Carr, J.L. and A. AJmendariz. 1990. Contribucion al conocimiento de

Carr, J.L. and A. AJmendariz. 1990. Contribucion al conocimiento de

Carr, J.L. and A. AJmendariz. 1990. Contribucion al conocimiento de la distribucion geografica de los quelonios del Ecuador occidental.
Polite'cnica, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Serie Biologia 2): 75-103.
ERRATA
p. 76, left column, 2nd line from the bottom, should read Siebenrock, 1907, instead of 1987.
p.79, right column, 3rd line of Ejempiares examinados should read ... (USNM 204050);
p. 81, right column, 3rd line should read Cinosternon sp.: ...
p. 83, left column, 5th line should read (EPN 106; ...
p. 83, left column, 10th line should read (JLC 324-325); ...
p. 83, left column, 2nd paragraph, 1st line should read Guayaquil, Rio ...
p. 83, right column, 7th line should read, Los ejemplares de Santo Domingo ya no existen ...
p. 84, left column, 5th line under Geoemvda annulata should read Wermuth y Mertens ...
p. 84, left column, 22nd line should read ... Mertens ...
p. 86, right column, 2nd paragraph, 18th line should read annulata esta presente ...
p. 87, left column, 3rd line should read ... Obst, 1986).
p. 87, right column, 2nd Jine of Ejemplares examinados should read (PCHP 2432-2440)
p. 91, left column, 2nd line should read 204055-56); ...
p. 92, right column, next to last line should read Buliin [San Francisco]
p. 93, right column, 9th line should read Duellman ...
p. 94, last line should read ... reptiles ...
p. 95, 15th line should read (Geoclemmvs melanosterna)
p. 95, 17th line should read Notes on three ...
p. 96, 3rd line should read ... Serie J721, CT-NI-E4, ...
p. 96, 13th line should read (Chelvdra serpentina acutirostris)
p. 97, 6th line should read ... viii + 152 pp.
p. 98, 1st line should read Cont. Herp. 2: x + 403 pp.
p. 98, before Siebenrock, 1909, should appear the following citation:
Siebenrock, F. 1907. Die Schildkrotenfamilie Cinosternidae. Sitzungberg. Akad. Wiss. Wien 116:527-599.
p. 99, 20th line should end with (2)
p. 101, 12th line should read ... al NE de Samborondon
p. 101, 23rd line should read ... en la margen izquierda ...
p. 102, 9th line should read ... en la margen izquierda ...
[This English translation is being provided to potential readers who might not otherwise
make ready use of the Spanish original. JLC]
CONTRIBUCION AL CONOCIMIENTO SOBRE LA DISTRIBUCION
GEOGRARCA DE LOS QUELONIOS DEL ECUADOR OCCIDENTAL
John L Carr
Department of Zoology. Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL 62901-6501, USA
Ana Almenddriz
Departamento de Ciencias Biofegieas
Escuela PoliUcnica Nacional
RESUMEN
Se presenta una clave para las cinco especies de tortugas terrestres y de agua
dulce encontrados en el Ecuador Occidental. La informacidn de cada especie incluye
referencias de los especf menes examlnados y de los reglstros de la literatura, asf como
una discusidn detallada de ciertas localidades err6nias o problemiticas. Ademas, se
adjunta un indlce toponfmico de todos los lugares mencionados en el texto.
ABSTRACT
A key for the five species of terrestrial and freshwater turtles found in western
Ecuador is presented. An account for each species includes reference to specimens
examined and literature records, as well as a detailed discussion of certain erroneous or
problematic localities. A completely cross-referenced gazetteer is included for all place
names mentioned in the text.
INTRODUCTION
Ecuador is readily divided into four major geographic areas: Amazonian
lowlands, Andean Cordillera, Pacific lowlands, and the Galapagos archipelago.
Terrestrial or freshwater turtles are found in three of these areas. The tortoises of the
GaUpagos have been the object of a great deal of research, but the mainland turtle
faunas have been largely overlooked. The Andes divide the mainland turtle fauna into
two discrete and distantly related units. There are no species shared between the
mostly pleurodlran turtle fauna of the Amazonian area and the entirely cryptodiran fauna
of the Pacific lowlands.
The distribution of freshwater and terrestrial turtles in the Pacific lowlands of
western Ecuador is of zoogeographic interest as the southernmost extent of the range
for all five species occurring there. This trans-Andean turtle fauna is ah extension of the
Chocoan fauna from Colombia, associated with the wet Chocoan rainforest. The
Chocoan fauna is in turn strongly related to the Caribbean fauna of lower Central
America. Farther south in Ecuador, more of the Pacific lowlands are covered with dry
forest formations. The climate and vegetation are influenced by opposing offshore
currents which meet near the equator, and are dominant factors influencing the
zoogeography of the Pacific lowlands (Peters, 1960).
Most references to turtles in western Ecuador have occurred as reports of single
or very few specimens (Gunther, 1860; Cope, 1868; Boulenger, 1882, 1898, 1902a;
Peracca, 1904; Siebenrock. 1907; Vaillant, 1911). Three of the five taxa were described
on the basis of material from western Ecuador (Gray, 1860; Peters, 1862; Boulenger,
1902b). Orws V. (1949) is the only author to have addressed the distribution of
Ecuadorian turtles specifically, and in a comprehensive manner based on many
specimens of several taxa.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss literature records and present new
information regarding the distribution of turtles in western Ecuador.
METHODS
The organization of this report is similar to that adopted by Peters (1960, 1967)
for his snake and lizard checklists. A key for the five turtle species in western Ecuador is
followed by an account for each species and a distribution map. A gazetteer of localities
mentioned in the species accounts is included.
Each account contains the following information: a synonymy with name
combinations and subsequent usages for known references based upon specimens from
Ecuador, and significant reviews, checklists, and catalogs of turtles which have
mentioned Ecuador in the range description; and type locality and museum numbers of
the type specimens for the three turtles described from western Ecuador. The
synonymy Is followed by an account of common names used in Ecuador. The
specimens examined section is grouped by province, with localities listed alphabetically
by place name. Specimens known to be from Ecuador, but without specific locality data
are referenced also. Literature records are referred to with a literature citation rather
than a museum number. A comments section contains a general statement of
distribution In western Ecuador and remarks about problems of taxonomy or distribution.
The specimens examined are from museum collections In the United States and
Ecuador, and are identified with the museum abbreviations recommended by Leviton et
al. (1985). Type specimens in two European museums have not been examined. The
following list includes the collection abbreviations used in the species accounts.
