NJ Pulse - New Jersey Pulse
Transcripción
NJ Pulse - New Jersey Pulse
4 Women: “President of Pastors’ Workshop Sexually Harassed Us” Multicultural News, Entertainment, Events, Connections, Resources, Interviews, Community, Religion and Politics June-July 2016 Bergen, Essex, Passaic County and around New Jersey News Without Influence Page 7 Why The Property Taxes In Bergen and Passaic Counties Are So High Page 2 Rev. Mike McDuffie City Officials Get Job Performance Review And It’s Not Good Paterson 3rd Worst City To Live In US Page 11 Officials Who FBI: Hillary Clinton Targeted The Press Lied, “Not During Election To Intentionally”,So Get Criminal Charges No Charges Will Be Against Them Filed Against Her Two other NJ cities also made the list - 24/7WallSt.com Page 8 Reverso Back Cover We are pleased to make a maximum of 3 copies available to a reader for free, after which $1 will be charged per copy. Call us for payment or bulk delivery. NJ Pulse - News Without Influence Four Young Women Accuse Pastor Of Sexual Advances President of the Paterson Pastors Workshop called himself “the Wolf” in sexually explicit message to victim of his alleged sexual advances PATERSON The NJ Pulse News and Christian Heritage US president is investigating allegations of sexual harassment against four Christian women involving Paterson Pastors Workshop President Michael McDuffie. As a Christian-owned publication, the Pulse president believes “we are all brothers to the women and men in the faith and have an obligation to respond when these kinds of allegations are made, especially when we also have a Christian publication.” Some time ago, three of the four women met with the president of this publication and alleged McDuffie made sexual advances toward them while they were members of his church, which is also his home, on Derrom Avenue in Paterson. At first, this publication was very reluctant to believe the young women, as there was no evidence to suggest the pastor is that kind of person, knowing him as a public figure. But during the meeting, the women showed Facebook inbox messages, of private communications with the sexual connections and explicit conversations. “As a Christian man, I was angry but I had to hold my peace. This man is very clever and is highly-connected to politicians and law enforcement. This was a serious 'trespass' against our faith and my sisters,” the NJ Pulse and Christian Heritage U.S. president told the women. According to Christian law, he explained to the women, the Bible teaches; "Moreover, if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican." The matter must be dealt with privately first the NJ Pulse and Christian Heritage news president, Sirrano Keith Baldeo stated. The president reached out to McDuffie first alone, according to Christian faith, through Facebook, - the very place he allegedly committed some of the acts against one of the women. He was then confronted lightly in an open forum. McDuffie was told there was an issue with the women and “we need to talk.” When the Pulse president asked McDuffie for a meeting, suspecting he could be asked about his alleged advances towards the woman, he blocked the NJ Pulse on Facebook, refusing to talk or respond. The NJ Pulse president then, still following Christian law, asked the Rev. Randall M. Lassiter of Calvary Baptist Church to aid arranging a meeting with McDuffie privately, and/or the women, to see if they might have misunderstood his actions as advances. Lassiter stated the pastor was also reluctant to respond to him on the matter. The Pulse president, again, following Christian law, sent a message to McDuffie asking he meet with pastors of other churches and was told that if he is in need of help or prayer on his struggle with the flesh, that they will be able to help and not condemn him. McDuffie again refused to respond to the request. During a follow-up call with the victims, they stated McDuffie’s wife is aware of his advances towards women in his church. They also stated there was a confrontation in the church with the family of one of the girls and McDuffie’s assistant, named Marcus, called the mother outside to fight. Shortly after, Marcus saw one of our posts about the church. He called the NJ Pulse president and began making physical threats, to harm the newspaper’s president, threatening by saying he knows people and that he is "a dangerous person. Don’t F--- with him, etc.” He warned that if the NJ Pulse or Christian Heritage News published anything about McDuffie he would take physical action. That conversation was recorded as he called on the news line. The young women who reported the incidents stated that several families left the church after it failed to address the issues They estimated about 24 people left. Even though they left McDuffie’s church, some stated they did not leave the faith and that they were not going to “turn from Christ” because of him. Several times, the president of this publication crossed paths with the pastor at events. When asked to speak, the pastor turned away and avoided answering, just uttering softly, “Yeah, yeah, sometime.” Several times when he spoke at those meetings, he tried rebuking anyone from asking and confronting him by saying; "We all try to bring each other down, going after one another." His language clearly seemed to try bringing guilt upon anyone who might try publicly calling him out, the pulse president stated. But that did not prohibit the president of this publication, who stated, “The last part of that law is to go publicly,” if he fails to cease from his acts against young Christian women, under his spiritual care. Ironically, in the sexually explicit messages McDuffie sent one alleged victim he called himself “The Wolf” Allegedly, it is a character and nickname he gave himself to express his sexual side in the messages. The messages were printed out by the women, who turned it over to the NJ Pulse president. Also, ironically, the very Bible McDuffie preaches speaks about wolves in the churches saying “Beware of false prophets, which come to you Paterson Reverend Michael McDuffie posted this photo of him casting out the devil from New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, but who is casting out his sexual devils, causing him to go after young women in his church in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” Also; "Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves;” It is not clear from McDuffie’s privately explicit messages if he is identifying himself as these wolves. Several community members told NJ Pulse, most people who know McDuffie know he has a problem but no one is willing to come out and say it. “He’s been doing that for a long time, that’s not new,” a leader in the city's black community stated. “And he is not the only one. Other churches are doing the same thing as well, that's why they can’t come together. Most of them have their own secrets.” This city leader also warned, “He’s just going to attack you and turn other churches against you, mostly Black churches. That's why people are afraid. They know how those churches connected to the Pastors Workshop are. These people grew up together. Even if you caught him in the act, they're just going to stick up for him and let him keep doing it. That's why we all know but we don’t say anything.” In the next issue of NJ Pulse, the public will have a chance to see what is supposed to be one of the serious sexually explicit messages. The victim will be identified, by her initials only, to protect her identity. The Paterson Pastors Workshop has had many troubles and internal fighting throughout the years. It is a group that has been beset completely by politics, we were told. Some critics have accused it of serving the needs of only a few churches with no community involvement. McDuffie became president because of the infighting involving some of the group's top churches, we were told. The Paterson Pastors Workshop also calls itself, “Clergy On Fire.” “They’re going to burn in fire alright. This is exactly what’s going to happen to the other churches as well, if they turn a blind eye and keep covering up these things. Then the name will truly fit them," the Pulse president stated. Editor's Note; If you or anyone you know is a suspected victim of McDuffie, or any other pastor or church, and you have evidence to prove it, please contact the NJ Pulse at: [email protected], if you request it, your identity will be kept confidential. NEWS TIP Do not assume we know everything. If you’ve got news or an event call us: 201 737 3300 [email protected] All confidential! P.O Box 695 Paterson NJ 07543 Publish Community Stories For Free 800 words or less & photos and we’ll consider it for publication Letter to the editor, comment, suggestion, news tip All information is kept confidential; [email protected] Employment with NJ Pulse: We are currently looking for a salesperson, editor and local writers NJ Pulse Inc.’s text, ads, stories, photos and graphics material are Copyright 2015 NJ Pulse LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be republished, re-broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or used in any public forum without the prior written consent of the NJ Pulse LLC’s President. All stories and articles in the NJ Pulse are the opinions of the publisher. Advertisers are responsible for their content. We do not release the identity of confidential sources. President Ad Sales Editor Managing Editor NJ PULSE LLC. Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] Sirrano Keith Baldeo 201 737 3300 - 973 854 7266 Susan Bridge Sarah Billie June-July, 2016 2 NJ Pulse - News Without Influence See our new digital menu for simpler choices Hot Cake Only Coupon FREE with purchase of a medium orange juice OFFER GOOD ONLY AT THE FOLLOWING MCDONALD’S 37-01 Broadway, Fair Lawn, NJ 537 Broadway, Bayonne, NJ 160 Market Street, Paterson, NJ 15-31 Central Avenue, Passaic, NJ 325 Grove Street, Jersey City, NJ 828 Rt. 17 North, Paramus, NJ Limit one coupon per customer, per visit. Please present coupon when ordering. Not valid in combination with any other offer. Cash value 1/20 of 1 cent. Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] June-July, 2016 3 New Jersey Pulse In The News NJ Pulse - News Without Influence NJ Pulse president is expected to file criminal and civil charges against 7 members of the Paterson City Council To Expose Political Corruption PATERSON The New Jersey Pulse president is asking the State Attorney General's Office, and federal authorities, to clear the way for criminal charges to be filed against at least seven City Council members collectively - and two of those council members individually. During the past city election campaign, NJ Pulse opposed re-electing most council members. The opposition was made on Facebook and in person at the regular council meetings, which are broadcast, to the public through local cable television. At council meetings, members can be seen talking on their cellphones, distracted or in personal conversations, at times, leaving their chairs, walking around and not paying attention to the meetings. A Facebook posting on Paterson Pulse asked, how much money the council members make annually and if this (such activities) is what taxpayers should be paying them for. When the NJ Pulse president felt the council was adopting laws for which the public was not aware of the consequences, he would speak at the mic to question the council about the laws, as a citizen and member of the press, on their questionable decisions. The comments would be broadcast so the public would have a better understanding about the municipal laws being enacted. But during the past election campaign, things began heating up when the Pulse president questioned the performance of the council and some of its decisions. He also questioned the behavior of the council, and, at one time, its decision to target the mayor for alleged wrongdoing when its members have done many things wrong for which they did not expect to be held accountable. After suspecting that one council member was using a reporter from WNBC -TV to specifically target the mayor, without also legitimately investigating the entire council, the Pulse president approached the microphone at a public meeting and blasted the members for also doing wrong, while accusing the mayor of improper actions, given they have their own alleged crimes to confront.. Shortly after that, the president of the NJ Pulse was informed that a career criminal, Ernest Rucker was hired to support the council members and target anyone coming to the meetings to speak against them. When the convict began targeting the Pulse president, information was posted on Facebook, and the NJ Pulse news website, that the public should not support the re-election of certain incumbent candidates, specifically, because they have been influential in helping raise taxes and part of the reason the city has deteriorated Among other things, the Pulse president then created “Team Paterson” to unite opposition candidates as one - those who indicated they were willing to make the hard choices Paterson needed and not play politics or use an elected position just for a job. As a result, the once-friendly relationship between at least some of the council members and the Pulse president became tense. These members did not want their decisions questioned or challenged, but that did not keep the president of the NJ Pulse from returning to the microphone at the public meetings, to question their actions. After previously supporting First Ward Councilman Mike Jackson, when it was learned he owed $38,000 in city taxes he refused to pay to Paterson, and obtained a $140,000 loan from city taxpayers that, some say, he was never qualified to receive, the NJ Pulse president began questioning his ability to lead the city out of its own financial crisis. He also questioned Council President Bill McKoy about why the public is only allowed to speak for three minutes to address the council, instead of the state's recommended five minutes for governing body meetings. McKoy, who works in Jersey City and attend a council meeting held only one evening a week, replied, “I don’t want to be here listening to people all night.” That reply, combined with council actions that included raising property taxes and adopting some questionable ordinances, troubled and prompted the Pulse president to consider and endorse other candidates he concluded would listen and care about the people first and the laws being passed. The city council then took action to censor and bar the NJ Pulse president from the council chamber and from speaking at the microphone to question them and their ability to lead the City of Paterson. Event though their actions are bared by the constitution and State laws. Official complaints have not yet been filed and a request to the state for a special prosecutor was still awaiting a response as of this publication deadline. But here is at least a partial list of the criminal charges being filed and the people they relate to:. Jackson: giving false statements on a police report, official misconduct, harassment and others. McKoy: criminal mischief, harassment, interfering with the administrative duties of an official, obstruction, official misconduct, failing to provide seating for people with restricted abilities and others. At least seven (of nine) council members including McKoy and Jackson - are all facing official misconduct and other charges, but in acting collectively as a single entity.. In terms of civil action, two notices of suit have already been filed with the city. The demand for the constitutional right violation is not public. Years ago, a former Paterson police officer Jeffrey Hefferman - filed suit against thenMayor Joey Torres (during a prior term) based on similar grounds arguing he was denied free speech rights, The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled in his favor, granting his right to sue the city after being demoted from detective to patrolman when he was found picking up a lawn sign for his mother endorsing a Torres mayoral opponent. In the current case against the council, being pursued by NJ Pulse, two cameras, one from the Pulse, and the city’s own camera, caught the incident on record. It showed the council members did not stop; they continued creating a hostile environment for the Pulse president to function as a press member in the council chamber, and using the setting as their own place to mete out punishment against him as the press, merely for expressing criticism. Even deny him the right to speak at a public broadcast portion of the meeting about them, when they allowed their campaign members to speak about the Pulse president to discredit him before the public, and gain favor for their re-election. Adding insult to injury, and purposely showing a vindictive, behavior, council members, willingly lead by McKoy, intentionally removed all the names of all Pulse president’s newspapers the city identifies for receiving mail, - even a Christian newspaper from the city’s agenda. Along with the seven council members (two members were absent), at least one police officer, the police director and police chief are also facing charges for allegedly failing to perform their duties in providing a safe environment for all people attending the council meetings and allegedly not protecting the safety of the NJ Pulse president from council members' threats and harassment. Important to note: the council recently doubled the police director Jerry Speziale's annual salary, but based on the same time schedule he has worked since his appointment and without added assignments or work duties. Speziale was also present, and supporting the election campaigns of incumbent council members running, for election and re-election, who committed the act stated in this story. Since the incidents in April, the Pulse president has not returned to council meetings for safety reasons. The NJ Pulse was told the purpose of the council's alleged actions to bar the presence of the Pulse president from speaking at the microphone during scheduled public meetings, was because they feared he was going to object to there re-electing while asking the public to support their endorsed opponents. As we reported in another story, council members, in many situations, are protected from being prosecuted for engaging in alleged political corruption and committing white-collar crimes by an alleged "political cartel," of Passaic County Democrats. The alleged "cartel" is capable of blocking complaints and employees of police agencies, prosecutors and the judi- Seven Paterson council members voted to bar the press from speaking at a public meeting because of its opposi tion to some council members being re-elected. Councilman Julio Tavarez Councilman Alex Mendez Councilwoman Ruby Cotton Councilman Bill McKoy Councilman Mike Jackson Councilwoman Maritza Davila Prosecutor Camelia Valdes is a close friend of Jerry Speziale Paterson’s city council also enjoys the protection of the Passaic County Prosecutor, who has been accused of already favoring several cases against council members. Valdes, the prosecutor, was seen attending the same political party’s event. Councilman Andre Sayegh Councilman Ken Morris Councilman Mohammed Akhtaruzzaman Council members enjoy the protection and favor of the police director Jerry Speziale, after they doubled his salary for the same job. The police director also supported the council members against their opponents for city council ciary, from taking required and legitimate actions to seek punishment against politicians caught committing these acts. The alleged "political cartel" can accomplish this by improperly exerting some form of control over such officials who rely on politicians, who’s party appoints them to the positions which "the cartel" controls. The framework creating this situation gives politicians, at least in many situations, a level of protection against being prosecuted - not enjoyed by the average citizen. This alleged "(Democrat) political cartel" in Passaic County depends on the 16,000-plus Democrat votes Paterson elected officials can bring to it to keep it strong. Because of this the NJ Pulse is first asking Police Director Jerry Speziale hugging and supporting one candidate over others President of the NJ Pulse routinely speaks at the microphone and question the city councils action. This time challenging thier re-election Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] federal law enforcement authorities to investigate this setup and monitor if any legitimate criminal complaints filed over corruption charges are improperly being intercepted by this political connection, given its undue influence over the county's legal and court systems. Once that communication is established with federal authorities, the cases against the seven council members collectively, and McKoy and Jackson individually, will be filed and detailed in NJ Pulse news' traditional print and online platforms. June-July, 2016 4 NJ Pulse - News Without Influence VILLAGE IDIOT, TAX CHEAT BOTH ELECTED TO PATERSON CITY COUNCIL “Paterson brings out the worst residents and makes them officials” Op/Ed; PATERSON City voters proved, once again, their actions justify the negative rating the city recently received from a bond rating service and an online publication's ranking it as one of America's three worst cities. New Fifth Ward Councilman Luis Velez had been making himself known around Democrat political bosses for more than nine years, first hoping for a handout, a job, anything that would make him feel important, but according to one Democratic leader, he is still not qualified to be an elected official for the state's third largest city. “His best purpose for the party was initially to be in the community handing our flyers and trying to bring in votes,” the party stated. Yet, Velez wanted more than he is qualified to offer. In 2012, he first made a failed run for the fifth ward council seat. Since then, he has remained unemployed and struggling to gain employment, even as he now sits on the council. He stated he has a Multi-service company but no one can tell how or where he is making a living from it, some suggest it’s just a front, as he has no real employment. After helping the Democratic Party win the county sheriff's election, sources say his wife was given a clerical job in the sheriff's office, yet the party's handlers felt then that Velez was not qualified to be a government representative. For the next four years following his first failed run, and with no real source of income, Velez began walking around the ward, hoping to gain the trust of mostly poor Latinos and elderly voters we were told. When asked about his employment by the NJ Pulse once, he stated he does all kinds of work. "Translation 'bum,'” a party official stated derisively to the NJ Pulse president, as Velez walked away after standing next to the official at an event. During efforts before his election, one elderly woman said Velez "brought us some sandwiches" and another person stated, “He’s always coming around, we are not sure he has a job.” So with no real employment, Velez used his free time and kept persisting upon the elderly in the ward to vote for him in the future. Most of the elderly live in apartment complexes, where, residents observing Velez at various times told us, he concentrated his efforts in ap- pealing to voters. Meanwhile, homeowners were reeling from this year's city property tax hike, hoping to find a candidate pledging fiscal responsibility. They did in Wendy Guzman, a former Board of Education commissioner. Unfortunately for homeowners, Guzman is employed and not free to constantly visit residents in the ward, especially rental complexes - a luxury the unemployed Velez had. During this year's election, Velez launched his plan to focus on renter and Section 8 (federal housing aid recipient) voters he previously solicited throughout the years. The election results showed he received a large majority of votes, not from homeowner taxpayers, but from the apartment complexes in the ward. Given, his free time, Velez was also able to solicit more that 350 mail-in ballots, we were told. When asked why they voted for him, most voters speaking with NJ Pule stated it was because "we always see him around." Thus, there was no consideration over his lack of experience or qualifications. The Democrat Party machine also put its weight around Velez. When asked why, one official replied, “It’s another vote we have on the City Council,” “So, instead of living off his second wife, now Velez can live off of taxpayers,” a supporter of his opponent stated. “He's a bum, the village idiot. He goes around and pretends he knows what he is doing and fools people into thinking he is qualified to be a councilman, a law maker and knows finances," this person complained. "And that is why taxpayers suffer - because people in apartments elect these village idiots. They see you, they vote for you. They don’t care if you are not qualified.” City voters also elected First Ward Councilman Mike Jackson, of the failed "Jacksonville" restaurant. Jackson tried capitalizing on his school fame to run a business, but was accused of deceptive business practices and refusing to pay his $38,000 in back taxes. He also borrowed $140,000 from Paterson taxpayers, which was used to get a bank loan of half a million dollars, we were told. Jackson defaulted on the city loan, leaving Paterson taxpayers to foot the bill for it. He also defaulted on the bank he baited to get its loan. NJ Pulse was informed that Jackson did Attorneys At Law Village Idiot Tax Cheat In this photo shared on Facebook, “village idiot,” Luis Valez (L) and “tax cheat” Mike Jackson (R) are backed by the council president Bill McKoy (C) who supported them to control the city council not have the necessary papers to gain the $140,000 in taxpayers money for Jacksonville in the first place. But the city allegedly intentionally overlooked his paperwork to give him access to Paterson’s money. NJ Pulse made several state Open Public Request Act (OPRA) requests to investigate the files, but the city attorney has blocked our requests to inspect loan-related records. If the allegations are true, it would aid Sun Bank in making its charges in damages from the city for knowingly granting the bad loan that caused Sun to invest in Jackson. During the election Jackson denied he owned any taxes and had bad loans. The NJ Pulse president, during a public event, called out the councilman and offered a $500. reward to anyone who could disprove the allegations. On the night of the election, although the Jacksonville property is up for auction, has no electricity or current food license and a tax lien, the city allowed the councilman to open it. A former city inspector stated that a large generator Jackson placed on the sidewalk and connected to the wires cut by PSE&G, was illegal. He also stated that if the restaurant was closed for six months, it needed to be re-inspected by all involved agencies for safety before being allowed to reopen for occupation and serving food. David Gilmore, with the city's Department of Community Improvements, claimed it was a private event, so there was nothing he could do. Not so, replied the former inspector, who insisted if it was any other place, it would have been shut down that night but because the event was "political," Jackson was given a free pass, particularly given the council president and others were in attendance. The fire department was also notified and visited the site, but an OPRA to obtain documents showed there was no report or action taken against the councilman, that he could not re-open. There was also no report on the person who installed the generator to the street wires, which requires a license. Velez and Jackson, who are supposedly unemployed and/or have little or no private income, are now earning $41,000 for their council service from Paterson taxpayers. The city may also pays for their health insurance, billed to taxpayers. Passaic, Bergen, Essex And Morris County 300 Lackawanna Ave. Woodland Pk., 973-785-8181 For more info. Call: 973-785-8181 Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] June-July, 2016 5 Editorial: Paterson takes steps to control the press not favorable to them NJ Pulse - News Without Influence Editorial: Response To The Actions Of The City Council Barring This Press New Jersey's elected officials are sworn to “support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New Jersey;" There is as follows; "I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same and to the governments established in the United States and in this state, under the authority of the people, so help me God, and that I will faithfully, impartially and justly perform all the duties of the office, according to the best of my ability, so help me God.” But that did not stop 7 of the Paterson council members from violation it, in order to protect their re-election and deprive another of their guaranteed rights, they swore to respect. For nine years, the New Jersey Pulse had a good