica de responsabilidad social del la PUCP Health General Direction DIGESA Social Responsability Academic Direction ‐
PUCP DARS PROPERU PROPERU Social Responsability Program from Catolica University Local NGO that developes projects in Cusco. MICROSOL LPP. PROPERU The following chart is the complete list of organizations we invited:
Cat. Organisation (if relevant) Name of invitee Means of invitation Date of invitation Conf? A Beneficiary José Atilio Ganoza Personal invitation Y Personal invitation Y A Beneficiary Esposa del Sr. Atilio B Oscar Altamirano Quispe/ President Email 14/07/2009 N E 14/07/2009 N Alfonso Ampuero/ Public Relations Henry Contreras Juarez/ Lima Representative Gustavo Corvera Coronel/ Social Development Manager Region AMAZONAS Jose Castro Pereyra/ General Manager for Natural Resources and environment B César Alvarez/ President Lic. Oscar Ruiz conde/ Social Development Manager Richard Rojas Castillo/ Planning Manager Srta. Amalia/ Planning Secretary Region ANCASH Amanda Moya/ Lima Representative Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
8
B B B B B B David Ambraham Salazar Morote/ President E Region APURIMAC Ruben rodriguez Colonia/ Social Development Manager Eduardo Incio/ Lima Representative Srta. Salinas/ Secretaria de General Manager 15/07/2009 Region AREQUIPA Juan Manuel Guillén Benavides/ President Luis Valdivia Rodriguez/General Secretary E‐mail 15/07/2009 Region AYACUCHO Marcos Cabrera Pimentel/ Social Development Manager Juan Ramos/ Social Promotion Representative Manuel Alcarraz Curi/ Managment Assistant Email Region CAJAMARCA Region CUSCO Region HUANCAVELICA Jesus Coronel Salirrosas/ President Omar Perrones/ Lima Representative Hugo Gonzales Sayán/ President Washington Alosilla Robles/ Social Development Manager Luis Federico Salas Guevara/President B Region HUANUCO Region ICA Email Region LA LIBERTAD Fernando Arias Vera/ Lima Representative N 15/07/2009 Email N 15/07/2009 N 15/07/2009 N 15/07/2009 Email Y 15/07/2009 Jose Humberto Murguia Zanier/ President B N 15/07/2009 Maria del Pilar Ramirez Castañeda/ Lima Representative Email Rómulo Triveño Pinto/ President Email Srta. Arboleda/ General Managment Secretary Region JUNIN N Email Vladimir Huaroc/ President Gina Sanabria Sanabria/ Lima Representativde B N 15/07/2009 Jorge Espinoza Egoavil/ President B 15/07/2009 Y Email N 15/07/2009 B B Region LAMBAYEQUE Region LORETO Nery Enni Saldarriaga de Kroll/ President Tito Santillán/ Lima Rpresentative Ivan Vásquez Valera/ President Email Email Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
N 16/07/2009 N 9
Angel Toralva/ Lima Representative Santos Kaway Komori/ President Hector Valcarcel/ General Manager Julio Villavicencio Castro/ Lima Representative B Region MADRE DE DIOS B Region MOQUEGUA B Region PASCO Srta. Cristina/ General Manager Secretary Jaime Rodriguez Villanueva/ President Boris Ayma/President Assesor Araceli Alvarez Hurtado/ Lima Representative Julio Granados/Legal Asesor Felix Rivera Serrano/ President Ivan Cubas Salazar/ General Manager Ing. Leónidas/ Lima Representative Grimaldo Cristobal Apolinario/ Social Development Manager Email 16/07/2009 N Email 16/07/2009 N Email 16/07/2009 N Cesar Trelles Lara/ President Cesar Guerrero Navarro/ General Manager Clara Lama García/ Lima Representative B B Region PIURA Srta. Guardado/ General Managment Representative Email 16/07/2009 N Region PUNO Pablo Hernán Fuentes Guzmán/ President Hugo Quintanilla Jara/ General Managment Gladys Luna/ Lima Representative Email 16/07/2009 N César Villanueva Arévalo/ President B Region SAN MARTIN B Region TACNA B B Walter Cabrera/ Lima Representative Hugo Froilán Ordoñez Salazar/ President Carlos Manzanares/ Lima Representative Email 16/07/2009 N Email 16/07/2009 N Region TUMBES Betty Inga/ Lima Representative Email 16/07/2009 N Region UCAYALI Jorge Velasquez Portocarrero/ 16/07/2009 N Wilmer Dios Benites/ President Email Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
10
President Oliver Martinez/ Lima Representative Antonio Brack/ Minister Vanessa Vereau/ Vice Minister Marisa Quiñones/ Asessor Carmen Wilson/ Asistant Personal Invitation MINVIV Roberto Prieto Email JUNTOS Ivan Hidalgo/ Director Jorge Feliciano/ Operations Manager Lourdes Chunga/ Managment Assistant Adolfo Medrano Carbajal / Managment of Diffusion Personal invitation 12/08/2009 Y Personal Invitation 04/08/2009 Y Email 04/08/2009 Y B MINAM B B Oscar Ugarte/ Minister Javier Hernández Campanella/ DIGESA General Director Rocío Espinoza Laín/ Executive Director ‐ Ecology and Environment Direction DIGESA B MINSA B CAN Verónica Rojas Ricardo Giesecke/ Regional Coordinator Tropical Andean Glacier Adaptation Project SGCAN ‐ BM B PNUD Diego Leslie James/ Carbon Program ODM Email Manuel Peña/ Peru Director Luis Valencia/ Environmental Health Sandra Zeña Giraldo/ UNETE Project Freddy Garro Flores Personal Invitation Carta Julia Justo/ Executive Director Email B OPS D FONAM D DETEC D REMURPE Cesar Campos Rodriguez/ Executive Director Wilbert Rozas Beltran/ National Coordinator – Mayor of Anta (Cuzco) D DESCO 03/08/2009 Y N N 04/08/2009 Y Y 21/07/2009 Y Email 21/07/2009 Y Email 21/07/2009 N Oscar Toro Quinto/ Responsible of South Regional Program Email 21/07/2009 N Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
11
D MASAL D DESCO ‐ Programa Sierra Central Marco Sotomayor/ National Director Hugo Carrillo Cavero/ Responsible of Centre Andean Region D IDMA Sandy Yoplac/ Program Coordinator Lima ‐ Lurin Jacques Ogier/ Latin America and Caribbean Coordinator D Sociedad Nacional del Ambiente D Giovanna Orcotoma/ Project Managment Climate Change Responsible Martín Alcalde/ Executive Director Email 21/07/2009 N Email 21/07/2009 N Email 21/07/2009 N Email 21/07/2009 N Email 21/07/2009 N Email 21/07/2009 N Email 21/07/2009 N Email 21/07/2009 Y D Pro Naturaleza Conservación Internacional Pro Ambiente Saludable D PRISMA Alfredo Ferreyros Narciso Wong Guzmán/ President Mariela Levano/ Communitary Helath Manager ITACAB Fernando Villafuerte Medina/ Executive Director Norma Vidal Añaños/ Project Manager Email 22/07/2009 N D Asociación Peruana de Energía Solar Manfred Horn/ General Secretary Rafael Espinoza/ General Secretary Email 22/07/2009 N D CENTRO ECO ‐ Centro de Ecología y Género D HEIFER PERU D D D D ITDG ‐ Soluciones prácticas Swiss contact Maria Dolores Vasquez/ Director Maribel Díaz/ Healthy Housegold Manager Email Madeleine Munoz/ Improved Cookstoves Responsible Email Oliver Marcelo Bret/ Energy, Infrastucture and Basic Services Coordinator Fernando Acosta Bedoya/ Biomass and Biofuel Project Coordinator Javier Coello/ Improved Cookstoves Project Email Kenia Leitao/ Project Specialist Email Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
22/07/2009 22/07/2009 Y 22/07/2009 Y 22/07/2009 N 12
D ILZRO RAPS Perú D D Grupo GEA Grupo Vida D Onward Peru ‐