AMNH - American Museum of Natural History, New York
BMNH - British Museum (Natural History), London
CAS - California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco
EPN - Escuela PoliUcnica Nacional, Quito
JLC - J.L Carr field number
KU - Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas
MCZ - Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University
MECN - Museo Ecuatoriano de Ciencias Naturales, Quito
MVZ - Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Berkeley
PCHP - private collection of Peter C.H. Pritchard
UCE - Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito
UMMZ - University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor
USNM - National Museum of Natural History, Washington
ZMB - Museum fur Naturkunde, Berlin
OMISSIONS
Two species of tortoises have been reported from western Ecuador, but we
consider them erroneous records based upon translocated specimens. Cope (1868)
reported a specimen of Testudo eJeohantopus (» Geochelone niqra fide Pritchard, 1986)
obtained by the Orton expedition in Guayaquil. The specimen almost certainly was
USNM 6692, which is no longer in the collection (R.P. Reynolds, in litt). It must have
been transported from the GaUpagos Islands, for which Guayaquil was the usual
mainland port of departure and arrival. Captive tortoises from the GaUpagos may still be
found in and around Guayaquil (R.P. Reynolds, pers. comm.).
Orc*s V. (1949) reported Testudo denticulata (= Geochelone denticulata) from
two localities (near Guayaquil and Esmeraldas) in western Ecuador. According to
Professor Orc<§s (pers. comm.), it dealt with two specimens maintained in captivity for
some time and sold or donated to Dr. Spillman in Guayaquil. This species otherwise is
considered to have an Amazonian distribution (e.g. Pritchard and Trebbau, 1984).
Lacking evidence that any tortoise species occurs naturally on the Pacific versant of
mainland Ecuador, we conclude that Geochelone denticulata specimens in Ecuador all
originated in the Amazonian lowlands. It is apparently common for this species from
Amazonian Ecuador to be transported to the Pacific lowlands and the intermontane
basins (A. Almendariz, pers. obs.). For example, we were offered a large tortoise sheH in
1986 in a remote area of Esmeraldas Province. Upon inquiring it was said to have come
from Napo Province (in Amazonia). Advances in transportation systems and increased
mobility of the lowland human population may eventually result in the establishment of
tortoise populations In the Pacific lowlands.
Pichincha : Centro Cientffico Rfo Palenque, 47 km S of Santo Domingo de los
KEY TO THE FRESHWATER AND TERRESTRIAL
TURTLES OF WESTERN ECUADOR
1A
B.
2.A.
B.
3A
B.
Colorados. 150-220 m (USNM 285506-09); Estacian Biologica Rfo Palenque, 56 km N
Carapace with 11 marginal scutes on each side; plastron with two transverse
hinges
Kinosternidae fKinosternon leucostomum
postinauinale)
Carapace with 12 marginal scutes on each side; plastron without obvious
transverse hinges ... 2
Carapacial margin strongly serrated posteriorly; plastron cruciform, without an
anal notch; tail long with dorsal osteoderms
(Chelvdra serpentina acutirostris)
Chelydridae
Carapacial margin not, or only slightly, serrated posteriorly; extensive plastron
with an anal notch; tail relatively short, without dorsal protuberances
3 (Rhinoclemmvs)
Carapace usually with some yellow coloration on the middorsa! keel; bridge
completely dark brown or black; dorsal surface of the head without bright or
distinct stripes
.£. annulata
Carapace with a darkly colored mid-dorsal keel, which is not lighter than the
lateral areas of the carapace; bridge some shade of yellow; dorsolateral surface
of the head with distinct yellowish stripes
Quevedo (KU 146745); Estacian Cientfflca Rfo Palenque (MCZ 162883); Santo Domingo
de los Colorados (KU 179510. UMMZ 123174); 11 km S Santo Domingo de los
Colorados (KU 146746); 15 km N Santo Domingo de los Colorados, 500 m (AMNH
110613); Hacienda Equinox, 30 km NNW of Santo Domingo de los Colorados. 1000 ft
(USNM 204047); 200 yd. W of R.o Blanco at Equator, 32 km NNW Santo Domingo de
los Colorados, 1000 ft (USNM 204048-49).
UTERATURE RECORDS.- Esmeraldas : no specific locality (Vaillant, 1911); Rio Durango.
350 ft. (Boulenger, 1902); Rfo Mataje (Medem, 1977); San Javier, 60 ft. (Boulenger,
1902). Guayas : Duran (Medem. 1977); Guayaquil (Cope, 1868); Isla de Silva (Orces V.,
1949).
COMMENTS.- Medem (1977) reviewed the distribution of this turtle throughout its range.
Chelvdra seroentina acutirostris was described from Ecuador (Peters, 1862), and has
been recorded from Ecuador many times in the primary and secondary literature.
Known localities in Ecuador extend from the R«o Mataje on the border with Colombia to
Guayaquil in the south, at elevations of 600 meters or less (Fig. 1).
Family Kinosternidae
4
4.A.
B.
Entire central portion of plastron black or dark brown; dorsolateral head stripe
yellow, extending from snout to back of head; axillary and inguinal pockets
bright golden yellow with black markings
fl. melanosterna
Plastron largely pale cream or yellow, with a black spot or smudge on each
scute; dorsolateral head stripe pale yellow and discontinuous over the eyes;
axillary and inguinal pockets unmarked, uniformly pale yellow to gray
£. nasuta
SPECIES ACCOUNTS
Order Testudines
Family Chelydridae
Chelvdra serpentina acutirostris Peters
Chelvdra serpentina var. acutirostris Peters, 1862:627.
Type locality: Guayaquil (ZMB 4500).
Chelvdra serpentina: Cope (1868:96); Siebenrock (1909:434); Freiberg (1979:114); Albuja
et al. (1980:23); Pritchard (1985:230); Iverson (1986:13).
Chelvdra Rossianonii: Boulenger (1902:50); Vaillant (1911).
Chelvdra serpentina acutirostris: Muller (1939:98); Peters (1955:341); Mertens and
Wermuth (1955:333); Wermuth and Mertens (1961:6, 1977:2); Donoso-Barros
(1965:1); Pritchard (1967:57); Medem (1977:41); Patzelt (1979:179); Miyata
(1982:11); Pritchard and Trebbau (1984:12).
Chelvdra acutirostris: Orcds V. (1949:18).
NOMBRES LOCALES.- Tortugana" is used throughout the Rfo Cayapas basin. Medem
(1977) reported the use of "tortugana" or "tortugana" along the Ecuadorian coast.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED.- Esmeraldas : without specific locality (EPN 43, 49, 72, 78);
near Cachavf, ca. 20 m (USNM 204050); Finca "La Esperanza", Concepcion (USNM
281873-74); near Rfo Santiago, vicinity of Concepcten (JLC 292[MECN], EPN 196); El
Pan (EPN 2654); vicinity of La Boca (EPN 86, USNM 281875).
Guayas : Guayaquil (USNM 66875); Isla de Silva, nr. Guayaquil (EPN 81, 82); nr.