relationship with at least seven of the nine Paterson City Council members, while criticizing two for bad job performance and seeking personal gain with the use of their office. But for the May 10 election, all that changed, when I was not pleased with the performance of many on the council, mainly for raising taxes, not paying taxes, not repaying a personal loan to the city, not opening the public portion of the meetings for five minutes to address the council, passing laws that add criminal charges for the public, bonding money that would increase the taxes in the long run, not being able to curb crime, not being able to add major ratables and other issues the council has failed to address. During one meeting, a reporter from WNBC-TV, apparently friendly with Sixth Ward Councilman Andre Sayegh, was present at a council meeting, hinting of a story where he allegedly was going to expose the mayor for using city employees for doing work privately at his home. The council, which had just enacted a very heavy tax increase on businesses and homeowners, indicated it was going to launch an internal investigation on the mayor as a result of the story. Even if the mayor used a few employees at his home for the time the story alleged. It would probably amount to about $50-$60 a day per person, I felt that was nothing compared to the $3,000 to $6,000 in tax increase per property, the council jacked up the community for, so why are the council members targeting the mayor? Plus, the $38,000 First Ward Councilman Michael Jackson owed in personal business taxes to the city and the $140,000 publicly financed loan he took from taxpayers and then forfeiting it. Then there is Sixth Ward Councilman Andre Sayegh, who took $2,500 in campaign contributions from a trash company in his ward and helped award it a $400,000 city contract, plus the millions he helped award while on the Board of Education and the city council to NJCDC, where he was once given a $41,000-ayear job serving on the Paterson Alliance, linked to the same NJCDC. At a public council meeting last spring, I approached the microphone and chastised the council for its intended actions, saying some members have engaged in wrongdoing worse than the mayor, and I called out some members individually, including Council President Bill McKoy of the Third Ward. As I left the microphone, three of them began attacking me verbally, with support from the incumbent candidates’ campaign supporters sitting in the audience, who praised the council's attacks. I was not afraid, or ashamed, to call them out publically and like I saw it. These council members have their own evil-doing against the community, yet they targeted the mayor and had people stalk and follow him around for more than a year, but they don’t want the same treatment for themselves. Who the council members want investigated and judged they will do, but, for themselves, they want to be exempt from the same scrutiny and questions. After that meeting, members of the council who did not even previously speak to each other joined forces and plotted to remove NJ Pulse from the council chamber and bar me from speaking at the public microphone. This, knowing at the time an election was coming up and I could affect the incumbents’ chances of winning. At one time angry at me for endorsing another candidate and not him, McKoy began removing my newspaper from City Hall - on the very same tables he himself uses to advertise his “Toys for Kids” events and places his campaign materials. When that failed, he began calling in the police department to remove me from the chamber, if I had a camera on the ledge or any tactic he felt he could use to intimidate me in the council chamber. Jackson, a black belt in karate, began lying to the police department in saying that I assaulted him, and in expressing fears for his life while sitting in the chamber. This happened during the election, where I use the microphone and their cameras to confront them. I cannot go into the chamber because of this, false statement to the police department who supported his campaign. I then began receiving physical threats in the mail, which, I suspect, he is behind. In a written letter, I then asked the police department to protect me at the meetings, but when Police Director Jerry Speziale found out it was the city council harassing me, led by a council president who he was supporting for reelection, he refused to ask the officers working below him, to intervene or keep the peace or me protected. Yet it is believed the Paterson Police Department has a policy prohibiting anyone from being overtly involved in a political campaign. It is not clear whether the police director is subjected to, or above, that policy. It is also important to know the Paterson Police PBA donated $1,100 to Mc Koy’s re-election and $500 to some of the council members running for election. What that conflict does is not only make for a hostile and dangerous environment for a member of the press to work within, but if you are drawn into a confrontation by a council member, an officer stationed in the chamber would likely be inclined to work to protect them, leaving the journalist or anyone else unprotected. The press, speaking only for myself, must be able to do its critically important job without fear of intimidation, harassment, and violence. So for my safety in the current climate of harassment and intimidation, I have not attended council meetings, where I had been for almost 10 years, since April. So in a place that I considered my office, my view into the world of the alleged “political cartel,” which controls the people, who make laws that could hurt the average taxpayer and who control spending the taxpayer’s hard-earned money. I have been prohibited from report those things. But the government has decided, at least in Paterson, to now restrict me, led by the very elected officials who place their hands on the Bible upon their inauguration and promise “to respect the rights of everyone, Impartially and justly.” Seven council members voted to block me from speaking right after they let their campaign supporters on public camera ridicule me for no legitimate reason, just for opposing their re-election. That night of the meeting as I stood there, the council began voting to end the public portion, excluding me. I felt as if I was watching my constitutional rights being raped by each of the council members as they said “yes” to the closing the public meeting where I asked had the right to speak. Not one of them stop it or said, I can’t be involved with a politically motivated action against someone rights, I am saying no. They all backed each other. After the election, I thought it was over, only to see that they continued in their vindictiveness to remove all my newspapers from the city’s list of who should be recognized officially Photo (L) shows the NJ Pulse being removed from City Hall by Council President Bill McKoy. Top row photos are council members responsible for leading the removal of the newspaper from the agenda. Second row photos are their campaign supporters attacking the NJ Pulse before its President was barred from speaking. Before After X X X X Publications in “X” are the ones removed in retaliation (all owned by the NJ Pulse) by the city of Paterson. But that’s OK, I am a strong believer “God does not like evil.” This is a council president (Bill McKoy) who claims to be a Christian. He is mad because I called him out. This “Christian” is seeking revenge to punish me, even after the election is over and he won. These are the bullies and tyrants in government, the law claims it will prosecute if they engage in civil and criminal misconduct, if they violate the use of their authority and office to harm the rights of a citizen, who disagrees with them. So we’ll see what happens. Some of them have even illegally gone after my advertisers, and when I filed criminal charges against them, they recently got judges within their political party willing to fix the case for them - after it was remanded out of Paterson to Passaic Municipal Court. Still. Which encourages them to continue to violate the law and the rights of others. At that very council meeting, they boasted how they have reduced my paper to nothing, yet they’re wrong because I’m still here for the public. My last hope as a member of the free press was to question them on camera, and that’s why they took the desperate steps to try muzzling me, not even caring about violating the constitutional rights they swore upon taking their oaths not to violate. They were scared. If I spoke on camera, those incumbents running earlier this year could have lost. They know many of their voters are the elderly and others my paper can’t reach, so they depend on the camera to get those votes. But for those reading this. I promise not to be influenced as a Christian first. Yes, they attacked my faith too, but I don’t care. My work is to tell the truth, and I will not be pressured to keep the secrets for those entrusted with the office, that have that kind of authority over the people. I know a man who died for telling the truth and refusing to keep their secrets and that’s why I became a Christian. Hopefully, the law will police itself when I file complaints for what they did, or hopefully, I’m at least going to get to expose them for who and what they are - corrupt crooks, speaking how well they do for you the public, when their actions show something far different. So if you watch the meetings now and no longer see me, there, it’s not because of them only. It’s because of the people you also entrust with charging and prosecuting public officials when those officials do wrong. These are the people, in the ranks of our law enforcement and judiciary who are supposed to be the real monitors of the people’s business. Yet it seems many are hopelessly corrupt themselves, and if that’s the case, you really lose because it seems you have already surren- Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] dered your rights to a system - dominated by members of “a political class” - that really seems designed to work for them and keep you, the average law-abiding system, where you need to be - a hopeless, silent follower serving their greed for power and money. They kiss you when they want your vote and kick you when you turn and walk away. There are two other “reporters” at the council meetings, Joe, and Ray the blogger. Yet they play their cards right. They report some stories and then turn away purposely from telling the truth, - a deliberate blindness, getting favors and enabling them to make nice with the politicians to get information when they need for their publications to stay in business. If the press have the hid politicians secrets to stay in business, either the constitution is no longer effective or the days of real journalism is dead. The government is now unchecked. We only publish what they want or we become their enemies. And since their party selects the judges, how far would our complaints of criminal and constitutional right violation go, since they cover each other. So the other “press” get to have the personal interviews I don’t get and the information about shooting etc. and that’s why I must ask my questions at the microphone. I wish I could just walk up to these “reporters” and ask them what the heck are they doing for news? Stop candy-coating them! Stop interviewing felons and controversial people for comments instead of good citizens. These are the kind of members of the press or bloggers reporting news in Paterson, who pat each other on the back, and hang out together, I usually stay to myself, independent, I am happy to share information but don’t’ waste my time. If they (public officials) are evil and corrupt, then I say they are evil and corrupt. That ‘s our job and responsibility to the public. Serving in the press is a sacred and critical job, without the real truth finders, the government will remain a powerful corrupted entity, but with us the “truth tellers,” you get to vote to bring that “corrupted temple” down. And that’s what they are afraid of, not so much of me, but you! To know the truth about them. I have asked those who follow me to keep this information, and if anything should happen to me, it’s because I decided to take on the corrupted line of officials that extends into the courts the judges and prosecutors who are connected to the FBI and Homeland Security. It’s all one big family, so when I file criminal charges against these 7 councilmembers, we’ll know how high the corruption runs. If I can’t put them in jail at least I can expose the people that protects them from it. June-July, 2016 6 The Fairness Formula is the Future of Education Funding NJ Pulse - News Without Influence Why The Property Taxes In Bergen and Passaic Counties Are So High By Assemblywoman Holly Schepisi Many people in New Jersey do not understand the archaic formulas which drive state funding for our schools and the vastly different property tax results in our respective municipalities. Under the New Jersey Constitution, it is mandated that students be provided a thorough and efficient education. That phrase has been thrown around conveniently in defense of an inequitable formula that is too expensive to fund with results that scream failure. New Jersey needs a fair funding formula that fixes the problem, and Bergen taxpayers need real property tax relief. A few weeks ago, Governor Christie proposed a formula that would provide equal funding on a per student basis. This new formula, called the fairness formula, is nearly identical to what I have introduced since 2012. The majority in the legislature wants to continue with a failed system, which has disproportionately and negatively impacted 69 out of 70 communities in Bergen County. What the Governor and I have proposed will fix the problem. Under the proposed fairness formula, state aid would be $6,599 per pupil with additional funding provided for students with special needs. No student will be regarded as worth more than another. The state has thrown billions of dollars at underperforming districts for years and the situation hasn’t improved. The time is now that we face reality and provide fair funding for every student in the state and stop strangling taxpayers to fund failure. One of those former Abbott districts is Passaic City. With only around 10,000 public students, it receives more money than all 70 municipalities combined in Bergen, which has approximately 250,000 students. Further, overfunded municipalities often use that money to pay for things other