Organización para el desarrollo de América Latina y El Caribe D Peru Ambiente D DEALSI ‐ Desarrollo Alternativo Sistémico D IAA‐ Instituto para una Alternativa Agraria Marcos Alegre Ángeles/ Direction Email Marcos Alegre Chang/ Eco eficiency and Social Responsability Centre Email Arturo Alfaro Medina/ President Email Felix Gonzales Polar/ Representative Cristian Monteverde/ Program Director 22/07/2009 N 22/07/2009 22/07/2009 Y Email 22/07/2009 Dante Lagatta Maria Elvira Luna Heredia/ Director Edgar Mosqueira Lopez Carlos Ernesto Paredes Gonzales Email 22/07/2009 Email 22/07/2009 Haydee Romero/Director Email 22/07/2009 N Julio Araujo Email 22/07/2009 Y Leandro Sandoval Alvarado/ Executive Manager Email 22/07/2009 N Email 22/07/2009 N Email 22/07/2009 Y Ricardo Maravi/ Asesor Miguel Mejia Personal Invitation 04/08/2009 Y Jose Pepe Diaz/ Responsible Ulla Helimo/ Cooperation Asesor Email 23/07/2009 N Email 23/07/2009 Rojas Sarapura Alejandro/ Development Program Coordinator Segundo Davila/DESSAN, climate change and reconstruction program Coordinator Nella Canales/Climate Change Responsible Julio Salcedo D D CARE Peru Organización para el Desarrollo Sostenible ‐ ODS D Calandria Lourdes Liliana Sandoval Chaupe/ Clean Air Regional Responsible D Eficiencia energética Manuel Bocanegra Alayo/ Techinical Manager Pilar Nores/ Director Virgina Borra D SEMBRANDO D Bolivia Inti D Embajada de Finlandia Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
13
Luis Herrera/ Cooperation Consulor Jorge Falcón Marina/ National Director D SOLARIS Patricia Narvaéz Email 23/07/2009 Y Email 23/07/2009 N Email 23/07/2009 N Email 23/07/2009 N Email 23/07/2009 N Saul Calle Caleb Meza Jose Luis Ochoa Paul Betman D WORLDVISION Paul Woods Jose Umberto Bernilla Peter Pfaumann/ GTZ Peru Director D Ana Moreno Carlos Cabezudo GTZ Roberto Kometter D Intercooperation D Cruz Roja Veronica Galmez/ ECOBONA Regional Program Luis Enrique Machuca Nájar/ Director Lucia Ramos D USAID Lucy Lopez Email 23/07/2009 N D AESI Jose Hermosa/ Environment Responsible Email 23/07/2009 N Monica Vasquez Maria‐Elena Vattuone/ Health and nutrition program – Antamina Mining Fund Email 23/07/2009 Y Email 23/07/2009 N Jorge Terrel Marco Zeisser/ Director Jazmin/ Secretary Andrés Moran/ Social Development Managment Carlos Villanueva/ Social Development Managment Manuel Pulgar‐Vidal/ Executive Director Email 23/07/2009 Y Email 23/07/2009 Y Email 23/07/2009 N Email 23/07/2009 N Ricardo Ordoñez D RAMP‐Perú D ANTAMINA D Fondo Verde D Centro Bartolome de las Casas D Caritas del Perú D Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental Pablo Peña José Luis Capella/ Forests Program Director Jessica Hidalgo/ Andean Amazon Initiative Protection Director. Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
14
Pastor Walter Britton/General Manager Santos Guerrero/Operations manager Mylene Huanqui/Health Manager D ADRA Johnny Saavedra/Agriculture Development Manager Piero Durand Email 23/07/2009 Y D PROPERU Javier Saldivar/Improved Cookstoves Responsible Email 24/07/2009 D Swiss Development Coorperation COSUDE Sebastian Eugster Email 05/08/2009 Y Roberto Persivale Email N Cecilia Persivale Email N Justin Stebbins Email N Cesar Gordillo Email Email D D Asesor Andes Programa de Adaptacion al Cambio Climatico ‐COSUDE E GS Expert South America Mauro Fadda Email F WWF Peru Ted Peña Herrera Email G CEBIES SAC G Salustio Soto Rodriguez Liz Carranza Ortega/ Accountant G CyB Desarrollo Rural Sustentable G G G Katya Barcena Carranza Judith Tasesola Bonifaz Ernesto Mauricio Rodriguez Empresa Fundición Jose Atilio Coronel G Consultora Externa Lourdes Terán G G Consultora Externa Municipalidad de Patricia Palacios Augusto Aparicio Arrieta Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
24/07/2009 N 24/07/2009 N Y 04/08/2009 N 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 15
Cajatambo G Carlos Dante Aparicio Arrieta G Universidad del Callao G Juan Tapia Copa/ Environment and Natural resources Faculty Víctor Landa Ponte afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Enrique Perez Reyna Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Student Hector Tello Pillaca Aviso en prensa/ afiches G Jorge Pacora Puga G Walter Montalván Saavedra G Victor Manuel Vergara Castillo G Asociación Civil Pro Desarrollo G G G G G G INDER G ODC G SENCICO G G G G G G G Asociación Solidarios Roxana Águila Ponte Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ Maria Velarde Montoya afiches Aviso en prensa/ Eusebio Ocampos Chanta afiches Aviso en prensa/ Javier Cateriano Alzamora afiches Aviso en prensa/ Jose Fernando Gutierrez Anci afiches Aviso en prensa/ Julio Sanchez Rodriguez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Carmen Kuroiwa Horiuchi afiches Aviso en prensa/ Gabriela Esparza afiches Aviso en prensa/ Urphy Vásquez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Veronica Viñas afiches Aviso en prensa/ Omar Gonzales afiches Aviso en prensa/ Michael Callahan afiches Aviso en prensa/ Mariano Granda afiches Aviso en prensa/ Daniel Ávarez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Manuel Dominguez Bahamonde afiches Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 16
Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ Miguel Angel Goicochea Galvez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Rolando Lajo afiches Aviso en prensa/ José Luis Tiravanti afiches Aviso en prensa/ Fernando Vasquez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Hugo Enrique Palomino afiches Aviso en prensa/ Cesar Dávalos Tafur afiches Carolina de la Cruz Arias G G G G Asociación Enlace Solidario (UP) G G H CENERGIA H 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y Email 24/07/2009 Y Revista Agro Enfoque Johnny Nahui Ortiz Santa Cruz Jorge/ Director General Email 24/07/2009 N H GRUPO Miguel Hadzich/ Coordinador Email 24/07/2009 Y H Revista CO2 Patricia Benites de la Lama Email 24/07/2009 Y H Julio Vargas Neumann/ Rectory Asessor Email 24/07/2009 N H PUCP Universidad Cayetano Heredia Roberto Accinelli Email 24/07/2009 N H Mission Economique Franco Peruana Email 24/07/2009 N H Embajada de Francia H Embajada Britannica H H H H Martine Lebacq/ Commerce Chamber in Peru ‐ Manager Cécile MOUTON‐BRADY de POZZO DI BORGO/ Ambassador Veronique Hernandez/ Asistant Catherine Nettleton/ Ambassador UNALM ‐ Laboratorio Jose Luis Calle Maraví de Energías Renovables Wilfredo Herrera Liendo Horn Mutschler Manfred/ Director UNI ‐ Centro de Energías Renovables Diario el Comercio Journalist Gonzalo Saavedra Manuel Marticorena Juan Zegarra Rafael Hidalgo Mónica Belling Mary Enciso Email N Email 24/07/2009 N Email 24/07/2009 Y Email 24/07/2009 N Email Email 24/07/2009 N 24/07/2009 N A. 2. Invitation text
17
Find in the image below the invitation that was sent, the newspaper add, flyer model and
poster model.
a) Invitation
18
b) Newspaper add
19
20
c) Poster
21
d) Flyer
22
SECTION B.