Quevedo, cabeceras del Rfo Congo (USNM 204051).
Kinosternon leucostomum postinauinale (Cope)
Cinosternon sp.: Boulenger (1882:457).
Cinosternum postinauinale Cope. 1887:23; replacement name for C. breviaulare Cope
(1885:389), a primary junior homonym of Q. brevtaulare Gunther (1885:17).
Cinosternum leucostomum: Boulenger (1898:108); Peracca (1904:2); Siebenrock
(1907:595. 1909:446).
Kinosternon leucostomum: Muller (1939:98); Pritchard (1985:230); Iverson (1986:121).
Kinosternon aff. spurrelli: Orc*s V. (1949:18. 21).
Kinosternon leucostomum spurrelli: Pritchard (1979:529); Pritchard and Trebbau
(1984:12).
Kinosternon spurelll: Patzelt (1979:93). (incorrect subsequent spelling)
Klnostemon leucostomum postinauinale: Smith and Smith (1980:77).
Kinosternon spurrelli: Albuja et al. (1980:23); Miyata (1982:11).
NOMBRES LOCALES.- Tapacuio" is used throughout western Ecuador, as it is in
Colombia (Mittermeier et al., 1980).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED.- Esmeraldas : Rfo Cachavf (EPN 26. 41, 52); nr. Rfo Santiago,
vie. Concepci6n (JLC 274, 275); Rfo Bogota, nr. Concepcidn (JLC 277); Rfo Bogota at
Concepcion (USNM 281876); Finca "La Esperanza". Concepcidn (EPN 106; JLC 289, 298;
USNM 281877); Estero El Ceibo (JLC 315); El Pan (EPN 2561-62. 2656); Glga City
(USNM 20607); vie. La Boca (EPN 53-55); Luis Vargas Torres (EPN 38-39, 47 51); Playa
Grande (JLC 324-325); San Jose de Tagua (EPN 104-105; JLC 299); region of R.o
Santiago (USNM 204059); Finca "Chuju*. Rfo Santiago (EPN 195); Santiago River
(USNM 20606).
Guayas : Guayaquil, Guaymas [= Guayas] River (USNM 94337-339); Pascuales (EPN
40).
Pichincha : Centro Clentiflco Rfo Palenque (USNM 285511-13); Hacienda Equinox, 30
km WNW of Santo Domingo de los Colorados (USNM 204058); San Miguel de los
Colorados (USNM 204057).
UTERATURE RECORDS.- Esmeraldas : Rio Bogota, Rio Durango (Siebenrock, 1907).
Guayas : Puente del Chimbo (Boulenger, 1898); Chimbo (» Puente del Chimbo of
Bouienger, 1898], Guayaquil (Siebenrock, 1907); market in Guayaquil (Pritchard, 1967).
Los Rios: Vinces (Peracca, 1904). Pichincha : Nanegal (Boulenger, 1882).
COMMENTS.- Orc6s V. (1949) reported upon several specimens of Kinosternon from
western Ecuador. Me suggested that a specimen from Guayaquil resembled K spurrelli
or K. postinauinale. and that others from Santo Domingo de los Colorados possibly
resembled j<. dunnl. The specimens from Santo Domingo no longer exist (G. Orc*s V.,
pers. comm.). All specimens of Kinosternon from western Ecuador that we have
examined, including those from the vicinity of Santo Domingo, represent the species K.
leucostomum. As suggested by Legler (1965) and Moll and Legler (1971). we refer the
Ecuadorian K. leucostpmiim to the subspecies K. leucostomum postinauinale. and the
name Kinosternon spurrelli is considered a junior synonym of this subspecies.
Pritchard and Trebbau (1984) listed Peru in the distribution of K. leucostomum
spurrelH. and Pritchard (1985) stated that K. leucostomum ranges as far south as
northern Peru along the Pacific coast. The record for Peru is based on an
undocumented sighting by a second party (P.C.H. Pritchard. 1988. in litt.). We could not
locate any museum specimens of K. leucostomum from Peru, nor have other compilers
of distributional information recorded this species from Peru (Carrillo de Espinoza, 1970;
Carrillo de Espinoza. 1987, In litt.; Iverson. 1986).
Records for K. leucostomum In Ecuador range from the Colombian border south
to Guayaquil, from near sea level to approximately 1400 meters (Fig. 2).
Family Emydidae
Rhinoclemmvs annulata (Gray)
Geodemmvs annulata Gray. 1860:231.
Type locality: Esmeraldas (BMNH 1946.1.22.56. 1947.3.5.58-59).
Nlcorla annulata: Boulenger (1889:126, 1898:108).
Geoemvda annulata: Siebenrock (1909:499); Vaillant (1911:48); Wettstein (1934:18);
Muller (1939:100); Orcas V. (1949:19); Mertens and Wermuth (1955:350);
Wermuth and Mertens (1961:83); Donoso-Barros (1965:3); Pritchard (1967:112);
Freiberg (1979:51).
Geoemvda (Rhinoclemmvs) annulata: Wermuth and Mertens (1977:29).
Calloosis annulata: Ernst (1978:116).
Rhinoclemvs annulata: Patzelt (1979:94); Pritchard (1979:178); Albuja et al. (1980:128).
Rhinoclemmvs annulata: Freiberg (1979:122); Ernst (1980a:1); Pritchard and Trebbau
(1984:12); Iverson (1986:63).
NOMBRES LOCALES.- "Bambera" was used in the Rfo Santiago basin. Tortuga" was
used at Playa Grande on the Rfo Cayapas.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED.- Esmeraldas : Immediate environs of Cachavf (USNM 20405253); Estero El Ceibo (EPN 90); Estero El Placer (EPN 2546); La Boca (EPN 2334); Luis
Vargas Torres (EPN 17. 36, 44); vie. Playa Grande (USNM 281892); vie. Ricaurte (USNM
281879); vie. San Jos* de Tagua (USNM 281878).
Guayas : Bucay (AMNH 22088); purchased in Guayaquil (PCHP 48).
Los Rios: 5 miles E of Quevedo (USNM [MSU 1410)).
Manabi: Manta (USNM 96020).
LITERATURE RECORDS.- Esmeraldas : Bulon (Siebenrock. 1909); Bulum (Muller, 1939);
Esmeraldas (Gunther. 1860); "cerca de la boca del Rfo Esmeraldas" (Orc^s, 1949); St.
Javier (Ernst. 1978). Guayas : Guayaquil (Siebenrock. 1909; Orc6s, 1949). Imbabura:
Paramba (Boulenger. 1898). Los Rios: Quevedo (Ores. 1949). Manabi: Manta
(Orc«s. 1949). Pichincha : Puerto de lla (Orces, 1949); Santo Domingo (Vaillant, 1911).
Western Ecuador (Ores, 1949).
