S-VHI - ResearchPosters.com
Transcripción
S-VHI - ResearchPosters.com
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Singing Voice Handicap Index (S-VHI) Into Spanish Faustino Nuñez-Batalla M.D.1, Isabel Garcia-Perez M.D.2 1 HUCA, Universidad de Oviedo, Asturias (Spain), 2Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid (Spain) ABSTRACT Objectives: 1. To validate the Spanish translation of the disorder-specific health status instrument (Singing Voice Handicap Index: S-VHI) in order to use it with patients with singing problems. 2. To determine the S-VHI threshold of a healthy population of professional classical singers. Methods: The S-VHI was translated into Spanish from a validated English version. The questionnaire was completed by 29 dysphonic singers and 81 healthy singers between January and December 2009. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity were assessed. Results: Results showed high test-retest reliability (r = 0.63, P = .000) and high itemtotal correlation for the Spanish version of the S-VHI. Internal consistency demonstrated a Cronbach´s alpha of 0.96, and the correlation between the S-VHI and the self-rated singing voice impairment was 0.52 (p = .000). Dysphonic singers had worse S-VHI scores than normal singers (ANOVA, F = 10.9, P <002). Conclusions: The Spanish version of the questionnaire is a validated tool with proper internal consistency and reliability. The average score of the S-VHI in healthy singers is 20% of the maximum possible score of the questionnaire, well above the average score in a healthy population for the spoken voice with VHI-30 (6.7%). INTRODUCTION The self-evaluation of the voice, although subjective by definition, is of growing importance in daily clinical practice since it is the patient who has to live with his/her voice. Social and cultural aspects may also be relevant when considering voice quality. This evaluation needs careful quantification as it is paramount, and needs to be compared and correlated with the data of the objective assessment. Prior reports have demonstrated that voice disorders adversely impact patients´ lives, specifically on their physical, social, emotional and economic areas. A Voice Handicap Index (VHI) can be computed on the base of the patient's answers to a carefully selected list of questions. Singers represent a unique patient population at a high risk for voice impairment and more vocal disability. Voice disorders and their impact upon the individual differ between singers and non-singers. VHI do not adequately address the voice problems in singers, consequently a disorder-specific health status instrument (Singing Voice Handicap Index) was developed and validated in order to use it with singers with voice problems. The aim of the present study was to test the psychometric properties of the Spanish Singing Voice Handicap Index (S-VHI) and to confirm its validity for the Spanish-speaking population. METHODS AND MATERIALS A Spanish version of the original English S-VHI was developed for the present study. After the translation of the Spanish S-VHI, a group of voice care professionals, singing professors and singers were interviewed to discuss the items in the Spanish S-VHI. Wordings of the questionnaire were modified on the basis of their suggestions. Participants: The questionnaire was completed by 29 dysphonic singers and 81 healthy singers between January and December 2009 (95.4% professional singers: 84.5% classical and 15.4% pop-rock). CONTACT Faustino Nunez-Batalla Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias Email: [email protected] Phone: +34630800581 Poster Design & Printing by Genigraphics® - 800.790.4001 Procedure: Each participant completed the Spanish S-VHI questionnaire on his/her own. The patients were also asked to self-rate their overall severity of singing related voice symptoms using a fourpoint scale. The test was administrated again 2 weeks later, the participants did not receive therapeutic intervention within this period. Statistical tests were performed using the SPSS 15.0 statistical software. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, item-total correlation and construct validity were performed. Spanish S-VHI Instrucciones: A través del uso de la escala que se le provee a continuación, enumere cada una de las aseveraciones siguientes, según lo que aplique para su caso. 0= Nunca 1= Casi nunca Siempre 2= A veces 3= Casi siempre 4= 1. Me cuesta mucho esfuerzo cantar. 2. Mi voz carece de fuerza y se rompe. 3. Me siento frustrado con mi forma de cantar. 4. Cuando canto, la gente me pregunta: ¿qué le pasa a tu voz? 5. Mi habilidad para cantar varía de un día para otro. 6. Mi voz se va cuando canto. 7. Mi voz cantada me disgusta. 8. Mis problemas para cantar hacen que no desee cantar/actuar. 9. Me da vergüenza cantar. 10. Soy incapaz de cantar en el registro agudo. 11. Me pongo nervioso antes de cantar debido a mis problemas para cantar. 12. Mi voz hablada no es normal. 13. Tengo la garganta seca cuando canto. 14. He tenido que eliminar ciertos temas de mi repertorio. 15. No tengo confianza en mi voz cantada. 16. Mi voz cantada nunca es normal. 17. Me cuesta que mi voz haga lo que quiero. 18. Tengo que hacer esfuerzo para que me salga la voz cuando canto. 