Meeting
B. 1. Agenda of the meeting
9:00 9.15 9.30 9.45 10.00 10.15 10.30 10.45 11.25 12.00 Inscription of participants Event opening  Welcoming speeches by PAHO (Pan American Health Organization), CAN (Andean Nations Community) MINAM (Ministry of Environment) and MINSA (Ministry of Health),  Presentation of lecturers: GRUPO, MICROSOL, ADRA, PROPERÚ. Presentation: Improved Cookstoves. Clean technology for development. Miguel Hadzich ‐ GRUPO Presntation: Plan of Activities for clean technologies in carbón market. Qori Q’oncha cookstove Programm. Arthur Laurent ‐ MICROSOL Expample of work with LPP: ADRA PERÚ and cookstove difusion in Ancash. Exposición a cargo de ADRA PERÚ Expample of work with LPP: PROPERÚ and Cookstove difusion in Cuzco Javier Saldivar ‐ PROPERÚ Break Indicators for clean technologies. Presentation of Qori Q’oncha Programm indicators. MICROSOL Monitoring for Qori Q’oncha Programm. Closure of the event. Field visit to cookstove models placed B. 2. Non-technical summary
We decided to present 2 non-technical summaries: One of the VPA and one of the POA.
See them in Spanish as follows.
Programa Qori Q’oncha – Difusión de cocinas mejoradas en el Perú ‐ Resumen ‐ El Programa Qori Q’oncha busca coordinar diversas iniciativas voluntarias de difusión de cocinas mejoradas en el Perú, funcionando como un VPA (Voluntary Program of Activities). Las actividades son coordinadas MICROSOL, empresa social francesa que trabaja en Perú como coordinadora de los procesos de valorización en el mercado del carbono, y Myclimate, fundación suiza de protección climática, con base en Zurich. Como contrapartes, esto es, agentes ejecutores de la difusión de cocinas mejoradas, se considera diversos actores locales (LPP – Local Project Participant), como lo son: Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
23
-
Ramas peruanas de ONG internacionales Instituciones internacionales ONG Nacionales Autoridades regionales y locales (gobiernos regionales, municipios provinciales, municipios locales) Compañías nacionales e internacionales Habitantes peruanos organizados en comunidades o asociaciones. El marco geográfico del programa corresponde a todo el Perú. Por ejemplo, durante el 2008 se realizó la difusión de actividades en Cuzco y Ancash. Cada iniciativa de difusión de cocinas se incluye en un VPA (Voluntary Programm of Activities). Un VPA puede incluir uno o más proyectos de difusión de cocinas mejoradas en regiones definidas del Perú. Cada VPA se divide en clusters (población objetivo). Para que un VPA sea incluible en un POA, debe seguir varios criterios que deberán ser revisados a nivel de cada cluster, completando un formato denominado “VPA cluster elegibility form”. Dentro de los criterios más importantes se destaca: - Cada nueva cocina emite menos GEI (Gases de Efecto Invernadero) que la reemplazada. - La cocina tiene una chimenea para liberar el humo fuera de la vivienda. - La construcción de la cocina favorece el uso de materiales locales (menos barro y adobe). - La población destinataria es de nacionalidad peruana y pertenece a los sectores más pobres de la población. Programa Qori Q’oncha – Difusión de cocinas mejoradas en el Perú ‐ Resumen del VPA 2008‐ Este proyecto es parte del programa de actividades del POA del Programa Qori Q’oncha. Las actividades del proyecto están diseñadas para mejoras en el largo plazo de condiciones de vida de habitantes locales. Esto se permite por el uso de cocinas mejoradas en sus viviendas Las actividades del proyecto son la diseminación y transferencia de 3’624 cocinas mejoradas en dos regiones del Perú: Ancash y Cuzco. Estas actividades se realizarán entre el 2008 y 2014 (la transferencia de tecnología fue realizada durante el 2008). Los principales actores que implementan las actividades del proyecto son: - Fondo Minero Antamina, fondo financiero de la compañía minera Antamina y dedicado a la inversión en proyectos sociales en la región de Ancash. Est fondo financia parte de las actividades el proyecto. - ADRA PERÚ, LPP1 de este VPA, rama peruana de la ONG internacional ADRA. ADRA PERÚ implementa las actividades del proyecto en la región de Ancash. - PRO PERÚ, LPP2 de este VPA, rama peruana de la ONG internacional My ProWorld. PRO PERÚ implementa las actividades del proyecto en la región de Cuzco. - MICROSOL, empresa social francesa dedicada a apoyar actores locales en la implementación de acciones voluntarias sobre la difusión de cocinas mejoradas. MICROSOL coordina los proyectos. Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008
24
Para este VPA se definieron dos clusters que, no obstante ubicarse en regiones distintas, cumplían criterios homogéneos para su agrupación del VPA. La razón de esta división es que cada cluster considera a) una región específica, b) modelos específicos de cocinas mejoradas). Cuadro resumen Cluster Location (region) Leading LPP N° of improved cookstoves 1 Ancash ADRA PERÚ 2404 2 Cusco PROPERÚ 1200 B. 3. Participants
i. List of participants
The participant list will be attached in annex 1 (once scanned)
Participant List of Stakeholder consultation Date and time: August 20th. 9.00AM Location: Engieenigering Auditorium of Catolica University Nombre Organización E‐mail Acosta, Fernando ITDG [email protected]
Aparicio Arrieta, Augusto Municipalidad Distrital de Huamapoma [email protected]
Aparicio Arrieta, Carlos Dante Municipalidad Distrital de Huamapoma [email protected]
Arana Ysa, Vladimir MINAM [email protected]
Atilio Coronel, Jose INDEPENDIENTE Ávarez, Daniel N.A. Cardich, Catherine MINAM Carranza Ortega, Liz N.A. [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Carranza, Liz N.A. ‐ Castillo Coila, Guisselle MICROSOL Cuba, Ricardo DARS Gcastillo@microsol‐int.com
[email protected]
Dávalos P., Alfredo SENCICO Dávalos Tafur, Cesar MINEM‐ Electrificación Rural ‐ David, Susana DIGESA [email protected]
Davila Arenas, Aurelio MESA DE CONCERTACION DISTRITAL DE SJL Dávila, Celso ITDG De la Cruz Arias, Carolina ASOCIACION SOLIDARIOS Diez Canseco, Daniella FONAM [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
25
Dominguez Bahamonde, Manuel ASCOCIACION SOLIDARIOS Durand, Piero ADRA PERU [email protected]
[email protected]
Enciso, Mary N.A. ‐ Esparza, Gabriela SENCICO Esperzún La Torre, Ronald COLEGIO ARQUITECTOS CAP [email protected]
[email protected]
Espinoza Chavez, Saonoria N.A. ‐ Espinoza, Rocio DIGESA Fadda, Mauro GOLD STANDARD Falcón Marina, Jorge ASOCIACIÓN SOLIDARIOS Feliciano, Jorge JUNTOS [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Galingo Huayta, John GOBIERNO LOCAL ‐ Garbonel Quiñones, Jorge COLEGIO ARQUITECTOS CAP García Howell, David FONAM García Rossell, Manuel FONAM Garro Flores, Freddy Alejandro FONAM dgarcí[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Giesecke, Ricardo Comunidad Andina de Naciones‐CAN [email protected] Goicochea Galvez, Miguel Angel N.A. ‐ Gonzales, Omar GRUPO [email protected]
Grados Tello, Adriana MICROSOL agrados@microsol‐int.com Guerra Zevallos, Cesar INICAM Guevara, Magaly DIGESA [email protected]
[email protected]
Hadzich, Miguel GRUPO Incio Muñoz, Martín E. GOBIERNO REGIONAL APURIMAC Justo, Julia FONAM Landa Ponte, Víctor ASOCIACION PRODESARROLLO Laura Chaquspuma, Prudencio MINSA DIGESA [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Laurent, Arthur MICROSOL alaurent@microsol‐int.com Lévano, Mariella PRISMA Malque Perez, Elena ADRA PERU [email protected]
[email protected]
Maraví, Ricardo SEMBRANDO Mecklenburg, Francisco ADRA PERU Muñoz , Madeleine HEIFER PERU Noriega, Dante INDEPENDIENTE Noriega, Giovanni INDEPENDIENTE Ocampos Chanta, Eusebio INDER ‐ CANCHAQUE ‐ PIURA Palacios, Patricia INDEPENDIENTE [email protected]
madeleine.muñ[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
26
Percivale, Roberto N.A. ‐ Quinto Ushiñahua, Victor N.A. [email protected]
Quiñones, Marisa MINAM [email protected] Ramos, Hector SEMBRANDO Reyes, Laura MINAM [email protected]
[email protected]
Rodriguez, Mauricio N.A. ‐ Rolando Lajo, Luis Evanista N.A. Romani, Julio MNEM [email protected]
Saldivar, Javier PROPERU [email protected] Sanchez Rodriguez, Sergio ODC Tapia Copa, Juan UNAC FIARN Tasesola, Judith N.A. Teran, Lourdes IN.A. Terrel, Jorge FONDO VERDE Tiravanti, Jose Luis MESA DISTRITAL SALAS Vásquez, Urphy GRUPO Vergara Castillo, Victor Manuel VERGARA CASTILLO METAL SRL Vila Benites, Gisselle MICROSOL Vivanco Mackie, Gustavo MINAM Zeña, Sandra OPS Zevallos, Hector ADRA PERU [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Gvila@microsol‐int.com
[email protected]
[email protected]‐oms.org
[email protected]
ii. Evaluation forms
Evaluations forms are received via e-mail because they were not finished by the end of
the event. As it lasted around 5 hours, all attendants were hurrying to leave. Then we
send emails to all of them, attaching the evaluation form template, asking to fill it up. Only
4 people have answered.