COMMENTS.- Records for Ecuador indicate a distribution from the Colombian border to
the vicinity of Guayaquil in the south, at elevations less than 800 meters (Fig. 3). Other
than the xerlc locality of Manta, this terrestrial species appears to be associated with
rainforest or riparian forest habitats almost exclusively.
Other than an old literature record, there are no records for£. annulata south of
Ecuador. Gray (1870:706) reported a specimen which "came direct from Chili (sic)'.
This locality is obviously erroneus given our current distributional understanding (e.g.
Iverson. 1986). and this specimen, as well as the Testudo eieohantopus (= Geochelone
nlara) he reported, can be assumed to have originated somewhere north of Chile,
possibly both of them from Ecuador (obviously the case for the Galapagos tortoise).
Two localities reported by Ernst (1978) are problematic. The locality list
accompanying his paper (NAPS Document #03252) included a specimen from Kiederie
Farm. 1 km W of Puerto Napo, Provincia del Napo (USNM 201594). though this locality
appears hot to have been mapped in a later publication (Ernst. 1980). Napo is east of
the Andes, and this locality clearly Is in error. A subsequent investigation by USNM staff
of the field catalog has revealed that the Napo locality data was erroneusly attributed to
that particular specimen, and the USNM catalog has been corrected to read "Ecuador"
only.
The other questionable locality is one called "Mendoza" (BMNH 1874.3.5.7).
Both Boulenger (1889) and Siebenrock (1909) referred to the locality without attributing it
to a particular country. The current catalog card with the entry for "Mendoza" has no
reference to any political entity. The three preceding entries are for the type specimens
originating in Ecuador, and this may have lead Ernst (1978) to attribute Mendoza to
Ecuador. Muller (1939) specifically suggested that "Mendoza" was in northwestern
Venezuela, after Wettstein (1934) had listed Venezuela within the range of £. annulata.
but there is otherwise no evidence that £. annulata occurs in Venezuela (Pritchard and
Trebbau, 1984). These references are evidently the source of the often repeated
description of the distribution of R. annulata as including Venezuela (Mertens and
Wermuth. 1955; Wermuth and Mertens, 1961. 1977; Donoso-Barros, 1965; Pritchard.
1967; Freiberg. 1979, 1981; Obst. 1986). As it is Impossible to associate "Mendoza" with
any confidence to either Ecuador or Venezuela, we recommend it be excluded from
further consideration in the geographic distribution of R. annulata.
Dr. Luis Albuja (pers. comm.) informed us that he collected a specimen of R.
annulqtq in Chongdn, Guayas Province, and that he maintained it in captivity for nearly a
year, feeding principally on fruits.
Rhinoclemmys melanosterna (Gray)
Geoclemmvs melanosterna Gray, 1861:205.
Geoemvda punctularia melanosternum: Siebenrock (1909:498).
Geoemvda punctularia melanostema: Wettstein (1934:19); Muller (1939:100); Mertens
and Wermuth (1955:352); Wermuth and Mertens (1961:94); Donoso-Barros
(1965:4); Pritchard (1967:109).
Pichincha : Centro Cientifico Rfo Palenque (USNM 285510); Estacidn Cientffica Rfo
Palenque (MCZ 156901); Puerto lla (USNM 201597); Hacienda Equinox, 30 km NNW of
Qepemyda (Rhinoclemmvs) punctularia melanosterna: Wermuth and Mertens (1977:32).
Domingo (CAS 13297); San Miguel de los Colorados (USNM 201596).
Rhinoclemmvs melanostema: Pritchard and Trebbau (1984:12); Iverson (1986:67).
Santo Domingo de los Colorados. 1000 ft (USNM 201595); Ramsey Farm, km 19. Chone
Road, 18 km W of Santo Domingo de los Colorados (USNM 204054); 9 km W Santo
No specific locality: (AMNH 97630; EPN 6, 9; MVZ 77497).
Callopsis punctularia melanostema: Ernst (1978:124).
Rhinoclemys melanostema: Pritchard (1979:180).
Rhinoclemmvs punctularia melanostema: Freiberg (1979:123); Ernst (1981:2)
COMMON NAMES.- The name "pintadilla" was used in the Rfo Santiago basin. "Orito"
was used at Playa Grande on the Rfo Cayapas. This species was referred to as
"patiamarilla" in La Tola at the mouth of the Rfo Cayapas. All of these names allude to
the vivid yellow-gold coloration of this species' soft parts.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED.- Esmeraldas : purchased in Borbdn (PCHP 2432-2440);
Concepcten (EPN 33, 34, 37, 92; JLC 270); Finca "La Esperanza", Concepdan (JLC 281;
USNM 281880-81); Rfo Bogota at Concepdan (EPN 91); Rfo Bogota upstream from
Concepcidn (EPN 29. 103; USNM 281882); Rfo Huimbicito near Concepcion (JLC 269);
nr. Rfo Santiago upstream from Concepcldn (EPN 130; JLC 271. 272); Estero El Ceibo
(JLC 318* USNM 281883-85); El Pan (EPN 2655); purchased in Esmeraldas (PCHP 242931); vicinity of La Boca (EPN 2337); La Boca. Rfo Bogota (EPN 19-20); Playa Grande
(JLC 326; USNM 281886); San Jose de Tagua (JLC 302-303).
No specific locality: (EPN 50).
LITERATURE RECORDS.- Esmeraldas : Borbon (Siebenrock, 1909); St. Javier (Ernst,
1978); River Bogota (Ernst, 1978).
COMMENTS.- The range of R. melanostema was depicted with a single locality in
Ecuador by Ernst (1981). The two specimens which formed the basis for that record
were both from Esmeraldas (St. Javier, BMNH 1901.3.29.3; River Bogota, BMNH
1902.5.27.8). Ernst's (1981) locality spot was misplaced far to the south of either
location, and outside of the known range in Ecuador. The range map of Iverson (1986)
was more accurate.
All unquestionable Ecuadorian records for this species come from the Rfos
Cayapas-Santiago or Mataje basins, at elevations below 175 m (Fig. 4). The only *
suggestion that fi. melanostema may occur as far south as the Rfo Esmeraldas basin is
three shells purchased in Esmeraldas (PCHP 2429-31). The specimens true provenance
is unknown. Until such time as£. melanosterna is collected in the Rfo Esmeraldas
basin we do not accept this record as a valid indication of the presence of this species
in the immediate vicinity of Esmeraldas (the city). While in La Tola, we were told of a
commercial source of R. melanosterna at Molinita, along the coast several kilometers
southwest of the mouth of the Rfo Cayapas.
Rhinoclemmvs nasuta (Boulenger)
Nicoria nasuta Boulenger. 1902:53.
Type locality: "Buton. 160 feet, and from the Rio Durango, 350 feet" (BMNH
1947.3.5.54-57).