19. Me cuesta controlar el aire en la voz. 20. Tengo problemas para controlar la aspereza en mi voz. 21. Tengo problemas al cantar fuerte. 22. Tengo problemas para mantener la afinación mientras canto. 23. Me siento agobiado por mi forma de cantar. 24. Mi canto suena forzado. 25. Mi voz hablada suena ronca después de cantar. 26. La calidad de mi voz es variable. 27. Al público le cuesta oír mi voz cuando canto. 28. Mi forma de cantar me hace sentirme en desventaja. 29. Mi voz cantada se cansa fácilmente. 30. Siento dolor, picor o ahogo cuando canto. 31. No me siento seguro de lo que va a salir cuando canto. 32. Siento que falta algo en mi vida por mis limitaciones para cantar. 33. Me preocupa que mis problemas para cantar me hagan perder dinero. 34. Me siento excluido de la escena musical por mi voz. 35. Mi forma de cantar me hace sentirme incompetente. 36. Tengo que cancelar actuaciones, contratos, ensayos o clases por mi forma de cantar. RESULTS DISCUSSION Test-retest reliability: Forty-two of 110 singers (38.1%) completed the S-VHI twice over a period of 2 to 8 weeks. Strong test-retest reliability for the total scores of the questionnaire was found (r=0.63; p=.000). The results showed strong test-retest reliability and internal consistency for the Spanish S-VHI. The construct validity was supported by the findings that the total scores were significantly correlated with the participants’ self-perceived overall singing voice condition. Dysphonic patients had significantly higher mean total scores than the control group, which supports the use of the S-VHI to separate dysphonic and non-dysphonic groups. The second aim of this study was to determine the S-VHI threshold of a healthy population of professional classical singers. A striking fact was that among healthy singers, when asked their opinion about their singing voice, only nine people (8.7%) of 83 answered that it was a perfect voice while the rest replied that it felt as a most normal voice but could be better (score 2 of 5). This observation is also transferred to the scores of the S-VHI, where a high basal score was found. Contrary to what one might expect, the scores of the healthy singers do not tend to zero, but have a mean of 28.4 ±18.5 points, 19.7% of the maximum possible score of 144 points. Compared to what happens in non-singers, with the baseline score of the VHI (baseline scores of 8.1 ± 9.8 points or 6.75% of the maximum possible score of 120 points), it is found that self-assessment of the singing voice on controls using the S-VHI tends to have high baseline values, therefore demonstrating the high vocal demands of this unique patient population. Internal Consistency and Item-Total correlation: Overall reliability analysis included answers from all participants. Cronbach´s alpha showed that the S-VHI was reliable (α=0.966). A review of the individual items showed that all items in both tests had high item-total correlations (Table 3). Construct validity: Significant correlations were demonstrated between the self-rated overall severity of the voice handicap and the total scores of S-VHI (r=0.52; p=.000). The total scores for the control group were significantly lower than those of the patients group (ANOVA f=10.9; p=.002). Diagnoses of final patient cohort Table 1 ♂ ♀ Mean Age (range) 13 (46.4%) 16 (53.6%) 37.8 years (21-54 years) N Patient cohort: 29 Exudative lesions of Reinke`s space Muscular tension dysphonia Laryngitis Vocal cyst Vascular lesions Granuloma Vocal abuse 5 5 6 3 3 1 6 Control group: 81 33 (40.7%) 48 (59.2%) 36.5 years (20-55 years) Total 110 46 64 35.8 years Parameter Table 2: Acoustic parameters Table 3: Item-total correlation CONCLUSIONS Percent Jitter (>0.6%) 19% Shimmer (>6.5%) 66.6% Noise (>2.5) 38% MPT (< 11 seg) 28.5% s/a Index (>1.4) 47.6% GRBAS •Grade 1 •Grade 2 88% 12% Yanagihara •Grade I •Grade II •Grade III •Grade IV 52% 14.2% 23.8% 4.7% This study developed a Spanish version of S-VHI and tested its reliability and validity. High test-retest reliability and high item-total correlation were found. The Spanish S-VHI was also able to distinguish between the dysphonic group and the control group of singers. The scores of the healthy singers do not tend to zero but have a mean of 28.4 ±18.5 points, 19.7% of the maximum possible score, well above the average score in a healthy population for the spoken voice with VHI-30 (6.7%). REFERENCES Item 1 0.72 Item 13 0.53 Item 25 0.59 2 0.62 14 0.50 26 0.61 3 0.71 15 0.71 27 0.51 4 0.61 16 0.66 28 0.68 5 0.56 17 0.63 29 0.60 6 0.65 18 0.69 30 0.60 7 0.65 19 0.62 31 0.68 8 0.49 20 0.61 32 0.64 9 0.45 21 0.58 33 0.54 10 0.61 22 0.51 34 0.56 11 0.67 23 0.70 35 0.65 12 0.50 24 0.69 36 0.60 1. Cohen SM, Jacobson BH, Garrett CG et al. Creation and validation of the singing voice handicap index. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007; 116: 402-406. 2. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1997; 6: 66-70. 3. Cohen SM, Witsell DL, Scearce L, Vess G, Banka C. Treatment responsiveness of the singing voice handicap index. Laryngoscope 2008; 118: 1705-1708. 4. Núñez-Batalla F, Corte-Santos P, Señaris-González B et al. Adaptación y Validación del Índice de Incapacidad Vocal (VHI-30) y su Versión Abreviada (VHI-10) al Español. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2007; 58:386-92.