All comments are translated below the original summit. Understand that we literally
translate all that was commented. The mistakes are of origin.
Name
What is your
impression of the
meeting?
Carlos Aparicio
Se presentaron muchas personas con grandes conocimientos teóricos y
como siempre no se pudo hacer el análisis de involucrados ya que estos no
se encontraban presentes, los representates de las ONGs si aportaron
mucho ya que conocen sus respectivas zonas de influencias pero habían
personas que retrasaron el taller con propuestas fuera de contextos ya que
27
no conocen la realidad que viven nuestros campesinos.
What do you like
about the
project?
What do you not
like about the
project?
Signature
Name
What is your
impression of the
meeting?
Many people attended the meeting with great theorethical knowledge and as
usual there was no opportunity to make the analysis with the involved ones
since they were not present, the NGO representatives contributed a lot since
they know each respective influence area, but there was people that delayed
the workshop with out of context proposals because they don’t know the real
conditions our peasants live.
La sensación de que las cosas se quieren hacer lo más práctica posible sin
complicarse la vida como se suele hacer en los proyectos SNIP los cuales
aún cuando han sido flexibilizados varias veces, por la misma entidad, con el
fin de que el objetivo se haga realidad lo más pronto posible hay evaluadores
que no entienden el porqué de las mencionadas flexibilizaciones y ponen
trabas innecesarias causando demoras en el gasto del dinero.
The feeling that things want to be done in the most practical posible way,
without complications as in SNIP projects [SNIP is the government program to
apply any new Project idea], even thought they have been changed to be
more flexible so the objective can be accomplished sooner, althought there
are some evaluators that don’t understand the meaning of this and delay the
job, making more expenses.
(nothing written down)
Carlos Aparicio Arrieta DNI15594094
Carlos Landa Ponte
Mas q nada su carácter participativo, en algo tan importante como es el
mejoramiento de la calidad de vida y medio ambiente .Algo q pienso es una
de las formas para crear conciencia y cultura ante el peligro inminente sobre
la humanidad de los cambios climáticos ,el desmejoramiento de la capa de
ozono y la contaminación en general.
Its participative character, something very important in life quality
improvement and environment. Something I think is one of the ways in which
we raise conscience and culture in front of the inminent danger humanity
faces climate change, the slimming of the ozone layer and contamination in
general.
What do you like
about the
project?
El enfoque q dieron personas conocedoras del tema y sus aportes en las
experiencias q tienen en sus comunidades.Otro asunto q me agrado fue la
convocatoria q tuvo x la asistencia de los participantes q llegaron desde
diferentes partes del pais.En terminos generales fue una experiencia muy
agradable y de enriquecimiento de experiencias muy positivas.
The foucs provided by experts and their contributions based on the
experience they have in their communities. Other issue I liked was the call
28
What do you not
like about the
project?
Signature
Name
What is your
impression of the
meeting?
What do you like
about the
project?
What do you not
like about the
project?
made because the invitees came from different parts of the country. In
general, it was a very nice experience, which allowed the knowledge of
positive experiences.
Creo q no se aprovecho ,la presencia de personas de todos los rincones del
pais el sentido ,se debio tratar de dar mas comunicación entre ellos,via
grupos q emitan un concepto previamente elaborado entre ellos,lo cual
permitiria mas socializacion entre ellos,conocernos mas y creo q eso
permitiria ser mas fructifera este tipo de reuniones.Tratar de encaminarnos en
este tipo de proyectos,q entidades nos pueden ayudar ,o buscar el
financiamiento respectivo,en conclusión una orientación al respecto.
I think the assitance of people form different parts of the country was not
exploited, more communication could have been developed among them,
from groups that have already constructed concepts, which could have
allowed more socialization, know each other. Try to approach each other in
this kind of projects, what institutions can support us, finding proper financial
support, in general orientation about the subject.
DNI 06120615
Firma VICTOR LANDA PONTE PRESIDENTE ASOCIACION CIVIL PRO
DESARROLLO CONSTRUYENDO PERU
Mariella Lévano
El tema propuesto es de interés institucional y personal, las presentaciones
fueron motivadoras junto con las experiencias de las agencias sin embargo
los tiempos y metodología empleados para la discusión pudieron ser
mejorados.
Sería interesante retomar la discusión a partir de la propuesta de indicadores
mostrados en la reunión así como conocer si existen experiencias similares al
propuesto en otros países.
The subject is of institutional and personal interest, the presentations were
motivational, linked with the agencies experience, but the timing and
methodology could have been better. It would be interesting to re-take the
discussion based upon the index proposal that was shown in the meeting as
well as know if there are similar experiences in other countries.
La posibilidad de obtener una acreditación internacional y de financiar la
sostenibilidad de los proyectos de cocinas mejoradas. Conocer las
condiciones que se requieren para que las instituciones participen de un
proyecto de esta naturaleza y la posibilidad de discutir la propuesta de
indicadores.
The possibility to gain international accreditation and financing improved
cookstoves project sustainability. Know different required conditions for
institutions to participate in a project of this nature and the possibility to
discuss the index proposal.
El manejo de los tiempos, especialmente el empleado en el análisis de
indicadores, que resultó insuficiente.
Ingresar a una discusión con un público diverso, sin documentación previa
de referencia (propuesta de indicadores) y con una metodología que no
ayudó a ajustar todos los indicadores planteados.
The timing handle, specially the periods dedicated to indicators analysis,
29
Signature
which turned to be insufficient.
Getting inside a discussion with diverse public, without previous reference
documentation (index proposal) and with a methodology that did not help to
adjust all presented indicators.
DNI 07533235
Firma: Mariela Lévano
Name
What is your
impression of the
meeting?
What do you like
about the
project?
What do you not
like about the
project?
Signature
Victor Quinto Ushiñahua
En el evento me dio la impresión de que se estaba haciendo una norma
técnica, es decir que cocina sería la mejor que pueda construirse, en ese
caso, etc.
Pienso que en el evento no estaban presente gente que tal vez no estaba de
acuerdo en dichas condiciones de construcción. Es decir no es un modelo
estándar la dicha construcción, lo que sí me parece que si hay métodos
distintos para su diseño y construcción.
I was under the impression that a technical norm was being made, which is
what improved cookstove is the best to be built. I think that there was not
present people that might have not being in agreement with these terms. I
mean, there is no standard cookstove model, but different methods for its
building up and design.