than stu- dents, such as Elizabeth which in 2015 spent more per student on legal and consulting fees ($237 per pupil) than on textbooks and supplies. In comparison, Pascack Valley Regional High School District is rated the eighth best school district in New Jersey with a graduation rate of 98 percent, while receiving only $550 per student (a number only slightly higher than what Elizabeth spent on legal and consulting fees). The average property tax in Bergen County is well over $11,000. As a result of these increasingly high property taxes, Bergen County has found itself in recent years with one of the highest rates of foreclosures, pre-foreclosures and personal bankruptcies. On the flip side, Camden High School has only a 46 percent graduation rate and yet receives over $30,000 per student. The average property tax in Camden County is only slightly over $6,000. Other than a handful of exceptions, towns in Bergen and Passaic counties have carried the brunt of increasing property taxes, yet they have received the least amount of funding in the entire state. This lopsided school funding formula is indefensible. Bergen and Passaic homeowners are paying sky high property taxes to fund a school district on the opposite side of the state that can’t graduate half of its students. What makes the students in Camden worth sixty-times more than a student who goes to Pascack Valley or any other school district in Bergen or Passaic? What makes 10,000 school age children in Passaic more valuable than every school district in Bergen County combined? The answer: court mandates on how the state should spend its money. The state Supreme Court ruled in the Abbott v. Burke decisions that most money should be distributed to districts that have demonstrated an inability to provide educational excellence. The consequence has been diverting money from districts that pay through the nose for education to districts that don’t; such as Bergen paying for Camden. Diverting these funds has resulted in higher property taxes for districts that want to maintain the educational excellence they have achieved. In some cases the towns with diverted funds have large retiree populations, robbing senior citizens of their savings and the value of their homes. The Corzine school funding formula the court approved has resulted in failure. The court ruled that nearly sixty percent of school funding provided to only 5 percent of school districts satisfies a constitutionally thorough and efficient education. This unfair formula has increased property taxes across the state and has failed to effectively educate the students in districts that cost the most taxpayer dollars. All the while, student enrollment in the former Abbott districts has decreased as funding has increased. When schools are funded on a per pupil basis, taxpayers benefit. School funding will increase nearly 500 percent in Bergen and Passaic with the fairness formula, while average property taxes will be reduced by over $2,000. When schools aren’t funded on a per pupil basis, $5.1 billion goes to 31 districts and $4 billion goes to 546 districts. The fairness formula will equitably spend $9.1 billion across all 577 districts, without any property tax discrimination based on educational excellence. Any legislator representing these counties who does not support this fair and balanced approach is failing to represent their own constituents. Providing funding equally on a per pupil basis will level out the playing field and decrease property taxes across the state. Extra aid will only be provided to make sure we take care of our special education students who need the extra help to get by. Three out of four school districts in the entire state Assemblywoman Holly Schepisi would see an increase in aid, 69 out of 70 municipalities in Bergen County would see an increase in aid. That means 69 Bergen County towns will see a reduction in property taxes, providing much needed relief. The current school funding formula has been a disaster that drives up property taxes and does nothing to help failing school districts reverse the course. The fairness formula will provide fair funding. Opponents to the idea will holler that it is unconstitutional. If that is their only concern, I have sponsored a resolution since 2012 (ACR35) amending the constitution to provide a thorough and efficient education on a per pupil basis. The current formula is an indefensible failure, if the constitution is the only concern, then pass my resolution and the fairness formula. Report: More Whites Are Killed By Police, More Blacks Kill Blacks Some cops are out of control but not out to gun down blacks, New York Post story says University of Toledo criminologist Dr. Richard R. Johnson examined the latest data from the FBI and Centers for Disease Control, In an opinon piece to the New York Post. From 2003 through 2012, law-enforcement officers killed an average of 429 people per year in “legal interventions.” These include a relatively small number of innocent people killed by cops and many more who died due to reasonable use of force. When a bank robber thrusts a loaded Glock into a teller’s neck, that’s a really good time for the police to kill him. Anti-police protesters chant the well-known names of several black males who lately have died at the hands of cops: Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Freddie Gray, Tamir Rice and Walter Scott. Some cops (such as Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown) have been exonerated, even by Obama’s Justice Department. Others face trial — such as Officer Michael Slager, who shot Walter Scott in the back in North Charleston, SC, and the three white and three black Baltimore cops in whose custody Freddie Gray died. What this controversy sorely needs is a strong dose of facts. Actual crime data reveal that this movement is based on mythology. Thanks to the Ferguson Effect, blistering anti-lawenforcement rhetoric and sometimes fatal attacks on police have made cops timid, if not terrified. The result? A murder explosion that, ironically, is killing the very black people whom Black Lives Matter claims to champion. Year to date, homicides are up 8.3 percent in New York, 19.2 percent in Chicago, 51.5 percent in St. Louis and 52.5 percent in Baltimore. On average, 4,472 black men were killed by other black men annually between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2012, according to the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports. Using FBI and CDC statistics, Professor Johnson calculates that 112 black men, on average, suffered both justified and unjustified policeinvolved deaths annually during this period. This equals 2.5 percent of these 4,472 yearly deaths. For every black man — criminal or innocent — killed by a cop, 40 black men were murdered by other black men. The, at most, 2.5 percent of the problem generates relentless rage. And, yet, it is rudeto-racist to mention 97.5 percent of the problem. As America’s largest police force, one would ex- pect the NYPD to be a major player in this alleged mass murder of innocent blacks. Wrong again! The supposedly trigger-happy, bigoted NYPD killed a whopping eight people last year, according to its meticulous, 73-page “2014 Annual Firearms Discharge Report.” Of these, four were black. All of them were armed with cutting instruments (scissors, a hatchet, a boxcutter and a knife) and wielded them when they fatally were shot. Rather than NYPD gunfire, the high-profile Eric Garner case involved a police chokehold that may have given the overweight Garner a lethal coronary. Still, these five deaths (at least four of them justified) total last year’s NYPD “genocide” against black men. They equal 4.95 percent of Gotham’s 101 blackon-black murders in 2014. Other blacks are 20 times deadlier to black New Yorkers than is the NYPD. Yes, some police are overzealous, twitchy-fingered and — surely — racist. NYPD Officer James Frascatore’s heavy-handed takedown of tennis player James Blake outside a Manhattan hotel in September confirms that some cops need leashes. Also, According to the Washington Post more white citizens are killing in confrontation with police officers than Blacks; An analysis released last week shows that more white people died at the hands of law enforcement than those of any other race in the last two years, even as the Justice Department, social-justice groups and media coverage focus on black victims of police force. The deaths of whites at the hands of law enforcement typically receive less attention, even when the case is shrouded in controversy. For example, Gilbert Collar, an 18-year-old white student at the University of South Alabama, was shot and killed while naked, unarmed and under the influence of drugs by a black police officer. The story noted. Police assigned to black communities with high crime rates are more accustomed to dangerous situations and thus are more likely to be able to resolve them without resort to lethal force. “Yes, more whites than blacks die as a result of an encounter with police, but whites also represent a much bigger chunk of the total population,” PolitiFact said in its Aug. 21 post. “The odds that a black man will be shot and killed by a police officer is about 1 in 60,000. For a white man those odds are 1 in 200,000. killed by police in 2016: 242 Whites, 129 Blacks, 80 Hispanics, 23 other, 48 unknown Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] killed by police in 2015: 494 Whites, 258 Blacks, 127 Hispanics, 38 other, 28 unknown June-July, 2016 7 FBI Find Major Conflict In Clinton Story But Won’t Convict NJ Pulse - News Without Influence FBI Director: Hillary Clinton broke the law “but not intentionally” on the Investigation of Clinton’s use of having top secret documents on her Personal E-Mail System Remarks prepared for delivery at press briefing. Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State. Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities. Consistent with our counterintelligence responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with the personal e-mail server by any foreign power, or other hostile actors. From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent. The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private email domain. With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. Now let me tell you what we found: Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information. For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails). None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these emails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail. Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it. With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various con We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account. So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice: In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order. Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past. In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials ex- posed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now. And so we at this newspaper pause for a moment, to remember our brother is blue. Fiver officers in Dallas who were trying to shield protesters from gun fire, not knowing the bullets were for them. Something that happened in two States far away, they paid for. The other three in Baton Rouge, also woke up that morning, said good bye to their family, not knowing it was the last time,it was their last good bye. Cursed are they that commit an Eye for an Eye and do justise and Judgement before the Lord; Matthew 5:38 Rest in peace my Christian brothers, you are now soldiers of the Lord Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] Officer Montrell Jackson did not get to go home to his son. He will never know his father, only that some coward, gunned him down for something he did not do. June-July, 2016 8 Opinions - like it or not These just won’t stop. Some one is getting paid here, NBC reporter in Paterson with Councilman Sayegh, the are the only 2 obsessed with the mayor and who is at his home. I can’t tell you what he’s done for the city. So if the makes the mayor look bad, we’ll all run to him. NJ Pulse - News Without Influence Where are they now!? Paterson vote for these dummies. The took the vote and the money and they ran. The city is in a deep crisis but you won’t see them now. The got what they wanted, control of the money and the power to run they county. And Paterson will do it all over again. Where are these people? the too come to council meeting when they heard the taxes were going up, it did, and when the election come, they stayed home. The same council that raised their taxes, they left them to be re-elected. They’ll be back again. Advertise Your Business In The New Jersey Pulse News If you’re seeing this, they are seeing it too [email protected] 201 737 3300 Paterson Kids Not Allowed On City Field for 30 Years Paterson City Council sells out Pennington Park fields to outside company for 30 years and limits access to Paterson kids PATERSON The city has turned over some fields in Pennington Park to a Bergen County-based youth soccer academy for 30 years, after the city spent public funds to help restore the park. Under an agreement the City Council earlier approved, the city will lease two field plots for 30 years to South Hackensack-based Cedar Stars Academy USA Corp. The nonprofit operates several New Jersey youth soccer programs for boys and girls, with ages generally ranging from early elementary to high school. The agreement enables Cedar Stars to expand its operations into Passaic County, as its website www.cedarstars.com - shows it currently offers programs in Bergen, Essex and Monmouth counties. The new fields are not expected to be fully operational until early 2017. The park is situated in the Old Great Falls Historic District. It features two other fields, including a baseball diamond. But for 30 years, the two fields will primarily be used by Cedar Stars. And Paterson kids not enrolled in a special academy scholarship program are virtually shut out from using them, except for possibly a three-hour window on weekdays during the summer, when examining the contract's exact language. In the agreement, Cedar Stars is expected to finance constructing two artificial turf fields, to be principally utilized for soccer activities: clinics, camps, leagues, training sessions, games and tournaments. The resolution states Cedar Stars will itself spend only $1.6 million to $2 million over the 30 years it primarily