Geoemvda nasuta: Siebenrock (1909:499); Wettstein (1934:18); Muller (1939:100).
Geoemvs nasuta: Orces V. (1949:20). (incorrect subsequent spelling)
Geoemvda ounctularia nasuta: Mertens and Wermuth (1955:352); Wermuth and Mertens
(1961:95); Donoso-Barros (1965:4); Pritchard (1967:109).
Geoemvda fflhinoclemmvsl ounctularia nasuta: Wermuth and Mertens (1977:32).
Callopsis nasuta: Ernst (1978:120).
Rhinoclemys nasuta: Pritchard (1979:179).
Rhinoclemmvs punctularia nasuta: Freiberg (1979:123).
Rhinoclemvs puntularia nasuta: Albuja et al. (1980:37). (incorrect subsequent spelling)
Rhinoclemmvs nasuta: Ernst (1980b: 1); Pritchard and Trebbau (1984:12); Iverson
(1986:68).
COMMON NAME.- "Sabaleta" is used in the Cayapas-Santiago basin, as Mittermeier et
al. (1980) reported for Departamentos Narino and Cauca, Colombia.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED.- Esmeraldas : immediate environs of Cachavf (USNM 20405556); Rfo Cachavf (EPN 12, 22); in affluent of Quebrada Chiquita on road to Ricuarte.
1-13* N, 78-441 W (USNM 281891); Como Hacemos. nr. Rfo Santiago (EPN 35); Estero
El Ceibo (EPN 101, 107, 312-313; JLC 306. 308-309; USNM 281887); Estero El Placer
(EPN 2545. 2563); Guembi (EPN 11); vicinity of La Boca (EPN 2335-2336); "La Chiquita",
km 12 via San Lorenzo-Ricaurte (EPN 10,16. 28); nr. Playa Grande (EPN 108; JLC 328);
"2 km antes del Salto del Bravo" (EPN 27); San Lorenzo (EPN 18); San Jos* Cachavf
(EPN 7-8. 13-15. 21, 46); Sarrla. RfO BogoU (JLC 332. 334; USNM 281888-90); vie.
Sucre, Rfo Huimbi (EPN 30-32).
Pichincha : Santo Domingo de los Colorados (EPN specimen without number).
No specific locality: (EPN 48).
UTERATURE RECORDS.- Esmeraldas : Bulun, 160 feet (Boulenger, 1902); Rio Durango.
350 feet (Boulenger, 1902).
COMMENTS.. TwoaspectsofR. nasuta distribution in Ecuador are problematic. One is
whether or not£. nasuta occurs in the Rfo Esmeraldas basin. The only specimen which
bears on this question is from Santo Domingo de los Colorados (EPN). Santo Domingo
is a city situated between the upper tributaries of both the Esmeraldas and Guayas
basins. The collector confirmed the locality of this specimen, said to have been
collected to the north of Santo Domingo in the Rfo Esmeraldas basin (M. Olalla, pers.
comm.). Given this account by the collector, we accept this locality as valid, although
we are at a loss to explain why others have not encountered specimens in this heavily
collected area.
Ernst (1980b) presented a map of the distribution of B nasuta with three
localities depicted in Ecuador. One locality was just south of the Rfo Esmeraldas near
its mouth, and the text states that the species has been recorded from "near
Esmeraldas". Dr. Ernst (in litt.) has advised us that the type specimens and the USNM
specimens (only 204055-56 at that time) formed the basis for his map. These three
localities are all relatively closely spaced in the northwestern corner of the country, but
at the time the map was made the actual location of the type localities was unknown;
the type locality spot was merely placed in far northwestern Ecuador (C.H. Ernst, in litt.).
Therefore, there is no basis for a record of £. nasuta near Esmeraldas. This erroneous
locality was unfortunately repeated by Iverson (1986). We are left with the Santo
Domingo specimen as the only evidence of the presence of £• nasuta in the Rfo
Esmeraldas drainage basin.
The type locality of JJ. nasuta has been a problem for those attempting to locate
the two place names designated by Boulenger (1902). Peters (1955) was the first to
confront the issue as he tried to catalog the type localities of amphibians and reptiles
described from Ecuador. He referred "Bulun" to "Pulun", following Chapman (1926), but
he was not able to place the "Rio Durango" in an Ecuadorian province. Ernst (1980b)
addressed the matter by placing a single spot in far northwestern Ecuador on a small
scale map, but with "Bulun" misspelled "Belun" and without specific geographic
knowledge of the places' actual locations. Apparently unknown to Ernst (1980b), others
had determined that "Bulun" was a misspelling for "Pulun" (Chapman, 1926; Peters, 1955;
Paynter and Traylor, 1977), probably the result of bad transcription. Pulun appeared on
the map of Ecuador in 1950 (IGM) as a small town on the Rfo BogoU, but it has
disappeared from recent maps (e.g. IGM, 1985), and two towns now appear in the same
vicinity on the upper Rfo Bogota (Santa Rita and San Francisco). Through interviews
with people at La Boca, we were able to ascertain that a name transformation had taken
place at Pulun. A priest had come to Pulun and built a church in the late 19th or earliest
part of the 20th century. The patron saint of that church was San Francisco, and
gradually the town came to be called "San Francisco de Pulun". Over the course of
years the "de Pulun11 was gradually dropped, and today the town Is known simply as
"San Francisco". Knowledge of the name "Pulun" is retained only by the older
inhabitants of the area; the younger people are completely unaware that "San Francisco"
ever was called "Pulun".
The Rfo Durango locality has been even more problematic. Paynter and Traylor
(1977) could not locate the Rfo Durango, but noted evidence of an association with
Paramba on the Rfo Mira at an elevation around 1.000 m. and faunal evidence of it
being a lowland location in Esmeraldas. The Rfo Durango Is an affluent of the upper
Rfo Bogota, entering that river less than one kilometer upstream from San Francisco
(IGM, 1985). With regard to the conflicting evidence discussed by Paynter and Traylor
(1977), the uppermost reaches of the Rfo Durango are at an elevation slightly less than
500 meters, and the Rfo Mira is approximately six kilometers directly east (IGM, 1985).
Boulenger (1902) reported the elevation of Bulun [San Francisco] as 160 feet.
This figure corresponds with ca. 49 meters, and San Francisco lies between the 40 and
60 m contours (IGM, 1985). The other syntypes were from the Rfo Durango at 350 feet,
which is approximately 107 m. Interpolation of this elevation along the river course
places it several km upstream from San Francisco at 1*03' N, 78*38* W.