Que no se llego a una idea concreta, sobre las cocinas en sí, la mayoría de
instituciones presento la experiencias de las comunidades en que se
desarrollaron dichos eventos, (la construcción de la cocina) pero si bien
todas logran su propósito bien.
That no concrete idea was reachedm about cookstoves, most institutions
presented community experiences in which this events took place (the
cookstove construction), but in the end all accomplish their objective.
Que quizás no estuvo bien encaminado en el sentido como lo mencione
antes, el propósito del evento no fue el de hacer o ceñirse en un modelo de
cocina estándar porque eso me dio la impresión.
That it might have not be very well conducted, as mentioned before. The
purpose of this event was not to build or adjust to an standard cookstove
model, because I was under that impression.
DNI: 10614668
Firma: Víctor A. Quinto Ushiñahua
B. 4. Pictures
30
Image 1. Arthur Laurent, in representation of Microsol, exposes POA.
Image 2. Audience listens to expositions.
31
Image 3. People at coffee break.
Image 4. Mauro Fadda, GS Representative, with some beneficiaries.
32
Image 5. Guests have quick luch. Food was made in improved cookstoves within Catolica University.
33
B. 5. Outcome of consultation
i. Minutes of the meeting
In this section we write the questions that were raised once we presented the indicators
and monitoring matrixes.
Q1: Refering to air quality, are you placing pollution indicators or only air quality
indicators? Does this refere to toxic gases or particular material? Are there other
indicators about chemical substances?
Answer: About air quality, we understand it as including also patricular material and
chemical substances but the machines to mesure are very expensive and, as assessing
it it not the main purpose of the monitoring program, we have limited the monitoring to
assess the presence or not of a chimeney, that is to say the capacity to evacuate gases
relate to combustion.
Q2: Do you monitor the eventual parallel use of the older stove? If the older stove
remains, health impact could not be lower ? How to guarantee that the older model of
cookstove is not being used and that the new one is successfull? How will you know that
people are not using both cookstoves? And what about people’s rights? Because it
wouldn’t be appropriate to just go inside their houses and replace their older models of
cookstove.
Answer: Through the project, populations are informed of the negative impact of using
the older stove. We do follow up the presence of the other cookstove through monitoring
nevertheless we do not make it mandatory and leave it to the LPPs criteria. From our
experience and the LPP’s, we can say a great majority of cookstove are removed.
If the older stove is still used, eventual loss in health impact should actually appear whith
monitoring the health impact. As far as GHG reduction is concerned, quantitative
monitoring is made on the general wood consumption in the house so, loss in wood
consumption is also included in the monitoring.
Q3: Usually, people in the highlands want to keep the smoke of the cookstoves within
their household because it warms them up and it is part of their culture. How do we go
against it?
Answer: In the workshops, the benefits of having an improved cookstove are
demonstrated, specially because of health problems: having the smoke out of the house
improve health and reduces risks of respiratory problems. Again, we do not impose the
installation of a cookstove, we try to talk together and see how our efforts can be
complemented. On the other side, the need for heating has to be assessed and it is
included in the monitoring, if populations would use any other device for heating, such
use would be assessed and its corresponding effect on wood consumption and health
would appear.
Q4: About respiratory problems, it has been proved that smoke within the household
34
generates eyes irritability. Actually, people in the highlands know that smoke gathers
closed to the ceiling of their houses, and women tend to cook sitting down, so they don’t
get contact with smoke. Irritability of eyes could be considered as a parameter for
monitoring health impact.
Answer: Ok, such a parameter seems usefull and applicable, we shall try to apply it in the
future.
Q5: As a parameter for health impact you suggest asking if respiratory deseases
occurred during the three month to date of monitoring. Such a large time slot is not
appropriate, you should prefer a few weeks period as larger periods are difficult to
remember. For example a question like: “have you had any cough or cold during last two
weeks”? coul be used. Actually helath ministry uses data regarding respiratory diseases
yo might use.
Q6: We don’t see any specific indicator for health when the main purpose of cookstove
diffusion is to tackle health problems. Would it be possible to make a specific indicator
that for?
Q7: Should there not be specific health impacts in the context of coosktove diffusion
project in Lima ?
Q8: As women are the one who are in charge of cooking and biomass collectinf, a
positive impact on gender issues could not be monitored with related questions and be
included as an indicator ? In general could’nt you monitor behavior changes, let’s say
more qualitative impacts?
Q9: As far as deforestation is concerned, impact should be difficult to assess as other
factors could influence the wood offer.WWhat is the conception of logging that you have?
General logging? Parcial logging? Biomass renewability? Also, what is the indicator used
for forest land? Which studies are you refering to, for this indicator?
Answer: Anual medium growth and family log consumption is the indicator we handle for
logging. We refer to the studies of AgroRural, from the Ministry of Agriculture.
Q10: There is a positive impact as promoters of clean energy services. Why do you place
it as neutral?
Answer: If this is the case, we can place it as positive.
Q11: As improved coosktoves imply using less biomass, deforestation reduces, then soil
is maintained and erosion is reduced so you could consider soil condition being positively
impacted by the project.
Q12: The simple fact of saving forests should be easily related to preserving the
biodiversity living in it if you find relevant documentation showing this.
Q13: The reduction in ash availability could not have a negative impact in agricultural
35
production when ash would be use as an organic fertilizer?
Q14: You have considered impact on quality of employment as neutral, nevertheless
project activities implies job creation, you should be able to easily demonstrate how such
jobs implies beter quality as wages are higher than those in current situation.
Q15: Couldn’t we consider that woods savings induces water preservation thanks to
reduced deforestation, As far as I know, forest coverings induce water preservation...
36
ii. Assessment of comments
[See Toolkit 2.6]
Stakeholder Comment
Q1: Refering to air quality, are
you placing pollution indicators
or only air quality indicators?
Does this refere to toxic gases or
particular material? Are there
other indicators about chemical
substances?
Assessment
Eventual air quality medition
should include patriculated
material and chemical
substances.
Q2: Do you monitor the eventual
parallel use of the older stove? If
the older stove remains, health
impact could not be lower ? How
to guarantee that the older
model of cookstove is not being
used and that the new one is
successfull? How will you know
that people are not using both
cookstoves? And what about
people’s rights? Because it
wouldn’t be appropriate to just
go inside their houses and
replace their older models of
cookstove.
The parallel use of the older
coosktove is a risk as far as helth
impact is concerned, but
compulsory destruction would
not be socially acceptable.
Threw the project, populations
are informed of the negative
impact of using the older stove,
keeping it is their decisions.
As far as GHG reduction is
concerned, quantitative
monitoring is made on the
general wood consumption in the
house so, loss in wood
consumption is also included in
the monitoring.
Q3: Usually, people in the
highlands want to keep the
smoke of the cookstoves within
their household because it
warms them up and it is part of
their culture. How do we go
against it?
Heating is a necessity in some
parts of the proposed project
activity because of high altitude
and corresponding cold climate
so that resistance due to heting
needs is plausible.
Q4: About respiratory problems,
it has been proved that smoke
within the household generates
eyes irritability. Actually, people
in the highlands know that
smoke gathers closed to the
ceiling of their houses, and
women tend to cook sitting
down, so they don’t get contact
In the field, people often mention
old stove disadvantage of eyes
irritating.
Response to comment
Whenever financiary
possible, monitoring
should include the
medition of all mentioned
air quality determinants.
Nevertheless, the
minimum assessment is
the evacuation of smoke
threw the presence of a
chimeney as it is very cost
effective as parameter.
The parapell use of the
older stove shall be
considered having a
counterproductive impact
on air quality and health.
Heating use is assessed in
the monitoring and
whenever detected,
corresponding influence
on health impact will be
taken into account while
influence on GHG
emission is, by definition,
already taken into account.
Whenever possible, such
a parameter could be used
for monitoring health
impact.
37
with smoke. Irritability of eyes
could be considered as a
parameter for monitoring health
impact.