controls the fields. Yet in a memorandum from the city, it was revealed that Cedar Stars has received $5 million to $7 million in program donations. A check of Cedar Stars' website shows expenses for certain academy camps, such as summer camps, can run as high as $200 per week for each student, which show additional income to Cedar Stars. There is nothing in the agreement that Paterson would receive a percentage of the fees Cedar Stars is charging or money it is making of the fields, including any paid tournaments or games. The city council also did not looking into the income for Cedar Stars use of the park and if part of that money could be used by the city, for other repairs to Pennington park and or other parks in the city of Paterson we were told. Some questioned why the council was blindsided by the fields repair, which would benefit Cedar Star anyway and not able to see the large income Cedar Star is allegedly making, from Paterson and add that to the deal. The agreement also requires the city of Paterson to fully subsidize upkeep and maintenance at the two fields - and for paying to provide full-time police security - during the operational hours of Pennington Park. Taxpayers must foot the bill, for $200,000, for fencing in and securing the fields, according to the agreement The city has not yet calculated taxpayer costs for maintenance and security, which is separate from the agreement. Requiring the city to entirely fund maintenance and security for the two new soccer fields could come with a hefty price tag, based on its own experiences, we were told. During similar games and events at other locations, such as city-owned East Side Park, security and cleanup expenses - from the police department and Department of Public Works can run into the tens of thousands for dollars per event. The agreement says, "Cedar Star shall be entitled to priority usage and non-priority usage for the improvement of the property for a period of 30 years." That priority usage is defined as "a right of first refusal to use the Paterson property." While the organization deals itself the better hand, Paterson kids are left with very few cards in the game. Cedar Stars stated it will give scholarships, and other help, to some Paterson kids in exchange for controlling the park for its own use. But that provision sounds more like throwing a bone, than giving a fair shake to Paterson, a Paterson resident stated. As an example, Cedar Stars will offer some kind of initiative giving free soccer program scholarships to certain Paterson children - but only provided they qualify under specific requirements. For instance, Cedar Stars will provide an after school recreational training program for about 100 city children on free scholarships for six hours weekly, and a yearly summer soccer program for three weeks for 200 city children on free scholarships. In the agreement, only Cedar Stars will have Paterson kid playing soccer in Clifton since Cedar Stars will likely need some time to wrap up its games and leave, and then, children wishing to use the field at 1 p.m. might have to hurry to meet a 4 p.m. restriction. Cedar Stars could then resume activities through 10 p.m., under its agreement. Even for the 100 Paterson children fortunate enough to be picked for the non-summer scholarship program, a rough calculation from NJ Pulse shows their field time would be severely limited. For 100 children, at only six hours per week during the times the program will be run: full access to the fields. The following are the times Cedar Stars will control the two fields for the next 30 years - the same times Paterson children unable to obtain the special scholarships will be barred from using them. January – December - Mon.-Fri.: 4 to 10 p.m. For the non-summer months, since Paterson children are expected to be in school on weekdays, they will have no access to the leased fields during this time for 30 years. September 1 – November 21 = (24 hours a month over three months). January – December Sat.-Sun.: - 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. This means that, for 30 years, most Paterson children will be barred from using the field on weekends during the day. Local ordinance prohibits use of the fields after 8 p.m. Mon.-Fri.: June – August - 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. This means that, if most Paterson children want to use the two leased fields weekdays in the summer. they would have only between 1 and 4 p.m. to play there. The three-hour window might even be shorter, Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] April 1 – June 15 = (24 hours a month over three months). It should be noted that, after the council approved this agreement, all incumbent council members running for re-election last May was reelected. Council President Bill McKoy has publicly stated that, regardless of how many of a council majority on the nine-member body approve a program, all council members then assume responsibility for working to support the program. June-July, 2016 9 NJ Pulse - News Without Influence With So Many Parking Facilities, There’s No excuse To Park Illegally In The City Of Paterson Low Cost and Worry Free Parking In The City Of Paterson You Take Care of The Shopping and Business and We’ll Take Car Of Your Car For You Site #10 $1. per hour 1Block from Main Street and downtown shopping Dwayne Cox, Chairman - Ashley Turnbull, Vice Chairman - Joseph Barbieri, Secretary - Rev. Kenneth Clayton Treasurer - Jenny M. Formentin, Assistant Secretary, - Ventura Padilla, Commissioner, Rev. Fabian A. Herah Commissioner - Glenn F. Scotland, General Counsel, Tony Perez - Executive Director, Diana Carabello - Manager of Operations. Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] June-July, 2016 10 Paterson Officially Awarded 3rd Worst City In The U.S. NJ Pulse - News Without Influence City of Paterson, Newark and Camden on the list of worst city in the US PATERSON According to a study by 24/7 Wall St., and published in USA Today, Paterson city officials were handed their report card and it is not good. The City of Paterson is listed as the 3rd worst city in the United States, a heartbeat behind Detroit, Mich. and Miami, Florida. New Jersey has 250 boroughs, 52 cities, 15 towns, 245 townships, and four villages. What makes the number more staggering is that The United States Census reported there are 50,432 municipalities and townships combined in the United States. Paterson officials were also handed that piece of bad news. Moody’s, a trusted credit rating agency, once again downgraded Paterson’s outlook as "negative." “Summary Rating" Rationale: Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the City of Paterson, New Jersey's general obligation rating at Ba1. The outlook was revised to negative. Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed the A3 enhanced rating on the city's Municipal Qualified Bond Act (MQBA) enhanced bonds. The outlook on the enhanced rating remains negative. The affirmation of the Ba1 is based the city's very weak financial position after worse-thanexpected financial performance in fiscal 2015. Fund balance and cash reserves will remain weak through fiscal 2016 and could likely worsen going forward. The rating reflects the city's large, declining tax base, below-average income levels, high rates of poverty and unemployment, and above-average debt burden. It also incorporates the city's considerable reliance on state emergency aid and deficit financing to support operations. The A3 enhanced rating reflects the additional security provided by the state's Municipal Qualified Bond Act (MQBA) pre-default state intercept program. The A3 rating is one notch below the State of New Jersey (A2 negative), reflecting strong 3.8 times debt service coverage provided by qualified state aid revenues. Rating Outlook: The negative underlying outlook reflects our expectation that city operations will be significantly pressured over the next 12 to 18 months by the lack of budget consensus for fiscal 2016 (June 30). The negative outlook assigned to the enhanced qualified bond ratings is directly linked to the state's negative outlook,” Moody's report concludes. Moody’s also gave this city some advice, which it has trouble comprehending or implementing, such as: Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade Significant and sustained improvement in liquidity and current fund balance. Material improvements in the city's socioeconomic profile. Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Further deterioration in current fund balance and/or cash reserves. Continued difficulty passing budgets in a timely fashion. Material declines in the tax base or socioeconomic profile. Significant increase in debt or pension burden. Moody’s recently cited the City Council's budget fight with the mayor as a major negative for the city. The council's refusal to pass the budget caused the city to be shut down, costing employees a half-million dollars in pay, only to pass the same budget later on. This "worst list" is also bad news for the Democrat Party, which took control of Paterson 21 years ago and has controlled not just Paterson but Passaic County itself. The city has seen a major decline in services, jobs, living conditions, streets; growth and investments. It also, on the other side, saw an increase in crime, unemployment, taxes, foreclosures and loss of businesses. Under Republican control in the 80s, the city had been thriving. With the influx of minorities, the city has shifted from being Republican to one fully controlled by the Democrats. For years, the Republicans have tried regaining control but been unsuccessful, with one Republican even saying, “Hey Paterson, you keep voting Democratic. How is that working out for you?” Paterson was one of the richest cities in the country. Detroit was also arguably the richest city in the world. Today Detroit is broke with crime spread across it land scape, Paterson is one beat behind Detroit on the list. Paterson officials have enjoyed the Democrat party-line politics, which have repeatedly seen these same officials win - despite the city's constant slide into deterioration. Forbes explain it as; “increasing the relative size of one’s political base through distortionary, wealth-reducing policies.” Translation: A politician or a political party can achieve long-term dominance by tipping the balance of votes in their direction through the implementation of policies that strangle and stifle economic growth. Counterintuitively, making a city poorer leads to political success for the engineers of that impoverishment. Here’s an example of how the Curley effect works: Let’s say a mayor advocates and adopts policies that redistribute wealth from the prosperous to the not-so-prosperous by bestowing generous tax-financed favors on unions, the public sector in general, and select corporations. These beneficiaries become economically dependent on their political patrons, so they give them their undivided electoral support—e.g., votes, campaign contributions, and get-out-thevote drives. Meanwhile, the anti-rich rhetoric of these clever demagogues, combined with higher taxes to fund the political favors, triggers a flight of tax refugees from the cities to the suburbs. It also shrinks the tax base of the city, even as the city’s budget swells.” In Paterson there is also little consensus on where funding should come from, or be cut, between the mayor and an inexperienced council, most of whose members lack any background in economic growth, fiscal training, the vision to create an Urban Plan or legal knowledge. The new members were elected based on their popularity in the community, rather than being vetted for experience and education in government. Someone who may not have a job, but who walks around being friendly with the community will most likely be elected over someone who is at work and does not have the luxury of being constantly seen by the community. Homeowners also do not have a choice in deciding who is better qualified to reduce their taxes, as most of the votes are from renters in large apartment complexes. The report stated it considered a number of factors when deciding where one should live, including the quality of schools, the strength of the local economy and job market, the area’s safety and culture, as well as its climate. “Most, if not all, people do not control where they are born, live, or move to, 24/7 Wall St. states. "Millions of Americans find themselves in places that lack jobs, amenities, and security. While people love and hate cities for any number of reasons, there are some objective measures by which all cities can be compared.” To determine America’s worst cities to live in, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed data on the 550 U.S. cities with populations of 65,000 or more as Inside the Paterson council chamber where they are responsible for running the cities business - some members see here are no longe with the council measured by the U.S. Census Bureau. Based on a range of variables, including crime rates, employment growth, access to restaurants and attractions, educational attainment, and housing affordability, it identified America’s 50 worst cities to live in. "Income is highly associated with a range of other social and economic factors. Because of its importance, financial status was a major component of the ranking. Low-income families tend to live in communities with less-stable housing, worse health systems, greater exposure to stressors such as violent crime, less secure employment, and higher exposure to poor air quality and environmental toxins. While prospering under these conditions is certainly possible, these factors dramatically lower the likelihood of doing so. Residents of the worst cities to live in tend to have lower incomes and higher poverty rates. Of the 50 worst cities, only eight have median incomes higher than the nationwide median households income of $53,657 a year. In 29 of the 50 cities, more than 25% of the population lives in poverty, in contrast with the national poverty rate of 15.5%," the report states. "Violence is closely associated with a range of negative social and economic outcomes for all involved, including incarceration, unstable employment, lower cognitive functioning among children, and anxiety," the report further maintains. "The violent crime rates in almost all of the worst cities to live is higher than the national rate of 366 reported incidents per 100,000 people. Even compared to other cities, where. in general, violence is more common, these cities are not especially safe. In half of the 50, the violent crime rate exceeds 1,000 incidents per 100,000 people." The following includes a summary of why Paterson is third on the list of 50,432 ciites, based on Wall St. 24/7's findings. 