Red Shoveler in South America
Transcripción
Red Shoveler in South America
Red Shoveler in South America Scientific name: Anas platalea Family: Anatidae Spanish name: Pato cuchara Migration: Partial Neotropical migrant Population estimate: 25,000-100,000 Trend: Stable Ramsar Criterion 6 (1% level): 1,000 IUCN Conservation status: Not known to have unfavourable conservation status Distribution and abundances Distributes in southern South America, from Tierra del Fuego and Malvinas / Falkland Islands to south-eastern Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia and southern Peru. Highest abundances recorded in central Chile and within inland Patagonia (moulting and staging sites are lakes of inland Santa Cruz province, in Argentina) and the Pampas of Argentina (see Abundances map). Sites reaching the 1% threshold (Ramsar Convention Criterion No. 6), between others are: Tranque San Rafael and Batuco, in central Chile, and Laguna Los Huaicos, Lagunas cloacales near Trelew city (Chubut province), Laguna Las Tunas, Laguna Mar Chiquita and Bañados del Río Dulce, Laguna La Brava, Laguna Melincué, Laguna La Salada and Laguna Miramar in Argentina. Migration and seasonality Southern population migrates northward in austral autumn / winter to northern Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and as far as southeastern Brazil and southern Peru. Northward migration occurs along the western, central and eastern Argentina routes. Some populations spend the whole year in Patagonia (see Seasonality map). Habitat Shallow brackish and fresh-water lakes, lagoons and marshes with dense vegetation. Also in flooded grasslands, estuaries and tidal creeks, streams and sewer lagoons. Less common in marine coasts. Habits and interactions with human activities Gregarious, sometimes in groups of hundreds during the non-breeding season and in mixed flocks with other duck species. In Patagonia recorded in big numbers in urban lagoons and sewer lagoons. High grazing of sheep and goat has reduced the breeding success of Patagonian populations. Bibliography Albrieu, C., S. Imberti & S. Ferrari. 2004. Las aves de la Patagonia Sur - El Estuario del Río Gallegos y zonas aledañas. Ed. Univ. Nac. Patagonia Austral, Río Gallegos. 204 pp. Canevari, M., P. Canevari, G.R. Carrizo, G. Harris, J. Rodríguez Mata & R. Straneck. 1991. Nueva Guía de las Aves Argentinas. Fundación Acindar. Santiago de Chile. Tome I: 200 pp. and Tome II: 182 pp. del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott & J. Sargatal (eds). 1992. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1. Ostrich to Ducks. Lynx Ed., Barcelona. Fjeldsa, J. & N. Krabbe. 1990. Birds of the High Andes. Zoological Museum, Univ. of Copenhagen, Denmark. Narosky, T. & D. Yzurieta. 1987. Guía para la identificación de las aves de Argentina y Uruguay. Asoc. Ornitológica del Plata. Vázquez Manzini Ed. Buenos Aires. 345 pp. Olrog, C.C. 1963. Lista y distribución de las aves argentinas. Opera Lilloana IX, Tucumán. Olrog, C.C. 1968. Las aves sudamericanas: Una guía de campo. Tomo I. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Fundación - Instituto Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina. Rodríguez Mata, J., F. Erize & M. Rumboll. 2006. Guía de Campo Collins – Aves de Sudamérica: No Passeriformes. Harper Collins Ltd. Wetlands International. 2006. Waterbird Population Estimates – Fourth Edition. Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Woods, R.W. & Anne Woods. 1997. Atlas of Breeding birds of the Falkland Islands. Anthony Nelson, England. 190 pp. Authors: Daniel E. Blanco, Román Baigún & Bernabé López-Lanús Data compiler: Ignacio Roesler Photographer: Roberto Güller Recommended citation: Blanco D.E., R. Baigún & B. López-Lanús. 2008. Red Shoveler in South America factsheet. Wetlands International for the Global Avian Influenza Network for Surveillance / WCS / USAID. This factsheet and maps were made possible through support provided by the Office of Health, Infectious Disease and Nutrition, Bureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development and Wildlife Conservation Society, under the terms of Leader Award No.LAG-A-00-99-00047-00, Cooperative Agreement: GHS-A-00-0600005. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development or Wildlife Conservation Society.