Q5: As a parameter for health
impact you suggest asking if
respiratory deseases occurred
during the three month to date of
monitoring. Such a large time
slot is not appropriate, you
should prefer a few weeks period
as larger periods are difficult to
remember. For example a the
question: “have you had any
cough or cold during last two
weeks?” could be used. Actually
health ministry uses data
regarding respiratory diseases
yo might use.
The recommendation is usefull.
Whenever possible, the
time slot will be reduced
and the specific sentence
proposed will be used.
Q6: We don’t see any specific
indicator for health when the
main purpose of cookstove
diffusion is to tackle health
problems. Would it be possible
to make a specific indicator that
for?
The GS matrix does not consider
specifically health but health can
be included in living conditions.
Matrix purpose if to define wether
impact is negative, null or
positive. Defining a specific
health indicator is thus not
adecuate.
Q7: Should there not be specific
health impacts in the context of
coosktove diffusion project in
Lima ?
We cannot think of any different
impact in Lima.
Health impact will be
assessed threw questions
included in the living
condition indicator but with
adecuate
parameters.Further
specific consideration
about health will then be
possible.
Not relevant.
Q8: As women are the one who
are in charge of cooking and
biomass collecting, a positive
impact on gender issues could
not be monitored with related
questions and be included as an
indicator ? In general could’nt
you monitor behavior changes,
let’s say more qualitative impacts
?
Gender issues are not
considered as such in GS Matrix.
It could thus be included in living
conditions but the additional cost
of such a unnecessary
monitoring could be a barrier for
doing so.
Whenever possible, if
simple question
corresponding is defined,
gender and behaviour
issues might be assessed,
thus, it is not considered
as compulsory.
Q9: As far as deforestation is
concerned, impact should be
difficult to assess as other
factors could influence the wood
offer.WWhat is the conception of
logging that you have? General
logging? Parcial logging?
Other factors could influence the
forestation but it is then not
related to project activity and its
impact should be considered
outside such influences unless
direct relation is demonstrated.
Eventual overconsumption due
Not relevant.
38
Biomass renewability? Also,
what is the indicator used for
forest land? Which studies are
you refering to, for this indicator?
Q10: There is a positive impact
as promoters of clean energy
services. Why do you place it as
neutral?
Q11: As improved coosktoves
imply using less biomass,
deforestation reduces, then soil
is maintained and erosion is
reduced so you could consider
soil condition being positively
impacted by the project.
Q12: The simple fact of saving
forests should be easily related
to preserving the biodiversity
living in it if you find relevant
documentation showing this.
to disponibility is assessed in
leakage 1 (rebound effect) but
shoulf not be considered in the
SD matrix. Other mùentioned
aspects are assessed in NRB
Looking at it that way it, the
impact could be considered as
positive.
Positive impact will be
claimed for.
positive.
Whenever convincing
study is found, positive
impact will be claimed for.
positive.
Whenever convincing
study is found, positive
Q13: The reduction in ash
availability coulf not have a
negative impact in agricultural
production when ash would be
use as an organic fertilizer?
Ash use for fertilizing is not a
massive habit, on the contrary of
dung.
Not relevant.
Q14: You have considered
impact on quality of employment
as neutral, nevertheless project
activities implies job creation,
you should be able to easily
demonstrate how such jobs
implies beter quality as wages
are higher than those in current
situation.
positive.
Whenever convincing data
is obtained, positive
Q15: Couldn’t we consider that
woods savings induces water
preservation thanks to reduced
deforestation, As far as I know,
forest coverings induce water
preservation...
positive.
Whenever convincing data
is obtained, positive
iii. Revisit sustainability assessment
39
[See Toolkit 2.7]
Yes
Are you going to revisit the sustainable
development assessment?
No
x
Give reasoning behind the decision.
Even though we initially though not to be able to demonstrate the positive impact on several indicator,
stakeholder consultation comments brought us ways to do so that we consider as potentially credible.
iv. Summary of alterations based on comments
4 indicators pass from null to positive:
- Soil condition
- Biodiversity
- Quality of employment
- Access to affordable and clean energy services
- Water quality and quantity
SECTION C.
C.1.
Sustainable Development Matrix
Own sustainable development matrix
Indicator
Mitigation
measure
Gold
Standard
indicators of
sustainable
development.
If relevant copy
mitigation
measure from
"do no harm" –
table, or include
mitigation
measure used
to neutralise a
score of ‘–‘
Air quality
Relevance
to achieving
MDG
Check
www.undp.o
r/mdg and
www.mdgm
onitor.org
Chosen parameter and
explanation
Preliminary score
Defined by project developer
Negative impact:
score ‘-‘ in case
negative impact is
not fully mitigated
score 0 in case
impact is planned
to be fully mitigated
No change in
impact: score 0
Positive impact:
score ‘+’
Strong presumption of positive
impact :
- reduction of wood burning induces
a proportional reduction of all toxic
+
Describe
how your
indicator is
related to
local MDG
goals
40
Water quality
and quantity
Soil condition
Other
pollutants
Biodiversity
Quality of
employment
Livelihood of
the poor
Access to
affordable and
clean energy
services
Human and
institutional
capacity
Quantitative
employment
and income
generation
gases,
- bettering of the combustion
through use of the efficient
cookstove1.
No significant impact.
Presumption of positive secondary
impact on soil condition (diminution
of erosion caused by deforestation),
but impossible to assess.
Not relevant.
Strong presumption of positive
secondary impact on biodiversity
conservation (preservation of
ecosystems through diminution of
deforestation), but impossible to
assess.
Presumption of direct positive
impact (technical nature of the jobs,
capacity-building on environment
and health issues for the workers),
but impossible to monitor.
Major positive impact.
+
0
0
0
0
+
The project activities do bring an
improvement to an existing energy
service. It does not facilitate access
to an additional energy service.
The project activities are mainly
based on:
- the empowerment of all actors of
the chain;
- the involvement of the final
beneficiaries.
0
Important direct employment for
construction, capacity building and
consciousness-raising.
Slight long-term employment for
maintenance, follow-up.
+
+
General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves), Aprovecho Center (www.aprovecho.org).
For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation
of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco San Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol
office.
1
41
Balance of
payments and
investment
Technology
transfer and
technological
self-reliance
Not relevant
0
The projects allows a complete
technological self reliance, as it
focuses on:
- Direct knowledge of the
populations;
- Replicability of the technology.
+
Justification choices, data source and provision of references
Air quality
Water quality
and quantity
Soil condition
General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves), Aprovecho
Center (www.aprovecho.org). For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús
Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco San
Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol office.
The project activities do not consider water supply. It has not incidence on this indicator.
Other
pollutants
Biodiversity
Quality of
employment
Livelihood of
the poor
A World Health Organization report2 on the emissions related to the use of cook-stove in the
Cusco region of Peru show a positive impact on the intra-domiciliary air quality. It shows also
that when the user is well trained, the emission of certain gases is almost disappearing from
the house.
Intra-domiciliary smokes being a major cause for respiratory diseases3, the health of the
children and the women is therefore highly improved thanks to the appropriate use of their
improved cook-stove.
Besides, the poverty is therefore reduced thanks to an economy of time or money (the fuel is
either gathered or bought). More time and / or money is available for education / productive
activity purposes.General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves),
“Los efectos de las cocinas tradicionales y las cocinas mejoradas en épocas de friaje en cuatro localidades de extrema
pobreza de las zonas altoandinas del departamento de Cusco, Perú”, Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) –
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), 2007. This document can be consulted on the following web page:
http://www.per.ops-oms.org/doc/seminario-polu/Informe-monitoreo-Cusco.pdf
2
Global information: “Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78 (9)”:
http://www.who.int/docstore/bulletin/pdf/2000/issue9/bul0711.pdf
For the more specific case of Peru: “Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Neumología, vol. 48, n°2”:
http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVrevistas/enfermedades_torax/v48_n2/Pdf/a06.pdf
3
42
Aprovecho Center (www.aprovecho.org). For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis
of Jesús Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”,
Cusco San Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol
office.