3. Paterson, New Jersey > Population: 146,746 > Median home value: $239,300 > Poverty rate: 30.7% > Pct. with at least a bachelor’s degree: 10.8% "Paterson is home to the Great Falls of the Passaic, which used to power the mills of the city’s once vibrant textile manufacturing industry. According to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Paterson’s textile industry was so productive in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that the city became known as “Silk City.” Close to 16% of the city’s workforce is employed in the manufacturing sector, still well above the national proportion. Like many American industrial cities, Paterson’s economy is no longer prospering as it once was. More than 30% of the area’s residents live in poverty, nearly double the national poverty rate." The two other New Jersey cities listed, with summaries, are: Newark, which came in 43rd place: Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] 43. Newark, New Jersey > Population: 280,577 > Median home value: $216,200 > Poverty rate: 28.2% > Pct. with at least a bachelor’s degree: 13.7% "New York is the most populous, economically robust metropolitan area in the country. Not all parts of the metro area are especially great places to live. Located roughly 15 miles from midtown Manhattan, goods and services are pricey in Newark. As a whole, the cost of living in Newark is 21.6% higher than it is across the country as a whole. Housing is particularly expensive, costing about 50% more than housing costs nationwide. Not only does a dollar not go as far in the New Jersey city, the median household income in Newark is about $17,700 lower than the national median income." Camden also fair better that Paterson coming in 25th: 25. Camden, New Jersey > Population: 77,317 > Median home value: $82,700 > Poverty rate: 36.5% > Pct. with at least a bachelor’s degree: 7.8% "Opportunities to socialize and the presence of entertainment venues help increase the quality of life in a community. Camden has very few social amenities. There are only 163.0 restaurants, cafes, or similar eateries for every 100,000 people in the city, far fewer than the national concentration of 238.4 per 100,000 people nationwide. An increase in the number of such establishments would likely make the city a more attractive place to live. Camden has more serious economic problems than the lack of leisure time amenities, as well as environmental problems. Only 7.8% of area adults have a bachelor’s degree, far fewer than the 30.1% of American adults. This likely makes the area less attractive to businesses seeking highly-skilled workers. Low air quality can greatly increase certain health risks, and the air quality is hazardous 8.1% of days each year in Camden, far more than the national 5.9% share of low air quality days." Paterson, near the top of the list, is one beat away from Detroit, which made number two, followed by Miami, which is number one. 15 worst cities starting with #1 1. Miami, Florida 2. Detroit, Michigan 3. Paterson, New Jersey 4. Hawthorne, California 5. Fall River, Massachusetts 6. Birmingham, Alabama 7. Memphis, Tennessee 8. Flint, Michigan 9. Cleveland, Ohio 10. Gary, Indiana 11. Westminster, California 12. Jackson, Mississippi 13. Dayton, Ohio 14. Buffalo, New York 15. St. Louis, Missouri June-July, 2016 11 One step forward, two steps back on NJ Pension and Health NJ Pulse - News Without Influence Gov: $195,000 in and $2.6 Million out is not a good pension plan for taxpayers TRANSCRIPT: “If I had the money today, to make the full pension payment I would. We don't, and I'm not going to raise taxes on all the people of New Jersey to benefit 625,000 residents in New Jersey. The system is completely broken and here's what you need to be telling the people New Jersey - and I’m certainly going to be telling them. Let's take the average teacher in New Jersey who works 30 years - that average teacher puts $84,000 into the pension system over their 30-year career. Eighty-four thousand dollars and they take out $1.1 million, over their lifetime. The average teacher in New Jersey who gets family health coverage, pays $1 a hundred eleven thousand dollars over their 30-year career for health coverage and the cost to that health coverage is $1.5 million, so, we have an average teacher New Jer- sey works 30 years to pay the $195,000 for their pension and health care and gets out $2.6 million in benefits. That is a broken system and it will go bankrupt no matter how much money we put in and so the fact is I'm not going to raise taxes on 8 million people in New Jersey to benefits 625,000 people, who are benefiting from bloated and broken system. I stand ready to go back to the negotiating table, any time, with the unions in this state to fix this system. If they refuse to do so, they will be the stewards of a bankrupt system. Remember this - when we make our $1.3 billion payment in fiscal year 16, with the additional 212 we just put in, that means we will put in, in this administration in six years, $ 4.4 billion into the pension system, which is double, double what any other governor has done in the history of the state. So they can yell at me and pick on me but I've given more money than any governor has and I've been the one that has told the truth about what we need to reform it, and when I hear the teachers union say, ‘We make their payments,’ well, I would offer, to any citizen in New Jersey, to put $195,000 in, over 30 years, and get $2.6 million out. The only reason it can be done is because the taxpayers in New Jersey are shouldering that cost. And so they can continue to make their payments. I welcome them too but don't equate your payments to the value you’re getting out because it’s nowhere close. Funding for the Transportation Trust Fund, that prompted a week-long shutdown of construction projects, is threatening a proposed constitutional amendment, guaranteeing public worker pension contributions.” CHRISTIE ON VP REJECTION “I’M DISAPPOINTED.” Governor Christie not happy about VP snub “Of course you’re disappointed (speaking for himself) to NJ.com. I don’t ever get into anything that I don’t want to win. And so when you’re not picked of course you’re going to get disappointed but I’ve been through the parade before and I realize it’s like getting hit by lightening you know. It didn’t happen, that’s fine and like I said in the interview that I gave on Thursday, before I knew what was going to happen, you get disappointed, you take a deep breath and you get ready for tomorrow and here I am, and I’ll be speaking Tuesday night, (at the GOP convention) and I’m running the transition I’ve got more things to do this week than I have time to do them so. It’s just the way it goes and I would not trade the experience for anything.” At a breakfast for Michigan’s GOP delegates Christie – who was passed over for the role as Trump’s vice president – also praised the presumptive nominee’s choice of Indiana Gov. Mike Pence to join the ticket. “I am really relieved that Donald Trump picked a governor to be his running mate,” said Christie, who didn’t mention his being in contention for the role. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer report. Christie’s political future was of some interest to the Michigan delegates. “When asked, please say you’ll be the next attorney general,” a woman told Christie during a question-and-answer session. (“That’s very nice, and very kind,” Christie said, adding that “we’ll see what life brings.”) Presuming that Christie would be selected as attorney general, Randy Bishop asked the governor: “Will you announce today, right here, that you will prosecute Hillary Clinton?” Christie said it would be wrong for him to “prejudge” the matter, but joked: “Listen, it is very tempting to give into what I know would be an enormous applause line.” When You Advertise Your Business With Us You Support The Truth Nobody Tell’s The News Like We Do IN PRINT TALK ONLINE COVERAGE AREA To Advertise With The NJ Pulse And or US Latino Pulse Call: 201 737 3300 Email: [email protected] Web: www.NewJerseyPulse.com - Email:[email protected] June-July, 2016 12 US Latino Pulse News Without Influence Estados Unidos aprueba $ 70 mil millones para reconstruir la deuda de Puerto Rico Estados Unidos aprueba $ 70 mil millones para reconstruir la deuda de Puerto Rico. El presidente Obama firmó S. 2328, un proyecto de ley de alivio de deuda a Puerto Rico, junto con S. 337, la FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) Ley de Mejora de 2016. El proyecto de ley aborda la deuda de Puerto Rico mediante el establecimiento de una junta de supervisión, un proceso de reestructuración de la deuda, y los procedimientos acelerados para la aprobación de proyectos de infraestructura crítica. las responsabilidades del consejo incluyen: • aprobar el plan fiscal del gobernador; • aprobación de los presupuestos anuales; • hacer cumplir los presupuestos y ordenar las reducciones de gastos necesarios; y • revisar las leyes, contratos, normas, reglamentos u órdenes ejecutivas para el cumplimiento del plan fiscal. El establecimiento de la junta funciona como una suspensión automática de las acciones de los acreedores para hacer cumplir las demandas contra el gobierno de Puerto Rico. El proyecto de ley modifica la Ley de Normas Razonables de Trabajo de 1938 para permitir que el gobernador, sujeto a la aprobación de la junta, para designar un periodo de tiempo de no más de cuatro años durante los cuales los empleadores en Sirrano Keith Baldeo Publisher Me gustaría dar la bienvenida a los lectores de New Jersey Pulse a nuestro periódico hermano, el Pulso Latino de Estados Unidos. El US Latino Pulse se encuentra también en línea en www.USLatinoPulse.com. Actualmente se está introduciendo por este medio pero más adelante será un periódico independiente. Hace nueve años, creé el Paterson Pulse, que se convirtió en el periódico PNJ Pulse. NJ Pulse News es un portavoz para la comunidad negra. Pero con una minoria latina con una gran población, es lógico que nos convertamos también en portavoz para la comunidad latinal. Por qué la comunidad latina? Por dos razones. 1. Al ser un inmigrante a los Estados Unidos, entiendo los retos que encaran los inmigrantes y Puerto Rico pueden pagar ciertos empleados menos del salario mínimo nacional . El proyecto de ley establece un Coordinador de Revitalización para designar a los proyectos de infraestructura críticos que cumplan con los requisitos especificados. proyectos críticos aprobados por la junta de supervisión son elegibles para un proceso de autorización acelerada. La junta deberá dividir los acreedores en grupos en base a las características de la deuda, y cada grupo puede votar un plan de reestructuración de la deuda. Si al menos dos tercios de la cantidad principal pendiente de un grupo está de acuerdo con el plan, el grupo puede presentar una petición en el tribunal para obligar a los tenedores de bonos disidentes de la modificación. En general.- Tan pronto como sea posible después de que todos los miembros y el Presidente hayan sido nombrados miembro del Consejo de Supervisión de conformidad con la sección 101 (e) en el año fiscal en el que se establece la Junta de Supervisión, y en cada año fiscal posterior durante el que la Junta de Supervisión está en funcionamiento, la Junta de Supervisión deberá entregar un aviso al gobernador para proporcionar un calendario para el proceso de desarrollo, presentación, aprobación y certificación de los planes fiscales. La notificación también puede establecer un calendario para la revisión de cualquier plan fiscal que ya haya sido certificado, qué revisiones deben estar sujetas a la posterior aprobación y certificación por el Consejo de Supervisión. El Consejo de Supervisión consultará con el gobernador en el establecimiento de un calendario, pero la Junta de Supervisión será el único criterio para establecer o, mediante la entrega de una notificación posterior al gobernador, cambiar las fechas de tal horario de acuerdo a lo que se estime conveniente y razonablemente factible. El proyecto de ley prevé una estancia, o alto, a cualquier litigio iniciado contra el gobierno de Puerto Rico y sus organismos emisores de deuda retroactivo al mes de diciembre. Esto proporciona espacio para respirar a la junta para iniciar el proceso de reestructuración y supervisar un proceso de presupuesto sostenible. informó Reuter.com. Los partidarios dijeron que la intervención de los legisladores de Washington era necesario para ayudar a 3,5 millones de ciudadanos estadounidenses de la isla evitar una "caída en el caos", según el secretario del Tesoro de EE.UU. Jack Lew el martes. Puerto Rico ha estado esperando durante meses a que el Congreso actúe mientas su crisis económica empeoró. Ya se ha incumplido en parte de su deuda. El territorio de la isla del Caribe se está recuperando de una tasa de pobreza del 45 por ciento, así como un flujo constante de migración a la parte continental de. que reduce su base tributaria y fondo de servicios esenciales. El Estado Libre Asociado acumuló la deuda después de años de préstamos para cubrir los costos de operación. El plan prevé la mayor intervención federal en los asuntos fiscales de la isla, desde que se convirtió en un territorio EE.UU. en 1898 después de la Guerra Española-Americana. informó Bloomberg.com. "El proyecto de ley no resuelve ningún problema. Se le da un marco ", dijo otra persona involucrada en las negociaciones que hablaron bajo la condición de anonimato para proteger a sus relaciones de negocios. Las medidas de emergencia informó el . Washington Post Apesar de que Puerto Rico está en mora en el pago de deuda aproximadamente de $ 1 mil millones de pagos de la deuda que quedaron por pagar, en uno de los mayores incumplimientos de bonos municipales jamás visto. La isla todavía se enfrenta cerca de $ 2 millones de dólares en pagos de deudas vencidas y más en los próximos meses, mientras que la junta de supervisión se pone en marcha y comienza a funcionar. [email protected] sus familiares y el choque cultural al tratar de encajar en un nuevo mundo y una nueva vida. La experiencia puede ser un reto y a veces puede ser aterrador. Hace algunos años, escribí un libro titulado, "Cuando el Servicio de Inmigración le afecta," para ayudar y animar a otros a entender la vida en los Estados Unidos y cómo deshacerse