Known localities forJJ. nasuta in western Ecuador are primarily in the northwest
of Esmeraldas Province, possibly with an elevational range to 600 m (Fig. 5).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper is based in part upon material collected in the course of fieldwork in
1986 supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. BSR-8601094. For
their able assistance in the fieldwork we thank Mark Nielsen, John Simmons. Ramiro
Barriga, Bertha Ludena, and Jorge Villareal. Fieldwork was performed with permits
obtained from the Minlsterlo de Agriculture y Ganadena (MAG). The use of two MAG
forestry camps in Esmeraldas was especially helpful.
We gratefully acknowledge the information, specimen access, and loans
provided through the courtesy of C.J. Cole. G. Foley, M. Wemens, and C.W. Myers
(AMNH), A. Leviton and J. Vindum (CAS). L Albuja V. and G. Orc*s V. (EPN). WE.
Duetlman and J.E. Simmons (KU), J. Rosado and E.E. Williams (MCZ). H. Greene and
B.R. Stein (MVZ), P.C.H. Pritchard (PCHP). A. Kluge and G. Schneider (UMMZ). and R.
Heyer, R.W. McDiarmid, R.P. Reynolds, and G.R. Zug (USNM). Special thanks go to
Roy McDiarmid and Bob Reynolds (USNM) for help with Ecuadorian localities. Several
people helped with significant information: R. Barriga S., J.E. Cadle (ANSP). N. Carrillo
de Espinoza, C.H. Ernst. J.B. Iverson, C.J. McCarthy (BMNH). M. Olalla. G. Orc<§s V.,
V.G. Perdue. P.C.M. Pritchard. J. Rosado. and J.E. Simmons. Valuable comments on
the manuscript were received from RA Brandon. C.H. Ernst. J.B. Iverson. R.W.
McDiarmid. P.C.H. Pritchard. and R.P. Reynolds.
LITERATURE CITED
Albuja V., L, M. Ibarra. J. Urgiles, and R. Barriga. 1980. Estudlo Preliminar de los
Vertebrados Ecuatorianos. Quito: Escuela Politecnica Nacional, 143 pp.
Boulenger. G.A. 1882. Account of the reptiles and batrachians collected by Mr. Edward
Whymper In Ecuador in 1879-80. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.. Ser. 5. 9:457-467.
Boulenger, G.A. 1889. Catalogue of the Chelonians, Rhynchocephalians, and Crocodiles
in the British Museum (Natural History). London: Taylor and Francis, 311 pp.
Boulenger, G.A. 1898. An account of the reptiles and batrachians collected by Mr.
W.F.H. Rosenberg in western Ecuador. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1898:107-126.
Boulenger. G.A. 1902a. On the southern snapping-turtle (Chelvdra Rossianonii. Bocourt).
Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.. Ser. 7. 9:49-51.
Boulenger. GA 1902b. Descriptions of new batrachians and reptiles from north-western
Ecuador. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.. Ser. 7. 9:51-57.
Boulenger. G.A. 1913. A collection of batrachians and reptiles made by Dr. H.G.F.
Spurred. F.Z.S.. in the Choco. Colombia. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1913:10191038.
Carrillo de Espinoza. N. 1970. Contribucten at conocimiento de los reptiles del Peru.
Publ. Mus. Hist. Nat "Javier Prado". Ser. A. Zool. 22:1-64.
Chapman, F.M. 1926. The distribution of bird-life in Ecuador. A contribution to a study of
the origin of Andean bird-life. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 55:1-784.
Cope, E.D. 1868. An examination of the reptilia and batrachia obtained by the Orton
expedition to Equador and the upper Amazon, with notes on other species.
Proc. Acad. Nat Sci. Phil. 1868:96-140.
Cope. E.D. 1885. A contribution to the herpetology of Mexico. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc.
22:379-404.
Cope, E.D. 1887. Catalogue of batrachians and reptiles of Central America and Mexico.
Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 32:1-98.
Donoso-Barros. R. 1965. Distribuci6n de las tortugas en Sudamdrica. Publ. Ocas. Mus.
Nac. Hist. Nat., No. 8:1-14.
Ernst, C.H. 1978. A revision of the Neotropical turtle genus Calloosis (Testudines:
Emydidae: Batagurinae). Herpetologica 34:113-134.
Ernst. C.H. 1980a. Rhinoclemmvs annulata. Cat Amer. Amphib. Rept. 250:1-2.
Ernst. C.H. 1980b. Rhinoclemmvs nasuta. Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. 264:1.
Ernst. C.H. 1981. Rhinoclemmvs punctularia. Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. 276:1-2.
Freiberg. MA 1979. El Mundo de las Tortugas, 3rd ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Albatros,
151 pp.
Freiberg. MA 1981. Turtles of South America. Hong Kong: T.F.H. Publications, Inc.. Ltd..
125 pp.
Gray. J.E. 1860. Description of a new species of Geoclemmvs from Ecuador. Proc. Zool.
Soc. London 1860:231-232.
Gray, J.E. 1861. On a new species of water-tortoise (Geoclemmvs melanosterna) from
Darien. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1861:204-205.
Gray. J.E. 1870. Notes on three species of tortoises living in the Society's gaffens. Proc.
Zool. Soc. London 1870:706-708.
r
Gunther, A. 1860. Third list of cold-blooded vertebrata collected by Mr. Fraser in
Ecuador. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1860:233-240.
Gunther, A. 1885. Reptilia and Batrachia. Biotogia Central-Americana. London: Taylor
and Francis.
Instituto Geogrefico Militar. 1950. Mapa Geogrtfico del Ecuador. Quito. 1:1,000,000.
Instituto Geogrcfico Militar. s/f. Indice Toponfmico de la RepubJica del Ecuador. Quito.
Vol. I-Vlll.
Instituto Geografico Militar. 1985. Santa Rita, Ecuador. Serie J721, CT-NI-E4, 3897-II.
Topographic map, 1:50,000.
iverson, J.B. 1986. A checklist with distribution maps of the turtles of the world.
Richmond. Indiana: Privately printed, viii + 283 pp.
Legler, J.M. 1965. A new species of turtle, oenus Kinosternon. from Central America.
Univ. Kansas Publ.. Mus. Nat. Hist. 15:615-625.
Leviton. A.E.. R.H. Gibbs, Jr., E. Heal, and C.E. Dawson. 1985. Standards in herpetology
and ichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource
collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copela 1985:802-832.
Medem, F. 1977. Contribucian al conocimiento sobre la taxonomla, dlstribucidn
geografica y ecologia de la tortuga "bache" (Chelvdra seroentina acutirostris).
Caldasia 12:41-101.
Mertens. R. and H. Wermuth. 1955. Die rezenten Schilkroten, Krokodile und
Bruckenechsen: Eine kritische Uste der heute lebenden Arten und Rassen. Zool.
Jahrb., Abt. f. Syst. 83:323-440.
Mittermeier, R.A., F. Medem, and A.G.J. Rhodin. 1980. Vernacular names of South
American turtles. Herp. Circ. No. 9:1-44.