For the more specific case of Peru: “Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Neumología, vol. 48,
n°2”: http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVrevistas/enfermedades_torax/v48_n2/Pdf/a06.pdf
Access to
affordable and
clean energy
services
Human and
institutional
capacity
The purpose of the activities is to disseminate as far as possible the knowledge of the
technology and of the proper ways to implement / use it. Firstly, the empowerment will focus on
the workers of the LPPs. Then appropriate training programs will empower directly specific
persons of the communities. In the end, all families will be given the possibility to understand /
maintain & take care of / replicate / use properly their cook-stove.
An appropriate level of involvement of the poorest is then implemented, as the final
beneficiaries are actors and not only beneficiaries of the project. This, besides making possible
a structural change of habits in traditional communities, raises the consciousness of the
poorest in three directions:
- health and related good practices;
- environment and related good practices;
- own ability to better their own life standards
The empowerment, capacity-building and consciousness raising processes defined here are a
formal requisite for any project to enter the PoA. PoA and VPA should be checked in order to
verify this assessment.
Quantitative
employment
and income
generation
Balance of
payments and
investment
Technology
transfer and
technological
self-reliance
The project is fully replicable, and designed to be so. Indeed, the core of the project is to build
a chain of knowledge transfer, that has two purposes:
- That the people who build the technology and who train the users would master the whole
aspects (technical, sociological, methodological) of the technology. This makes the project
sustainable, as the maintenance is permitted within the communities.
- That the people who build the technology and who train the users are local people: this
guarantees that the technological and therefore cultural change is accepted, as it implemented
by the very people who are the final users.
Besides, the project is implemented in coordination with the institutional framework of the
country, and employees from these institutions are trained to manage and accompany this kind
43
of technology-introduction activities.
Direct knowledge and replicability capacity are guaranteed by the project, as it is a formal
requisite for a community to enter the LPPs projects to commit themselves in receiving the
knowledge so that at least a member of the community has this knowledge and is able to
replicate the technology.
PoA and VPA can be checked in order to verify this assessment.
Comments accompanying own sustainable development matrix
C.2.
Outcome Blind sustainable development exercise
[See Toolkit 2.6.1]
Indicator
Mitigation measure
Chosen parameter
and explanation
Score given by stakeholders
Gold Standard
indicators of
sustainable
development.
If relevant copy
mitigation measure
from "do no harm" –
table, or include
mitigation measure
used to neutralise a
score of ‘–‘
Defined by project
developer
Negative impact:
score ‘-‘ in case negative impact
is not fully mitigated
score 0 in case impact is planned
to be fully mitigated
No change in impact: score 0
Positive impact:
score ‘+’
44
Air quality
The presence of a
chimeney as been
found acceptable but
specific factors such
as the presence of
particular material
and toxic gases have
been found usefull
but corresponding
monitoring costs
unadecuate.
Wood fuel savings.
+
Wood fuel savings.
+
Other pollutants
Not relevant.
0
Biodiversity
Wood fuel savings.
+
Quality of
employment
wages of project
workers
Parameters for health
impact such as eye
irritation and cough
and cold during the
last 3 weeks.
+
Water quality and
quantity
Soil condition
Livelihood of the poor
Access to affordable
and clean energy
services
Human and
institutional capacity
Quantitative
employment and
income generation
Balance of payments
and investment
Technology transfer
and technological
self-reliance
+
+
Coosktoves difused.
+
Not been discussed
specifically
Not been discussed
specifically
+
Not been discussed
specifically
Not been discussed
specifically
0
+
+
Comments resulting from the blind sustainable development exercise
Stakeholder consultation has allowed for a major number of indicators with positive scores, giving advices on
way of proof.
Give analysis of difference between own sustainable development table and the one resulting from the blind
exercise with stakeholders. Explain way of consolidation.
As major differences comes from considering simple parameters for some parameters and believing studies
to be available for other indicators, the first type will be directly taken into account without further
consideration and an additional research will be done for accepting the second type. Whenever no relevant
study has been found as opposed to stakeholder consultation declaration, initial scoring will be maintained.
45
C.3.
Consolidated sustainable development matrix
Indicator
Mitigation
measure
Relevance to achieving MDG
Gold
Standard
indicators of
sustainable
development.
If relevant
copy
mitigation
measure from
"do no harm"
–table, or
include
mitigation
measure
used to
neutralise a
score of ‘–‘
For this section we list the 8 goals, in
order to quote them faster in the
following cells.
Goal 1 End poverty and hunger
Goal 2 Universal education
Goal 3 Gender equality
Goal 4 Child Health
Goal 5 Maternal Health
Goal 6 Combat HIV/ AIDS
Goal 7 Environmental Sustainability
Goal 8 Global Partnership
Air quality
Water quality
and quantity
Soil condition
Other
pollutants
Biodiversity
Quality of
employment
Livelihood of
the poor
Access to
affordable
and clean
energy
services
Human and
institutional
capacity
Quantitative
employment
Contributes to goal 4 and 5 as children and
women, specifically pregnant ones, are first
victims of bad indoor air quality.
Contributes to target 7.B in
Water quantity:
- 7.5 Proportion of total water resources
used
Water quality:
- 7.8 Proportion of population using an
improved drinking water source.
Contributes to target 7.B:
7.1 Proportion of land area covered by
forest.
N/A
Chosen
parameter
and
explanatio
n
Defined
by project
developer
Final score
To be
defined at
VPA level
To be
defined at
VPA level
+
To be
defined at
VPA level
N/A
+
Negative impact:
score ‘–‘ in case
negative impact is
not fully mitigated
score 0 in case
impact is planned to
be fully mitigated
No change in
impact: score 0
Positive impact:
score ‘+’
+
0
Contributes to target 7.B: Reduce
biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a
significant reduction in the rate of loss.
Contributes to target 1.B.5. Achieve full and
productive employment and decent work
for all, including women and young people
Contributes to goal 4 and 5 as children and
women, specifically pregnant ones, are first
victims of bad indoor air quality.
Contributes to goal 1 and 4 and 5 as
children and women, specifically pregnant
ones, are first victims of bad indoor air
quality.
To be
defined at
VPA level
To be
defined at
VPA level
To be
defined at
VPA level
To be
defined at
VPA level
+
Contributes to target 7.A: Integrate the
principles of sustainable development into
country policies and programmes and
reverse the loss of environmental
resources.
Contributes to Target 1.B Achieve full and
productive employment and decent work
To be
defined at
VPA level
+
To be
defined at
+
+
+
+
46
and income
generation
Balance of
payments and
investment
Technology
transfer and
technological
self-reliance
for all, including women and young people
-1.5 Employment-to-population ratio. As
this is an extensive program there is no
limit in the amount of workers that would be
needed, considering national boundaries
and norms.
N/A
Contributes to Target 8.F: In cooperation
with the private sector, make available the
benefits of new technologies, especially
information and communications
VPA level
N/A
0
To be
defined at
VPA level
+
Justification choices, data source and provision of references
Air quality
Water quality and
quantity
Biomass cookstoves or traditional cookstoves are usually placed within the household,
therefore the smoke and particulates produced by the combustion affect the people inside
the house. An improved cookstoves on the other side presents a chimeney that helps in
the expulsion of the smoke (along with the particles) to the outside.
General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves), Aprovecho
Center (www.aprovecho.org). Specific on indoor air quality and cookstoves:
http://www.hedon.info/1497/news.htm and
http://www.aprovecho.org/lab/issuelist/indoorair.
For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús Angel Baca Flores
“Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco San Antonio Abad
University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol office.
4
Inefficient use of fuel wood is considered one of the important causes of deforestation .
An improved cookstove permits savings in the biomass fuel used because of the
efficiency level (in comparison with a traditional cookstove), therefore it is considered to
have influence on the biomass stock. So, as it is proved that the forests act as a regulator
for the watersheds that provide water, then implementing improved stoves contributes to
water quality and availability.
General literature:
FAO. Programa Agua y Bosques –Departamento de Foresteria. 2005. Consultado el 13
de Octubre del 2009. On internet: http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/40417/es/ (“Influencia en
el régimen de aguas”, 2nd theme)
Peruvian case: Grupo de Trabajo Multisectorial Preparación del Ministerio del Ambiente.