de los miedos y malentendidos cuando se Interactúa con el gobierno, sus leyes y los agentes de policía. Estoy profundamente preocupado por las personas que se hacen líderes en la comunidad latina en su país prospectivo y lo único que hacen es utilizar su liderazgo para obtener beneficios para sí mismos -, mientras que las necesidades de todos los latinos se dejan en abandono. Estamos en los Estados Unidos de America; no en nuestro pais de origen,, por lo cual las cosas marchan de diferente manera aquí. Las personas que utilizan la cultura de su país de origen para explotar a sus propios conciudadanos deben ser desafiados. Que es lo que ya se está haciendo. Recuerdo haber ido a la corte para ayudar a una madre latina, que fue detenida acusada de resistencia a un agente policíaco, simplemente porque había hecho una parada de tráfico para dejar su hija en una escuela diurna; no ví a los llamados "líderes latinos" luchando por sus derecho en la corte. Ella pasó nueve horas en la cárcel, sin agua ni comida, porque un policía quería golpear a alguien sin motivo. Y me parece que la policía arremetió contra ella debido a que no hablaba In- glés. 2. La otra razón de Latino Pulse en Estados Unidos es la visión que veo para los latinos como cristianos. En los Estados Unidos, la fe cristiana está cayendose a pedazos. Hay algunas personas que luchan por no perder la cabeza, pero hay más personas que luchan por romper la fe. Aunque no voy a entrar en detalles, voy a decir lo siguiente: las únicas personas que están actualmente siguiendo a Jesucristo en gran número son personas que entran en los son los latinos - en trenes, aviones, automóviles y a pie. Se dice que una cultura sólo puede sobrevivir si produce más de 2,5 hijos por familia, siempre y cuando se le enseñe a los niños de esa cultura a mantener su fe y otra cultura no alcance a reproducirse más que ella. Pues bien, dada la actual tasa de crecimiento de otras culturas y con el alejamiento de más y más cristianos, la cultura cristiana no sobrevivirá plenamente en América. La única otra raza o cultura, mayor que la blanca y la cultura negro, que cuenta con un gran número de cristianos que creen en Cristo, y que se reproduce sobrepasando la cantidad de niños necesarios para reconstruir una nación, son los latinos. Así de importante eres para los Estados Unidos. Pero si los latinos no están debidamente integrados en este país, con los cristianos que quedan, entonces su propósito aquí se perderá. Tranquilamente, han llegado a estas tierras trayendo la causa de Cristo. Mi propósito para animar a los latinos a adoptar un estilo de vida profesional y de élite integrar, no separar. Eso significa que la mentalidad desarrollada a partir de dónde viene, como yo, debe cambiar para que sea igual a los que vinieron aquí hace más de 240 años. Veo a muchos latinos que luchan por mirar hacia atrás a donde proceden, pero eso rs la razón por la cual vinimos aquí. No es por esa razón por la que Dios hizo posible el cruzar fronteras y les trajo aquí. Ustedes son el futuro de Cristo aquí, mirando hacia adelante. Ustedes son el futuro de su reino. Ustedes son un pueblo bendito. No lo arruines! Si no nos unimos a los otros cristianos "verdaderos" que quedan aquí, y mantenemos en alto el nombre de Cristo, en un futuro próximo, habrán perdido su nombre y el reino por el que murió. Por lo que debe saber, ya que los nuevos cristianos que han emigrado a este país como yo, por qué Dios te trajo aquí - no a vivir una vida de pobreza y opresión a causa de nuestro origen sino para ponernos de pie y cuestionar a aquellos que vinieron antes que nosotros, "Por qué no has guardado la fe?" Y para aquellos que han ejercido su derecho dado por Dios para venir aquí y están manteniendo la fe - si usted es blanco, negro o alguna otra raza -esa es su labor para proteger, preservar y propagar el Evangelio de Jesucristo. Us Latino Pulse Editorial: ÚNETE A NOSOTROS (Join Us) : Gracias por leer el primer número del US Latino Pulse. (Thank you for reading the first issue of the US Latino Pulse ) El propósito de Latino Pulse es elevar el estilo de vida de la comunidad latina, para representar a los latinos en un nivel de élite y de la profesión e integrar mejor y más a los latinos a la comunidad. Es por eso que el Latino Pulse se ha asociado con los hispanos estadounidenses, Cámaras de Comercio para promover, comercializar y promover los negocios latinos y profesionales y para asegurar que los latinos están adecuadamente representados y recibir los servicios en la comunidad. También creemos que los latinos son una parte muy importante del futuro de la fe cristiana en los Estados Unidos y su integración es crucial para la supervivencia de la fe cristiana. Integración que debe estar en una profesión y nivel de elite para ser reconocidos como iguales en este país y tener un asiento en la mesa de cualquier discusión y reconocimiento. Únase a nosotros para ayudar a avanzar en este medio de comunicación o simplemente ser parte de esta causa. Actualmente estamos en busqued de sl personas con kas siguientes calificaciones: 1.) Escritores / Reporteros - deben ser bilingües. 2.) personas en ventas de publicidad. 3.) Diseño web y gráficos. 3.) En la cámara de host de nuestros programas en línea; se llevará a cabo entrevistas, informes sobre noticias, eventos y entretenimiento.Si usted siente que tiene lo que se necesita, envie un correo electrónico con su formación y experiencia. Entrenamiento disponible en algunos casos. Las noticias será en español e Inglés. Envíanos un email a: [email protected] or [email protected] Web: USLatinoPulse.com - Email:[email protected] July-August, 2016 4 Corte Suprema rechaza Orden de Inmigración de Obama US Latino Pulse News Without Influence El Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos votó 4 a 4 sobre la política de inmigración del presidente Obama haciendo que fuese rechazada y devuelta a la corte de menor rango.l El juez de distrito Andrew Hanen EE.UU. de Brownsville dictaminó que la administración Obama no "cumplió con la Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo." La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo regula la forma en se hacen las regulaciones y la cantidad de entrada que el público tiene. informó The Texas Tribune. La política de Obama procura concederle a inmigrantes indocumentados - incluyendo algunos 1,46 millones en Texas - un permiso de trabajo y un alivio temporal de la deportación.Abbott, ex fiscal general del estado, presentó antes de ser juramentado como gobernador. Texas es parte de una coalición de 26 estados que desafió a la acción ejecutiva, que fue anunciada en noviembre de 2014. Abbott acusó al presidente de violar varias disposiciones de la Constitución de EE.UU., incluyendo uno que da jurisdicción al Congreso sobre las leyes de inmigración. Abbott también argumentó que Texas sería irreparablemente dañado por la acción. Citó como prueba el aumento del verano pasado de los inmigrantes indocumentados de América Central que entraron ilegalmente a Texas a través del Valle del Río Bravo. El programa fue bloqueado en febrero de 2015 por un juez federal con sede en Brownsville, Andrew Hanen, días antes de que fuera programada para comenzar. El Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones 5ª EE.UU. confirmó que la medida caducaba en noviembre. En una opinión de una sola frase en la división 4-4, el Tribunal Supremo declaró el 5 de Circuito el juicio queda afirmado por una Corte dividida por igual." El caso ahora vuelve a la corte de distrito de Hanen, donde el litigio sobre el fondo del plan podría continuar. "La Constitución es clara," dijo el presidente de la Cámara Paul Ryan en un comunicado. "El presidente no está tiene permisp para dictar leyes - sólo el Congreso." El punto muerto deja en su lugar la decisión de un tribunal inferior que impide plan de inmigración de Obama tenga efecto, negar el alivio temporal de la deportación a más de 4 millones de padres inmigrantes de ciudadanos de Estados Unidos bajo un programa denominado Acción Diferida para los padres de los estadounidenses, o DAPA. Fue modelado en un programa de 2012, la Acción Diferida para la niñez llegadas, que ofrecía un alivio similar a cerca de 600.000 jóvenes que se habían criado en los EE.UU. ilegalmente. Obama también había dirigido a la Seguridad Nacional y otras agencias a centrar los esfuerzos de expulsar delincuentes, pandilleros y personas que cruzan repetidamente la frontera, en lugar de los que no habían violado ninguna ley, fuera de estar en el país ilegalmeante. informó Los Angeles Times. La decisión del Tribunal Supremo no afecta a un programa separado 2012 destinado a proteger a las personas traídas a Estados Unidos cuando eran niños de expulsión, que Texas y los otros estados no desafiaron.que una Obama tomó la acción después de republicanos de la Cámara mataron legislación migratoria bipartidista, considerada como la mayor revisión de las leyes estadounidenses sobre la materia en décadas y proporcionar un camino hacia la ciudadanía para los inmigrantes ilegales, que fue aprobada por el Senado en 2013. El caso de inmigración trató de dos programas separados Obama. Uno podría permitir que los inmigrantes indocumentados que son padres de ciudadanos estadounidenses, ya sea o residentes permanentes legales para vivir y trabajar en los EE.UU. sin la amenaza de la deportación. La otra sería ampliar un programa existente para proteger de la expulsión a un grupo más numeroso de inmigrantes que fueron traídos a los EE.UU. ilegalmente cuando eran niños, diio Foxnews. Después de que Obama sobrepasó el Congreso de Estados Unidos y firmó la orden ejecutiva, el estado de Texas fue rápidamente a los tribunales para bloquear las iniciativas de Obama. Su demanda fue inicialmente analizada por el juez Andrew Hanen EE.UU. en Brownsville, Latino Business Owner? Get 10% Off First Year Membership with This Ad Business Planning & Operations Courses, Financing & Accounting Courses, Marketing Courses, Social Media Courses, Discounts on Graphic Design, Web Design, Business & Community Development JOIN THE FASTEST GROWING BUSINESS NETWORK Hispanic American Chambers Of Commerce Educational Seminars and Hot Topic Work / Lunch and Learn Sessions, Small Business Development Team, Community Wide Visioning Process, Scholarships, Access to Networking Activities (Excludes Annual Banquet) Economic Development & Enrichment Seminars. Network With Other Latino Businesses and Reach The Latino Community Diana Lynch President & CEO Maximo Sanchez Treasurer Executive Board Carlos Hernandez Secretary Executive Board www.haccnow.org - 973 -333-8232 office Texas. Hanen previamente había criticado a la administración sobre las leyes de inmigración laxa. Hanende ldejó wn mano de los estados, el bloqueo de los programas pE no surjan efecto. El Tribunal 5º EE.UU. Circuito de Apelaciones también gobernados por los estados, y el Departamento de Justicia se lanzaron una apelación al tribunal superior para que pueda ser escuchado este término. U.S Servicio de Inmigración y publicadas en su página web una actualización y el efecto sobre el fallo. Actualización: Debido a una orden judicial federal, el USCIS no comenzará a aceptar solicitudes para la expansión de las DACA el 18 de febrero como el previsto inicialmente y se ha suspendido la ejecución de la Acción Diferida para los padres de los estadounidenses y residentes legales permanentes. orden temporal de la corte, expedida el 16 de febrero no afecta a la DACA existente. Los individuos pueden continuar a presentarse y solicitar una subvención inicial de DACA o renovación de DACA bajo las directrices originales. Por favor revise las actualizaciones. El 20 de noviembre de 2014, el Presidente anunció una serie de acciones ejecutivas para combatir la inmigración ilegal en la frontera, a priorizar la deportación de criminales no las familias, y requieren ciertos inmigrantes indocumentados que pasar una verificación de antecedentes penales y pagar impuestos con el fin de permanecer temporalmente en los EE.UU. sin temor a ser deportados. Estas iniciativas incluyen: • La expansión de la población elegible para la acción diferida para la Infancia llegadas (DACA) programa para personas de cualquier edad actual que entraron a Estados Unidos antes de los 16 años y vivían en los Estados Unidos continuamente desde el 1 de enero del 2010, y que se extiende el período de DACA y autorización de trabajo a partir de dos años a tres años. • Permitir que los padres de ciudadanos estadounidenses y residentes permanentes legales para solicitar acción diferida y autorización de empleo durante tres años, en una nueva acción diferida para los padres de los estadounidenses y residentes permanentes legales * del programa, siempre que hayan vivido en los Estados Unidos continuamente desde el 1 de enero de de 2010, y pasar la verificación de antecedentes requeridos. • Ampliar el uso de dispensas provisionales de presencia ilegal para incluir a los cónyuges e hijos de residentes permanentes legales y los hijos e hijas de los ciudadanos de Estados Unidos. • La modernización, mejorar y aclarar los programas de inmigrantes y la visa de no inmigrante para hacer crecer nuestra economía y crear puestos de trabajo. La promoción de la educación ciudadana y sensibilización del público para los residentes permanentes legales y proporcionar una opción para los solicitantes de naturalización para utilizar tarjetas de crédito para pagar la cuota de solicitud. Aviso importante: Estas iniciativas aún no se han aplicado, y el USCIS no está aceptando las peticiones o solicitudes en este momento. Cuidado con cualquier persona que se ofrece a ayudarle a presentar una demanda o una solicitud de cualquiera de estas acciones antes de que estén disponibles. Usted podría ser víctima de un fraude de inmigración. Suscríbete para recibir actualizaciones por correo electrónico cuando se publica nueva información. Aunque USCIS no está aceptando solicitudes o aplicaciones en este momento, si cree que puede ser elegible para una de las iniciativas mencionadas anteriormente, se puede preparar mediante la recopilación de los documentos que establecen factores tales como su: • Identidad; • Relación con el ciudadano de EE.UU. o residente legal permanente, si es necesario; y Web: USLatinoPulse.com - Email:[email protected] residencia continua en los Estados Unidos durante los últimos cinco años o más. 1. ¿Quién es elegible; Las personas sin estatus legal de inmigración que buscan acción inicial o de renovación DACA.Deferred para Llegados en la Infancia. Se extiende el período de acción diferida y