Miyata, K. 1982. A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Ecuador with a
bibliography of Ecuadorian herpetology. Smith. Herp. Inf. Serv.. No. 54:1-70.
Moll. E.O. and J.M. Legler. 1971. The life history of a Neotropical slider turtle,
Pseudemvs scripta (Schoepff). in Panama. Bull. Los Angeles Co. Mus. Nat. Hist..
Science 11:1-102.
Muiler, L 1939. Ueber die Verbreitung der Chelonier auf dem Sudamerikanischen
Kontinent. Physis 16:89-102.
Obst. F.J. 1986. Turtles, Tortoises and Terrapins. Leipzig, GDR: Edition Leipzig, 231 pp.
Orces V., G. 1949. Los Testudinata ecuatorianos que se conservan en las colecciones
de Quito, Ecuador. Bol. Inf. Cien. Nac. 3:13-22.
Patzelt, E. 1979. Fauna del Ecuador. Quito: Editorial Las Casas. xiii + 184 pp.
Paynter. R.A., Jr. and M.A. Traylor, Jr. 1977. Ornithological gazetteer of Ecuador, viii +
152 pp.
Peracca, M.G. 1904. Viaggio del Dr. Enrico Festa nell'Ecuador e rigloni vicine: Rettili.
Bol. Mus. Zool. Anat. Comp. Univ. Torino 19(465):1-41.
Peters, J.A. 1955. Herpetological type localities in Ecuador. Rev. Ecuat. Entomol.Parasitol. 2:335-352.
Peters, J.A. 1960. The snakes of Ecuador a check list and key. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.
122:491-541.
Peters, J.A. 1967. The lizards of Ecuador, a check list and key. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus.
119:1-49.
Peters. W. 1862. Mittheilung uber einige neuen Phvllodactvlus aus Guayaquil. Monats.
10
Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1862:626-627.
Pritchard. P.C.H. 1967. Living Turtles of the World. Jersey City. NJ: T.F.H. Publications,
288 pp.
Prftchaid. P.C.H. 1979. Encyclopedia of Turtles. Hong Kong: T.F.H. Publications. Inc.
Ltd., 895 pp.
Pritchard. P.C.H. 1985. Evolution and zoogeography of South American turtles. Stud.
Geol. Salmant., Vol. Esp. 1:225-233.
Pritchard. P.C.H. 1986. A ^interpretation of Testudo oloantea Schweigger, 1812. J. Herp.
20:522-534.
Pritchard, P.C.H. and P. Trebbau. 1984. The Turtles of Venezuela. Cont. Herp. 2:x + 403
pp.
Siebenrock. F. 1909. Synopsis der rezenten Schildkroten. Zod. Jahrb.. Suppl. 10:427*
618.
Smith, H.M. and R.B. Smith. 1980. Synopsis of the Herpetofauna of Mexico. Vol. VI.
Guide to Mexican Turtles, Bibliographic Addendum III. North Bennington, VT:
John Johnson, xviii + 1044 pp.
U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. 1950. Mapa del Ecuador. Washington, DC. 1:1.000.000.
Vaillant, L 1911. Cheloniens et batraclen urodele, recuellis par M. le Or. Rivet. Mission
du Service geographique de I'Armee pour la mesure d'un arc meridien
equatorial en Amerique du Sud sous le controle scientifique de I'Academie des
Sciences 98:45-57 + 3 pis.
Wermuth. H. and R. Mertens. 1977. Uste der rezenten Amphibien und Reptilien:
Testudines, Crocodytia, Rhynchocephalia. Das Tierreich 100:xxvii + 174 pp.
Wettsteln, 0.1934. Ergebnisse der osterreichischen biologischen Costa Rica-expedition
1930: Die Amphibien und Reptilien. Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Math.-nat. XI. 134:139.
GAZETTEER OF ECUADORIAN TURTLE LOCALITIES
The following list includes all place names mentioned in the text, Including map
coordinates and the province in which found. The coordinates for rivers and streams
are for the mouth, unless otherwise specified. Coordinates have been derived from the
IGM 1:50.000 topographic map series when unattributed, or from one of the following
sources designated with the corresponding number: (1) IGM (s/f); (2) Paynter and
Traylor (1977); and (3) USCGS (1950).
Bekin - misspelling for Butan
Blanco. Rfo (ESMERALDAS & PICHINCHA)
0*28' N. 79*25' W (2)
afluente del Rfo Esmeraldas
Bogota, Rfo (ESMERALDAS)
1*03' N, 78*50' W (2)
afluente del Rfo Santiago
Borb6n (ESMERALDAS)
1*06' N. 78*59* W (2)
pobfacten en la confluencia de los Rtos Cayapas y Santiago
Bravo, Rfo. salto del (ESMERALDAS)
0*40' N, 78*56' W
el Rfo Bravo es un afluente del Rfo Cayapas; 198 m.