Diagnostico Ambiental del Perú. 2008. Internet consultation:
http://www.spda.org.pe/portal/_data/spda/documentos/20080331180832_Grupo%20Multi.
pdf (page: 44, 2nd paragraph).
Soil condition
Inefficient use of fuel wood is considered one of the important causes of deforestation5.
4
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V78-47GY924B&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1165330136&_re
runOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=e4f5606a26a831bd54f
3eda24eb6f8f5
5
3eda24eb6f8f5
47
have influence on the biomass stock. So, as it is proved that the forests act as a regulator
for soil condition, then implementing improved stoves contributes to water quality and
availability.
General literature:
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente -PNUMA. La Campaña de los
Mil millones de árboles. On internet:
http://www.unep.org/billiontreecampaign/spanish/FactsFigures/FastFacts/index.asp
(number 13 and 16)
FAO. Programa Agua y Bosques –Departamento de Foresteria. 2005. Consultado el 13
de Octubre del 2009. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/40417/es/ (“Reducción
de la erosión del suelo por la acción del agua”, first theme)
Other pollutants
Biodiversity
SPECIFIC CASE OF PERU
Grupo de Trabajo Multisectorial Preparación del Ministerio del Ambiente. Diagnostico
Ambiental del Perú. 2008. Consultado el 13 de Octubre del 2009. Disponible en:
pdf (page 105, number 50)
No major contribution to reducing other pollutants than those considered in the air quality
indicator can be identified has been identified.
Inefficient use of fuel wood is considered one of the important causes of deforestation6.
have influence on the biomass stock. So, as it is proved that the forests are have a major
contribution to biosiversity conservation, then implementing improved stoves contributes
to water quality and availability.
General Literature:
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente -PNUMA. La Campaña de los
Mil millones de árboles. On the internet:
http://www.unep.org/billiontreecampaign/spanish/FactsFigures/QandA/index.asp (Number
4:“¿Cuales son las funciones protectoras de los bosques?”)
Nath, Bhaskar; Hens, Luc; Compton, Paul & Devuyst, Dimitri, (eds.) Environmental
Management in Practice: Vol. 3: Managing the Ecosystem. 1999. Routledge, London.
ISBN 0 415 18791 5. On the internet:
http://books.google.com.pe/books?id=wA40012ZjM0C&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=Environme
ntal+Management+in+Practice:+Managing+the+ecosystem++Bhaskar+Nath&source=bl&
ots=EqUuQX0GZ&sig=PkWV2AFiPH25pgYoSWWkgA6FxnY&hl=es&ei=ScDUSraVA8eX8Aahz
5yRDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q
=&f=false (page 189, 2nd paragraph)
For the specific case of Peru:
Grupo de Trabajo Multisectorial Preparación del Ministerio del Ambiente. Diagnostico
Ambiental del Perú. 2008. Consultado el 13 de Octubre del 2009. Disponible en:
6
3eda24eb6f8f5
48
pdf (page 145, number 290), (page114, number 106 and 109)
Quality of employment
Livelihood of the poor
In a country with high level of self-employment, being employed with a wage at minimum
level represents a good position especially in a rural context where projects generally
occur.
A World Health Organization report7 on the emissions related to the use of cook-stove in
the Cusco region of Peru show a positive impact on the intra-domiciliary air quality. It
shows also that when the user is well trained, the emission of certain gases is almost
disappearing from the house.
8
Intra-domiciliary smokes being a major cause for respiratory diseases , the health of the
children and the women is therefore highly improved thanks to the appropriate use of their
improved cook-stove.
Besides, the poverty is therefore reduced thanks to an economy of time or money (the
fuel is either gathered or bought). More time and / or money is available for education /
productive activity purposes.General literature: Hedon
(http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves), Aprovecho Center
(www.aprovecho.org). For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús
Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco
San Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol
office.
For the more specific case of Peru: “Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Neumología, vol.
48, n°2”: http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVrevistas/enfermedades_torax/v48_n2/Pdf/a06.pdf
Access to affordable
and clean energy
services
Human and institutional
capacity
The project induces the diffusion of efficient cook-stove which are cost savings and clean
technologies.
The purpose of the activities is to disseminate as far as possible the knowledge of the
technology and of the proper ways to implement / use it. Firstly, the empowerment will
focus on the workers of the LPPs. Then appropriate training programs will empower
directly specific persons of the communities. In the end, all families will be given the
possibility to understand / maintain & take care of / replicate / use properly their cookstove.
An appropriate level of involvement of the poorest is then implemented, as the final
beneficiaries are actors and not only beneficiaries of the project. This, besides making
possible a structural change of habits in traditional communities, raises the consciousness
of the poorest in three directions:
- health and related good practices;
“Los efectos de las cocinas tradicionales y las cocinas mejoradas en épocas de friaje en cuatro localidades de extrema
pobreza de las zonas altoandinas del departamento de Cusco, Perú”, Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) –
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), 2007. This document can be consulted on the following web page:
http://www.onu.org.pe/upload/noticias/Informe_monitoreo_Cusco.pdf
7
http://www.who.int/docstore/bulletin/pdf/2000/issue9/bul0711.pdf (page 1, Resume: paragraph 2 and 3)
For the more specific case of Peru: “Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Neumología, vol. 48, n°2”:
http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVrevistas/enfermedades_torax/v48_n2/Pdf/a06.pdf (page 1, Resume: paragraph 5 and 6)
8
49
Quantitative
employment and
income generation
Balance of payments
and investment
Technology transfer
and technological selfreliance
- environment and related good practices;
- own ability to better their own life standards
The empowerment, capacity-building and consciousness raising processes defined here
are a formal requisite for any project to enter the PoA.
Projects induce personal contracting for coordination and for technical profession on the
fields. For this job local people of the community are often contracted. Those job mean
income generation. As well as wood savings mean direct (when buying fuel) or indirect
(saving time) income.
The level of importation due to project activity should be assessed. As a requirement is to
favor local materials and the one and only material that could be produced with imported
material is iron spare parts (that definitively could not be considered as significant in
relation with general iron importation) an impact on balance of payment is very unlikely.
LPPs are due to transfer knowledge at community level so impact is positive for project
participant.
50
SECTION D. Preparation of Stakeholder Feedback Round
Based on the outcome of stakeholder consultation process, we will submit our new matrix to all email addresses signed up in the participants list. Nevertheless, a link will be posted at our website
were the report will be downloadable for every user.
This is the schedule we will follow.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Preparation of website information to be downloaded.
Invitations to see the new matrix.
Reception of comments.
Until
Process and validation from comments
Until
Final report
Friday 23th October
Monday 26th October
Friday 6 th November
Friday the 13 th November
Monday 16th November
We consider that online feedback round will be faster and more effectively than a live one
because:
-
All information is easily canalized because of the placed items of discussion
It is adjustable for everyone’s time, considering that all of our invitees belong to some type
of institution and have regular jobs.
It allows also the ones that did not attend the consultation, so we can have new
perspectives and opinions.
Initially, we consider prudent to keep a two week period for checking the new matrix, so everyone
can have enough time besides their own time limitations. After this time, we didn’t receive any
comments.
Eventually this time period was extended up for two months. For that, we posted at our official
website all relevant information for stakeholder comments. This can be found in:
http://www.microsol-int.com/consulta%20publica.php.
This website is open up to date. Still, we didn’t receive any more comments.
51
Annex 1: Participant list
52
53
54
55
Annex 2: Feedback forms
As we received feedback forms through the mail, we have no prints of them, but the
reception dates of those e-mails, which are:
Name
Carlos Aparicio Arrieta
Mariela Lévano
Víctor A. Quinto Ushiñahua
Carlos Landa Ponte
Date
October 2nd
September 30th
September 30th
October 1st
56

Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation

Transcripción

Documentos relacionados

as PDF - Panama Real Estate Properties

After the rally

Rancho de Polo La Martina, excelente propiedad u