la autorización de empleo de tres años a partir de dos años, y le permite ser considerado para DACA si: Entrado en los Estados Unidos antes de los 16 años; Han vivido en los Estados Unidos continuamente desde al menos el 1 de enero de 2010 en lugar de la exigencia antes del 15 de junio de 2007; Son de cualquier edad (elimina el requisito de haber nacido desde junio 15, 1981); y Cumplir con todos los demás directrices DACA. 2. ¿Qué va a hacer la iniciativa; La acción diferida para los padres de ciudadanos estadounidenses y residentes permanentes legales. Un individuo que vive indocumentado en los Estados Unidos que es el padre de un ciudadano de EE.UU. o residente legal permanente y que cumpla con las directrices que figuran a continuación. Permite a los padres para solicitar la acción diferida y permiso de trabajo si: • Haber vivido en los Estados Unidos continuamente desde 1 de enero de 2010; Tenido, el 20 de noviembre de 2014, un hijo o una hija que es un ciudadano de EE.UU. o residente legal permanente; y no son una prioridad de la fuerza para la expulsión de los Estados 3. Cuando se puede empezar a hacer una solicitud; exenciones provisionales de presencia ilegal. Las personas indocumentadas que han residido ilegalmente en los Estados Unidos durante al menos 180 días y que son: Los hijos e hijas de los ciudadanos de Estados Unidos; o El cónyuge y los hijos o hijas de residentes permanentes legales. Se expande el programa de exención provisional anunciada en 2013 al permitir que los cónyuges, hijos e hijas de residentes permanentes legales y los hijos e hijas de los ciudadanos de Estados Unidos para obtener una exención si la visa está disponible. Puede haber ocasiones cuando el pariente calificado no es el peticionario. Aclara el significado de la norma "extrema dificultad" que se deben cumplir para obtener una exención. A pesar de esto las deportaciones de inmigrantes de Estados Unidos tiene un alcance máximo histórico bajo la Administración Obama De acuerdo con el Pew Research, el gobierno de Obama deportó un récord de 438,421 inmigrantes no autorizados en el año fiscal 2013, continuando con una racha de intensificado la aplicación que se ha traducido en más de 2 millones de deportaciones desde que Obama asumió el cargo, recientemente publicado Departamento de datos muestran Seguridad Nacional. El número récord de deportaciones viene incluso as580,946 jóvenes inmigrantes no autorizados han recibido alivio de la deportación y permisos de trabajo desde 2012 en virtud de una política llamada Acción Diferida para la Infancia llegadas. En Pew Research Center encuestas, los hispanos han expresado su desaprobación del creciente número de deportaciones durante la administración de Obama. Seis de cada diez adultos hispanos en febrero del 2014, dijo que el aumento del número de deportaciones de inmigrantes no autorizados es una "cosa mala", mientras que el público en general EE.UU. fue dividido en el tema. Y mientras que el 89% de los hispanos en 2013, dijo que apoyan una vía hacia la ciudadanía para los inmigrantes no autorizados que cumplan con ciertos requisitos, la mayoría (55%) dijo que la deportación reliefis más importante que un camino a la ciudadanía para esta población July-August, 2016 4 Corte Suprema rechaza Orden de Inmigración de Obama US Latino Pulse News Without Influence The US Supreme court voted 4 for 4 against President Obama’s immigration policy causing it to be rejected and return to the lower court. U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen of Brownsville ruled that the Obama administration did not "comply with the Administrative Procedure Act." The Administrative Procedure Act governs the way regulations are made and how much input the public has. The Texas Tribune reported. Obama's policy seeks to give as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants — including some 1.46 million in Texas — a work permit and temporary relief from deportation. Abbott, the state's former attorney general, filed the before being sworn in as governor. Texas is part of a 26-state coalition that challenged the executive action, which was announced in November of 2014. Abbott accused the president of violating several provisions of the U.S. Constitution, including one that gives Congress jurisdiction over immigration laws. Abbott also argued that Texas would be irreparably harmed by the action. He cited as proof last summer’s surge of undocumented immigrants from Central America who entered Texas illegally through the Rio Grande Valley. The program was blocked in February 2015 by a Brownsville-based federal judge, Andrew Hanen, days before it was scheduled to begin. The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that injunction in November. In a one-sentence opinion on the 4-4 split, the Supreme Court declared the 5th Circuit's "judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court." The case now returns to Hanen's district court, where litigation on the merits of the plan could continue. “The Constitution is clear,” House Speaker Paul Ryan said in a statement. “The president is not permitted to write laws — only Congress is." The deadlock leaves in place the lower-court decision that prevents Obama's immigration plan from taking effect, denying temporary relief from deportation to more than 4 million immigrant parents of U.S. citizens under a program called Deferred Action for Parents of Americans, or DAPA. It was modeled on a 2012 program, Deferred Ac- tion for Childhood Arrivals, which offered similar relief to about 600,000 young people who had been brought into the U.S. illegally. Obama had also directed Homeland Security and other agencies to focus deportation efforts on criminals, gang members and people who repeatedly cross the border, rather than those who had broken no laws besides living in the country illegally. The La Times reported. The Supreme Court decision does not affect a separate 2012 program aimed at protecting people brought to the United States as children from deportation, which Texas and the other states did not challenge. Reuters.com published. Obama took the action after House Republicans killed bipartisan immigration legislation, billed as the biggest overhaul of U.S. laws on the matter in decades and providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, that was passed by the Senate in 2013. The immigration case dealt with two separate Obama programs. One would allow undocumented immigrants who are parents of either U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents to live and work in the U.S. without the threat of deportation. The other would expand an existing program to protect from deportation a larger population of immigrants who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children. Said Foxnews. After Obama bypassed the US Congress and signed the executive order, the states of Texas quickly went to court to block the Obama initiatives. Their lawsuit was heard initially by U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen in Brownsville, Texas. Hanen previously had criticized the administration for lax immigration enforcement. Hanen sided with the states, blocking the programs from taking effect. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also ruled for the states, and the Justice Department rushed an appeal to the high court so that it could be heard this term. U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services published on it’s website an update and effect on the ruling. Update: Due to a federal court order, USCIS will not begin accepting requests for the expansion of DACA on February 18 as originally planned and has suspended implementation of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents. The court's temporary injunction, issued February 16, does not affect the existing DACA. Individuals may continue to come forward and request an initial grant of DACA or renewal of DACA under the original guidelines. Please check back for updates. On November 20, 2014, the President announced a series of executive actions to crack down on illegal immigration at the border, prioritize deporting felons not families, and require certain undocumented immigrants to pass a criminal background check and pay taxes in order to temporarily stay in the U.S. without fear of deportation. These initiatives include: Expanding the population eligible for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program to people of any current age who entered the United States before the age of 16 and lived in the United States continuously since January 1, 2010, and extending the period of DACA and work authorization from two years to three years. • Allowing parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents to request deferred action and employment authorization for three years, in a new Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents* program, provided they have lived in the United States continuously since January 1, 2010, and pass required background checks. • Expanding the use of provisional waivers of unlawful presence to include the spouses and sons and daughters of lawful permanent residents and the sons and daughters of U.S. citizens. • Modernizing, improving and clarifying immigrant and nonimmigrant visa programs to grow our economy and create jobs. Promoting citizenship education and public awareness for lawful permanent residents and providing an option for naturalization applicants to use credit cards to pay the application fee. Important notice: These initiatives have not yet been implemented, and USCIS is not accepting any requests or applications at this time. Beware of anyone who offers to help you submit an application or a request for any of these actions before they are available. You could become a victim of an immigration scam. Subscribe to get updates by email when new information is posted. While USCIS is not accepting requests or applications at this time, if you believe you may be eligible for one of the initiatives listed above, you can prepare by gathering documents that establish factors such as your: • Identity; • Relationship to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, if necessary; and Continuous residence in the United States over the last five years or more. 1. Who is eligible; Individuals with no lawful immigration status who are seeking initial or renewal DACA. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Extends the deferred action period and employment authorization to three years from two years, and allows you to be considered for DACA if you: Entered the United States before the age of 16; Have lived in the United States continuously since at least January 1, 2010, rather than the prior requirement of June 15, 2007; Are of any age (removes the requirement to have been born since June 15, 1981); and Meet all the other DACA guidelines. 2. What the initiative will do; Deferred action for parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. An undocumented individual living in the United States who is the parent of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident and who meets the guidelines listed below. Allows parents to request deferred action and employment authorization if they: • Have lived in the United States continuously since January 1, 2010; Had, on November 20, 2014, a son or daughter who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident; and Are not an enforcement priority for removal from the United 3. When you can begin to make a request; Provisional waivers of unlawful presence. Undocumented individuals who have resided unlawfully in the United States for at least 180 days and who are: The sons and daughters of U.S. citizens; or The spouse and sons or daughters of lawful permanent residents. Expands the provisional waiver program announced in 2013 by allowing the spouses, sons and daughters of lawful permanent residents and the sons and daughters of U.S. citizens to get a waiver if a visa is available. There may be instances when the qualifying relative is not the petitioner. Clarifies the meaning of the “extreme hardship” standard that must be met to obtain a waiver. Despite this the U.S. deportations of immigrants has reach record high under the Obama Administration According to the Pew Research, the Obama administration deported a record 438,421 unauthorized immigrants in fiscal year 2013, continuing a streak of stepped up enforcement that has resulted in more than 2 million deportations since Obama took office, newly released Department of Homeland Security data show. The record number of deportations comes even as 580,946 young unauthorized immigrants have received relief from deportation and work permits since 2012 under a policy called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. In Pew Research Center surveys, Hispanics have expressed disapproval of the growing number of deportations during the Obama administration. Six-in-ten Hispanic adults in February of 2014, said the increased number of deportations of unauthorized immigrants is a “bad thing,” while the U.S. general public was divided on the issue. And while 89% of Hispanics in 2013 said they support a pathway to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants who meet certain requirements, a majority (55%) said deportation relief is more important than a pathway to citizenship for this population. [email protected] [email protected] Hispanic American Chamber Of Commerce Gala Web: USLatinoPulse.com - Email:[email protected] July-August, 2016 3 US Latino Pulse News Without Influence Hispanic American Chambers Of Commerce Gala And Award Ceremony Web: USLatinoPulse.com - Email:[email protected] July-August, 2016 2 Uno Gratis US Latino Pulse News Without Influence Julio-Agosto 2016 Corte Suprema rechaza Orden de Inmigración de Obama Locales, Nacionales, Noticias Internacionales Estados Unidos aprueba $ 70 mil millones para reconstruir la deuda de Puerto Sin noticias de Influencia Me gustaría dar la bienvenida a los lectores de New Jersey Pulse a nuestro periódico hermano, el Pulso Latino de Estados Unidos. Free Full Service Car Wash with Paid Oil Change Hi-Pressure Pre-Wash Wheel Wash Foam Polishing Pads 1269 McBride Ave. • Woodland Park, NJ Mon.–Sat. 8am–7pm • Sun. 8am–6pm Phone (973) 256-2600 Website: www.perfectshineauto.com Tri-Color Foam Polish Wax Hi-Pressure Rinse A “Perfect Shine” 3 copies available to a reader for free, after which $1 will be charged per copy. NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME TO VISIT PERFECT SHINE! Web: USLatinoPulse.com - Email:[email protected] July-August, 2016 1