Bucay (GUAYAS)
2*10' S, 79*06* W (2)
poblacion al lado del Rfo Chimbo
Bulum - misspelling for Butan
Buton - misspelling for Pulun
Cachabf (= Urbina]
Cachabf. Rfo - see Rfo Cachavf
Cachavf 1= Urbina]
Cachavf, Rfo (ESMERALDAS)
afluente del Rfo Bogota
Cayapas, Rfo (ESMERALDAS)
1 *03* N, 78*49'W
1-13' N, 79*03' W (2)
desemboca en el Oc^ano Pacfflco
Centro Cientifico Rfo Palenque
0*35* S. 79*22' W (3)
56 km N Quevedo. 47 km S Santo Domingo en la vf a entre los dos; en
Pichincha
Como Hacemos (ESMERALDAS)
1 *03' N. 78*52' W
localidad cerca del Rfo Santiago al NO de Concepcian
11
Concepcfon (ESMERALDAS)
1*02' N. 78*50' W (1)
poblacion entre los Rfos Santiago y Bogota, en la desembocadura del Rfo
Huimbicito
Congo, Rfo, cabeceras del (GUAYAS)
1*05* S. 79*42' W (3)
afluente del Rfo Daule. al O de Quevedo
Chimbo - see Puente del Chimbo
Chiquita, Quebrada (ESMERALDAS)
1 • 11' N, 78*44' W
afluente del Rfo Tululbf
Duranf* EloyAlfaro]
Durango. Rfo (ESMERALDAS)
1-05' N. 78*41' W
afluente del Rfo Bogota
El Ceibo. Estero (ESMERALDAS)
1 *05' N, 78*48* W
afluente del Rfo Bogota
Eloy Alfaro (GUAYAS)
2*10' S. 79*51' W (1)
poblacion 3 kms. al E de Guayaquil
El Pan (ESMERALDAS)
1*15' N, 78*36' W
poblacion al lado del Rfo Mataje. en la frontera con Colombia
El Placer, Estero (ESMERALDAS)
1*12' N. 78*34' W
afluente del Rfo Mataje
Esmeraldas (ESMERALDAS)
0*58' N, 79*39' W (1)
ciudad y capital de la Provlncla de Esmeraldas
Esmeraldas. Rfo (ESMERALDAS)
0*56' N. 79*38* W (1)
desemboca en el Oceano Pacffico
Estaclon Biologica Rfo Palenque • see Centro Cientifico
Estaddn Cientifica Rfo Palenque - see Centro Cientifico
Finca "Chuju" (ESMERALDAS)
1*02' N, 78*49* W
flnca cerca de Conception, en el Rfo Santiago
Finca "La Esperanza" (ESMERALDAS)
1 *03' N, 78*50* W
flnca frente a Concepcidn, margen Izquierda del Rfo Santiago
"Glga City* (ESMERALDAS)
incorrect name, probably in the Rfo Santiago basin judging by the other
specimens from the same field collection
Guayaquil (GUAYAS)
2*10* S. 79*52* W(1)
ciudad y capital de la Provincia de Guayas
Guayas. RfO (GUAYAS)
2*36' S. 79*52' W (2)
formed from the Rfos Daule and Babahoyo
Guembi [= Huimbi]
Hacienda Equinox (PICHINCHA)
0*01' S. 79*14' W (3)
"30 km NNW Santo Domingo de los Colorados*
Hacienda Paramba (IMBABURA)
0*48' N, 78*21' W (1)
finca al surdel Rfo Mira
Huimbi (ESMERALDAS)
0*56' N, 78*46' W (3)
poblacion en la margen derecha del Rfo Huimbi
Huimbi, Rfo (ESMERALDAS)
1*01' N. 78*49' W
afluente del Rfo Santiago
Huimbicito, R f o (ESMERALDAS)
1 *02* N, 78*49' W
afluente del Rfo Santiago, desemboca en Concepdan
Isla de Silva (GUAYAS)
1 *55' S, 79*42' W (1)
sitio 5 kms. al NE de Samborondan
La Boca (ESMERALDAS)
1 *08* N, 78*46* W
poblacion en la confluencia de los Rfos Bogota y Tululbf
La Chiquita (ESMERALDAS)
1*13* N, 78*45' W
campamento forestal del Ministerio de Agriculture y Ganaderfa al E de San
Lorenzo; a km 12 en la via San Lorenzo-Rlcaurte; 60 m.
La Tola (ESMERALDAS)
1 • 12* N, 79*02* W
poblacian en la margen izquierda de la desembocadura del Rfo Cayapas
Luis Vargas Torres (ESMERALDAS)
0*52' N, 78*47' W (1)
poblacion en la margen izquierda del Rfo Santiago; 200 m.
Manta (MANABI)
0*56* S, 80*43' W (1)
ciudad en la costa Pacffica
12
Malaje. Rfo (ESMERALDAS)
1*21" N. 78-44* W (1)
en la frontera con Colombia; desemboca en el Oc«ano Pacffico
Mira. Rfo (CARCHI. ESMERALDAS. IMBABURA)
1*36* N, 79-01* N (2)
rfo del noroccidente ecuatoriano y que desemboca en Colombia
Molinita (ESMERALDAS)
1 -09' N, 79-05' W
poblacidn al SO de La Tola cerca el Oc*ano Pacffico
Nanegal (PICHINCHA)
0-08* N, 78*40' W (1)
poblacidn en el Rio Nanegal 35 kms. at NO de Quito; ca. 1400 m. (2)
Paramba • see Hacienda Paramba
Pascuales (GUAYAS)
2-03* S. 79-55* W (1)
poblacidn en la margen derecha del Rio Daule
Playa del Oro [= Luis Vargas Torres)
Playa Grande (ESMERALDAS)
0-54' N, 78-58* W
poblacidn en la margen Izquierda del Rfo Cayapas
Puente del Chimbo (GUAYAS)
cerca a Bucay; 345 m (2)
2-T0* S, 79-10* W (2)
Puerto de Ha - see next entry
Puerto Ha (PICHINCHA)
0-33* S, 79-22* W (2)
poblacidn al lado del Rro Baba
Pulon [« San Francisco]
Quevedo (LOS RIOS)
1*01* S, 79-27* W (1)
ciudad de la Prov. de Los Rfos
Ramsey Farm (PICHINCHA)
0-16* S, 79-20' W (3)
•km 19, Chone Road, 18 km W of Santo Domingo de los Colorados"
Ricaurte (ESMERALDAS)
1 • 11' N, 78-44* W
poblacidn cerca a la confluencia de los Rfos Tululbf y Palabf
Salto del Bravo - see Rfo Bravo
San Francisco (ESMERALDAS)
1-05* N, 78-42* W
poblacidn en la margen derecha del Rfo Bogota; antes llamada Pulun
San Javier (de Cachavf) (ESMERALDAS)
1-04' N, 78*46* W
poblacidn en la margen derecha del Rfo Cachavf, y en la Ifnea de ferrocarril
entre Ibarra y San Lorenzo
San Jos* (de) Cachavf (ESMERALDAS)
0-57* N, 78-39' W (3)
San Jos* de Tagua (ESMERALDAS)
1 *01' N, 78-50' W
poblacidn del alto Rfo Cachavf
poblacidn en la margen izquierda del Rfo Santiago
San Lorenzo (ESMERALDAS)
1-17* N, 78-50* W
Santiago, Rfo (ESMERALDAS)
1-05* N, 78-59* W
ciudad costera del noroccidente ecuatoriano
San Miguel de los Colorados (PICHINCHA)
0-20* S, 79-15* W
cerca a Santo Domingo de los Colorados, en la vfa a Quevedo
desemboca en Borbdn
Santa Rita (ESMERALDAS)
1 -06' N, 78-43* W
poblacidn en la margen izquierda del alto Rfo Bogota
Santo Domingo - see Santo Domingo de los Colorados
Santo Domingo de los Colorados (PICHINCHA) 0-15* S, 79-09' W (2)
ciudad on the main highway from the Pacific lowlands to Quito
Sarria (ESMERALDAS)
1-06* Nt 78-48* W
localidad cerca del Rfo Bogota al SO de La Boca
St. Javier - see San Javier
Sucre (ESMERALDAS)
1 -00' N, 78-48' W
poblacidn en la margen derecha del Rfo Huimbi
Urbina (ESMERALDAS)
1 «02* N, 78-46* W
poblacidn en la margen izquierda del Rfo Cachavf, y en la Ifnea de ferrocarril
entre Ibarra y San Lorenzo; antes era llamada Cachavf o Cachabf
Vinces (LOS RIOS)
1 -32* S, 79-45* W (2)
poblacidn en la margen izquierda del Rfo Vinces
13